Hoping to disprove the notion that everything with the word "Crysis" on it requires the latest, greatest supercomputer – and several ounces of irradiated uranium – to run with a framerate in the double digits, EA has teamed up with UltraPC to sell what it's (unofficially?) calling the "Warhead PC" – a single SKU offering that brings some of console gaming's simplicity to the PC gaming world.
In short, the team at Crytek wanted Crysis Warhead to run on far more systems than Crysis did, so they built their own lower-end "Warhead PC" which they used to test the game on throughout its development. Dropping frames on the Warhead PC? Tweak it until it runs smooth as butter. With a "hard cap" to aim for, the developers were able to guarantee a minimum level of performance using the following specs: an Intel Core Duo e7300 running 2.66GHz, an Nvidia 9800GT video card, and 2 gigglebytes of RAM.
The Warhead PC will be available to preorder on September 16 – the game's launch day – for $699, a far cry from the hundreds of bajillions we had saved up for a Crysis rig of our own. We'll spend the rest of that money on tricking out the rather bland box – seen above – with enough blue LEDs to burn our retinas. Ahh, PC gaming ...
[Via Big Download]
Reader Comments (75)
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:25PM TechGuySteve said
yes, a new computer with a giant tumor growing on the top of it.
(least that's what it looks like from first glance)
Reply
(least that's what it looks like from first glance)
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:30PM (Unverified) said
"a far cry from the hundreds of bajillions we had saved up for a Crysis rig of our own."
I see what you did there.
Reply
I see what you did there.
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:30PM (Unverified) said
Would you look at that EA is trying to sell PC gamers a gaming rig to play a game. EA loves to seel whatever they can huh?
That PC doesn't look like $700 to me.
Reply
That PC doesn't look like $700 to me.
Posted: Sep 9th 2008 1:59AM (Unverified) said
Already got the monitor, speakers, gaming mouse and headset.
IMA GET ONE FO CHRISTMAS. :D
Reply
IMA GET ONE FO CHRISTMAS. :D
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:36PM (Unverified) said
Maybe Id spend 700 dollars on Crysis Warhead if i thought Crysis Warhead was going to be any good
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 8:29PM (Unverified) said
The fact that it's an 8800GT with a different clock.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 9:01PM (Unverified) said
Agreed. A 9800 GTX is easily worth the cost difference, even if they had to cut the CPU down even worse.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:39PM FredFredrickson said
Sure there wasn't a missing zero in there somewhere, Joystiq?
$6990 sounds more realistic to me.
Reply
$6990 sounds more realistic to me.
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 8:47PM iHavePants said
You don't include the price of a HDTV with your console, so why include the monitor price for a PC?
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 10:07PM Liquidmark said
@Ihavepants
Because a console can be played on any tv.
Unless you live in a cave, you are bound to have at least one tv in the house.
Reply
Because a console can be played on any tv.
Unless you live in a cave, you are bound to have at least one tv in the house.
Posted: Sep 9th 2008 12:26AM Bootes said
And monitors aren't? A good monitor is much cheaper than a good TV.
And it would be easy to get a perfectly good screen for free. I see them on the side of the road, being thrown out, all the time. Sure they're not flat and pretty looking, but neither are your cheap abundant TVs.
Reply
And it would be easy to get a perfectly good screen for free. I see them on the side of the road, being thrown out, all the time. Sure they're not flat and pretty looking, but neither are your cheap abundant TVs.
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:43PM Chrisness said
This is going to sell like hotcakes. I have friends that want a new PC for Starcraft and for the latest games and they don't believe me when I tell them it's easy to build a great PC and they still have the misconception that you need a $1200+ PC to run crysis.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:43PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said
You know I hate to break it to everyone, but... Crysis doesn't take a very powerful computer to play.
I can run it at 1024x768 with graphical settings set to high on a computer that cost me a total of $360 to pull together. On a 60 dollar graphics card.
I'm tired of hearing that rubbish.. /:
Reply
I can run it at 1024x768 with graphical settings set to high on a computer that cost me a total of $360 to pull together. On a 60 dollar graphics card.
I'm tired of hearing that rubbish.. /:
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:48PM (Unverified) said
Personally, I'm tired of PC fanboys spreading lies that you can get a good Crysis experience for as low amount of money as you said. My PC can run Crysis on high, but very poorly. Odds are with a $60 graphics card you won't be getting over 5FPS at any point in Crysis on high.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:51PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said
I dunno what I can do to make you believe me, but my specs are 2 gigs of RAM, a dual 2.2 processor, and a Radeon HD 3650. And it's perfectly playable with very occasional framerate dips, specifically when zooming in with the binocs.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:53PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said
D'oh! I totally meant to say medium settings.
Point is the game still looks gorgeous even set to that, and tuns near flawlessly.
Crysis is not the PC melter everyone seems to think it is. End of story.
Reply
Point is the game still looks gorgeous even set to that, and tuns near flawlessly.
Crysis is not the PC melter everyone seems to think it is. End of story.
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:54PM (Unverified) said
That card gets ~20FPS AVERAGE on MEDIUM, high probably rarely escapes the single digits...
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1303/10/sapphire_radeon_hd_3450_and_hd_3650/index.html
Reply
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1303/10/sapphire_radeon_hd_3450_and_hd_3650/index.html
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:55PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said
What reason could I have to lie about this? You're just butthurt.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 8:01PM ludwigk said
Um, Crysis IS the PC melter its made out to be. The point is to play the game at high settings at 1920x1200 with 4x FSAA, 4xbells+whistles.
You know that "High" tab that's grayed out because your GPU doesn't make the cut? That's where the *GOOD* graphics that Crysis can deliver are hiding. You don't get them. You get the medium textures until you upgrade your system.
The point is, yes, you can *PLAY* crysis on a slow system. I finished it on a (at the time) 2 year old iMac with a Radeon X1900, and the game looked like Half Life 2. Then, I went and played it some more on a Mac Pro with an nVidia 8800GT. World o difference there.
Reply
You know that "High" tab that's grayed out because your GPU doesn't make the cut? That's where the *GOOD* graphics that Crysis can deliver are hiding. You don't get them. You get the medium textures until you upgrade your system.
The point is, yes, you can *PLAY* crysis on a slow system. I finished it on a (at the time) 2 year old iMac with a Radeon X1900, and the game looked like Half Life 2. Then, I went and played it some more on a Mac Pro with an nVidia 8800GT. World o difference there.
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 9:50PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said
Right, but everyone makes it out to seem like you need a 9800 with a quad core processor just to play it at minimum settings. That's what I'm talking about.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 11:38PM BananaBoat said
Even at medium, you wouldn't get proper framerates. Low? Maybe.
There is always that troll with the 500 dollar computer that runs Crysis at high, with the framerate never dipping, despite hundreds of benchmarks on the same hardware that prove otherwise. The people that spent over a thousand just to play it have a good laugh every time though.
Reply
There is always that troll with the 500 dollar computer that runs Crysis at high, with the framerate never dipping, despite hundreds of benchmarks on the same hardware that prove otherwise. The people that spent over a thousand just to play it have a good laugh every time though.
Posted: Sep 9th 2008 4:47AM ROBOCOLOSSUS said
Okay, sure. I'll just be over here, playing Crysis perfectly at medium, regardless of what is said in this comment section.
Have fun over there in i-know-because-the-internet-says-so land.
Reply
Have fun over there in i-know-because-the-internet-says-so land.
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:46PM (Unverified) said
The goal is to have 30FPS average on high settings, which means there will be dips below 30fps and when you stare at a wall you'll get 100fps.
It's kind of a smart idea to set a goal 'specification' in general, which Crytek completely ignored with Crysis. Plus apparently they're optimizing for this PC specs.
Crysis Warhead is said to be much more optimized than regular Crysis, but the overall detail on high versus Crysis high might be lower, who knows.
The thing is, who will care about this? Crysis was hardly a high profile / great game, and this is just an expansion pack.
Reply
It's kind of a smart idea to set a goal 'specification' in general, which Crytek completely ignored with Crysis. Plus apparently they're optimizing for this PC specs.
Crysis Warhead is said to be much more optimized than regular Crysis, but the overall detail on high versus Crysis high might be lower, who knows.
The thing is, who will care about this? Crysis was hardly a high profile / great game, and this is just an expansion pack.
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:48PM Shagittarius said
Crysis was a good game. Some parts were fantastic. Your attempts to discredit the game and or dev Fail.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:51PM (Unverified) said
The game had bad AI, very little innovation, poor pacing, and was mediocre all around. Your attempts to say the game was anything more than a graphical showcase fail.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:58PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said
Your attempts to argue every point posted here fail also.
Seriously, get a life.
Reply
Seriously, get a life.
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:25PM (Unverified) said
The game seemed to do what every other game had already done before, except taking it to the extreme, whether it be graphics, physics, AI or level design.
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:36PM original fred said
how about we all stop fighting and go out for milkshakes?
everyone loves milkshakes and you don't need a 700 dollar computer to drink them.
:]
Reply
everyone loves milkshakes and you don't need a 700 dollar computer to drink them.
:]
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:46PM Shagittarius said
Not much of a deal considering I can build a computer that includes the same hardware as specified and case et all for 390.00
Reply
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:13PM Shagittarius said
Your right I didnt include the cost of an OS in that...So I guess were talking close to 600 if you need a copy of vista.
I guess not too bad of a deal then...
I always forget people buy OS'
Reply
I guess not too bad of a deal then...
I always forget people buy OS'
Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:04PM (Unverified) said
Wow...finally something that the Lemonade, Strip Club, University, Zoo, Hospice, Solid Waste, and Mall Tycooners can get excited about.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 101 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments










