| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (54)

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:03PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The guy doesn't like games like Mario Galaxy or Mass Effect... and he still expects us to take his gaming opinions seriously? O_O
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mass Effect wasn't all that good to begin with, oh wait I forgot its a Bioware game. That means it has to be good right?
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:16PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
But it was good so what's your point?
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mass Effect sucked terribly gameplay wise.
Still the story was excellent and Wrex was simple the best character of 2008.Each of his lines is just pure gold.

Commander Shepard: You krogan live for centuries, you must've had something interesting happen.
Urdnot Wrex: Well, there was this one time when the salarians almost wiped out our entire race. That was fun.

Commander Shepard: We're not looking to start a fight.
Urdnot Wrex: Why not?

Urdnot Wrex: Bah, we're wasting time, we could have beaten him into cooperation.
Garrus Vakarian: No we couldn't.
Urdnot Wrex: Yeah we could; think he lifts anything
heavier than stacks of hard data?

Urdnot Wrex: Do your people ever talk about how you unleashed the geth on the universe and then got banished from your own world by them?
Tali'Zorah: Do your people ever talk about how you tried to take over the universe, but were struck with a virus to make you all sterile?
Urdnot Wrex : All the time.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:52PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My point is that both games were mostly well-received... so it seems silly to take this guy seriously when his opinions are so backward.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 5:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I remember one time I was talking to the gianna parisinni lady on Noveria and she said something about the administrator costing the company money, and Wrex says "If he's costing your company credits he's a fool, you should eat him"
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 8:12PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I honestly didn't care all that much for either myself. Both games bored me in the middle and I never bothered to finish either one. I think I've just grown away from games like SMG. It was just sort of a chore to play. Everything in the game just feels pointless... I just didn't care about collecting stars. I also didn't really care for how you had to get only one specific star at a time. I preferred the Mario 64 method where you were given a clue for a specific star, but if you happened to find one of the others you could get that instead.

As for Mass Effect, I just couldn't stand the gimped combat. I know the game it's not a true shooter, but the combat was so close to being a shooter, yet it felt so crippled. If you're going to go down that direction, do it right or don't do it at all.
Reply

Posted: Aug 15th 2008 5:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
1st

Always wanted to do that!!

I agree with Ben

Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:08PM FernandoRocker said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Epic.Fail.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:10PM postpwn said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Always wanted to do what? Fail at failing?

Wait, is that winning? If so, Variety wins this round!
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There were other 3d platformers this gen?
Reply

Posted: Aug 13th 2008 12:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well I've been awaiting fable 2 and it does sound like it's going to be great. It has a big enough fanbase so why didn't it win anything! Mistria!!!

-The Motorokr
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I'm glad to hear some "varied" opinions from this guy. I'm happy to know somebody didn't like Mario and Mass Effect from last year. They both had their flaws. And Gears 2 has NO improvements from the last, unless you count the human shield thing....oh wait I forgot "meat shield".

CliffyB is one clever guy, why can't he think of a better nickname?
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 5:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You are an absolute tool. Please stick to commenting at PS3fanboy so as not to emmarass us other PS3 owners.
Reply

Posted: Aug 13th 2008 1:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh I'm very sorry for "emmarassing" you. It won't happen again.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
he sucks
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 9:52PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OK Computer is one of the greatest albums of all time.


But Dave Matthews is a tool. Those ants can march themselves off of a rooftop.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:07PM Nadril said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
In all honesty Mario Galexy wasn't amazing and Mass Effect was a huge letdown from Bioware. (especially when competing up against their other incredible titles)

That and I'm not really holding my breath for Gears of War 2 (don't really care about resistance 2 either though).

So was the point of this blog post just to pick at his tastes, or what?
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:10PM FernandoRocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't know about Mario Galexy, but Super Mario Galaxy is awesome.

Best 3D platformer this gen so far.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:11PM Nadril said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know what I meant, typo's happen.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:14PM JACKOFNOTRADES85 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fernando

You have not played all of the platformer games this gen so you can't say that.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:17PM FernandoRocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have played a lot of platformers this gen, specially on the DS.

But please, don't mention Tools of Destruction (I have played it and beated it), because that game is more like an action adventure/shooter game instead of a platformer.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Fernando

You have not played a the platformer games ON PS3 so you can't say that."

Corrected.

I'm pretty sure that Fernando did check out every Wii60 plat out there.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:22PM Shmil said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Galsxy is a typo, Galexy is just not knowing how to spell
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:22PM FernandoRocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jakka

I have said several times that my cousin (his house is a couple of blocks from mine) has a PS3, and my friend also has a PS3.

I have acces to the PS3 anytime I want, and I have finished several games on the system.

His PSN is WayneX
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There were other 3d platformers this gen?
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
:0
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...but...you're teh fanboyz!

*brain explodes*
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've played every 3-D platformer this generation so far, and Super Mario Galaxy is indeed the best one yet, and from the looks of it, will be for some time.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 6:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bah! Conformity...

It's sad when people get reprimanded for differing tastes. It's no wonder why review scores are all pretty much the same. If you don't like one-two "good" games then all of a sudden your entire taste in video games is put into question.

For the record, I thought Super Mario Galaxy was a bit of a let down. I was really into it at first, but after getting about halfway through it felt like the game was stretched out just to give it more playtime. That and Bee Mario and Boo Mario were horrible; you'd think Miyamoto could have made more interesting use of the Wiimote for new Mario suits...

Didn't much care for Mass Effect either; the gameplay was dull. I typically have a difficult time with these Action/RPG hybrids. They rarely have the thoughtful, strategic planning of a turn-based RPG, and yet, they are no where near as exciting as full action titles. I also have a difficult time plugging several hours of my life into a game before it "starts to get good."

So does this mean I have universally bad taste in video games? Not necessarily, it just means those two games didn't do it for me.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:14PM FernandoRocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Joystiq: Giving free publicity to Variety and Edge this day?

Better use the effort to fix the comment section. Comments keep dissapearing.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Galaxy is a great game, yet I had it since Christmas and I only have about 35 stars. I guess I’m not into platformers as much as I used to be. That or it’s a case of franchise fatigue.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:19PM Saria the Cat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
No game is without its flaws, and Mass Effect and SMG have theirs. But that doesn't change the fact that they are *good* games. I thought the first Fable was awesome, too. Personally, I can't really expect anything enlightening from this guy if I already fundamentally disagree with his game preferences. I just hope his praise of Fable 2 doesn't mean it will be an epic fail.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Obviously I'm biased since I only own a 360 and do not own a PS3 or a Wii (but do follow the games on each platform). My thoughts on R2 are from articles read on the game and the E3 stage video and trailer. Sorry if you don't like what you are about to hear.

Honest to god, I think he's Sony biased and this is not a true analytical opinion. Resistance 2 offers more, yes, but how he can call the improvements to Gears 2 "minor" is beyond me. Feature on feature, Gears 2 is offering a good deal more than Resistance is (remember, this is by amounts of features, not saying one game is better than the other) and a hell of alot more than it's original.

Resistance has a good amount of enemies on screen, but the graphical fidelity of it is slightly average (better than average, but comon, it's no stunner now is it?). Now look at Gears - some sites awarded it Best Graphics of E3 (look at IGN for example) so it's obviously a great looking game as we know, but look at the amount of enemies on screen combined with what's going on. It's immense. You didn't get that in Gears 1.

Frankly, like most analysts, this guy is talking right out of his backside.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 5:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Obviously I'm biased..."

And who isn't?

Owning all three consoles doesn't make you any less of a fanboy and I hate those insecure assholes who try to give their statements extra credibility by saying stuff in the lines of "I own all three console so I'm totally unbiased and have more credibility than one-console-owners.".

I don't like the PS3 because it's way too expensive in UK and inferior to 360 imo.That's also why I don't own one.Now if I got a PS3 through another "Get a free..." phone contract, would it suddenly change the basis of my opinions? People, please stop being a bunch of pussies and apologizing for voicing out your opinions as well as those retards who use the PSWii60 excuse.If you have an opinion,stick to it to the end because after all, you can't possibly name a single person on this planet who ISN'T biased.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 11:15PM philmcfail said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hooligunn, I just think that Gears 1 just offered a hell of a more fun experience than Resistance 1 (When both first came out of course). Resistance 1 was real generic shooter to me, even with all the crazy guns they had. They only thing that made me buy it was 40 online multiplayer. (which honestly didn't turn out to make it more fun) But looking at R2, it doesn't seem half bad. I mean way better graphics, new locales (which aren't generically grey, brown, and black), 8 player online coop with diff story, and rumors of the game having a cover system sound cool, but I still got mixed feelings for it. I think the thing with R2 is that the predecessor was such a letdown compared that its seemed drastically better with the new features. Gears 2 was practically destined to be good even when before it was announced.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"But opinions are like assholes right?"

Dude, that's totally not cool.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjoined_Twins
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:28PM Ruinkind said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Didn't like Mass Effect? I'm Asari, but Ben Fritz lives in another universe.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PUUUUUNS
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PUUUUUNS
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 9:54PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
http://www.instantrimshot.com


Yessir, you are correct sir! Heyooooooo!
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:28PM warmonk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is exactly how I feel!
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:30PM Ranus Studios said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be fair, Galaxy got on my nerves, too. I traded it in for Smash Brothers Brawl.

Which, by the way, is getting on my nerves too.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Eh, as if I go to Variety for gaming news/opinions.

I will say that Gears 2 doesn't look like that huge of an improvement, at least from a gameplay standpoint.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 4:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whoa this post is pretty unfair. First the title isn't right. I have no problem with the awards at all. I just personally disagree with the majority of the winners. And in fact as I note, I like most of the winning games ("Fallout 3," "Spore," LittleBigPlanet," "Left4Dead"), they just weren't my first choices in the categories they won. And I certainly never said I "didn't care" for "Super Mario Galaxy." I wrote that I "didn't lavish superlatives" on it and if you read the review, it's positive, just not as positive as most others.
And for what it's worth, all the commenters except "Just a guy" had at least some positive things to say. Yeesh.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 5:45PM Ludwig Kietzmann said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hi Ben,

Please see the update to our original post. We totally agree with you. Well, except on Mirror's Edge. :)
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 8:47PM Saria the Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ludwig: Thank you! I was about to doubt Joystiq's integrity for a moment after reading Ben's article but you quickly remedied that with the fair post change. :) Another reason I love this place.
Reply

Posted: Aug 13th 2008 3:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hi Ben
Sure... you say a couple of nice things about SMG, but let me give you some homework: Go back to your published article, and count the number of sentences where you have said something directly positive and then count the number of sentences where you use a negative connotation. I think you'll see why people perceive you as not caring for the game.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 5:13PM Jawmuncher said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This guy is AWESOME!
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2008 5:16PM mezzaninex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. Kudos to him.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW