| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (61)

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:08PM Ethan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be honest, I think anyone who's played advance wars knows an RTS can be brilliant on a console (albeit handheld). Obviously this needs a larger tactical scope, That'll make or break this for me.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
RTS?
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
+1 Internets to the first guy who can tell this joker what the R stands for in RTS.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
retard training simulator
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:19PM Ethan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Fair enough.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
RTS = Real Time Strategy

Advance Wars is turn based.

:/
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Except that Advance wars WASN'T AN RTS. Rts means REAL TIME STRATEGY. Advance wars was turn based. And no, RTS games never do well on the console, people think they do well untill you try and play against someone who is using a mouse and keyboard.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:47PM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I fed you a vote, fatass
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:47PM arrrgh said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
+1 advance wars is an AMAZING series. Easily one of my favourite series on any system, let alone handhelds
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 2:48PM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh, how did BioRebel's post get up there?

I feel unimportant. :'(
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2008 2:24AM original fred said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if you use the email system and validate it later it appears higher up but with the validation time
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So pre-order now then, yes? ;)
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Guy, did you really need to spell out what "UI" means on a fucking video game blog? "User interface", or as the kids call it, "UI."

Douche.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:14PM RanWitScissorz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Troll nothing to see here.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I like how you're taking this as a personal insult or something.

Check this out - there are people, other than you, on the internet. Who may not know what UI means. I know, hard to swallow, right?
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:18PM Knight Marquise said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Did you really need to post that comment? What's it like to be an angry little man on a video game blog?
How about you go back to bed and try getting up on the other side.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:24PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Douche."

Was that your signature line?
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 8:14PM Gun Barrier said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i didn't know what GUI/UI meant untill i went to wiki. :o
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:11PM FlawedLogicXIII said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That sounds great, but what about the multiplayer?...this is key to Halo. It was already announced that you can be the Covenant (and Flood is yet to be confirmed - expansion maybe), but can you have more than just 1v1 online matches?
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"...this is key to Halo."

But how are Halo 1-3 players going to adapt to this shift in gameplay? I don't see it happening, for the most part

...unless there's a 'Jump around madly while spamming grenades' move accessed through the Y button
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:44PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One can only hope. That would make this a day 1 purchase.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WOW!! I really have high expectatives, after all Ensemble Studios is the one who is in charge of all this. The game looks pretty good, but i thought that may be it should be better whit a little more of Strategy involved...let's just wait.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:15PM Huey2k2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*waits for the consoles can't do RTS's comments*
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:17PM ummhello said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sooo....how soon does this hit retail stores?? I can't wait!!!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Joystiq E3 hands-on: Halo Wars (Xbox 360)"

Isn't it only on 360? Man I've tried RTS games but can never get into them. This one looks like it might be fun though. Nice preview Sliwinski.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:25PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They are fun in small doses sometimes.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:25PM Duke said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
BTW - sorry I didn't say hi last night, I had notifications off and didn't see you come online.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Thats cool man, I just figured you were a raging alcoholic and were too plastered to even notice :P

I just thought I would say wuddup since its very wierd seeing the little "bloop" notification come on saying (NATO_Duke is online) on a weeknight.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 4:59PM ExMcCloud said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fenix I need your gamertag son...Unless of course your Jostiq name and Gamertag are one and the same....Which then my statement just became null in-void
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Too bad, Consoles can do RTS. Battalion Wars, C&C, EndWar, etc.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:30PM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How can you list Endwars when it's not out yet? Or are you saying they can be done because you think the old phrase "consoles can't do RTS's" refers to just porting an RTS to the console? Everyone knows you can "put" an RTS on a console, will it play worth a damn is the question.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because, EndWar seems like its going to be awesome. It's called a prediction
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
..he might have played the beta?

why so much hate, brahhhh

anways, im not much a fan of RTS on consoles.
but we'll see how it goes
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:54PM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hate? Did it come across like that? If so, not my intention.

Getting back on topic, I loved RTS's back in the early C&C and warcraft days, but really have not enjoyed one since the first "new" C&C, I forget what it was called... Maybe the Halo will peak my interest again.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:08PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't believe you of all people also forgot: Pikmin
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know you didn't mean to come across as hateful. No, I have not played the BETA, but from hearing how good the voice controls work, it sounds like it would take some sort of major cock-up for this to be a bad game. But, then again, what is Ubisoft known for :P
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:40PM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It seems pretty standard to me. You have a main base, buildings that make troops, tanks, and aerial units. There are special super-powers that recharge. You can upgrade facilities and units.

It is good to hear that the controls are tight. That's a big challenge on consoles. I like that it stays true to Halo roots to give some familiarity. If it is executed well, then it should be a good game.

The thing with an RTS game is that first impressions only let you know if it will be fun for the first dozen hours. But once the masses have time with the title, I'll be curious to see if it has balance. That is the real key. Will one side be clearly better? Will it devolve into a "race to build the most heavy tanks and laser turrets" as too many RTS games do? You really won't know that until it has been out for a while.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:50PM FlawedLogicXIII said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Which brings up the question of whether or not there will be a map/scenario creator...As most RTS games do. This allows players to build custom levels or tactical situations that need to be overcome.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know I do I have a USB mouse.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 12:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I saw vids of this and it looked puke inducing bad at this stage. Not so much the graphics (meh), but the gameplay looked unbearably generic.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:00PM zlickrick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now begins the Mario-ization of the Halo franchise.

Next up, Halo Party and Super Halo Brawl.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Is the flood also in this game? or is just the Covenant and UNCS?

If that's the case it will be like "Kidz:My First Starcraft"
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:29PM Snowblind said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Flood are almost definitely in. But either way, I'd take this over Starcraft anyday. Far more interesting universe, vehicles and story. In my opinion.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:46PM Huey2k2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The flood are not in this game.

Halo Wars takes place 20 years before the original Halo, the flood weren't discovered until the original Halo storyline.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:47PM Cyro 117 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem is that this took place 20 years before the First Halo. Which means that humans still haven't seen the flood. So I don't know how can this come into play..

:/
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:47PM Huey2k2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The Flood are almost definitely in."

Ensemble has stated many times that the flood are not in Halo Wars... and with good reason. Introducing the flood would totally mess up the Halo timeline.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 2:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you cant compare anything to starcraft man tat is blasphemy
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 3:57PM Snowblind said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ensemble have dodged the question on every account. There's nothing to say that THESE humans hadn't, especially if they're isolated from Earth. Alternatively, they could simply be in as an extra faction to play as in the multiplayer, there's no reason that it would have to make total sense there.

And we already know the Covenant had.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 1:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be honest, when I first heard about this game I was skeptical. Based on this impression, though, it sounds like the game is coming along nicely.

I'm very pleased to see that they are approaching the RTS differently rather than trying to just copy the PC RTS formula. Those that say "consoles can't do RTS" are only half-correct. Consoles can't properly emulate the PC-style RTS. What they need is their own RTS style and it sounds like they may finally get it with this game. Just gonna have to wait and see if Ensemble pulls it off.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 2:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Everyone will die, if some of you buy PS3 Games with lots of pink color and awesome cookies!!!

OH MY COUCH!(not God because he is not real...like Santa or Phil Collins, you know.)

Ball?
CHAIR! mfg
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW