| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (75)

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:35PM Thief said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crap... they're all pretty awesome, but i'd probably have to say either 1 or 3.

The third one makes me want to turn my monitor upside down, and will most likely catch attention easier.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:37PM Thief said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yah fix that, number 3... it has more thought to it and makes you stare at it a bit longer.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Number 3 clearly.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:36PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I voted 3. I love the contrast between them.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:54PM pkpk523 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
obviously 3, like everyone else says. Actually, I really like the Playstation Network tab. Kinda classes it up for me for whatever reason. But the "only for playstation" thing looks craptacular and cheap.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AGREED.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 4:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hrm, generic FPS box cover #1 or generic FPS box cover #2?

Think I'll go with #3 as well. I mean, this thing does need to stand out at Wall Mart, right? Well #3 does that.

Make it so, make the change!
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 4:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Number three! Number three!

My opinion counts!

Number three!
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 5:00PM IslandLife said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yup, #3
the other two look too much like they used a generic cover design template.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Definitely #3
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:36PM Joanna D said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
New "Only on PlayStation" and "PlayStation Network" bar looks hideous.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Same can be said for the only on Xbox 360 boxes they stamp on.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:01PM foxhound said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They never put the 'for humans only' stamp I lobbied for. :\
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:04PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whether or not the 360 branding looks hideous has nothing to do with what Neil said.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i like it, i just hope it doesnt come back to bite them when a game has that logo and later comes out for another system. kinda like bioshock on the 360.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
obviously Foxhound, you have never really lived
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They should make the entire tab smaller. The PS3 boxes are already vertically challenged, and instead of having a crappy "Only on PlayStation" that looks like it was done in MS Word by someone in the 6th grade, why not just a simple PS logo with the tag "Exclusive" or even "only".
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 5:16PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Marty, both of which have nothing to do with the topic, stop correcting people ¬_¬
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:37PM johnpaul12 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
doesn't the third one look like the Fable 2 cover? anyways the third one looks the best.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:39PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they're all kinda crappy.
3 is the most interesting, but it lacks any impact.
Still, if I wasn't so lazy and could bring myself to vote, I'd go with 3.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shame i can't see hi-res images of them because i have scripts blocked in my browser and IGN is such a steaming pile of script-laden bullshit.

*squints* Ummm, number one.
Brooding.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:46PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We have some higher-res versions in that gallery there.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ah, so you do, cheers.
I change my vote to number 3.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree with every one else...

Cover Art 3 FTW
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
3 Wins. 1&2 are the usual "Big Mean Motherfucker with Badass Shit in the background" and they suck.Got too stale and clichéd ever since every major shooter decided to have a cover like that.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:46PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Numero Tres!
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1 and 2 look generic and 3 looks better overall. I agree with Neil, the only on PS3 and PSN labels look crappy.

#3
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
3 ftw!
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Allowing me to vote on the cover art for the collector's edition makes me even more excited about this game!!!
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 2:58PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like the contrast of #3, and I know they are going for a mirror image effect, but I find the upside down portion to be a bit hard on the eyes. But part of that may be due to the fact that I can't easily flip it looking at the image on my monitor the way I would be able to flip the box.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:02PM foxhound said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I vote for #3.

But wait...

I'm in Florida. Thus, I say the ballot is confusing and needs a recount, which will result in the least favorite winning.

Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You don't get the American voting system at all! First, everyone votes for a cover, but it doesn't matter what the popular vote says because Sony will have a group in their hierarchy, let's call them the Electoral University, that will actually decide what they want. Get it?
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:05PM FredFredrickson said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
What is the point of voting when all three look like they dropped out of a generic cover-art machine?
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:25PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Why does your post look like it dropped out of a generic Marty PS3 article response machine?
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 4:34PM atrimus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
LOL!!! too true Vidikron
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 5:04PM FredFredrickson said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Ooh, burn. I don't respond this way to every PS3 article here, though, so not accurate.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
They all suck. I'd pick #3 since it's the best out of the garbage.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#3
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:06PM hsol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Third one. No close up face shots like MGS4 please.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:12PM Vordus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
These things are often decided by consumer surveys anyway. This is just turning a consumer survey into a marketing ploy.

Which is actually a pretty good idea.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:15PM nmezib said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
def num 3 ftw
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:17PM TangoCharlie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
3.

Numbers one and two have no real focal point. 3 is a mixed bag too, but at least has contrast.

Is this for real? If the studio can't make up its mind about THIS, which is a no-brainer, I hope they're doing a better job making decisions on gameplay issues.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why do they even let you vote obviously #3 was their original boxart but to raise publicity they created this poll. They give you two ugly choices which are duplicates meaning people who actually for some reason like that design will have to split votes among 1 and 2.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:31PM Jawmuncher said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They all suck besides cover 3.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I voted for # 1. It's solid. 3 has a nice idea but the execution isn't so hot. And 2 is just the worst.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:40PM QuePasa87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i like #3
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:41PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gee, I wonder!
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Number 1: the face is lacking detail and looks awful up close.
Number 2: replace face with models and voila.
Number 3: Looks guys we saw this awesome art for this game I think its was called Fable or Story or something anyway I think it would look great for our game, nobdy will notice the similarities."

Seriously all 3 options are rather rubbish, numbers 1 and 2 look ametuerish and number 3 is far too much like the Fable cover art.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#1 for sure. Why? Because it's the fugliest. We all know Killzone 2 is going to destroy this POS. No one wants to admit it, but Resistance 1 was very BLAH. People jumped on it just because it was the PS3's first EXCLUSIVE "next gen shooter". It was a way for the Sony fanboys to wave their angry fists in retaliation of the Xbox Haloers. Yes, I own a PS3. Yes, I own a 360. Yes I played both Resistance and Halo 3 (also mildly sucks!). Please don't yell at me - I'm just a post-apocalyptic dude with a gun in a hockey mask. I am also a pap filled douchebag so there, I saved you the trouble.
Reply

Posted: Aug 26th 2008 3:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"No one wants to admit it, but Resistance 1 was very BLAH."

WRONG!

I admitted it. Lots of times. This one looks to be waaaaay better though. Thats why people are giving a fuck.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW