| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (72)

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 9:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
awesome, it'll only take them 2 more years to make a player to support it and 3 more for it to be under $400... BLU RAY ROCKS!
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:22PM spin cycle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, that seem about correct.

And what's wrong with that? If you're price-sensitive, don't buy the 400GB version, buy a 50GB player only (like a PS3). There won't be movies on the 400GB format for a long time (if ever) anyway.

Do you expect higher capacity versions to be the same price or ready immediately? If so, why?
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:29PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I could be buying 400GB hard drives for the price of most PS3 games. Let me choose 8 games, put them on a hard drive, and maybe I'll continue to not care about Blu-ray.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:53PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It could have been worse. It it wasn't for HD-DVD, Blu-ray would have come in a damn caddy!
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 11:02PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3.5 will play it :) Then our games will be even bigger, and longer to develop, yay, MGS5, here we come!
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 1:18AM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
More cut scenes and less button pressing than ever before.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 2:00AM Temple said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm more interested in a 400GB Blu-ray recorder, not so much as a format for distributing games/movies.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 4:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
damn thats a long load :O
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd rather wait on one of the superior formats coming out in the future, ones that can support TBs worth of information.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 9:35PM Mr Slayer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That thing has more space than my hdd. D:
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 12:53AM foxhound said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
same here! o_o; It nearly makes my TB external drive useless.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Its one thing to develop it, it's another to mass produce it. Chances are this will compete with the other high storage optical disc formats for enterprise solutions.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:56PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bang on the money. Blu-ray had been around in some form (a horrid caddy based thing) in the corporate world for quite awhile before phlebs like us got hold of it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 11:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those discs have over a terabyte of storage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_Versatile_Disc
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 9:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"it is possible to maintain compatibility between the new 16-layer optical disc and the BD discs."
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 9:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I thing it would be even more impressive if it was a cartridge.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:24PM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that cartridge would be the size of my couch
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:45PM Nincodedo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The cartridge would BE your couch.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Your ass would get sore rather quickly
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 1:03AM The Artist Formerly known as Jes said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Though the cartridge would load games before your ass would get sore.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 9:54PM Erico316 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
um the info is being twisted by this site.they never said it couldnt be use in other players
http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/07/pioneers-blu-ray-disc-hits-400gb/
http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=1484
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 3:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hillarious, they got caught on on PS3Fanboy posting their twisted lies, but they continue to post it here...
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 9:00AM KyleOrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The wording of the press release is a bit unclear, but it seems that the 16-layer disc requires a special optical sensor, and thus won't work on existing Blu-ray players. That said, it seems existing Blu-ray discs will work on the new sensor. This seems to be the source of the confusion.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 9:53PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So...they've created massive storage capacity, that will only be economically viable YEARS from now, on a medium that will be extinct within the same time frame...

Brilliant!
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:33PM Erico316 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nothing can ever replace a hard copy of full retails games.Microsoft statements are dumb about dlc. blu ray or a new format will always be there with downloadable games will also be there
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn you summed it up pretty good.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:48PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're uninformed, ignorant, and naive comments weren't needed at all erico316.

The optical disc is a medium that will die out. Maybe not soon, but by the time a 400GB disc is available for purchase in a 25 pack for a reasonable price, it will be.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 11:06PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Die out to what Negative cool? DLC? Maybe so, but I'm sure there will be a market for high definition movies as long as there is the technology to play it. When such new technology takes its place, so be it, we will move on. But while its popular, why not make the most of it, you might be right, then again, you might not be so right...yet.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 11:33PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Die out to storage space and DLC!
Is it that hard of a concept?
Would you rather bring up 5,000 songs instantly on iTunes(or what have you), or shuffle through hundreds of CD's to play the one song on your mind?
DLC is giving the music industry headaches because they're as stubborn about keeping their precious physical CD's as some people are about championing the future proofness of blu ray.

VHS lost out fast to DVD because it was quite obvious to even the most dimwitted of consumers that DVD was infinitely more convenient.

All blu ray does is simply offer more than DVD does, but is in no way more convenient.
The only way consumers will recognize more convenience, is if they ditch the physical medium and are able to navigate their library instantly, just like mp3’s.

Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 1:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
LOL, the release of the Call of Duty 4 map pack crashed LIVE and you seriously think the industry is capable of supplying a couple million people with the bandwidth and stability needed to successfully let users download 10-25GB titles?

The only reason Microsoft blows that horn so fucking loud is because of their DRM practices. A company can make a lot more money off people when they are able to control the way those people use what content they buy from them. You will no longer be able to rent, borrow, sell or trade any of your games. And if you think MS (or any other company for that matter) is interested in letting you practice these actions you need to wake up.

Steam is arguably as successful as it is because PC gamers were screwed a long time ago with authentication keys and the like. Buying a PC game in the store is not much different than buying it on Steam. Buying a physical copy of a console game currently have a lot of advantages. You'd be wise not to give them up.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 1:17AM Vidikron said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Would you rather bring up 5,000 songs instantly on iTunes(or what have you), or shuffle through hundreds of CD's to play the one song on your mind? "

I don't know what the future holds and I do think that digital distribution is the future at some point... But I also know I'd rather not have to rebuy all 5000 when my HDD dies.. that's for sure. Digital ditribution may be the future, but if consumers aren't careful we'll wind up giving away all our rights for convenience. Hooray! Fuck DD.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 10:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, whoever claims digital distribution will take the place of disc media are kidding themselves. There will ALWAYS be a place for disc media and dare I say it, it will still be the dominant form of entertainment (at least movie and video game-wise) for the average consumer.

Most people do not want just a digital copy, they want something physical. Maybe in 10 years our download services will be 10 times better, but will the average consumer be able to afford it? And even if it was 10 times faster, if you want a HD digital media with all the bells and whistles for your movie (commentaries, etc.) that will still take forever to download.

People said the theater was dying, but it seems to me they're doing pretty well and ticket sales are up every year (according to boxofficemojo.com). It's the same thing here, nothing will ever totally replace disc media.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 11:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Man, ck said exactly what I was going to.

I'll add:

You say folks want instant access to their content, but they will have to spend hours to download an HD movie in 7.1 audio. With Blu Ray, or any other big physical media, it allows for instant playback and gratification for uncompressed audio tracks and HD. All they have to do is put in the disk!

Its funny that a lot of people that bitch about installing a game to a hard drive before playing it want to see a downloadable world where you buy something and then wait a few hours to view/play it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 9:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"For reference, that disc could hold roughly eight copies of Metal Gear Solid 4, 187 copies of Final Fantasy VII, or 1.25 million copies of the original Super Mario Bros."

Excellent. What a great way to frame it.

I want 1.25 million copies of SMB.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 12:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Since I'm such a nerd, I went and did the math myself and found out that the number is actually 10.5 million.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 3:31AM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Only 2 copies of MGS5
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 9:00AM KyleOrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
400GB=~400,000MB=~400,000,000KB
Divide by
~320KB for SMB
Equals
1.25 million.
SO THERE!
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:00PM gotjpeg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
think of all the porn you could put on that....
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:01PM quiggy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, like... 400 gigs worth..
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 11:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Is that enough?
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 12:10AM Supermanisdead said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
ITS NEVER ENOUGH
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:22PM PhydeWice said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
8 times bigger capacity. Does that mean the installs will be 8 times as big as well?
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:30PM BigD145 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The discs will be so sensitive to damage, you'll only get 8 uses out of them. Or 1 rental.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:27PM Pojomofo said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
that means the 360 version of MGS5 will only need 45 DVD's!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:43PM AUserName said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
No one can help that they released a movie disguised as a game. Also, I bet MSG4 wouldn't be that hueg after removing all the repeat files needed to make Blu-Ray work half-decent.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 11:57PM Gun Barrier said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
and the ps3 version will need a 100gb install.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 12:21AM AUserName said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mod me down all you want, but you know it's true. I rented it and could play it. About the time I'm getting into it, the effer throws another CGI movie at me. If I wanted a spy flick, I would of rented MI:2.
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 12:46AM XLM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MI:2 sucked...
Reply

Posted: Jul 8th 2008 1:35AM AUserName said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea, but I couldn't work 300 into a reference for MGS4.
Reply

Posted: Jul 7th 2008 10:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. I can just buy one of those instead of a hard drive.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW