Meet 1ickTh3P0l3. He can vote. But why tell him that? When Rock the Vote comes to Xbox Live on Monday (the start of the Democratic National Convention), it won't find the disempowered young citizens eager to be mobilized it's expecting. In fact, the Xbox Live community is a conglomerate of well-organized sub-divisions -- or "clans" -- which communicate through a modified, verbalization of "133t speak" with a large admixture of derisive language; including racial, ethnic, gender, sex, and religious slurs. These nihilistic hatemongers shoot first, typically with rocket launchers, and top it off with a teabag over your dead body. Oh wait, these are just the Xbox Live users under 18. Imagine how the ones of legal voting age spend their nights and weekends ... And you want them rocking what now?
[Image credit: Jeff the Trojan]
Reader Comments (121)
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:00PM h0mi said
"From 2000-2004 the entire government was ruled by the Republican Party."
2003-2004. In 2001-2002 the senate was controlled by Democrats.
2003-2004. In 2001-2002 the senate was controlled by Democrats.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:02PM leobebes said
@duke
I know, I don't mean to sound like an arrogant, absolutist prick by saying that. I don't want to suggest you are an ignorant asshole for having differing viewpoints. But we are at a cross roads right now, and I am trying to convince those who don't want Obama that we either keep going where were going or choose another path. This election is as black and white as it has ever been since the Harding party ideal/FDR.
@servo
We are talking about realistic choices here. Your attempts to vote in a third party are admirable, but the libertarian movement is currently too frayed to be taken seriously. They really have a racism problem in some of their ranks.
I know, I don't mean to sound like an arrogant, absolutist prick by saying that. I don't want to suggest you are an ignorant asshole for having differing viewpoints. But we are at a cross roads right now, and I am trying to convince those who don't want Obama that we either keep going where were going or choose another path. This election is as black and white as it has ever been since the Harding party ideal/FDR.
@servo
We are talking about realistic choices here. Your attempts to vote in a third party are admirable, but the libertarian movement is currently too frayed to be taken seriously. They really have a racism problem in some of their ranks.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 5:15PM leobebes said
Hey Duke thanks for understanding. I am not going to tell you to vote for Obama. One of the reasons that people stick with McCain is because they think.
A. Obama is a socialist
B. Obama is inexperienced
C. Religious reasons pro life/anti gay marriage
Lets start with point A. Raising taxes can be construed to some as being a socialist stance. Now in this current state we live in, there is no way this economy keep going unless there is re write of tax laws. We cannot keep continue to fight wars without a tax increase, it has never been done in the history of the United States. McCain has show no reservations about going to war with another Middle Eastern Country, he also shown support for the continued Bush tax cuts. How do we sustain our march towards "spreading democracy" without some type of consistent net positive revenue stream? Because the Iraq war has no paid for itself despite assurances by Bush/Cheney that it would.
B. Obama is inexperienced: Bush was a Governor of Texas. Came from a family full with ties to political history, Dick Cheney his VP worked with the Nixon administration. Will probably have an entire chapter dedicated to him in your grandchildren's history textbook...unfavorably.
C. Religious aspect: When your parents lose their home or the economy is in the shitter no amount of prayer or religious dedication will put food on your table. Religion is a personal matter not a political matter. Besides religious motivation in politics swings a little too close to a theocratic nature. You got to respect the Constitution.
Reply
A. Obama is a socialist
B. Obama is inexperienced
C. Religious reasons pro life/anti gay marriage
Lets start with point A. Raising taxes can be construed to some as being a socialist stance. Now in this current state we live in, there is no way this economy keep going unless there is re write of tax laws. We cannot keep continue to fight wars without a tax increase, it has never been done in the history of the United States. McCain has show no reservations about going to war with another Middle Eastern Country, he also shown support for the continued Bush tax cuts. How do we sustain our march towards "spreading democracy" without some type of consistent net positive revenue stream? Because the Iraq war has no paid for itself despite assurances by Bush/Cheney that it would.
B. Obama is inexperienced: Bush was a Governor of Texas. Came from a family full with ties to political history, Dick Cheney his VP worked with the Nixon administration. Will probably have an entire chapter dedicated to him in your grandchildren's history textbook...unfavorably.
C. Religious aspect: When your parents lose their home or the economy is in the shitter no amount of prayer or religious dedication will put food on your table. Religion is a personal matter not a political matter. Besides religious motivation in politics swings a little too close to a theocratic nature. You got to respect the Constitution.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 5:27PM (Unverified) said
@Leo
funny thing about church and state is that it was mearly a letter to one of Jefferson's advisors as opposed to something that our founding fathers wrote in the constitution or even agreed upon. It seems if you ask any person about seperation of church and state they will say it is in the constitution. Our founding fathers had the foresight to put it there. Wrong.
I think the moral decay of our society can be directly attributed to our opulent lifestyles and the fact that God has been removed from our lives for reasons of political pandering and political correctness.
I am not advocating forced religon on anyone but I am saying that America would be in better shape if the guiding principles of religon were taught in the public school system (civics wouldn't hurt either). After all, our country was founded on the premise of religous freedom and all of our laws evoloved from these same righteous edicts.
My mom always told me the two things you never discuss are religon and politics. Whoops.
Reply
funny thing about church and state is that it was mearly a letter to one of Jefferson's advisors as opposed to something that our founding fathers wrote in the constitution or even agreed upon. It seems if you ask any person about seperation of church and state they will say it is in the constitution. Our founding fathers had the foresight to put it there. Wrong.
I think the moral decay of our society can be directly attributed to our opulent lifestyles and the fact that God has been removed from our lives for reasons of political pandering and political correctness.
I am not advocating forced religon on anyone but I am saying that America would be in better shape if the guiding principles of religon were taught in the public school system (civics wouldn't hurt either). After all, our country was founded on the premise of religous freedom and all of our laws evoloved from these same righteous edicts.
My mom always told me the two things you never discuss are religon and politics. Whoops.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 5:54PM leobebes said
@immortal
I hope I wasn't coming across as disingenuous in my attempt to establish separation of church and state.Yes you are right there is nothing in the Constitution that unequivocally states an absolute separation of church and state. The direct quote of "separation of church and state" was written like you say by Jefferson in the Treaty of Tripoli. Which had no bearing on the Constitution.
However, in the Constitution it does explicitly state that government cannot endorse a specific religion but it also states that you cannot prevent the exercise of. Which means if you want to assemble private citizens in a form of prayer or religious demonstration you can but expecting the government to endorse your prayer or even make it a mandatory implementation to all citizens would be deemed unconstitutional. You can prayer groups in school during recess or after school, you can have Christian clubs, but you cannot have teachers make everyone bow their heads in prayer at the beginning of every class.
Now some might say that religion must be protected in a public setting or in courtrooms due to majority rule or continued tradition. Now why is this unconstitutional? Of course we know its not just religion that people are defending here it is a derivative of Christian protestantism that is being advocated. In 20 years some communities in the country will have a Hispanic majority. Most of these Hispanics are Catholic. If we go by majority rule and disregard the Constitution, they can easily vote in mandatory hail mary's for everyone despite Protestantism's reservations of the Virgin Mary being a divine entity. See the conundrum this creates if we have government sanctioned religion?
I think the one class that all school systems would benefit from if it were an implemented course of the curriculum would be critical thinking. Logic based thinking I think would provide an edge to other school systems around the world. If you haven't take this class, take it. It is going to change your life and your perceptions of the world.
Reply
I hope I wasn't coming across as disingenuous in my attempt to establish separation of church and state.Yes you are right there is nothing in the Constitution that unequivocally states an absolute separation of church and state. The direct quote of "separation of church and state" was written like you say by Jefferson in the Treaty of Tripoli. Which had no bearing on the Constitution.
However, in the Constitution it does explicitly state that government cannot endorse a specific religion but it also states that you cannot prevent the exercise of. Which means if you want to assemble private citizens in a form of prayer or religious demonstration you can but expecting the government to endorse your prayer or even make it a mandatory implementation to all citizens would be deemed unconstitutional. You can prayer groups in school during recess or after school, you can have Christian clubs, but you cannot have teachers make everyone bow their heads in prayer at the beginning of every class.
Now some might say that religion must be protected in a public setting or in courtrooms due to majority rule or continued tradition. Now why is this unconstitutional? Of course we know its not just religion that people are defending here it is a derivative of Christian protestantism that is being advocated. In 20 years some communities in the country will have a Hispanic majority. Most of these Hispanics are Catholic. If we go by majority rule and disregard the Constitution, they can easily vote in mandatory hail mary's for everyone despite Protestantism's reservations of the Virgin Mary being a divine entity. See the conundrum this creates if we have government sanctioned religion?
I think the one class that all school systems would benefit from if it were an implemented course of the curriculum would be critical thinking. Logic based thinking I think would provide an edge to other school systems around the world. If you haven't take this class, take it. It is going to change your life and your perceptions of the world.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 6:32PM leobebes said
"Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
Even though its not in the Constitution its still an extension of the founding father's intent on the reason the Constitution was written. Therefore ironing out any argued subtext associated with the initial intention of the Constitution.
Reply
Even though its not in the Constitution its still an extension of the founding father's intent on the reason the Constitution was written. Therefore ironing out any argued subtext associated with the initial intention of the Constitution.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 6:49PM Knight Marquise said
Mcpoop~
I have =never= agreed with a thing you have ever written. So, I about choked on my lunch reading your post (copied below) as I agree 100%.
Also...I supported Paul, but can not, in good conscience, support Obama. I seriously dislike McCain, but will vote for him over Obama. Obviously, I am a conservative republican, and one who is not very happy with our choices this year.
Kudos to you and your post:
" think the moral decay of our society can be directly attributed to our opulent lifestyles and the fact that God has been removed from our lives for reasons of political pandering and political correctness.
I am not advocating forced religon on anyone but I am saying that America would be in better shape if the guiding principles of religon were taught in the public school system (civics wouldn't hurt either). After all, our country was founded on the premise of religous freedom and all of our laws evoloved from these same righteous edicts. "
Reply
I have =never= agreed with a thing you have ever written. So, I about choked on my lunch reading your post (copied below) as I agree 100%.
Also...I supported Paul, but can not, in good conscience, support Obama. I seriously dislike McCain, but will vote for him over Obama. Obviously, I am a conservative republican, and one who is not very happy with our choices this year.
Kudos to you and your post:
" think the moral decay of our society can be directly attributed to our opulent lifestyles and the fact that God has been removed from our lives for reasons of political pandering and political correctness.
I am not advocating forced religon on anyone but I am saying that America would be in better shape if the guiding principles of religon were taught in the public school system (civics wouldn't hurt either). After all, our country was founded on the premise of religous freedom and all of our laws evoloved from these same righteous edicts. "
Posted: Aug 22nd 2008 10:29AM Knight Marquise said
Leo...
The other funny thing is 9 times out of 10 I +1 your post because I agree with your stance on video games, however, in politics, we're obviously polar opposites.
I'd be happy to discuss politics with you should you wish. You can reach me at silverbearpowdercoating[at]gmail[dot]com
Reply
The other funny thing is 9 times out of 10 I +1 your post because I agree with your stance on video games, however, in politics, we're obviously polar opposites.
I'd be happy to discuss politics with you should you wish. You can reach me at silverbearpowdercoating[at]gmail[dot]com
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:04PM Mr Khan said
It is amusing how the joystiq fanboy camps don't reflect at all on political allegiances, seeing tmac and samfish agree, or seeing Crono (if anyone remembers him), and myself disagree
That being said: while get-out-the-vote groups can have agendas, their primary effort is usually to just get people to vote. Like when the NAACP canvases poor inner-city communities around election season. Sure, they'd like them to vote democrat, but they're just as happy to see them vote at all
LIVE is a good place to go if you want to target the largely unregistered Youth of america.
That being said: while get-out-the-vote groups can have agendas, their primary effort is usually to just get people to vote. Like when the NAACP canvases poor inner-city communities around election season. Sure, they'd like them to vote democrat, but they're just as happy to see them vote at all
LIVE is a good place to go if you want to target the largely unregistered Youth of america.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:12PM xTHE MEAT said
I'll bet more than half the people sucking Obamas ass right now dont even show up at the polls.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:36PM (Unverified) said
Right...because the 4 million NEW voters he brought out at the primaries won't bother voting again in the main election. That's horrible logic.
Reply
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 4:40PM Jude said
I just love it when Joystiq finds a way to miraculously blend my 2 favorite things on the interwebs: Politics & Video Games.
:)
:)
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 4:56PM (Unverified) said
This is a great idea. Here's hoping Obama wins
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 5:19PM (Unverified) said
This article is all sarcasm and lacks real depth or constructive criticism. I would think a popular industry blog would rejoice in the fact that a game service is working with politicians to get more young voters AND prove to the world that we aren't all immature racists and sexists. I lost a lot of respect for Joystiq today. Go read the Rock the Vote article on Kotaku if you want some real news.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 5:45PM Jude said
"Go read the Rock the Vote article on Kotaku if you want some real news."
Or http://english.aljazeera.net/ like a good little terrorist!
(just kidding, but you are being kind of a jerk here, lighten up)
Reply
Or http://english.aljazeera.net/ like a good little terrorist!
(just kidding, but you are being kind of a jerk here, lighten up)
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 6:40PM Saria the Cat said
I don't see anything wrong with motivating kids to get off their butts and learning about politics and why it's important to vote. There's a reason the interests of minorities, youth, and the poor are underrepresented in our politics---they don't vote. Politicians care about constituents. Become a voter and they'll start caring about you, too.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 10:51PM Sinth said
All I can say is that I want to elect a democrat. I don't care who it is. Please tax me more! Tell me what to do! I hate rich people. Give me more money for doing nothing. Take my guns please! Take away my video games because they are too violent (thanks Tipper Gore). The government, especially the IRS, is so efficient I want them to run my health care as well! Vote for Obama!
Posted: Aug 22nd 2008 11:52AM Jude said
All I can say is that I want to elect a Republican. I don't care who he is as long as he is old, white and publicly says he loves Jesus, even if he really has no idea what he's talking about spiritually, or otherwise. Please borrow more money from China for more worthless wars based on lies so that my Grandchildren will be born in debt to those damn Commies. Please take away all of my civil liberties and right to privacy and habeus corpus for that matter. I hate poor people especially if they are disabled in any way. They shouldn't be given any kind of chance to survive. Just let me keep my guns so I can kill them if they get too close. I worked so hard to be born to rich parents who utilized countless social programs completely taken for granted as being such to gain their wealth, but I shouldn't ever have to give anything back. The Government has become bigger than any other in History under Republicans, but I like it when they talk about "smaller government". The insurance industry is so efficient and loves their profits that 43 million people without insurance don't mind that they're the one's running our healthcare and are rewarded for not doing their job. And I absolutely loath the Constitution and the separation of powers with every fibre in my body. All I need is a dictator who is a puppet of multi-national corporations to tell me who to hate. Vote for Bush... er.. McCain!
Reply
Posted: Aug 22nd 2008 2:40PM leobebes said
Well I am with a private health plan (HMO), and let me tell its shit too.
Featured Stories
Super Joystiq Podcast 004: 38 Studios meltdown, Gravity Rush, Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, Dragon's Dogma
Posted on May 25th 2012 3:30PM





