Reader Comments (13)
Posted: Jul 14th 2008 2:05PM D3m0sthenes said
Sweet, Fable 1 was awesome (If you didn't listen to Peter talk it up) and I have high hopes for this game.
Reply
Posted: Jul 14th 2008 2:07PM FredFredrickson said
I like the idea of XBLA / full game interactivity, but my one fear is that if you earn a ton of money in the pub games, it'll make the full game (or at least some aspect of it) too easy.
Not that the original game was a very money-centric game, but still... seems kinda odd to go straight into the game with a full load of money.
Reply
Not that the original game was a very money-centric game, but still... seems kinda odd to go straight into the game with a full load of money.
Posted: Jul 14th 2008 2:10PM (Unverified) said
The whole no cutscenes thing is kinda disappointing for me to be honest. I'm still intrigued by the game but I'm finding it harder and harder to explain why I should be.
Reply
Posted: Jul 14th 2008 2:20PM Vegeta has a ps3 said
Please. Cutscenes are overrated. I'd rather have the story explained to me in game.
Reply
Posted: Jul 14th 2008 7:04PM LaughingTarget said
Video games are interactive entertainment. Being able to further the story without infringing on that interactive aspect is what advancement in gaming is all about. Cutscenes are so 1999.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
Dark Side 'Cause It Looks Cool: The Failings of Moral Choice in Games
Posted on Feb 10th 2012 7:45PM
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 161 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 115 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
