The get-kids-voting people behind Rock the Vote recently spread out beyond the limitations of MTV's core demographic and decided to enlist the Xbox Live community, long known to be an e-bastion of enlightened political discourse. So, being the politically (and mathematically!) astute bloggers we are, we took a look at the live poll results, as presented by MyGamerCard.net.
As of press time, Democratic-nom Barack Obama had a commanding lead over Republican oppollnent John McCain, with 4,623 gamerpics in circulation versus just 2,076 – a nearly insurmountable lead of 2,547 gamerpics. That's fine, but what's the real story here? How the pundits and the pollsters – clouded by the corruption and cynicism of a two-party election system – have ignored the dark horse in this election: Gears of War skull face guy, who right now controls a most impressive 87,626 of The People's votes. Ignore the political machine and vote your conscience!
[Via Cheap Ass Gamer]
Reader Comments (131)
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:34PM (Unverified) said
Im not even into politics at all really and his speech last night made me want to register and vote for Obama. Lets just hope its not all just talk.
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:40PM (Unverified) said
Unfortunately, it is all talk. Just like Hillary's speech at the convention. Just like any speech that the Republicans will give. My vote is going to Gears of War skull face guy. Only he is running a practical, time-bound campaign that tackles the real issues like getting our troops out of Sera and chainsaw gun control.
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 1:13PM (Unverified) said
There needs to be a RPG where you are a poor baby abandoned by your communist father. Then you move to Indonesia and get a new Daddy for ten years then your grandparents help you get through high school. You go to law school then take some part time jobs become a small time politician make some good speeches become a big time politician and maybe become president. Maybe a GTA clone or something.
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 2:33PM beckerist said
There's a huge difference between being able to publicly speak / win elections and being president. Let's just hope he packs smart, benevolent people around him too to help him make smart decisions (this goes for McCain as well.)
Back on topic: I don't see this as anything statistical for Obama. The general XBOX population is most likely not of voting age, and just because you show an icon doesn't mean ANYTHING. It could just mean his supporters are more vocal, it could just mean more people liked the colors on the icon...there's no real way to tell.
Reply
Back on topic: I don't see this as anything statistical for Obama. The general XBOX population is most likely not of voting age, and just because you show an icon doesn't mean ANYTHING. It could just mean his supporters are more vocal, it could just mean more people liked the colors on the icon...there's no real way to tell.
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 2:33PM beckerist said
There's a huge difference between being able to publicly speak / win elections and being president. Let's just hope he packs smart, benevolent people around him too to help him make smart decisions (this goes for McCain as well.)
Back on topic: I don't see this as anything statistical for Obama. The general XBOX population is most likely not of voting age, and just because you show an icon doesn't mean ANYTHING. It could just mean his supporters are more vocal, it could just mean more people liked the colors on the icon...there's no real way to tell.
Reply
Back on topic: I don't see this as anything statistical for Obama. The general XBOX population is most likely not of voting age, and just because you show an icon doesn't mean ANYTHING. It could just mean his supporters are more vocal, it could just mean more people liked the colors on the icon...there's no real way to tell.
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:34PM (Unverified) said
Its funny looking at how many users pick Obama when the guy hates games. Pretty ironic don't you think
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:39PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said
Meh, everyone for thier own. Just because he may not like cheesecake (which I adore) doesn't make me dislike him, lol
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:40PM FernandoRocker said
What?
He said that people should not blame videoagames. He said that it was responsability of the parents to watch their kids.
Reply
He said that people should not blame videoagames. He said that it was responsability of the parents to watch their kids.
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:40PM (Unverified) said
To better prove my point
Unlike rival Hillary Clinton, Democratic presidential frontrunner Barack Obama does not have a significant track record with regard to video game content issues.
His speeches, however, often contain a reference to parents making their children "put away the video games." For Obama, video games seem to serve as a sort of metaphor for underachievement.
The Illinois senator repeated the theme last night in a victory speech following his big win over Clinton in the Wisconsin primary. As reported by the Washington Post, which carried a transcript and video of the speech, Obama said:
I know how hard it will be to alleviate poverty that has built up over centuries, how hard it will be to fix schools, because changing our schools will require not just money, but a change in attitudes.
We're going to have to parent better, and turn off the television set, and put the video games away, and instill a sense of excellence in our children, and that's going to take some time.
A day earlier, speaking to a college crowd in Youngstown, Ohio, Obama made similar remarks. The Youngstown Vindicator reports:
[Obama called for] investments in early childhood education to close the achievement gap, but with an added emphasis on poetry, music and art, not just academics. Obama admonished parents to do their part by turning off the television, putting away the video games, and instilling in their children a desire to get a good education.
Nor is this a new theme for Obama. GamePolitics reported on similar comments as far back as April, 2006.
source : http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/02/20/obama-campaign-theme-video-games-as-metaphor-for-underachievement
Reply
Unlike rival Hillary Clinton, Democratic presidential frontrunner Barack Obama does not have a significant track record with regard to video game content issues.
His speeches, however, often contain a reference to parents making their children "put away the video games." For Obama, video games seem to serve as a sort of metaphor for underachievement.
The Illinois senator repeated the theme last night in a victory speech following his big win over Clinton in the Wisconsin primary. As reported by the Washington Post, which carried a transcript and video of the speech, Obama said:
I know how hard it will be to alleviate poverty that has built up over centuries, how hard it will be to fix schools, because changing our schools will require not just money, but a change in attitudes.
We're going to have to parent better, and turn off the television set, and put the video games away, and instill a sense of excellence in our children, and that's going to take some time.
A day earlier, speaking to a college crowd in Youngstown, Ohio, Obama made similar remarks. The Youngstown Vindicator reports:
[Obama called for] investments in early childhood education to close the achievement gap, but with an added emphasis on poetry, music and art, not just academics. Obama admonished parents to do their part by turning off the television, putting away the video games, and instilling in their children a desire to get a good education.
Nor is this a new theme for Obama. GamePolitics reported on similar comments as far back as April, 2006.
source : http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/02/20/obama-campaign-theme-video-games-as-metaphor-for-underachievement
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:45PM Pipp said
I don't see anything wrong with what he said. Good parenting means you take control of your kids. Get them off the TV, Internet, Video Games, and anything else that might distract them from actually learning.
It's true. Parents need to do one thing: Parent.
I do feel sorry about Palin, though. Being used like that is a pretty poor move. Women are going to be pretty ticked off over that.
Reply
It's true. Parents need to do one thing: Parent.
I do feel sorry about Palin, though. Being used like that is a pretty poor move. Women are going to be pretty ticked off over that.
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:45PM SpacePenguinBot said
That's a stretch. He never said he hated games.
He's said things like this:
"We’re going to have to parent better, and turn off the television set, and put the video games away, and instill a sense of excellence in our children, and that’s going to take some time.”
He's not blaming games, he's asking parents to take responsibility for what their kids are doing. This sentiment has been echoed by many adult gamers on this and other sites. He's never written or promoted any legislation that would restrict the rights of gamers, like Hillary or Lieberman has.
Reply
He's said things like this:
"We’re going to have to parent better, and turn off the television set, and put the video games away, and instill a sense of excellence in our children, and that’s going to take some time.”
He's not blaming games, he's asking parents to take responsibility for what their kids are doing. This sentiment has been echoed by many adult gamers on this and other sites. He's never written or promoted any legislation that would restrict the rights of gamers, like Hillary or Lieberman has.
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:50PM freelance said
All though Joystiq poster are notorious for being know-it-alls the upside of that is they are too smart to fall for crap like that. The posters on here don't just take something someone said and run with it. They will research it and look it up and get back in your face if you are wrong. I hope you got something to back that up.
If remember correctly, Obama has denounced parents not controlling kids use of video games. Has he ever attacked video games directly?
Reply
If remember correctly, Obama has denounced parents not controlling kids use of video games. Has he ever attacked video games directly?
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 1:11PM Shagittarius said
While Obama himself hasn't really said anything inflamitory about Video games his choice of VP certainly is questionable.
Biden who doesn't say anything against games in particular is in fact a huge luddite. He doesn't believe in Net neutrality or net privacy and has worked in the past directly with the RIAA. For someone like Obama preaching change and progressive government to pick such an old luddite for his running mate kinda shows you were Obama himself places the importance on the things gamers and netizens really care about.
At least with republicans you know your hobby isn't going to get ganked as long as they can make money off it.
Reply
Biden who doesn't say anything against games in particular is in fact a huge luddite. He doesn't believe in Net neutrality or net privacy and has worked in the past directly with the RIAA. For someone like Obama preaching change and progressive government to pick such an old luddite for his running mate kinda shows you were Obama himself places the importance on the things gamers and netizens really care about.
At least with republicans you know your hobby isn't going to get ganked as long as they can make money off it.
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 2:26PM leobebes said
I give you props for stating your opinion. Yea it would be nice to get more specifics from Obama on where he stands with video games, but what good will that do if we won't have money to spend on games if gas gets to $8.00 a gallon because we decided to invade Iran?
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 3:43PM (Unverified) said
[Obama called for] investments in early childhood education to close the achievement gap, but with an added emphasis on poetry, music and art, not just academics. Obama admonished parents to do their part by turning off the television, putting away the video games, and instilling in their children a desire to get a good education.
THAT BASTARD! How he dares to wish children a better education.
Really games are hobbies and hobbies take time, If I had kids I wouldn’t allow them to play videogames except Saturdays and I would only buy them videogames if the report card said A or it was their Birthday, Christmas or any other festivity.
I’ve always been an A student but videogames take too much time and I would rather have my kids learning how to play the piano than swearing like drunken sailors in the xlive.
Playing more than 7 hours per week is the prize one gets when you finish School (With that I mean summer of course) or College (Why the spellcheck always change college to Colleague?) and you are a grown up with a job and can waste his or her time the way he or she wants.
Reply
THAT BASTARD! How he dares to wish children a better education.
Really games are hobbies and hobbies take time, If I had kids I wouldn’t allow them to play videogames except Saturdays and I would only buy them videogames if the report card said A or it was their Birthday, Christmas or any other festivity.
I’ve always been an A student but videogames take too much time and I would rather have my kids learning how to play the piano than swearing like drunken sailors in the xlive.
Playing more than 7 hours per week is the prize one gets when you finish School (With that I mean summer of course) or College (Why the spellcheck always change college to Colleague?) and you are a grown up with a job and can waste his or her time the way he or she wants.
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 6:51PM Neverz said
Well thank you for his views on video games... and I whole-heartedly agree with him. Kids should be doing a lot more activities than playing video-games and talking on their iphones while they glide their chubby a$$e$ around on those dumb-a$$ roller-shoes.
Too much of anything is never a good thing. Even pot...
Reply
Too much of anything is never a good thing. Even pot...
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:49PM (Unverified) said
lol, did you mean to use the word "err"? If not, that's hilarious, if so, that's brilliant. :)
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 3:59PM (Unverified) said
the kind of people with the money and leisure time to buy and play a 360 online might err on the more conservative side
Making reference to a Chris Rock sketch most of the people are conservative for some things and liberal for others.At end is all about money.
Reply
Making reference to a Chris Rock sketch most of the people are conservative for some things and liberal for others.At end is all about money.
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:51PM (Unverified) said
I enjoyed reading your well thought-out and highly articulate criticism of Mr. Obama. You may have just convinced me to rethink my vote...
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:54PM (Unverified) said
I enjoyed reading your well thought-out and highly articulate criticism of Mr. Obama. You may have just convinced me to rethink my vote...
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:54PM FernandoRocker said
" You guys are all crazy, X-men 3 was an awesome movie."
I think you really suck.
http://www.joystiq.com/profile/304467/
Reply
I think you really suck.
http://www.joystiq.com/profile/304467/
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:41PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said
There needs to be a game where you are a poor boy (customized character) and you grow up and become president, the aim of the game is it beat out opponents, make great speeches and become president :D
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 12:42PM WhiplashChick said
it's not Obama you have to worry about, it's Biden. mofo is in the pocket of Hollywood execs.
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 3:48PM Jude said
Biden's not in the pocket of anyone... as illustrated by him being one of the poorest members of the Senate. I actually consider that a good thing and a potential sign of character with all of the temptation so readily available to someone in that position. While I don't agree with every stance he's taken, I think he was a pretty solid VP pick.
Reply
Posted: Aug 29th 2008 1:12PM (Unverified) said
Yeah... I'm not too sure I would classify supporting a Republican after the Bush Admin as a sign of intelligence. Fiscal conservatives that sink the country into unprecedented debt? Unnecessary wars? The suspension of Habeus Corpus? It's probably a good time to try the other guys.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










