| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (139)

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This still stings. A lot.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Why? PS3 isn't losing it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'll admit that it's just my inner PS3 fanboy pride. It's like if Gears of War II went multi-platform. FF has been a Sony brand since FFVII.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:10PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because they lost a flagship RPG exclusive. Them losing it is not necessary for it to burn people.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Now Sony fans know how betrayed Nintendo fans felt.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:13PM SpeeGold said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I agree with Jonah. Now everybody gets to play it. The only people I can see being upset with reason are the people who bought a PS3 soley to play FFXIII. But I can't imagine too many people legitamately did that, especially since the game isn't out yet. It seems like it would be a waste to pay over $400 just to play one game.

To feel that you have been betrayed is a little bit silly as is all brand loyalty. I think Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony proved at their press conferences this year that being loyal to any brand is never a safe bet. You're better off just going with the flow and seeing which company's games you prefer at a given time.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:22PM Hyams said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
4MyFriends, you say that like it isn't coming to the PS3 anymore.

WE haven't been betrayed - we're still getting the game. Sony has been 'bertrayed', yes, but not the PS3 owners. We're not losing out on anything.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:35PM arrrgh said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
it's cool i'm sure they'll pass the betrayal on to the end user just like they did with the rootkit
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:13PM FireAnt360 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think FFXII went Multi-platform was because MGS4 wasn't a big hit as was predicted and with millions spent to develop it, Square didn't see the worth on releasing it on one platform. go multi-plat like Capcom did with DMC4 and make googobs of money.

my 2 cents, I could be wrong though.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:18PM Vcize said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Golden, some games are worth $400. Knowing how much fun I've gotten out of a game like Gears I would gladly pay $400 for it if I were forced to (the disc itself, not even the whole console that comes with it) and it would still be a tremendous bargain.

For me, MGS4 and FF13 were worth $400. Now one is gone. InFamous and God of War 3 (on top of MGS4) still make it worth it though.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:25PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
FireStiq: MGS4 has already sold between 2 and 3 million copies (depending on who you ask). Sounds like it was indeed a big hit to me. =)
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:56PM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This should sting PS3 owners in the sense that Japanese companies are realizing they'll make more money if they dual-release, and thus they are mostly abandoning Sony, especially since Sony so stubbornly refuses to give money hats in exchange for exclusivity (a thing that Microsoft has no problems doing).

In other words, except for niche anime games, train simulators, and what have you, there won't be very many PS3 exclusives in the future besides first party games. Money hats kinda have that effect on developers.... makes them want to dual release. (Or in the case of things like GTA downloadable content, exclusively release)
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 8:36PM bigsofty said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Great more 99.9999% pre-rendered cutscene CGI crap... oh lets not forget the antiquated RPG gameplay too... the PS3 can keep it... bordom!
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2008 1:16AM Klitorisaurus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If this game fits one one DVD then I'm most definitely NOT buying it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2008 2:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I agree completely and whole-heartedly with GoldenS1104. I love my PS3 buy I'm definitely buying an 360 for Fable 2 and a bunch of other games that seem cool on the xbox. I for one am happy for xbox owners who get to play this game. I don't know what the big deal is...
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That's nice. As long as it isn't over 4 discs I won't mind, it didn't harm my enjoyment of Lost Odyssey one bit.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
As long as they don't have to lower the PS3 versions quality in order to maintain a more equal format for the two versions, I don't mind at all.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 7:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No I'm sorry. You just cannot talk about the 360 and not compromising in the same sentence.

You compromise WHENEVER the 360 is involved. Let's run down the list.

You compromise:
-social life
-integrity
-sanity
-all around joyfulness
-the chance to enjoy any other soda other than Mountain Dew
-variety
-GETTING LAID


hahahahaahahahah!!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 8:01PM Gun Barrier said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
as long as they don't lower the quality on the 360 version to match the ps3 version.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 9:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Funnily enough Co, I'm a 360 owner and seem to have greater "all round joyfulness" than you do.

Someone who has so much time to bitch and whine about a bunch of plastic and solder surely can't be content.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:04PM Top Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
squeezing sharp squares is seriously sore
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:04PM jake11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think anyone will really care if it's on 2 dvds.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:05PM jake11 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I don't think anyone will really care if it's on 2 dvds
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:06PM jake11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
mother trucker
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:07PM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well...it just might be more than 2. Who knows at this point.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:07PM Ordeith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I found humor in your comment duplication.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ha, your comment is like the storage capabilities of the 360's DVD... get it, two comments... two DVD's...nevemind.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:10PM Hyams said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Two isn't bad, nor is three or four. Anything over that is probably pushing things a bit.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd rather use 2 dvds then waste space and time by installing something on the hdd. Although I won't be buying the game so it doesn't affect me.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 8:23PM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Two isn't bad, nor is three or four. Anything over that and people will likely start falling out of bed.

Wait, wrong thread, sorry people.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pssst. Fall update. Installation of games onto hard drive. Problem solved.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:08PM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There goes all of your hard drive space. You know, the one you spent a gajillion dollars on? Yeah...THAT one.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:13PM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cramming 25 to 50 gigabites onto your hard drive doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Especially if you only have a 20 gigabite hard drive, like most 360 owners.

But seriously, how many hours would it take to install?
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:37PM arrrgh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NOTE:

360 dash update is for OPTIONAL GAME INSTALLS in order to reduce wear on the discs, not to institute mandatory installs
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:40PM Hyams said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
No one is claiming otherwise, dude. =)

The fact that it's optional doesn't change the fact that that's a hell of a lot of data to dump onto your hard drive.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:16PM ripvanwinkle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it's more than one disc, I'm gonna install all of them except disc one. I wonder if we're still gonna have to switch discs if we do that...
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2008 7:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
YES YOU WILL seeing as you need the disc to be in the drive to play an 'installed' game.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:07PM MrHashbrown said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So how many discs do you think this one will have? My guess?

13! ROFL
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
no
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ruh-roh! Judging by your two insightful posts in this thread, I'd say we've got a member of the SDF on hand here.

- Scott
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It depends on how much useless crap they put into it. If they shove the game full of 'extra' crap just to help Sony justify the Bluray player, then that is nonsense.
I am all for a format with more space. But, there is no reason games today need to take up more than a 3 DVDs max. Nearly all games will fit on 1. It's the FF type games that are filled with so many damn CGI clips and what not that would take up a lot a lot of space.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:39PM dogmaticatheist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ChuckJ says:

"But, there is no reason games today need to take up more than a 3 DVDs max. Nearly all games will fit on 1. It's the FF type games that are filled with so many damn CGI clips and what not that would take up a lot a lot of space."

But, there is no reason games today need to take up more than one cartridge. Nearly all games will fit on 1. FF type games that are filled with so many damn CGI clips and what not that would take up a lot a lot of space.

That Playstation and it's fancy schmancy CD-ROMs. Doesn't Sony understand that cartridges are enough!!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 6:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ChuckJ Ya thats exactly why I bought a PS3 with bluray so when games are multiplatform they remove all the extra CGI content and all the extras just so they can fit it on your format (DVD).
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2008 1:27AM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. Light-hearted joke. Not an attack to 360. Sheesh, no wonder people put "/sarcasm" tags on their comments. People on Joystiq take everything seriously.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2008 1:35AM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Scotto:

I only attack things that the Big 3 do stupidly. For example, the launch and first year of PS3 were disastrous, I lashed out at them for removing BC, and I hate them for not doing anything interesting with Home.

Nintendo...well that press conference was punishment enough.

Microsoft does some things stupid also. Take for example Avatars, new Dashboard, RRoD handling, paying for Games for Windows Live when it should be free, etc.

While I do prefer Sony, I don't own a PS3 and I don't own any other next-gen systems. I have my PC, PSP, PS2, and I'm happy. I'm also give credit where credits due. Microsoft's idea with Achievements was absolutely brilliant and Sony basically ripped them off. So there.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2008 12:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yup everyone steals everything from each other. The greatest compliment than can be given.

Sony, Steam and Blizzard stole achievements from MS
Sony stole PSN idea from MS' XBL
Sony stole Micro-transactions from MS
Sony stole themes from MS
Sony stole sixaxis from Nintendo - wiimote
MS stole "Vision cam" from Sony
MS stole microphone singing game from Sony
MS stole avatars from Nintendo
MS stole HDD install from Sony (not the best thing)
MS stole dashboard update from PSN (keep it fresh)!
MS stole controller from Sony who stole it from Nintendo

Geez I hope I got that all right or I'm going to be flamed - the point is that all the companies have copied from each other. If they can tweak and improve on something - then that's good. Face it, no company is a supreme innovator anymore (well aside from Google ;)

Accept the fact that the company that you root for and makes you feel safe and secure in your purchase has, at some point, stole and implemented an idea and may have even tried to pass it off as it's own invention.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:07PM Supermanisdead said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't mind how much discs this game will be, I just want to see battle footage. That is always my deciding factor for any RPG. I hate slow menu-based stuff, but not all turn-based game are like that.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:08PM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lost Odyssey was on 4 DVD's with pseudo-mediocre graphics, few CGI videos, and less voice acting that I'd have liked (less than FFX, about the same ammount as FFXII).

Here's hoping Square Enix manage to squeeze Final Fantasy into 4 or 5 DVD's without any loss in quality.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2008 5:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I imagine the Lost Odyssey devs weren't too thorough with their compression though. The cost of putting the game onto 4 discs is probably little compared to the cost of the effort needed to squeeze it onto 2.

Square probably knows that any more than 4 discs is going to put people off, so will most likely work to make it fit that. Hell, if Microsoft fund it, they might even try to get it onto 3 discs, or even 2.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW