Epic's Rod Fergusson tells Gamasutra that the developer is approaching the "upper end" of what the Xbox 360 can do, but that consumers won't notice for a few more years. The senior producer on Gears of War 2 explains that the company is much further along with optimizing the console than it expected to be at this point. He believes that trend will continue over the next few years, with "room to grow" on titles shipping two years from now.
Of course, Fergusson's comments are pretty much a tale as old as the industry. Studios get really good at optimizing for a console, only to have the next one thrown their way, which involves stumbling through development and potential for a couple years. God of War 2 in particular is a good example of the type of title possible at the end of a console cycle, just when every last drop of blood is wrung from the stone.
Reader Comments (50)
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 4:35PM (Unverified) said
You guys always have the best pictures to go with your articles!
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:04PM (Unverified) said
I think destructoid does better from time to time.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 6:26PM (Unverified) said
So your saying repetitive images with a stupid user-bar font tag are better than Joystiq's pics? You've gotta be crazy.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 9:35PM (Unverified) said
@Al2x
Did you read the part that says from time to time, no, no you didn't. Since we are living in a world of absolutes with you. If you like something, you must love something, if you dis-like something you must completely hate it. If you think one joke in an entire movie was funny, it must have all been funny.
Reply
Did you read the part that says from time to time, no, no you didn't. Since we are living in a world of absolutes with you. If you like something, you must love something, if you dis-like something you must completely hate it. If you think one joke in an entire movie was funny, it must have all been funny.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 4:44PM (Unverified) said
I'm probably in the minority, but I'm pretty happy with where gaming graphics are these days. I think anything we get in the current gen systems moving forward is going to be minor improvements on what's already there. I'd be happy with the level of detail we have now, but higher framerates and more on screen activity. The next step I want to see is better physics and fully destructable environments. Give me GTA where EVERYTHING can be interacted with and destroyed!
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:00PM (Unverified) said
I'd like to see higher resolutions at more steady framerates. There was a lot of talk about 1080p this generation, but precious few games that make it that high with any kind of intricate graphics.
I'd like to see more photorealism, especially in people. It seems like we've gotten pretty good at making cars and other inanimate objects, but people are still fairly primitive in comparison.
And finally, yes, I agree, we need more interaction, more destruction.... I think with more procedurally generated environments, physics engines, and material engines, developers should be able to really push the envelope without having to design exactly how every piece of wall is going to break when you shoot it with a rocket launcher.
Reply
I'd like to see more photorealism, especially in people. It seems like we've gotten pretty good at making cars and other inanimate objects, but people are still fairly primitive in comparison.
And finally, yes, I agree, we need more interaction, more destruction.... I think with more procedurally generated environments, physics engines, and material engines, developers should be able to really push the envelope without having to design exactly how every piece of wall is going to break when you shoot it with a rocket launcher.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:01PM Mmmmz said
I agree. I couldn't give a damn about better graphics for the next systems to come out. Unless they'll make me seriously consider crapping my pants, I vote for better interaction, physics, etc. This generation has made me go from a hardcore gamer to a casual, and its simply because despite games looking better, all of them are pretty much the same ol' same ol'. Oh, and like a gigaton of useless remakes and rehashes.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:06PM (Unverified) said
I agree, graphics can stay where they're at right now as long as physics and animations are improved. Animation is probably the most important thing that needs improving. You can make a freaking stick figure look more life-like and human with good animation compared to some of the stiff, jolty movement we have in some games today.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:34PM Haggard said
Crysis has excellent character models, whatever your opinion on the game might be. I assume it wouldn't be too difficult to have something that detailed on a 360 or PS3, because character models are only a tiny part of what makes Crysis a system hog.
So I think most of the time it's lazy artists rather than a technical barrier holding back realistic looking people.
Reply
So I think most of the time it's lazy artists rather than a technical barrier holding back realistic looking people.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 7:57PM Premature ejaculation man said
I want more on-screen activity. Give me last generations graphics if it means I can be shooting 60 guys in a massive battle rather than 10
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 4:52PM vidguy said
Seems pretty obvious since the console is nearing its three year anniversary. Rumors of the next generation of consoles will start hitting by this time next year. I think it's hard to believe because of how staggered the console launches were this gen.
Malkovich, Malkovich?
Reply
Malkovich, Malkovich?
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 6:39PM (Unverified) said
Rumors of the next PlayStation started a short time ago. Wasn't it being called the PS4 or something?
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 6:51PM Vegeta has a ps3 said
Rumors of the next Wii started a short time ago.
Wasn't it being called the Wii2 or something?
Reply
Wasn't it being called the Wii2 or something?
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 7:18PM vidguy said
Rumors of the next Malkovich started a short time ago. Wasn't it being called the Malkovich or something?
Seriously, though, I'm thinking more along the lines of pictures of a developer test console or a rumored spec sheet. Having a code name or proposed retail name does nothing for me.
Reply
Seriously, though, I'm thinking more along the lines of pictures of a developer test console or a rumored spec sheet. Having a code name or proposed retail name does nothing for me.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:03PM Colonel Falafel said
They said this with Gears of War.
It's just PR bullshit, really.
Reply
It's just PR bullshit, really.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:07PM Gamer X said
I notice this article is only pertaining to the 360. Surprise surprise. I don't think Microsoft ever stated it's console was going to last another 7 years... unlike it's competitor. IMO I'm quite impressed with where games are visually as they stand now. By the time we see a major difference in graphics... the next consoles will roll out and fanboys will continue to make no sense... i.e...
PS3 is still untapped and is superior to 360... xbox fanboys suck!
Yay my xbox next is here and has better graphics and gameplay then the POS3!!
Yeah, well my PS3 is still around for another several years and graphics don't really matter... microsoft hates their fans and abandons their consoles (translation: I'm sad because my console is no longer superior)
For the love of God... graphics are not the console maker... it's the games. And if you love the games on your console i.e (Halo, Gears, Fable) or (MGS4, RFOM2, Killzone)... then END OF STORY!!! It makes sense that eventually hardware is going to be tapped. I can only see this article as flamebait!
Reply
PS3 is still untapped and is superior to 360... xbox fanboys suck!
Yay my xbox next is here and has better graphics and gameplay then the POS3!!
Yeah, well my PS3 is still around for another several years and graphics don't really matter... microsoft hates their fans and abandons their consoles (translation: I'm sad because my console is no longer superior)
For the love of God... graphics are not the console maker... it's the games. And if you love the games on your console i.e (Halo, Gears, Fable) or (MGS4, RFOM2, Killzone)... then END OF STORY!!! It makes sense that eventually hardware is going to be tapped. I can only see this article as flamebait!
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:27PM (Unverified) said
It'll be interesting to see what happens with the current xbox once the new one is launched.
They dropped their last one like a brick as soon as the 360 came out. (Thanks for that btw MS.)
I think they have learned from that though. They know how much the PS2 is still raking in, and they have basically come out and said that dropping it instantly like that was a big mistake. Dunno how much of that they will remember when next gen rolls around though.
And you can bet your ASS that they will do EVERYTHING to be first out of the gate again. It worked for them this gen. They wouldn't even have been on the radar if they hadn't launched so early.
Reply
They dropped their last one like a brick as soon as the 360 came out. (Thanks for that btw MS.)
I think they have learned from that though. They know how much the PS2 is still raking in, and they have basically come out and said that dropping it instantly like that was a big mistake. Dunno how much of that they will remember when next gen rolls around though.
And you can bet your ASS that they will do EVERYTHING to be first out of the gate again. It worked for them this gen. They wouldn't even have been on the radar if they hadn't launched so early.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:32PM Hyams said
The PS4 will probably be released around the same time as the NextBox. I imagine Sony won't want Microsoft to get a year's headstart again.
Hopefully Sony will continue to support the PS3 for a few more years though. Hence the ten year thing. No one said the PS4 wouldn't be released for another ten years, only that the PS3 will be supported for ten years.
Of course, as the PS3 isn't the market leader as Sony had obviously hoped it would be, it's entirely possible they've completed abandoned the ten year plan.
Reply
Hopefully Sony will continue to support the PS3 for a few more years though. Hence the ten year thing. No one said the PS4 wouldn't be released for another ten years, only that the PS3 will be supported for ten years.
Of course, as the PS3 isn't the market leader as Sony had obviously hoped it would be, it's entirely possible they've completed abandoned the ten year plan.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:34PM (Unverified) said
What did this have to do with the article?
1. The PS3's power is theoretical.. it's running around the same amount of performance as the 360, with the exception of the Blu-Ray storage system.
2. beep.
3. EPIC is stating that they're mastering the 360's hardware.. not saying the 360 cant go any further..
Reply
1. The PS3's power is theoretical.. it's running around the same amount of performance as the 360, with the exception of the Blu-Ray storage system.
2. beep.
3. EPIC is stating that they're mastering the 360's hardware.. not saying the 360 cant go any further..
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:39PM KingJD said
They dropped the OG Xbox because it was bleeding money. That's not true with this xbox. As long as it continues to be profitable, I'm very sure they will support it.
Do you really think if the PS2 was bleeding as much money as the OG Xbox Sony would have continued to support it?
Reply
Do you really think if the PS2 was bleeding as much money as the OG Xbox Sony would have continued to support it?
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 6:50PM Gamer X said
Whoops. Guess I got off topic a bit but there are a lot of valid points on here. Technically speaking.. it's interesting to see developers learning curves and what they are able to squeeze out of a console. Competition is great and breeds exciting hardware and software that is passed on to the gamers. Can't imagine what kind of interactive entertainment the next batch of consoles will produce. I'm still in awe of this gen.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:07PM (Unverified) said
Such a wierd movie but damn that dark haired chick was hot.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:13PM 343 Guilty Fart said
You mean the same chick who's in the 40 year old virgin?
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:24PM (Unverified) said
Wow, you're right. That was Catherine Keener. Damn she looks old now, still a milf though.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:13PM (Unverified) said
psh, ceilings, that's why all consoles should have outdoor architectures. Complete with pool, hammock and grill.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:20PM (Unverified) said
I don't want to blow a man in half and find out that their insides contain brighter and more excentric colours then a nursery schoolpainting.
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:20PM (Unverified) said
Reminds me of this other news story about how David Duchovny, lead actor of Californication admitted himself as a sex-addict.
Coincidentally, the new season of Californication is about to air, in which he plays a sex-addict. I mean, what are the odds?
But seriously though, I don't think there is too much PR behind this. 360 is easy to program for, consequently, hitting that ceiling is relatively easy I suppose.
Reply
Coincidentally, the new season of Californication is about to air, in which he plays a sex-addict. I mean, what are the odds?
But seriously though, I don't think there is too much PR behind this. 360 is easy to program for, consequently, hitting that ceiling is relatively easy I suppose.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 5:22PM AliasIncognito said
The article says EPIC is approaching the tech ceiling of the 360. Other devs may be approaching the hardware differently with their engines. I'm looking at you, Carmack.
I remember being blown away by the graphics quality of The Chronicles of Riddick : Escape from Butcher Bay and Ninja Gaiden on the original Xbox. I thought devs got as much as they could get out of the console before seeing those games.
Reply
I remember being blown away by the graphics quality of The Chronicles of Riddick : Escape from Butcher Bay and Ninja Gaiden on the original Xbox. I thought devs got as much as they could get out of the console before seeing those games.
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 7:30PM (Unverified) said
Yeah, pretty much I think they're saying UE3 is reaching its limit. Everyone keeps saying 360 has reached its limit, but better looking games keep coming out, eh?
Reply
Posted: Sep 2nd 2008 7:42PM (Unverified) said
Well if thats the case, then I'm satisfied with my 360 purchases..
-Waiaminute... I've BEEN HAPPY with my 360 Purchases!! thru 4-5 rrod (I lost count) to My Arcade and my Elite, I've had nothing but great games to play..
Xbox Live is the shit, and everyone I know has live so it's nothing but happy happy game time!
Reply
-Waiaminute... I've BEEN HAPPY with my 360 Purchases!! thru 4-5 rrod (I lost count) to My Arcade and my Elite, I've had nothing but great games to play..
Xbox Live is the shit, and everyone I know has live so it's nothing but happy happy game time!
Posted: Sep 3rd 2008 6:35AM BurntMeatloaf said
Does this mean more spark effects or 60FPS? I'll take frames, please.
With all the power in today's consoles, I am none too happy that most games I've played so far have had worse framerates than a lot of my PS2 games, even while working in standard def.
Reply
With all the power in today's consoles, I am none too happy that most games I've played so far have had worse framerates than a lot of my PS2 games, even while working in standard def.
Posted: Sep 3rd 2008 1:54PM Edge of Blade said
THANK YOU. About time someone started giving these people a clue. We want frames. 60 minimum, no exceptions.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 161 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 117 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments










