| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (65)

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:01PM Gir said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I saw a squirrel. He was goin' like this...
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:05PM Gir said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Me and the squirrel are friends!
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 6:40PM iHavePants said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
INGENIOUS!
Reply

Posted: Jul 26th 2008 5:58PM bigsofty said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Im going OpenGL enough of these M$ forced upgrades... time to REBEL!
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:02PM Assmar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But I just got my dang 4870!
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
don't worry about it :P We won't see DX11 for years, and that card you have is amazing, so enjoy it for the next few years. I'm getting one myself. I'm so glad ATI is back.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Fuck DX10.

Right now, I'm pretty damn happy with everything that poor ugly DX9 Unreal Engine 3 can throw at me.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fuck DX10, DX11, and vista too. So irritated at this forced-upgrade shit.

You know, actually I wouldn't be so upset if Vista was an actual upgrade. I don't mind spending money on the latest and greatest video cards and software- i wouldn't be a true pc gamer if I didn't! I don't like being forced to buy subpar operating systems for a few fancy extras that my hardware can already handle.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 7:47PM Peter F said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Forced upgrade? It seems like you are still using DX9. How exactly are you being forced to upgrade again?
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 8:10PM PlatinumSkeet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's why you dual-boot and download Vista for free just like the average guy does for about half the games on PC...
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 9:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Forced to upgrade to use the features I bought with my video card maybe?

DX10 is vista-only to force people to upgrade to vista. I'm happy with XP, why should I have to shell out money for an operating system that is sub-par to get all of the features I purchased in a video card?

And yes, I understand that you have to upgrade software and hardware in the PC universe. I'm not a fucking moron, and I'm not still running windows 95. We're talking about an operating system that is STILL covered by MS support (for the time being), and its 'replacement' is pretty much a steaming pile of dogshit.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 10:46PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm with you eldee.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 11:53PM simbadogg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so i guess when apple comes out w/ a 120 gig ipod, and you only have a 30 thats a forced upgrade. Or when sony comes out w/ a ps3 and still sells the ps2 thats another forced upgrade for you. and how bout those stupid car manufacturers forcing you to switch out your car every 5 years when the new model drops. those asshats.

point being, its not a forced upgrade until its NO LONGER supported. kinda like xp wont be supporter any longer many many years down the road.
Reply

Posted: Jul 23rd 2008 1:36AM Bslashingu said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Umm... SimbaDogg, this IS a forced upgrade. Windows XP got pulled from shelves not too long ago, and computer manufacturers don't have the option for you to install it on pre-made PCs anymore. The only way to get XP now is through torrents.

Knowing Microsoft, they're going to start passing money around to game companies to make their games DX11 exclusive, which also pops them into the Vista Exclusive category. It seems that if you want to continue gaming on the PC, you're pretty much FORCED into downgrading to Vista.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lets see if they can actually deliver this time. From 9c to 10.1 theres hardly a huge difference, not big enough to really notice. If DX11 can make a huge leap, then I'll be impressed.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:24PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Depends I guess on you define "huge", but DX10 makes a noticeable difference, especially in lighting. The main problem was the video cards available at the time DX10 launched weren't really ready to handle DX10 games.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:12PM 007craft said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so whens this coming out? I was planing on buying a card for spore in september, but if this is coming in janurary or something, I may just buy a cheap $50 older card for spore, and wait the 4 or 5 months and buy a nice dX11 card for like $400. Currently running integrated graphics. Only good for watching HD movies, almost all games unplayable :(. Rest of my specs, very high to handle any game.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:03PM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If you just go and buy a 4850 or 4870 now, you'll be able to max out most games for years to come.
Reply

Posted: Jul 26th 2008 3:33PM LuckyEMS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i love Vista
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:12PM Dolar said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
And I am sure all 15 people who use Vista will be stoked by the news.

Until they allow DX10 and 11 to run on XP who cares.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:18PM ForTheHuynh said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
As one of the 15, I'm fucking stoked!
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Vista just sold over 180 million
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:23PM GenBanks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Me too - so now we know that at least 2/15 vista users will be happy.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:32PM Vol said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I have 3 PCs with Vista. It's the only option now preinstalled. (unless you count Dell's $150 XP option) :-(

So there are 4 in this thread.. I know we can pass 15 in 10 minutes. Go! :-)
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:37PM AbsoluteZero said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm stoked...numba 5!
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:49PM Vol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This comment system makes it impossible.

Fail.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
My pirated copy of Vista would be stoked if only I didn't though it was a p.o.s. and rolled back to XP.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 6:07PM Sora said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Paint me stoked. Number 6.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 6:46PM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Vol... you buy Dell? And then you have the nerve to say that anything else fails?
You fail sir.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
vista sold 180mil.. don't make me laugh. They sold 180 mil licenses via 3rd parties (READ: Dell, HP, Gateway, Lenovo, etc). I would say 179 million of those users took the system home, wiped the drive clean, and installed XP on it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 23rd 2008 1:29PM WhatIsThatThing said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
eldee: Yep, that's me. High-end HP system wiped clean of filthy Vista.
Reply

Posted: Jul 24th 2008 7:35AM GenBanks said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What the heck's the problem with Vista? I'm running vista x64 which should theoretically be the worst of the lot and I've had Zero problems.

I think it's just 'geek cool' to bad-mouth vista and announce that you're using XP, even if there are no tangible differences, ESPECIALLY on a high-end PC.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:13PM relaxeder said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tesselmania!: Vista Edition, anyone?
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:21PM Veko said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Eh, if it's free I don't see any reason to complain. I have an 8600 in my first computer and a 6800 in my second one. Both play games fine. I doubt when DX11 comes out I'll have anything to worry about.

Follow the curve, I say, don't try to lead it (unless you have a lot of money to blow).
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Who gives a crap if i can't run it on XP.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:25PM McDude said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I liked Vista. It's pretty. :(
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 3:28PM Pushtrak said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think its safe to say XP support is not something to be looking out for. I'm happy with XP, but some people here need to get a brain. If there is new Windows OS info, its not going to be XP related.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is not good.

If it comes out B4 the new windows, all the XP owning pc gamers are doomed.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This is important, very important. Much moreso than what Joystiq's Chris Grant is making it sound. DX11 is going to shift gaming off your PC's processor, and ram, onto strictly the GPU itself. This is the way the future is headed for PC Gaming, and PC is going to completely revive itself to mass market in a big way.

It's not going to matter what PC you have, as long as you have the correct GPU slot, PCI-E, which all mobos feature nowadays, these things will work no problem. What this means? The only thing people will need to buy in the future to turn their PC's into gaming machines is a GPU, plain and simple, and the way pricing is going, it's going to be very cheap.

Smart move, and something Intel realizes, and is why they are jumping into the high end GPU market. Take a look at Project Offset, bought by Intel, amazingly impressive, and certainly not for their integrated line of chips.

Worried about gaming on the sofa in the living room and not your home office console gamers? Check out wireless HDMI, running on N based routers, it's amazing what's going on in that front. We'll be wirelessly streaming HD content (video games and movies of course) to any screen in the house. Wireless peripherals are already here, and there you have it. This is basically the merging of console and PC gaming that's coming a lot sooner then later.

On another note, I wouldn't be surprised to see Alan Wake make the DX11 jump, the game has obviously been reset for DX11 and probably the next Xbox. They software sellers, and that for some reason gives me that feeling.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:23PM Vidikron said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It make you sound like it's all on the GPU now, but the article specifically mentions that DX11 takes advantage of "multi-core machines"... which I assume is talking about CPUs. IMO, it would be a mistake to throw it all on the GPU. As it is now, most games are GPU bound, not CPU bound, so how is throwing more on the GPU going to improve anything? They need to be doing the exact opposite. Multi-core CPUs are the future and there would be a lot of waste occurring if games didn't capitalize on that.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:25PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WTF? I totally screwed up my first sentence... it should read, "You make it sound like..."
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 6:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What I'm saying is that right now, there's a blend in gaming, CPU and GPU. The more powerful GPU's become, the less CPU power is needed in order to run certain games. Right now, the only games that are truly CPU intensive are RTS games, and games with advanced AI. Placing that burden on the GPU is becoming easier as they get more powerful. What I should have said is, the CPU going from the motherboard onto the GPU for gaming purposes, meaning one could have a baseline 400 dollar PC say, integrated graphics chip, then, go out and purchase a nextgen GPU, which will include all the guts in order to game, nullifying the system PC's specs almost completely. The CPU, RAM ,and GPU are all in one, being utilized by games. This isn't going to happen tomorrow, but it will eventually down the road. The way I see it, programming for multicores is a real pain in the ass, and streamlining the process in the future is the only way we're going to see the CPU takeover as the main component to gaming. As for now, my money's on the GPU.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:56PM enbadesign said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder if true DX11 support will only be for Windows 7. Par for the Microsoft course.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:19PM captcarl said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Who cares about this? When will DX10 become available on XP?
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 7:50PM Peter F said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Never. Once games require DX10 you will have enough money saved up to buy the $20 2GB kit of RAM so that you can run Vista.
Reply

Posted: Jul 23rd 2008 2:24AM MinorHavoc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, it only cost me only $12 for 4GB of HP-branded Micron DDR2 DIMM's back in January, shipping included, after rebate. My Vista box doesn't even swap to disk most of the time. :-)
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:25PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WTF? I totally screwed up my first sentence... it should read, "You make it sound like..."
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:35PM mezzaninex said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Bleh. I'm done with PC gaming ;;
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:42PM robmv said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This is funny, Sony gives o developers the Cell, with additional Cores to do parallel processing and everyone scream because it is a difficult architecture, now MS want to build DX11 with support for parallel processing, and this is cool.

Looks like Sony is a few step ahead (at least on this front, still at the back in comparison with Live features)
Reply

Posted: Jul 24th 2008 5:46PM BaseVilliN said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The difference is Microsoft is creating the tools for developers to much more easily utilize multiple cores and gpus. This is to prevent the very thing that happened to Sony with the PS3.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Now Playing: February 6-12, 2012

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 5:45PM

Sanctum 2 defends PC, consoles in 2013

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW