| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (66)

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:06PM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"more engrossing than either BioShock or Call of Duty 4"
Riiiiight! Cliffy has been sniffing his plastic Lancer again. ;)
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's obvious not really him. If it were the real Cliff Bleszinski he wouldn't of named himself "CliffyB" the exact nickname he's trying to get rid of.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 10:34PM Pandaman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At least my Wii can play Eternal Darkness.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:07PM atrimus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this dude is such a tool.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:07PM IanC said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"If this is too much to ask, do not fret. There is always the Wii."

Hahahaha. We get it Cliffy, we get it. You hate the Wii. Boo frick'en hoo.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well, to be honest 80% of the reviewers are simply nitpicking as an attempt to attack Dyack.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not really, for example, the guys at 1up get well along with Dyack, yet they still gave Too Human a somewhat low score (C-)
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:20PM atrimus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
and 20% of MGS4's reviews were only nitpicking at cut scenes because they knew the other 80% were gonna fawn over everything else. OR here's a thought, the reviews for Too Human were genuine opinions. it's not the end of the world that the game barely got average scores.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:40PM Giantenemycrab said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
is there something about Dyack that I don't know? He seems like a cool guy to me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 6:50PM AGBear said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
80% of people who reviewed MGS4 were too caught up in nostalgia and hyperbole to realise it's a 1998 game stuffed into a 2008 graphics engine.

It DOES have too many cutscenes. It's a fucking video game, not the Lord of the Rings trilogy (which takes less time to watch than all of the cutscenes in Metal Gear 4!)
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:11PM Exo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hes not clffy b any more, be carfull he may come to attack you next
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:14PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
With what? His douchebag haircut? ;)

I keed, I keed..don't ban me from Gears 2! :(
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:13PM NightVortex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why does this guy always articulate his opinion like a forum troll with a stick in his ass?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:15PM OMGOMG said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bullshit. Even mentioning Bioshock in the same sentence as Too Human is like saying Disaster Movie was more character driven than Casablanca.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 6:21PM Handbone said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Coming from the guy who says Gears 2 will have a better story then Bioshock. Pshh
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 5:42PM 007craft said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
actually diaster movie IS more character drivin, since the whole point of the movie is to spoof other movies characters.

That said, It doesnt mean its better or even close to casablanca.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
what is Cliffy smoking this time?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
pole
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Blinding Biased bong of fail.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:24PM Mr Slayer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want whatever he's smoking. If makes you believe in your own bullshit, then why not?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:30PM james castle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dyack is sueing Cliffy over the Unreal Engine. Which gives Cliffy all the reason in the world to gush about the game. Now he can say "well it turned out great even without our engine". Too bad no one else seems to agree.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:40PM zuburi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No. Just... No.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 8:35PM james castle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Care to add content to your clever little "no...just no"?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Is there a legitimate reason people think this is actually CliffyB?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
is there any legitimate reason not to think it is cliff? Just because some people may like gears and don't like too human. And silicon knights and epic games are in a dispute doesn't mean that cliff can't be objective about playing the game, and in the end end up enjoying it. I am willing to bet that most of the people at SK have played Unreal tournament 3 and gears and are looking forward to gears 2. I am also willing to bet that cliff is not the only person at epic that has played too human. Most people that make games now a days are gamers and as such like to play games. Think about how diverse you taste in games is and then think how much more diverse it would be if you made games for a living.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"... I'm a writer of Epic Fantasy myself. That being said, Too Human isn't God's gift to writing, but along side other videogames it is in the top ten percent. I've been playing games since the Comodore and I feel I have the wherewithal to make that claim."

Cmon, how can you not automatically be able to tell based on that...


Anyway, I found this rather funny

"The action elements in this game are richer than any hack-and-slasher I have ever played, you just have to learn how to exploit your options instead of treating it like every other hack-and-slasher or shooter you have played. This game is both, and the controls have been implemented admirably."

Is he serious, has he played any game of the 3 biggest series (DMC, GoW, NG)?


"...am beginning to really like the camera because it is smarter than I am.."

Funny thing is that the camera isn't that great, that quote is going to haunt him for a while...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:56PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He actually mentions that games like Gears of War should not be 100% of a gamer's intake (although this could be selfless honesty), but he's also gone on a rampage on there calling some user who submitted a low review an idiot for 'unbalancing' the scores.

So I'm not sure it is CB.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well since he uses the name 'CliffyB' it MUST be him...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
BIFAT,

There is actually a lot of strategy to DMC and NG, I don't know about DMC4 or NG2 as I haven't played them, but I can tell you that if you just buttom smashed, you would die in no time...

DMC, NG, and GoW do require strategy, its just that they are faster paced and thus require faster reactions
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 5:22PM Lone Starr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The only reason they treat CliffyB as CliffyB is because it makes a great blog post.
Reply

Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 1:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
huh, I guess you haven't played said games, other than GoW, blocking all the time doesn't get you anywhere...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, perish the thought that someone didn't think BioShock and Call of Duty 4 were the be-all-end-all of gaming.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:38PM atrimus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that thought would've imperishable, until some face-tool came out and said Too Human (of all games) was more engrossing than either.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Clifford has a point. I don't think I've ever put 16 hours straight into a video game before, since my attention span is extremely small. But, the gamecube is one of the worst systems i've ever owned, and i have no interest in the Wii at all. In fact, i've spent more time PC gaming than anything else. I enjoy a Wii-jab here and there, but it looks like shitty trolling when it's not even clever. At least he isn't as bad as dyack.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:37PM cesaria said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The back handed attacks of the Wii need to stop. You just embarrass yourself. If you don't like it, get the fuck over it. Tool.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Who does he "embarrass" himself to? Pissed off nintendo fanboys, or the majority of the video game media that does the same thing? I don't think anyone who talks bad about the wii cares what nintendo fanboys have to say.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kind of like the shameless plug of your blog?

Did you know within your profile there is a specific place to put your website's URL?

I could really care less but there are people here that consider that trolling.

As for the Wii comment -- I agree with you that any baseless attacks should probably cease. However, if someone has a legitimate concern or opinion based off of experience it should not be considered unacceptable. I think the trolling attacks on all 3 consoles need to stop.

If this is really CliffyB saying these things it has more weight. He is A developer and one of the better ones at that. Many big time 3rd party developers have a less than stellar view of the Wii.

There is no need to take it personal. It is an attack on Nintendo not Cesaria.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:06PM OMGOMG said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Just to clarify, but you said in a previous post that brand loyalty is "retarded".

Weird.

Practice what you preach, buddy.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:43PM Mr Khan said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Eh, there's a difference in this case. Epic goes out of their way to bash Wii, it seems. So its totally valid to call them out for it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 6:28PM cesaria said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
It's annoying when ANY of them get attacked, but especially when it isn't even in context with the discussion. There's room to like every console, like I do. I love me some Echochrome, Pixeljunk, and Castle Crashers, none of which are availabe on Wii. I am definitely a Nintendo fan at heart, but I'm more of a GAMES fa. I lack the sufficient funds to afford another system right now due to a house I should not have bought and child support.
@OMG
I forgot that you knew me in real life. It's nice to have a friend who knows me so well. Must not have seen my Xbox and PS1.
@Immortal
Yeah, it is kinda shameless. It shall be removed.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 6:29PM Roto13 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't even see any Wii bashing. It basically says the Wii is easy to learn. Isn't that the point? I don't think you'd get a punch in the neck from Iwata if you went up to him and said "Your console does what you intended it to do!"
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I just finished this game. I have to say that the only thing Cliffy's correct about is that he finished the game, and that the story was weak.

It is NOT up to par with other games, specifically, the incredibly shitty ending. Not to mention that there's like 35 minutes of story woven in between like, 12 hours of repetitive combat. But, hey, this is the guy that thinks there was enough "story" in Gears of War to make it a trilogy, so what exactly does he know about how well stories compare favorably to other games?

There's reason people stopped using the analog stick as an attack in beat 'em ups after Rise to Honor didn't do so hot, and that's because it doesn't bleeping work right.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 7:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it doesn't really matter if we make fun of the wii because most of the people defending it probably aren't old enough to be posting comments on this website.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:50PM Cal said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well since he uses the name 'CliffyB' it MUST be him...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:58PM Cal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I faild, these two comments never happened...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 3:59PM Giantenemycrab said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I doubt that's really Cliff. Remember, he doesn't want to be called "CliffyB" anymore.. So why would he make that his username?
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You are probably right that it is not CliffyB. As to you're point about the user name. He could have created it before he decided on the name change.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He couldn't have created it before his name change because Giant Bomb's current user database did not exist at that time.
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 4:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Derrick

OK ... I think it is safe to say that this is a charlatan ...
Reply

Posted: Sep 1st 2008 7:13PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And that other guys point that Dyack is in the process of suing Epic at the moment. You'd think the real Cliff would be a bit hesitant to pat the guy on the back.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW