| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (83)

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:00PM Giantenemycrab said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How is that possible?
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:14PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"more powerful than a Nintendo DS and Sony PSP combined [with duct tape]"

Hope that makes sense now.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 5:34PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, the PSP is 'almost as powerful as a PS2' and that thing is old.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2008 9:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
10 bucks says Sony start's using the cell proccesor everywhere . First the PSPhone will have a quad-core cell . Then the Sony-Ericsonns will have them , then laptops , PC's EVERYTHING . (cell cammera's , cell GPS etc) ,
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:01PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yet it still can't post to Joystiq on a regular basis and runs slow as hell since the 2.0 revision came out. I call shenanigans.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I love how people try to point this out. What they don't realize is that a lot of the "power" goes towards the phone/online/email aspects of the iPhone and the data storage to hold contacts and whatnot.. I'll believe it when I see it
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:03PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
+1 your your bad-ass Dr. McNinja avatar.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:07PM iofthestorm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I hate the iPhone hype with a vengeance but John Carmack is one of the first and foremost experts of 3D graphics engines, and when he says something I tend to believe him. Now, he might be exaggerating but it's probably not too far from the truth. The processor's speed itself is much faster than the DS and a fair bit faster than the PSP, although I don't know what kind of dedicated graphics chip it's got. I'd guess it's probably closest to the PSP's graphics, but that's just me, a random internet commenter, guessing. Carmack's probably closer to the truth than you or I am.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 11:04AM jynxycat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Like when he said Doom3 would look as good on Xbox as PC ?

I tend to take his comments with a truck load of salt.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:01PM R V said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Again, like I posted on engadget, I would like to see an iphone run splinter cell 3.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:02PM Obienator said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Carmack needs to stop jerkin' off over horsepower and start making games that offer better gameplay.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:04PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Why when spitting out engines makes a bundle?
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:05PM Obienator said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I guess, but him new Rage engine is lookin' more like the Unreal engine.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:07PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When the only goal of the two engines is to mimic reality as close as possible, they're eventually going to converge.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
dude, that's like, deep n stuff
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:36PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nice points, LT. You nailed it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How is the Doom 3 engine making bundles? Seems to me that almost no one's licensing the engine except those inhouse devs...
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:54PM In A World said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But can the RAGE engine even mimic reality better than UE3? I'm not seeing much of a difference... in fact I'd have to give a slight nod to Gears 2.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 9:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
For fucks sake, he writes game engines. That is what he does, that is all he does, he has never claimed to do anything more than that.

He has never been anything but a programmer or a technical director. As ID has grown in size, his contribution to game play has decreased towards zero.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2008 3:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
he doesnt make the games dipshit, he makes graphics/engines for the games. Grow a brain and tell me when you decide to use it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:13PM Supermanisdead said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
If the iPhone is as strong as all those systems it still won't be able to half of what they could because of the lack of buttons. Apple should create some addon that has a d-pad and face buttons so that it can show off its graphics and have fun and deep games too.

Also, the batteries will die out in like 3 seconds on whatever dreamcast level ultra graphics game carmack is working on.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:23PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Agreed, the iPod has no decent input device other than the screen.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It'll get to to the title screen and the battery will die.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 9:47AM Keithustus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
If the iphone is so graphically capable, why are people already complaining about frame rate drops in the games that have already come out?
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 6:27PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's the main problem for me. Without good, tactile input it is nothing to me (in a gaming sense.)
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The iPhone can't even run 2 apps at the same time.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:42PM dfnj123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I surf the load up a webpage, my email all while listening to music on my iPhone. I don't know what device you are talking about.

Apple made so you couldn't run THIRD PART apps in the background because it would waste battery power.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yet it still has a shitty battery life.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:36PM Giroro said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
PS2 and Xbox1 are pretty far apart as far as graphics go, and both are significantly better than the Dreamcast.

Carmack's vague descriptions manages to mention 5 different gaming platforms, Which definitely hurts his credibility on the matter.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:49PM dfnj123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He says nothing about Graphics. He only talks about power.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 1:09AM stubby boardman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
though shalt not question Carmack!
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 5:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorry to burst your bubble, but,

Dreamcast > PS2
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 9:03AM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Dreamcast sucked, biggest waste of my money ¬_¬
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 12:52PM jmood88 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You must be talking about a different ps2 because the real one was never significantly better or even just better, graphically, than the dreamcast.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 1:11PM Extinction said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorry DC fanboys, PS2 was indeed better graphically than the Dreamcast.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 7:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Extinction, do some research. In a lot of fields, the PS2 has the upper hand, but same goes for the Dreamcast, and it can easily be argued that the Dreamcast is more powerful than the Playstation 2.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 10:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Dreamcast sucked, biggest waste of my money".

*Does the Bob and Cedric look.

Who?!,Who doesn't loves the Dreamcast?!!

(WTF are you talking about? the dreamcast was f*cking awesome but if you don't want it you can sell it to me,I'll find a good use.The DC was great).
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:33PM Gwr said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nice but the interface for the Iphone is still horrible.

The touchscreen is nice but its not enough on its own for most real games.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I guess I'll raise the obvious...

Wii is a "no" but the iPhone is a "hell ya"?
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:54PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo consoles are a no. For some reason they are anethema to iD.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
uh, once again I have to estate the same, the iPhone is considered one of the most powerful devices when it comes to cellphones, can the same be said about the Wii on the videogame scene?
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 2:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
id has had a long history with Nintendo. Nintendo usually pissed them off on everything they tried to bring to their consoles. Wolfenstein, Doom, you name it. It actually started when id offered to port Super Mario Brothers III to the PC and Nintendo gave them more than just a "no".
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The Iphone can't touch the Dreamcast.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:23PM Supermanisdead said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Agreed! However, if the iPhone gets Skies of Arcadia AND Jet Grind Radio....



it still won't be close to Dreamcast. :P
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2008 12:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If Skies of Arcadia was released on the iPhone I would cancel my current plan today and way what ever it takes to get that. That's one of the best RPGs ever!
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:03PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Like others have said, the lack of buttons completely ruins the point of making games on it. SOME DS games can be ported to it but others won't work because of the thickness of a finger both not being precise and blocking the screen.

I like the idea of having a shell that the iphone slides into, that has conventional buttons on it. it could also hold some more battery power to take care of the huge ammount of power gaming on the iphone would suck up.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 10:57PM Attila226 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

I saw someone playing a kart racing game on one today and the graphics were way better then a PSOne. A PS2 may be a bit of a stretch but I was impressed.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:11PM iofthestorm said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hmm, I think I saw the same game (some Crash Team Racing offshoot) and it seemed like PS1 quality to me.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I like the way he says it's far more powerful than a PSP but "almost" as powerful as a PS2, when the PSP and PS2 are fairly close in power.

Spec wise, it looks like it's a bit more powerful than the PSP, but it has to run Apple's OS, and who knows how much that takes to run behind the scenes.

Plus, you know, no buttons.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2008 11:17PM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The PSP is nowhere near as powerful as a PS2, the only reason that it looks like it is, is because of the tiny resolution that the PSP renders at. Get them both running at the same resolution and the PSP can't have nearly as much detail.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW