| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (24)

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:11PM thebetamax said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No achievements? No sale. I'll stick with the free demos...
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:30PM SeanR said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Going by that sentiment, you've never played games before the xbox 360 came out?

What is with people and achievements... whatever happened to playing a game because it was good or you liked it?
Reply

Posted: Jul 23rd 2008 8:06AM thebetamax said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've purchased retail games that I know I'll like or decided to purchase after the free demo. If I REALLY dig the demo I may buy it but for Arcade titles, the achievements come into play. Usually its only a few hours of gaming anyway so I don't feel like I'm missing anything...
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Let me be the first to say that it is L-A-M-E that developers will not have the choice to make there games free...
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:13PM YankeeBravo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If I'm reading this correctly, it looks like Xav got the "Microsoft to share up to 70%" a little backwards.

From the information provided by Microsoft, it sounds like they're saying that developers will keep 80 to 90 percent of sales unless Microsoft's promotion helps sell above a certain threshold. In that event, Microsoft takes a 30% cut of the pie.

In other words, it would be more accurate to say that Microsoft will share up to 90% of sales profit.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:24PM Xav de Matos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
According to the verbiage used to announce this plan Microsoft will hold onto a guaranteed 30% of all profits and has committed to share up to 70% of profits with developers of a game.

The reference in the story is based on the following statements made on promotion which would reduce the shares received from profits.

So, we're reading the same book we're just on different pages.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:13PM ZEBRA NINER said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
No cheevos!!??! What's that all about?!
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:54PM Omega Aero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They are probably doing that so they don't run the risk of people making games with easy achievements in order to sell loads.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:13PM Joeybeast said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Time to buy myself a new pc and give this XNA a try.
surely, It can't be that hard.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a step in the right direction. Now, if only it were a set 70-percent of profits to developers.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:36PM Deschain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is. you didn't read it correctly.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:39PM Xav de Matos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think he might mean Xbox Live Arcade developers, which had their royalties cut from 70ish % to much, much less.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:39PM MrMuggs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It seems odd that MS would structure their pricing based on the size of the game. Is there a correlation between the quality of the game and the size of it? Does a bigger game mean a better game? I'm sure that there are tons of shitty larger games and vice versa. Maybe the pricing has more to do with the cost to MS for hosting/bandwidth. The larger games cost MS more to host and allow for download therefore they charge the developer more. Will this pricing model cause developers to add more (sometimes crappy) content just to increase the size of the game and the price? Will a game that should be $2.50 be packed with a developer diary of photos and junk? It seems to me that the pricing should be based on the quality of the game and not the size.

As a side note, I don't understand why people are so hung up on achievements. Seriously, who cares? It's interested to see that you've reached certain milestones in a game but what's it really worth other than "bragging rights" and showing others how big your "E-Penis" is because you have no life and spend days getting achievements that hold no real world value. Actually, I would say that achievements are almost a direct correlation to your life. How many guys with a girlfriend/wife/job/life are racking up tons of achievement points. It's obviously important to some people though so whatever.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 5:24PM JCarpio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I see where you were going with the pricing structure.. but there is a flaw.. Basing a game's quality is a subjective thing, what they're doing is basing it off of something fixed. it seems to be following the pricing structure of XBLA games
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 7:08PM MrMuggs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's okay to base a game price on a fixed point. However, the fixed point to base pricing on shouldn't be the size of the game. That doesn't make sense.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 8:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well said my man! At last someone who can decipher the jargon for us minnions to understand. Great comment mate, top drawer.
Do you worrk for these guys? Just enquiring LOL
Reply

Posted: Jul 23rd 2008 9:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Size of the game is a good factor. The larger the game, the more space it takes on MS's servers, the more it costs them in bandwidth, etc.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 4:57PM JCarpio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Question..
what if i'm a member of the xna creators club.. I have to pay my fee plus the cost of the game on top of that?

that question aside. the pricing isn't that bad, plus you'd be supporting indie developers without much financial support.
Reply

Posted: Jul 23rd 2008 2:37PM sukru said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think you can upload games directly to your 360, if you're a developers club member.

You'll probably need the source code, which should be available on xna web site.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 6:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh, wont bother. Nothing major will come out of it. The Live arcade is mostly full of shit, XNA isn't going to be any better.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 7:39PM Stabby McStabs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am very excited for XNA, I'm looking forward to some more unusual and experimental games. The PSN seems to have it right with their mix of quirky small titles, and I'm hoping the community can deliver some nice alternatives to traditional games.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2008 11:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I believe this will produce excellent games. When people get paid to do something they do it good.
Reply

Posted: Jul 23rd 2008 6:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MrMuggs: I would have thought the opposite would be true, regarding developers 'bloating' their games to reach the higher price point.

Surely they'd rather sell 1million copies @ 200msp than 500k at 400msp or whatever. A developer, especially a new one, would much rather their game gets maximum exposure than maximum profits? That can come later, when you've got a couple of XNA hits under your belt ;o)

Or maybe I'm just living in an utopian fantasy world where money doesn't ALWAYS talk!
Reply

Posted: Aug 30th 2008 1:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NEW GAME IS DEVELOPED AT MAKERERE UNIVERSITY UGANDA
TO BE PRESENTED IN NIROBI KENYA
ON 11-09-2008 FOR THE INTER-UNIVERSITY SOFTWARE COMPITION
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW