| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (76)

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3 Fanboy:

Please stop posting articles from this person. They are pointless, poorly written and boring.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:21PM Andrew Yoon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's your choice not to read these articles. I for one find them incredibly funny and insightful, and they add something different to the site other than the usual news and previews you get from us. I have the utmost faith in Kylie to take your constructive feedback and really engage the readership. If you still don't like it, you can just remember not to tune in on Saturdays at noon.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@ Andrew Yoon

So I guess you better tell all the readers on this thread to stop tuning in.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 3:03PM Pico said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do you feel better about yourself now, Franky?
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 3:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Pico_Suarez

Uhhh...does it bother you that I am right and everyone else on this thread agree with me?


Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 3:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it IS a rant, it is even filed under Rants. the article has no grammatical errors. don't read it if it bores you. there are PLENTY of other sites and blogs to read last time i checked the internet. :P

Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 4:52PM haas599 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dont mind these rants being on PS3fanboy one bit, but I think there is a grammatical error.

I couldn't help but wonder if my extended absence from the PS3 had taught be anything

shouldn't it be "me" instead of "be"
Reply

Posted: Aug 20th 2008 12:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ryan -- In paragraph 1 of the article... "drooling at the though of returning home" -- it should be "thought"...

(I'm just teasing... still, the lack of editing on official blog articles is a personal pet peeve...)
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 12:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not only was I unable to determine the point of this article, but I was frequently annoyed by the unnecessary use of flowery language. There comes a point where you're being clever, and then there comes a point where you're just being obnoxious--and I think this author stepped over the line.

The writing is simply too convoluted. I think the following sentence makes my point:

"Not an ignoble game to be sure, though in the interest of full disclosure and at the risk of inciting a riot I will say that VII has never been at the top of my Final Fantasy games list."

To be fair, there were some spots where the article was very clear and fun to read, I just think the author needs to work a bit more to find a rhythm and avoid the pitfalls of too many flowery words. Instead of reading like a fun article, it read like some self-important British author giving me a lecture.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:20PM DVincent said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Couldn't have said it better myself
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Agree 100%.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No flowery words? So much for my piece on PixelJunk Eden... ^_^
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Instead of reading like a fun article, it read like some self-important British author giving me a lecture."

RACIST!!

On a serious note. Having read your comment (flowery, pitfalls, stepping over the methaphorical literary line into being obnoxious etc. etc.) I feel I have just been given a lecture by some self important kid on the internet.

I want 18 seconds of my life back!
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Despite my qualms with the author's more "layered" writing style, I have to give it up to his/her parents because "Kylie Prymus" is a badass name.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Bramf:

Hah, I guess I plead guilty.

@ Kylie: My apologies if I came across like an armchair critic. I do enjoy reading your articles, I guess I just take issue with how they sometimes seem like they're a little too academic. Then again, you probably write lots of research papers that require exactly that--it's got to be tough to write for two extremely different audiences.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 4:01PM Fane1024 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
baster

The only thing wrong with that sentence is that the primary clause is a fragment.

If you don't understand it, that's your shortcoming.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 5:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously? You couldn't understand what that sentence was implying?

It means, in simplified language:

"Not an ignoble game to be sure, though in the interest of full disclosure and at the risk of inciting a riot I will say that VII has never been at the top of my Final Fantasy games list."

It's not a bad game, but I just gotta say, even if it might make some of you idiots out there pissy and bitchy, FFVII was never my favorite Final Fantasy game.

There was that better? Would you like a cookie now? Maybe u can has 5th grade edumacation?
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 7:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Phrobably:

Of course I understood what it was implying, but that's why there's a comments system here; so we can voice our opinions on an article. I'm free to make constructive criticisms of an author's writing style (even though I may have been a tad harsh), just like you're free to be an anonymous prick.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2008 3:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I completely agree. It was subjective, while keeping a personal standpoint and not trying to be the every-man, or every-blog-critic.

Also, I believe in all actuality that someone with a PhD should be able to spell correctly, especially if they are doing articles online, where your primary method of communication is your words. More so than your PhD, correct and effective communication, as well as regular demeanor are what will get you readers and the respect you deserve for your extensive schooling.

Keep writing!

I personally only come to PS3Fanboy for the news, updates and previews, and to see cool titles that you use, only to note that it's a blog post is a bit of a let down, but I hate to see you flamed exceedingly also just for expressing yourself.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 12:28PM Bobrek said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What do any of Kylie's posts mean? Ordinarilly I wouldn't post so negatively, but I really do wonder as to the point of them. Possibly interesting posts heavily laden with pretentious insight. They put me in mind of when novelists tell their stories in pointlessly obtuse language to try and show off their academic prowess, when all they really do is alienate the reader.Just for the record I don't dislike intelligence, just meandering and pointless articles.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 12:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Is this a joke?

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 12:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I agree with everyone else. This guys post are lame quasi intellectual mush. I don't want to be a dick but his posts are the low point of this blog. Please spend those resources on something/someone else. Besides that, I love the site!

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 12:56PM SuperGayParade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
he's doing it for fun and for you all. I liked the article (although admittedly I skimmed a lot of it)

Maybe you guys aren't retrospective enough?!

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
An interesting accusation from someone who skimmed the article!
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 3:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think Kylie is a she not a he.

....did most people think they read KYLE Prymus? lol
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 4:15PM LettucePrey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Introspective perhaps? Either way may work really...

I generally enjoy her articles (yes, I see the links but considering the staff assures us she's female, I think I'll go with their assessment). A bit obtuse at times, but certainly makes one think. Applying philosophy to video gaming is a novel concept. Few folks can appreciate the merits of both.

Don't like? Don't read it. Better yet, go read a book and then come back. Peace.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 12:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FAIL

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you guys think these posts are boring and worthless, heres an idea.....DON'T READ THEM!

As much as I respect you guys in the comments section, I hate it when you talk about how these posts are a waste of space, some of us actually wouldn't mind reading this stuff.

This comment is directed to everyone who says these posts are worthless, NOT to the people who say they are too confusing, because they are, so Kylie, can you dumb it down a bit please =P

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lame. No more please.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i've gotta agree with the rest of the negativity. give us a column not an essay.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:37PM ssg said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Can't say the guy in the picture is going to get a ride anytime soon.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So games need stories, but sometimes a story should be easy to get into when you're coming back to it after a break.

... and you used 1000 words.

Pablum.

Posted: Aug 20th 2008 11:48PM KaCeX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this is the one response i really liked!! haha great one!! :)
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I liked the concept of the article, but I'm sorry to say this; the style of writing was just awful. I hope it was deliberatly trying to come across as pretentious for pretentious sake because all I could think of when I read was that it was exactly how it came across. I'm not saying "dumb it down," but there comes a point where trying to sound overly intelligent has the opposite effect. Please take this as constructive criticism rather than just negative criticism.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 4:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All university students suffer from the delusion that they have to go around an idea instead of through it. That's why they can never write a nice, short declarative sentence.

We've all been (will be) guilty of it. The challenge is rising above it. Unless you read Faulkner for fun, in which case you are beyond help.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:54PM cushenstein said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man, what's with all the negativity? I personally think these are interesting. It's just one person's musings on life, and whether or not I agree with them I just think it's interesting to hear what someone else is thinking on a deeper level.

I think some very good advice was given in the comments above: if you don't like this column, don't read it. It's that simple.

As for complaints about the complexity / showiness of the writing, I personally think it's refreshing, given all the internet-speak that we read every day. Also, it says at the top of the article that Kylie's a PhD candidate, which most likely means Kylie has to write in much more complex prose on a daily basis, so I don't think that any of this "hard writing" is intentional or meant to show off Kylie's "academic prowess." If Kylie wanted to do that, the whole article probably would have been written as one very long sentence.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Surprisingly interesting read. I do agree with some of the other comments but I actually enjoyed reading through the article.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:58PM Ben Forbes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Firstly, what is this, YouTube? Comments like "FAIL" and "Lame." are no more clever than just grunting in disapproval.

Yes, this post is "different" to PS3 Fanboy's traditional style, but it's a new(ish) writer, so give them a goddamn chance. Kylie is being entertaining here, but perhaps it's a more subtle entertainment than we're used to.

Personally, I liked it BECAUSE it seemed to have many tangents, but that's what makes it quirky, and not what we've seen before.

[insert witty closing anecdote or idiom]

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Me agree pleez dum doun all posts so me can unndrstan them. me no like think. no like big word. just small, like brain.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 6:47PM JaseH said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
HAHAHA.

GOLD.

Thanks for giving me a laugh. *Thumbs up*

_____________________
JaseH.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was pretty good if not verbose at times. Keep them coming m8!!

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is Kylie male or female? Not that it makes a difference at all. I just got the feeling they were a she.

Thought the article was ok, good to get a different type of posting on here rather than the normal previews/reviews/news.

PSN: superted2day

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i pronounced it Ky-Lee when i first read the name. and from the incredibly long, intelligently written essay (not to mention that cute "^_^" response from Kylie on the first page) i'm guessing female.

alot of people here just don't know how to treat a lady i guess...
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Some of these comments make me laugh. The backlash over something being too flowery, pointless, prententious, boring and poorly written - particularly amusing given the usual standard of news posts on this blog (no offence intended) - when you don't have to read it and it only takes a couple of minutes to read. I'm guessing if you are visiting PS3 fanboy on a Saturday you probably don't have much else to do so why not relax.

The internet is nothing else if a place to complain about nothing in particular.

So Kylie, if you are reading this I like reading your posts. Your language is beautiful in its excess. In a world of concise sound bites, abreviations and copius acronyms I find it refreshing to read the musings and thoughts of a gamer outside the usual drivel I get to experience on blogs and message boards.
I guess your biggest hurdle is convincing people to read something for readings sake. Maybe you should give away trophies when people read different parts of your column. Lord knows everything has to have a point and a context before it becomes worthwhile.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 4:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dilly dally, shilly wally, flammy wally, woo de doo. Contextualisation cheesy wotsits marvellous.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The entire story is summarized in the final paragraphs, children.

You can't expect a doctor in philosophy to speak layman, lol It just comes with the territory.

The author was speaking of CC's side quests, in direct correlation to their own life. While being bored on the road offers no real side quests, the PSP does, and in turn gives the author their own personal side quest.

A little too much filler, but a refreshing point of view nonetheless.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree with some of the negativity. But hell, I am doing the exact same thing in Final Fantasy Crisis Core, I have spent the last 3 hours of gameplay at a save point leveling up. He brings up some great points and hope to read more.

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:58PM Pico said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I enjoyed the article.

Featured Stories

Image

Now Playing: May 21-27, 2012

Posted on May 21st 2012 2:50PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW