If there was a magic ratio between the amount of time that a game is in development and the length of the final product, many of us would assume that the first installment in Silicon Knight's Norse-inspired trilogy, Too Human, would take roughly ten months to complete. However, Silicon founder Denis Dyack has expressed his concerns with lengthy games in the past, so it should come as no surprise that in a recent interview with gaming site Kikizo, Dyack explained that your first playthrough of his upcoming action/RPG hybrid should take "around fifteen hours".
Dyack goes on to explain that in order to hit level fifty (the game's level cap) might take between fifty and eighty hours, and searching for the game's "epic loot" will tack even more time to the title. If the length of Silicon's quickly approaching title doesn't interest you, perhaps Dyack's mad vision of a one-console future, discussed in the same interview, might catch your attention -- if only to make you furiously wonder what a console civil war would look like.
Reader Comments (55)
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 7:41PM Supermanisdead said
I played the demo of this last night, it's so sloppy. It's not even button mashing, it's just random analog flicking and your character flies across the screen to do some ugly animation and your enemy is dead... also with an ugly animation. I think it may be because I chose the class with the max meelee stat, but all the enemies (at least in the first 2 parts) died in 1 hit.
I wanted to like it so much... but seriously. When I have hack and slash games like Ninja Gaiden, God of War and Devil May Cry, why would I play this?
ON TOPIC:
I can see the fans of this game being disappointed with it. If someone told me a game I was looking forward to was only going to be a 15hr (and an RPG too!) I would be pissed. Of course there is the fact that you can max level all the different classes (I think there is 5) so you have 5 x 80hrs... but thats only 15 hours of a story.
Reply
I wanted to like it so much... but seriously. When I have hack and slash games like Ninja Gaiden, God of War and Devil May Cry, why would I play this?
ON TOPIC:
I can see the fans of this game being disappointed with it. If someone told me a game I was looking forward to was only going to be a 15hr (and an RPG too!) I would be pissed. Of course there is the fact that you can max level all the different classes (I think there is 5) so you have 5 x 80hrs... but thats only 15 hours of a story.
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 7:54PM Zarim said
I agree, I felt a little confused at the simplicity of the melee combat. "So pointing my analog stick at the enemy is all I do?" Despite that I still had some fun with the demo and will probably pick it up. I will probably play as the ranged class however.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 9:01PM SheppyReturns said
Well, here's my feelings on the combat system. Twin Stick shooters have recently been all the rage. People love geometry wars, etc. This same dynamic applied to a dungeon hacker seems interesting to me. It'll be a while before I can play the game though. The main complaints I've heard is the animation sucks though.
Reply
Posted: Aug 11th 2008 9:46AM Pipp said
I totally loved the demo. Once I unlocked the Berzeker the game changed pretty significantly. You got to see how varied classes really are. I've never seen a fighter action game character move so fast. Imagine some insanely fast combo in Dynasty Warriors and then speed it up another 100%. Crazy fast death everywhere.
Cannot wait for this game.
15 Hours sounds like a good amount because I plan on playing each class through the game, and then there are two more games that come after this one anyways.
Reply
Cannot wait for this game.
15 Hours sounds like a good amount because I plan on playing each class through the game, and then there are two more games that come after this one anyways.
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 7:51PM aMac said
I want to know more about the Co-op.
I'd heard through rumours and misinformation (ie. someone on a forum) that you can't Co-op the main story, or if you do, you miss out on all the cutscenes (and therefore key story elements).
I'm really looking forwards to a new good co-op game, and it would be a shame to have to play this solo to get the story, and then co-op being jut an excuse to kill things with a buddy.
Reply
I'd heard through rumours and misinformation (ie. someone on a forum) that you can't Co-op the main story, or if you do, you miss out on all the cutscenes (and therefore key story elements).
I'm really looking forwards to a new good co-op game, and it would be a shame to have to play this solo to get the story, and then co-op being jut an excuse to kill things with a buddy.
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 11:25PM (Unverified) said
Halo 2 did the same thing, as did Rainbow Six Vegas. I'm using those games, because those are pretty much the only two I remember playing co-op. On the other hand, diablo 2 kept the cinema scenes. That was nice.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 8:11PM (Unverified) said
I thought the demo was OK but it did not live up to the huge expectations of a whiny developer. I might pick it up used next year after some patches and updates. It is not a horrible game in fact it had a great concept but it was just not put together properly. If I had to describe it in one phrase it would have to be "poor implementation".
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 8:24PM ArtificeDrake formerly known as said
"fifteen hours"? sweet! that means about 30 hours for me!
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 8:45PM NO DOUBT GET LOUD said
I wish it was a little longer, I mean, Twilight Princess is like 30-40 hours.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 9:04PM (Unverified) said
And mass effect is 50 hours long and call of duty is 6 hours long and halo 3 is 8 hours long.
Your point, exactly?
Reply
Your point, exactly?
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 9:07PM NO DOUBT GET LOUD said
My point was that I wished it was a little longer... I thought the point was pretty clear.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 9:50PM (Unverified) said
Why are you talking about twilight princess then? It's completely irrelevant.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 10:14PM NO DOUBT GET LOUD said
I was giving an example as to how long I wished this game was... I thought the point was pretty clear.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 11:42PM Supermanisdead said
Lol, it took me at least 50 hours to beat Twilight Princess, that game is LONG. Rule about Zelda games:
When you think you are close to done, you are only about halfway there.
Reply
When you think you are close to done, you are only about halfway there.
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 12:38AM RobAccomando said
Your point was clear, some people are just daft.
Reply
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 12:49AM NO DOUBT GET LOUD said
Some people like short quick games and some like 60+ hour epics.
Different strokes for different folks.
Reply
Different strokes for different folks.
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 9:34AM (Unverified) said
that game took me 71 hours and it was full of win.
But does anyone now if the games saves after you beat because i feel nothing change after i beat it.
Reply
But does anyone now if the games saves after you beat because i feel nothing change after i beat it.
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 9:22PM atrimus said
so in other words, right about around the time i MIGHT start to think the controls are OKAY, the game will be over. i think i'll pass. it's bad enough we've had to pay a premium on games this generation, but now each game is getting shorter and shorter. i'll not waste 15 hours just getting accustomed to a game's control style, not with Fable 2 two months away. and what's with all this hate from the development community for lengthy games anyway? it's as if Oblivion has taught no one anything.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 9:42PM (Unverified) said
The thing you have to understand is how similar the concept is like Diablo. While you cannot co-op the campaign in Too Human like you can in that game, a bit part of the game is replaying it with the same character, hitting the max level, finding better and better loot.
Diablo II didn't take but a few hours to beat, but most people went back and beat it on all 3 modes, maxing out their level and tweaking their armor and weapons. It's the same concept here.
And if that isn't your thing, then it isn't your thing, that's okay... but it still makes for great replayability for those of us who love to loot and level... even if it means going through the same areas 2 or 3 times.
Reply
Diablo II didn't take but a few hours to beat, but most people went back and beat it on all 3 modes, maxing out their level and tweaking their armor and weapons. It's the same concept here.
And if that isn't your thing, then it isn't your thing, that's okay... but it still makes for great replayability for those of us who love to loot and level... even if it means going through the same areas 2 or 3 times.
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 12:43PM SheppyReturns said
"it's as if Oblivion has taught no one anything."
Oblivion was a pointlessly long mess of a narrative who's majority of length came from excessive use of the "quest" menu. There, I said it. In this day and age, with heavy reuse of assets, there was no excuse for the sheer lack of focus and constant revisiting of the same house found in Oblivion...
I said it before, I'll say it again. The excessively long games use repetitive tactics to artificially lengthen their games. The rage many feel against short games stems from them still being in school and having the time to complete a 100 hour RPG in three weeks.
Reply
Oblivion was a pointlessly long mess of a narrative who's majority of length came from excessive use of the "quest" menu. There, I said it. In this day and age, with heavy reuse of assets, there was no excuse for the sheer lack of focus and constant revisiting of the same house found in Oblivion...
I said it before, I'll say it again. The excessively long games use repetitive tactics to artificially lengthen their games. The rage many feel against short games stems from them still being in school and having the time to complete a 100 hour RPG in three weeks.
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 3:31PM atrimus said
well, if you're fine spending $60 on a 7 hour game with some online multiplayer tacked on so you can sit and be verbally abused by the same school kids you just derided, then who am i to say anything? i myself like longevity with my games.
as for Oblivion; well, i guess we just played two completely different games. i'd hardly call Oblivion a long narrative, especially since the bulk of its gameplay rest outside the main narrative/story. maybe you're confusing Oblivion with MGS4, which was still an awesome game itself.
Reply
as for Oblivion; well, i guess we just played two completely different games. i'd hardly call Oblivion a long narrative, especially since the bulk of its gameplay rest outside the main narrative/story. maybe you're confusing Oblivion with MGS4, which was still an awesome game itself.
Posted: Aug 11th 2008 8:38AM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said
Got to agree with Sheppy here...Oblivion had great concepts and was a ridiculously long game thanks to the Quests menu. I myself am not a quest whore (although I was a loot whore in Diablo II), so Oblivion was not very appealing to me. I loved it when it first began, but after that the game just felt too repetitive and the storyline got lost in the jumble of side-quests and NPCs. I'm not hating on anyone who loved Oblivion here, it just wasn't for everybody. To me, one has to be a die-hard RPG fan to take on Oblivion and the Shivering Isles expansion.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 10:26PM (Unverified) said
Thank you for one of the more informative responses of in all the Too Human posts I've browsed, MikeO. I enjoyed Diablo II quite a bit, perhaps I'll check this out as well.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 11:13PM (Unverified) said
hah, happy to help. I've studied everything there is to know about this game. Feel free to ask if you have any questions.
Reply
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 11:41PM (Unverified) said
Jake G,
If you mean the "Goblin Man" videos, I've heard a lot of odd comments in the documentaries and from Dyack himself that suggests that the videos were filmed exclusively for Too Human as a means of creating hype.
I wouldn't believe any of it that you hear, I think it's just a marketing scheme to add a "realistic" touch to the story of Too Human to make the story seem as if it were real.
Reply
If you mean the "Goblin Man" videos, I've heard a lot of odd comments in the documentaries and from Dyack himself that suggests that the videos were filmed exclusively for Too Human as a means of creating hype.
I wouldn't believe any of it that you hear, I think it's just a marketing scheme to add a "realistic" touch to the story of Too Human to make the story seem as if it were real.
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 11:14PM ALittleWeeny said
To be fair, the combat system is actually OK. The problem with it are the stiff awkward animations (everything doesn't feel like it flows. it feels like 3 stiff animations with no transition in between) and because of this it doesn't feel very satisfying. It doesn't feel like your really beating up on your opponents. In God of War it feels like your really beating the crap out of your opponent unlike Too Human. However if you can successfully chain the attacks together it's not so bad. However that's pretty hard to do. I'm overall disappointed but I most likely still rent it and maybe purchase it depending on good the full game is.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 11:42PM (Unverified) said
I liked the demo enough to try the full game.
But like some others have said, I was disappointed to hear that there was no co-op campaign.
By the time I complete the story, it's possible I will have had my fill of Too Human.
Reply
But like some others have said, I was disappointed to hear that there was no co-op campaign.
By the time I complete the story, it's possible I will have had my fill of Too Human.
Posted: Aug 9th 2008 11:42PM Supermanisdead said
I personally hate when RPG's are as long as regular action games. I want the story to be equal in length to the customization, Too Human has tonnes of items and customization, but who wants to keep upgrading when you beat the final boss 30 hours ago?
Reply
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 12:28AM SheppyReturns said
You know... Dragon Quest was only about 6-7 hours long. Personally, I think when an RPG breeches the 25 hour mark, it's a shame. Why? Because most of your time in RPGs like that is spent gricing and grinding and grinding and grinding. What I love about RPGs are the stories and ability to sit back and plan combat. What I hate is spending five hours in the SAME fucking field just because Bossy McDressonmales is 12 levels higher and has spells which directly cripple my capacity for violence towards him.
I think you'll find, should you remove all the unnecessary grinding and such from most RPGs, you'll find about a 20-30 hour experience regardless of how far over that 60 hour mark you're so proud of.
Frankly, I think RPGs should start taking lessons from action games. Especially in the pacing.
Reply
I think you'll find, should you remove all the unnecessary grinding and such from most RPGs, you'll find about a 20-30 hour experience regardless of how far over that 60 hour mark you're so proud of.
Frankly, I think RPGs should start taking lessons from action games. Especially in the pacing.
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 3:24PM Supermanisdead said
Well, that's just my opinion, I enjoyed Eternal Sonata, and that game didn't have any level grinding. It took me about 40 hours with the Mysterious Unison dungeon, and only once did I have to level grind (against Pirate Dolce because I had such a weak party).
Level grinding is very tedious when the combat is strictly menu-based, like Pokemon and Dragon Quest, but when combat is fun, I don't mind having to fight many enemies.
Reply
Level grinding is very tedious when the combat is strictly menu-based, like Pokemon and Dragon Quest, but when combat is fun, I don't mind having to fight many enemies.
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 3:58AM (Unverified) said
This game doesn't deserve all the flak it's getting, I'll still be purchasing it.
Reply
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 4:31AM R Planteer said
15 hours long after 4 years of development? Wow...
So just under 1 year for this team to make 4 hours worth of gameplay, lol. Pretty bad...
Reply
So just under 1 year for this team to make 4 hours worth of gameplay, lol. Pretty bad...
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 10:51AM (Unverified) said
hm. I don't really understand the point. It's about making 15h of a good game right, not 30 of a less good one. I don't know if it'll be any good (I thought the demo was ok), but just I don't understand the topic...
Reply
Posted: Aug 10th 2008 1:27PM (Unverified) said
i really wanted to enjoy this game but the demo atleast just feels cheap to me, the game almost and i say almost feels like a budget game . the animation is probably the biggest issue as its horrid, but im going to remain optimistic and wait for the full version to judge it fully.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments











