| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (86)

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
From other articles about the Rock Band 2 press release:

"If you already own Rock Band and you buy Rock Band 2 all of your songs will transfer over automatically and free o' charge."

To me, all pretty much means all, DLC or on disc.

Also, why all the negativity?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:37AM Ben Forbes said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:39AM monkeyssuck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because, like they said, it could all be done through a patch, and not paying $50 or more for the new version.

Although the camera thing...good god, if that actually works...*drools*.

The technology they are putting into plastic guitars these days. Don't you remember the days where we had one set of buttons, no touch sensitive buttons?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:45AM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"If you already own Rock Band and you buy Rock Band 2 all of your songs will transfer over automatically and free o' charge."

Yup, that's being reported right now by Kotaku and G4TV.

IGN and Gamespot both said the same thing initially, but claimed they made the whole thing up after a frightful encounter with Harmonix PR.

The backward compatibility is either a poorly kept secret, or there is a lot of bad information coming out because Harmonix can't write press releases properly.

This has gotten a little out of hand, and it's time for Harmonix to make an official statement on this.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:52AM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not negative, I'm actually really excited about Rock Band 2! But, the reality is, I'm also disappointed that I'll be switching discs to get to all my music. I can understand why, I can even live with it, but I'm disappointed nevertheless.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:56AM chrisgrant said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I was on the phone with Harmonix PR for 15 minutes yesterday asking them 10 different ways whether or not that content would work. They insist that the IGN and GameSpot reports are incorrect, but wouldn't actually deny that the functionality wasn't coming. So I'm left calling it an "apparent inability."

Any links for these stories that claim otherwise?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:34PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The G4TV link is here:

http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/686859/Rock_Band_2_Official_Tracks_Details_Announced.html

From the article:

"Plus, backwards compatibility, so all your Rock Band tracks, both in-game and downloadable, will be playable in Rock Band 2!"

The Kotaku story is pretty easy to find.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 1:45PM Larz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's cool and all, but it still seems like we're mostly just paying for what should have been a free patch. I guess time will tell as more info is revealed.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 7:59PM Sora said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"They insist that the IGN and GameSpot reports are incorrect, but wouldn't actually deny that the functionality wasn't coming."

Didn't both those reports say it would be downloadable? Maybe the RB1 tracks come on the RB2 disc along with the RB2 songs, and they'll let us send them our RB1 discs + approx $10-$20 and get RB2?
Reply

Posted: Aug 13th 2008 5:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
um. ok wait. is rockband2 going to be used for playstation 2 to? and what if i have rockband 1? can i just use the regular instruments for 2?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:40AM Ben Forbes said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"One final hardware upgrade is the guitar's "integrated calibration tool" – a tiny camera which can be held up to your display to instantly calibrate the game..."

Oh, thank you, O Gods of Harmonix.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:41AM McWeen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
New instruments are nice...unless you have the old ones and don't want to pay again. I feel like it is too soon for a sequel because of the constant DLC but I suppose they need to keep up with Guitar Hero.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:43AM KaneRobot said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Fine with me. I'm not expecting much else considering it's well under a year between games. It's going to take more than ripping off Rock Band, adding MOAR BUTTONZ to their drum set, and a half-assed "music maker" to get me to switch over to the broken, played-out Guitar Hero series.

For all the people saying RB2 is garbage (despite it basically doing everything people have asked for)...well, if you're not satisfied NOW, fine. When Rock Band 3 comes out and once again puts everything Guitar Hero does to shame and you come crawling back, don't say I didn't warn you.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"adding MOAR BUTTONZ to their drum set, and a half-assed "music maker""

1)That's strange because I've seen a couple of people who said they'd pick GHWT Drums over RB drums any time as long as they were compatible.

2)You can't call Custom-Content a "half-assed music maker" because so far no console game has done this before.If Rock Band 2 will do it better(and it won't), go on ahead and criticize GHWT but right now it's just like bashing Halo 3's Forge. Both dumb and pointless.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 1:33PM glassd said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Good points, however you did say something incorrect. Go look up the custom remixes of songs from amplitude or frequency.

Now user created is good, but I don't trust Neversoft to get it right, especially at first. I'm going to be sticking with Rockband because when Harmonix does release a music creater, I trust then to do it right.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 1:34PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
*cough*

Amplitude

And besides, Neversoft said how amazing the cheat insertion menu was, where people would probably share the songs they create with that in GHIII. I hope he was joking!
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 3:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
3 things:

1) To Kizzle, I play both Rock Band and Guitar Hero. Know this though, if it wasnt for Guitar Hero there would be NO Rock Band. Fact? No, but a huge certainty on that. I dont understand whats "broken" with Guitar Hero....to have lasted with this many games and "sequals" shows alot in the industry today. Both games are good, lets leave it at that.

2) I know a lot of people are asking "Why didnt they just release a patch instead of making us buy another game and just have the songs as downloads!?." Realize that if RB2 in fact has 80 songs...that would be $160 dollars and one hell of a download. "Yea! But we could pick and choose which songs we want to download!" THAT is the reason they release another game so that they dont get gyped on the profit charts, lol.

3) Noob question incoming, what would the camera calibration do? Im confused on what its purpose is. Give me a hand here peeps.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 3:51PM Huey2k2 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"To Kizzle, I play both Rock Band and Guitar Hero. Know this though, if it wasnt for Guitar Hero there would be NO Rock Band. Fact? No, but a huge certainty on that"

You do realise that the original developers of Guitar Hero are the ones making Rock Band and that the guys who make it now are essentially just the old Tony Hawk developers right?

So saying that without one the other wouldn't have existed is rather stilly IMO.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:43AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Rock Band 1 on PS3 is still a month away from release here in the UK... I may as well just wait for #2 to get the new instruments.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I bet that's the same thing you'll say when Rock Band 3 will be coming out!
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:12PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, apparently RB2 is having a simultaneous release worldwide.

It makes me wonder why they bothered releasing RB1 plus RB1's instruments here at such a late stage.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:44AM cuteSAVAGE said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I don't think it would have been very practical for them to just patch the original. If Harmonix wants to continue to find appeal to a wider audience and steal some of Guitar Hero's continued loyal supporters and advancement, they need a box product on shelves. They can't expect every single potential customer to understand or be interested in a strict download-only release model. As it stands, I rarely run into random people with DLC and most of the time it's one or two track packs. I'm shocked by how many people I play with that don't even have the free DLC.

I'm glad they are at least implementing some of the changes I've been longing for, specifically deeper character customization and Online BWT. And I still have high-hopes for them somehow making the original Rock Band's Disc Content compatible.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:58AM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm with you! The additions sound great, understand the need for a retail competitor, but nevertheless disappointed they haven't addressed the songs on the disc just yet. Hopeful.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. The COULD have added everything in a patch, but that's not the model in computer gaming, is it? They put out a new Madden every year, not because they can't patch the old one, but because it doesn't make sense to update a game with big changes.

Besides, to make the patch argument you have to argue that both:
1) RB2 is not going to be worth $60 if you already have RB1.
2) RB1 wasn't worth $60 because you thought all the new RB2 features were part of the game already.

Good luck convincing anyone of that.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"They put out a new Madden every year, not because they can't patch the old one, but because it doesn't make sense to update a game with big changes."

No, they do it to milk our money.

Something that apparently is so different with Rock Band compared to the no-good money stealing Guitar Hero.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"No, they do it to milk our money."

I never said it wasn't a business (aka, money) decision. It all comes down to how much do they feel the new features are worth, and how much it costs to make.

An example of a good patch are the class updates to TF2. They add to what's already there, without changing the underlying game mechanics.

RB2 seems to be completely overhauling the BWT and solo career modes to the point where they're almost unrecognizable from the original. You can't, and don't, patch that.

If you feel strongly enough that it's not worth $60, then don't purchase it. If you didn't think RB1's BWT was acceptable, then why did you buy it just to complain about it?

Oh right, internet.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 1:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good Points. I never bought RB1 though.

I just wanted to point out some double standards.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:52AM Patz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The way I see it you are getting 80 new tracks for 50 or 60 bucks plus some improvements. That is cheaper than how much it would cost to acquire that amount of songs through DLC no matter what.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 1:49PM Zephyr27 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Seconded.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 3:39PM colinisrad said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
thirdeded

i'm glad someone is actually seeing the smarts behind this.
Reply

Posted: Jul 15th 2008 6:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You mean 104. 20 songs of free DLC at launch.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:53AM Berzerk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Note to self:

Wait until RockBand 3, then buy RockBand 1 and 2. That way I get the goodest instruments and all the backwards compatible songs.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 11:59AM Joystick Hero said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Goodest"?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:00PM Berzerk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yup
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:05PM cjshrader said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
He meant bestest
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The very bestest ever?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 2:53PM tcc3 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You mean "evar"
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 7:41PM Berzerk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Na, I'm not sure I meant bestest evar. Goodest is a toned down version of bestest.

See, cuz the bestest evar would be a real guitar and drum set hooked up to a TV. That crosses the line between simulation and the real thing to the point where you're actually learning the real thing while playing a game at the same time.

More difficult, yes, but actually awesome and useful.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:00PM Ruk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The important thing to me, and the thing we probably won't find out until E3, is whether the PS2 and/or Wii versions will feature DLC and the character creator. I still haven't bought RB1 because I'm broke, but when I do make that purchase, it's going to be for one of those two systems, and I want to know that Harmonix is working on improving the experience across the board.

I'm a believer in their philosophies and such; I just wish we'd seen more of an effort to make the same game that the big boys got. Maybe they'll rectify some of those mistakes this time around. I'm hopeful. I honestly don't even care about online play (I mean, seriously—I've got a Wii and a PS2. Ask me if online play really matters to me), but I do relish the idea of new music every week, and especially being able to create my own rockers. I don't want Activision to win this music game duel, but in terms of features, they just might. In terms of style, Harmonix will always have them beat.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:38PM Ordeith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No DLC on PS2 - no real storage.
No DLC on Wii - not enough storage to make it viable.

Those consoles just weren't designed to support a DLC model, so the model doesn't fit.


Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:41PM Ruk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Activision swears there's going to be DLC on the Wii version of GHWT, and that you'll be able to save your songs to SD cards. Why couldn't Harmonix do something similar with RB2?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:48PM GregAshlin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wouldn't hold your breath for downloaded content for either of the two systems. Sony has more or less abandoned the PS2...they're not going to bother setting up the interface for a system they want people to upgrade from. And we've all seen how Nintendo values the online experience. *Sigh* I guess what I'm saying is that Sony and Nintendo have both made it difficult to do DC on your two systems, so I wouldn't put the blame on Harmonix.

I would save the money and pick up a PS3 (or a cheaper 360 come Sunday if you don't have a preference) before you get into Rock Band if DC is one of your primary objectives. That's your best bet for keeping up with the new content.

You very well may get your character creation tool though, so at least that's something?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:51PM Ruk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The character creator is something, you're right. For the brief while that I did have a 360, I enjoyed the online experience, and I might just end up grabbing one again after this price change.

That does kinda require that I have a job, though. Working on that.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 2:26PM whymog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Adam - I understand where you're coming from, and I think you make a well-reasoned argument.

Unfortunately, I would be very surprised if a more functional or robust version of either game is released on PS2 or Wii. While GH:WT will probably have downloadable songs and character creation in some form, I wouldn't be surprised if they're markedly worse than the 360/PS3 counterparts. Just look at GH3 or GH:Aerosmith on PS2 to see how much worse the sound and graphics quality is; do you really want to create a character if it will move like a robot? Harmonix won't do it unless they can pull it off in an aesthetically pleasing way -- something they'll probably argue is beyond the hardware capabilities of the PS2 and Wii.

If I were you, I would wait until a 360 or PS3 seems like a reasonable purchase. With the imminent 360 price drop, the console won't cost a whole lot more than the game bundle. If you were just content to have friends over and play the songs without worrying about DLC or customization, the PS2 or Wii would clearly be a safe bet; however, with the experience you're hoping for, I don't think you'll see it done right on anything but a current-gen console.

It's a shame, too, because I know a lot of people who only wanted a Wii and want the same experience.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm starting the hate bandwagon so in case that the Guitar Hero hate will sweep onto Rock Band, I can always say;

"I FUCKING CALLED IT!".
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
By the time Rock Band 4 comes out (or Rock Band 3 + GH 4) I'll have 4 drum sets. Cant wait to have a full band of only drummers... Would that work? it should!
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 12:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, you can do nothing but play Slipknot songs. Just make sure you have someone in a mask bobbing their head while you play.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 2:05PM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's this about a mask? Looks like John already has that part covered.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 2:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea, but the Pyro is known for playing the guitar, not the drums, so it doesn't work.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2008 2:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Medic can do the electric violin.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW