| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (24)

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 2:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is campaign co-op confirmed?
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No co-op. Yeah. It surprised the hell out of us as well.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 2:41PM leobebes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Playing the first game on the Xbox felt like a revelation. It was different than all the WWII shooters out there. Also the little red marker above their heads was in the previous games, so I don't know if Justin played the previous titles and see that the little red HUD has been part of this series since the beginning.

As long as this game keeps introducing new gameplay elements that others shooters don't have, and do them well it should be well received despite being part of a played out genre.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 2:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm afraid to ask about the supposed Wii BiA game they were making, because knowing Ubisoft is company filled with more pricks than a porcupine, I can only guess that it has been scrapped for something more "casual friendly". How about Imagine: Jonas Brothers in Arms. It will be a collection of the Jonas brothers in erotic poses with each other. And it will sell BILLIONS of copies.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 2:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have a feeling this is gonna get crushed by COD:WaW.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2008 1:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
too bad when the game is released the graphics will look outdated and it will be forgotten sitting next to bigger games on the shelves
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 2:55PM Aperture said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My only problem with Brothers in Arms has been it's weapons, they seem ungodly inacurate from what I've experienced.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The developers addressed the inaccuracy as a way to "improve gameplay" and "force teamwork."

*shrugs*
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:10PM rullers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crosshair on Nazis head...8 shots and all of them miss. Good times*COUGH*
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 4:09PM Huey2k2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe you shouldn't be trying to kill a Nazi with a thompson from 100 feet away then.

I had no problems with accuracy in the original BIA, you just need to use the weapons as they were intended to be used.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 5:08PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your point is absolutely correct...
But 100ft with a Thompson would make quick work of anything. I think you mean 100 yards.

Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:01PM Negativecool said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You don't know? Did you like what you played or didn't you?

You didn't seem to give any criticism other than implying that you didn't know how well others would receive the mechanics that you didn't actually criticize.

Seems like you are scared to endorse "another WWII" shooter.

Weak dude.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's nice to see some information about Hell's Highway finally start to trickle through the cracks. There is presently so little information about the title.

Thanks, Justin.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For people who like to think a little more in their games this is going to be a great one to get. Along with some awesome multiplayer (Based off the last two) I will definitely be picking this up and keeping it in my library. Just last month I went through the first one again.

@Negativecool - Agreed.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm worried about this game. Most of what I have seen has been promising until the newest trailer on XBL. Seriously, if you haven't seen it yet, oh man. Horrible visuals. I defended it when a friend told me. "I've seen Game Informer pics that look REALLY good!" UGH. What the hell happened? How could it look WORSE than all previous media. It has to be a mistake to release that garbage(with a 1080tag on it too). PS2 like graphics, and I am NOT kidding. I wish I was; I've always liked this series...
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:14PM OMGOMG said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are you serious? That isn't PS2 graphics at all.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know, I LOVE the last ones. Graphics looks good in screens right? Watch the XBL trailer. Thats the only time I haven't been impressed with the look. Anyone here seen it? Am I crazy? I'd like to think I was drunk that night or something.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 3:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Okay, false alarm. It was just super shitty trailer compression by Ubi. Like the worst I've seen. Why the hell would they do that? It had a 1080 tag too, lol.
HERE is the same trailer, and actually looks pretty good. http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35316.html
Compare to the one on live, and see why you might cancel your preorder after seeing it. Stupid Ubi marketing idiots.
Reply

Posted: Jul 28th 2008 10:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i totally agree with you, and since your the first person i have found that thought it looked worse i wanted to ask you, doesnt it look like they took out everything sweet about the gun handling, like when it sways, and how it was closer to you, like in the first videos for the five oh sink mission,then they moved the gun all the way out and it looks like call of duty 3 now.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 4:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Every time i've seen this all i can think is that it looks like a PS2/Xbox1 port.

I know they've gone for some kind of odd stylised cel/unreal-color type of look, but i just can't get over how utterly crap it looks in every possible way.
Seriously last gen.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 5:10PM Gimbal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The only thing bad about the previous games in the series was the framerate issues (that and the fact that there is no back-compat for them on the 360). I for one was overjoyed that guns didn't fire with laser-like accuracy. If you want that kind of game try Quake, Unreal, or something like that.

For those of you who haven't played the previous ones before, think of Brothers in Arms as a game like Full Spectrum Warrior. It is about tactics, flanking, cover fire, and all those things that go on in a battlefield. Sure you can play it as a FPS, but you will only end up frustrated.

Turn off the crosshair, turn off the supression indicators too. Pretend it is you that is under fire, ducked behind cover, trying to figure out how to get all of your men through the fight without everyone getting killed. If your decision then is to turn the crosshair option back on and take on each German yourself as they pop up from behind cover, well...you won't like this game.

I'm not as impressed with Hell's Highway as I was hoping I would be, but it looks like all the gameplay mechanics that worked so well in the first two are still there. I guess I was hoping for more than just a prettier version of the previous games.
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 5:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Happy 7th Anniversary!!! I love you!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 9:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Love you too!

:)
Reply

Posted: Jul 21st 2008 7:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be honest, this article didn't really mention anything new about the game other than using high places to scope enemy troops, the suppression thing has been in BIA since the Xbox version its not a new feature at all, so if those two points are all that could be said I am unimpressed, more with the detail of the hands-on than the game itself.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW