| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (22)

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 11:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Everybody loves -to sue- Nintendo!

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 11:17AM MrTyzik said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So no one else is allowed to develop their own orentation-based, tremor canceling, high accuracy, low latency handheld controller? If you want one of those, you are required to license it from these guys? Logitech chose to but I just never understand why someone else can't make it themselves. I highly doubt Nintendo bought the reference hardware (or printed out the patent) and reverse engineered it.

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 11:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, when you put a Wii Remote next to one of those rings, you have to admit it's pretty hard to tell the two apart.

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 11:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anyone else wonder why products that have been on the market for almost two years get sued for patent infringement... It's almost as if these companies wait to make sure there will be ample money to be made...

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 11:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I feel bad for Nintendo with all these law suits. They actually manage to be innovative and be successful with it, and everybody wants a piece of the action, legitimately or otherwise. Tell Hillcrest to get over it.

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 1:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you go to the Freespace website, the last sentence in the introductory paragraph says "Freespace can also be adapted for use in game controllers".

$20 says that the sentence was added after the Wii came out.

It also has no mention of optical sensors, which is the basis of the Wii remote technology, no?

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 1:58PM KidDynamic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, sure, IR sensing is the primary control, but it also has internal accelerometers and processes the input to give the Wii something clean to work with. The lawsuit could refer to any detail in the whole process.

So annoying.
Reply

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 2:45PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And so it begins again

Though, hopefully, it won't get as far as that ludicrous Classic Controller one

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you guys notice that in the "News" section of the Hillcrest Labs website they link to a story published on April 4 2008 titled "In Wii's wake, affordable motion sensors may be at hand"?

Back in April they were willing to simply ride Wii's coattails. Now they're looking for more...

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm just going to start boycotting all products related to companies trying to sue Nintendo. They don't even have the same freakin target audience! BAD FORM! And sorry logitech. You lease from Hillcrest so I guess that means I won't be buying your products either.

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm just going to start boycotting all products related to companies trying to sue Nintendo. They don't even have the same freakin target audience! BAD FORM! And sorry logitech. You lease from Hillcrest so I guess that means I won't be buying your products either.

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 4:56PM Nightwish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yet another patent troll with another obvious patent. Good, the more this crap happens, the more likely it is for the patent system to be overhauled at last.

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 8:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I've been ravenously reading all the blogs on this one. Because its just so laughable. If you look at the actual patents they are talking about, its hilarious! The fourth one about the screen control method isn't even anything like the Wii Channels. The other three on "motion control" basically try to cover every conceivable kind of remote motion control that anyone could possibly think of. Its SO vague that I can't believe that it was ever allowed to make it through the patent process to begin with! This is just another example of a company trying to sponge off of someone making it big. Its pathetic, and it really needs to stop.

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 8:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The patent on the Guitar Hero guitar peripheral is labeled "Musical Game Controller."

It pays to be vague in the patent industry, but they have to be exact as well, or they won't get patented.
Reply

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 9:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, exactly. And none of the patents from this company really seem to be specific about much of ANYTHING. They are FULL of vague references to just about anything that anyone could possibly think of after them.
Reply

Posted: Aug 21st 2008 8:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone else think that some companies are actually taking really old patents and prototype schematics or something like that and fleshing them out, claiming to have an actual product?

It seems to me like the reason they're suing so late is because they never had a product, just semi-relevant patents. Has anyone ever seen one of these in a store ever?

I know that probably isn't true, but whatever.

Posted: Aug 22nd 2008 2:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is as stupid as trying to sue someone for manufacturing bikes, or coffee mugs. It's such a general concept that you simply can't claim full ownership of it.

Posted: Aug 22nd 2008 5:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am going to patent taking a dump, and whenever anyone goes to drop a deuce I will swirl up out of the U Bend and demand twenty bucks.

My lawyer will of course be hiding in the tank ready to ambush in case negotiations break down.

Posted: Aug 22nd 2008 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mrtyzik apparently you have never been to asia, they COPY everything, technology, purses, watches, consoles, anything and everything, saying that nintendo doesnt reverse engineer anything is absurd, asians copy everything, copyright doesnt mean squat to them, even the big companies

Posted: Aug 22nd 2008 7:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Way to be racist. "Asians" copy everything? Hardly. illegitimate vendors sell direct copies of products. Most of these products are manufactured in China, but lets not point our fingers at all "Asians" for questionable products from a few knockoff manufacturers. There's plenty of legit Chinese businesses as well.

Nintendo is a legit company.

The Wiimote is not a replication of another product.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 1:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Have a look at the internet archive to see how their site has changed over time... Unfortunately you don't get a lot but it would appear that their market was a hand held 3d mouse more than a game controller... at least IMHO...

Posted: Nov 1st 2008 11:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Next thing you know, there going to find a way to sue Nintendo for their built-in camera DS.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW