We always think it's so bizarre when fanboys and girls start filling up our tips box with vitriol about the latest unpopular decision made by Sega, Square, Microsoft or practically anyone involved in the gaming industry. "Where do they get all that hate?" we wonder aloud, before going to donate more hugs down at the clinic. They would be a complete mystery to us were it not for Brett Ratner, who, according to a passing mention in a recent press release from MGM, has been tapped to direct the God of War film.
See, we hate Brett Ratner. Well, no, we don't hate the person. We're sure he's a perfectly nice man. But we hate everything he's ever put on film from Money Talks to X3 aka Brett Ratner's First-Person Theatrical Abortion. ... You know what? Forget what we said, we do hate Brett Ratner as a person. And if he directs God of War, it'll be awful, because all of his movies are awful and we don't know why he keeps being allowed to make them. The end.














(Page 1) Reader Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
NOTE: SPOILERS AHEAD
First, it had a bajillion characters and didn't spend time developing any of them. Maybe this was great for fans who just wanted to see all these characters, but I didn't care personally.
Second, with the exception of Pheonix (which, as a non-fan, I also didn't care about), nothing happened in the entire film. Or rather, everything that did happen was undone by the end of the film, like a bad TV episode. The bad guys joined the good guys, but then left again, big surprise. Some new enemies were made, but by the end of the film they were taken care of. Just... nothing in the film mattered. You could go from X1 to X3 and never know you missed anything, except you wouldn't know about Pheonix. That's it.
Thirdly, Wolverine's story sucked. They already pretty much explained it before, so now they just went in detail with it, but most of the details I had basically guessed anyway. And nothing that was learned changed the character of Wolverine. He was a badass that didn't know about his past and then he learned about his past and... well, nothing. It didn't change anything.
So basically, bad script and too many characters with too little development. What development there was was pointless, as were most of the introduced characters. I give it two stars.
"First, it had a bajillion characters and didn't spend time developing any of them"
That right there is bull, they spent time on most of the characters...
Iceman and his family
Pyro joining Magneto
Wolverine and his past
The Logan/Jean/Scott love triangle
and so on...
Better?
j/k. All the X-men movies were a joke looking back. They had so much potential, but i think they were a huge let down. had they waited a couple more years to start the series, they would've been so much better.
He also produces Prison Break on FOX and a lot of people seem to like that.
But one way or another, the X-Men trilogy had Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen, so just imagine how much worse the movies would have been without a couple very good actors playing such pivotal roles :)
What makes it so bad is how much potential it had.. But yeah, I agree, Ratner sucks big ones..
Reply
Actually, I would probably see God of War with Chris Tucker as his side kick.
Tucker: DAMN YOUSE RIPPED OFF DAT GUYS HEAD! YOU CRAZY KRATOS!
*Kratos proceeds to chop off Tuckers head*
Reply
Oh that was funny.
Reply
Reply
..... they could have chosen Uwe Boll
Reply
Now give him a big budget, and I think this movie wouldn't be so bad after all.
Vote for Uwe!
Reply
Reply
He's a hard character to write for, in the same way that the FANTASTIC FOUR are difficult do. Their tales are so "clean-cut" or "cliche'd" by this point that anything socially taboo & dark(like the X-MEN) or highly violent(like 300) would throw off the theme entirely. Add on the fact that Superman is so difficult to defeat by normal means, and you're left with the constant "throw the Kryptonite at him and hope for the best" villain angle is recited ad-nauseam.
The one thing I will blame Singer and WarnerBros./DC Comics for; would be the fact that they listened too closely to their shareholders. Spending ridiculous amounts of money on those new-age Panasonic HD Cameras, the copious amounts of money on the suits & set designs, and literally letting them tarnish a good concept into something that might as well be a Saturday afternoon movie... that's what killed SUPERMAN RETURNS for me.
You're right that Superman's relative power is always a problem, but there are options.
I think Parasite would make a formidable movie villain for example.
Bizarro would also be cool, except that it's such a dumb character as it stands, they would have to retcon him for it to not be a complete joke
I thought it did a good job both capturing the feel of the old superman movies, and trying to do something a little more grown up and less teenage. It felt very similar in style to Batman Begins to me.
Are they making another one? Personally I hope so, and I wish they'd move towards a crossover Batman/Superman movie in the future.
(x3 did indeed totally suck though...)
Reply
...haven't seen any other Michael Bay movies, though.
That's an opinion. One that millions of people completely disagree with you on.
Now go away, because you are 100% wrong.
I'm scared....really really scared.
YOU'VE GOT THE TOUCH....YOU'VE GOT THE POWAAAAAAAAAH
Reply
If I had to pick a director for a GOD OF WAR movie, it would be Guillermo del Toro(had to spell-check that XD) or possibly even Zack Snyder -- depending on how WATCHMEN actually turns out. I like what I see thus far, but the execs could still step-in and mold it into crap.
Reply
Actually, that's not a bad choice either. :] So long as we don't have to see ICHI THE KILLER style manjuicing over slaugher(LOL, other than that - it was a good flick) or that torture sequence from that one movie where the woman got needles jabbed underneath her finger nails(I forgot the title offhand, but even thinking about it has me shuddering).