| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (75)

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:24PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So what your saying is that I actually need to buy a new computer for this? Your computer in fact.

I kid! :P
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:25PM TechGuySteve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yes, a new computer with a giant tumor growing on the top of it.

(least that's what it looks like from first glance)
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 11:01PM BigPhi84 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, and that new logo for Crysis is the same shape as those annoying pink clouds from super smash bros brawl! Stupid clouds.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"a far cry from the hundreds of bajillions we had saved up for a Crysis rig of our own."

I see what you did there.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ba dum tish
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 11:09PM Tiptup300 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Would you look at that EA is trying to sell PC gamers a gaming rig to play a game. EA loves to seel whatever they can huh?

That PC doesn't look like $700 to me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sell*

Apparently I'm dyslexic today. :D
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:36PM kamanashi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's the insides that count. And based on the specs, it's a decent rig. Though, no telling if it come with an OS or monitor. So really, you could still end up paying over a thousand.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2008 1:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Already got the monitor, speakers, gaming mouse and headset.

IMA GET ONE FO CHRISTMAS. :D
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe Id spend 700 dollars on Crysis Warhead if i thought Crysis Warhead was going to be any good
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2008 7:24AM foxhound said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Or if it could play LEGEND OF SOL'TARE or CLAM DIGGER. ;]
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
doh, 9800GT :(
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 8:08PM michaspi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's wrong with a card that has one of the best price-to-performance ratios on the market?
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 8:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The fact that it's an 8800GT with a different clock.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 9:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. A 9800 GTX is easily worth the cost difference, even if they had to cut the CPU down even worse.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2008 12:29AM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
High five Zeus.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:38PM Neebs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's actually a pretty good PC. You could get a weaker one than that and it'll still run.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:39PM FredFredrickson said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Sure there wasn't a missing zero in there somewhere, Joystiq?

$6990 sounds more realistic to me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:31PM kamanashi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For that? Haha, that price sounds about right, but, who knows what comes with it. It could still end up being over $1,000 if it doesn't include a monitor, I mean a good one, and if an OS isn't installed.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 8:47PM iHavePants said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You don't include the price of a HDTV with your console, so why include the monitor price for a PC?
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 10:07PM Liquidmark said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Ihavepants

Because a console can be played on any tv.

Unless you live in a cave, you are bound to have at least one tv in the house.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 10:09PM iHavePants said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ok, and Tv's are free now right?
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2008 12:26AM Bootes said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And monitors aren't? A good monitor is much cheaper than a good TV.

And it would be easy to get a perfectly good screen for free. I see them on the side of the road, being thrown out, all the time. Sure they're not flat and pretty looking, but neither are your cheap abundant TVs.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2008 4:55AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Har har, your original humour kills me every time.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:43PM Chrisness said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This is going to sell like hotcakes. I have friends that want a new PC for Starcraft and for the latest games and they don't believe me when I tell them it's easy to build a great PC and they still have the misconception that you need a $1200+ PC to run crysis.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 8:55PM Geist said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Hell, you can rummage through a junkyard for the pieces required to play Starcraft on maximum settings.

Unless you're talking SC2, not sure.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:43PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know I hate to break it to everyone, but... Crysis doesn't take a very powerful computer to play.

I can run it at 1024x768 with graphical settings set to high on a computer that cost me a total of $360 to pull together. On a 60 dollar graphics card.

I'm tired of hearing that rubbish.. /:
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally, I'm tired of PC fanboys spreading lies that you can get a good Crysis experience for as low amount of money as you said. My PC can run Crysis on high, but very poorly. Odds are with a $60 graphics card you won't be getting over 5FPS at any point in Crysis on high.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:51PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dunno what I can do to make you believe me, but my specs are 2 gigs of RAM, a dual 2.2 processor, and a Radeon HD 3650. And it's perfectly playable with very occasional framerate dips, specifically when zooming in with the binocs.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:53PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
D'oh! I totally meant to say medium settings.

Point is the game still looks gorgeous even set to that, and tuns near flawlessly.

Crysis is not the PC melter everyone seems to think it is. End of story.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That card gets ~20FPS AVERAGE on MEDIUM, high probably rarely escapes the single digits...

http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1303/10/sapphire_radeon_hd_3450_and_hd_3650/index.html
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:55PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What reason could I have to lie about this? You're just butthurt.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:35PM kamanashi said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Uh... $360 sounds kinda low. Maybe $500, not $360. Though I could be wrong.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 8:01PM ludwigk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Um, Crysis IS the PC melter its made out to be. The point is to play the game at high settings at 1920x1200 with 4x FSAA, 4xbells+whistles.

You know that "High" tab that's grayed out because your GPU doesn't make the cut? That's where the *GOOD* graphics that Crysis can deliver are hiding. You don't get them. You get the medium textures until you upgrade your system.

The point is, yes, you can *PLAY* crysis on a slow system. I finished it on a (at the time) 2 year old iMac with a Radeon X1900, and the game looked like Half Life 2. Then, I went and played it some more on a Mac Pro with an nVidia 8800GT. World o difference there.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 9:50PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Right, but everyone makes it out to seem like you need a 9800 with a quad core processor just to play it at minimum settings. That's what I'm talking about.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 11:38PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even at medium, you wouldn't get proper framerates. Low? Maybe.

There is always that troll with the 500 dollar computer that runs Crysis at high, with the framerate never dipping, despite hundreds of benchmarks on the same hardware that prove otherwise. The people that spent over a thousand just to play it have a good laugh every time though.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2008 4:47AM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Okay, sure. I'll just be over here, playing Crysis perfectly at medium, regardless of what is said in this comment section.

Have fun over there in i-know-because-the-internet-says-so land.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2008 10:53AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ichi The One

Note the resolution settings he mentioned.

@bobartig
It's the 'very high' settings that are greyed out.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The goal is to have 30FPS average on high settings, which means there will be dips below 30fps and when you stare at a wall you'll get 100fps.

It's kind of a smart idea to set a goal 'specification' in general, which Crytek completely ignored with Crysis. Plus apparently they're optimizing for this PC specs.

Crysis Warhead is said to be much more optimized than regular Crysis, but the overall detail on high versus Crysis high might be lower, who knows.

The thing is, who will care about this? Crysis was hardly a high profile / great game, and this is just an expansion pack.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:48PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crysis was a good game. Some parts were fantastic. Your attempts to discredit the game and or dev Fail.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game had bad AI, very little innovation, poor pacing, and was mediocre all around. Your attempts to say the game was anything more than a graphical showcase fail.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:58PM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your attempts to argue every point posted here fail also.

Seriously, get a life.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game seemed to do what every other game had already done before, except taking it to the extreme, whether it be graphics, physics, AI or level design.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:36PM original fred said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
how about we all stop fighting and go out for milkshakes?

everyone loves milkshakes and you don't need a 700 dollar computer to drink them.

:]
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:37PM kamanashi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the AI isn't as bad as everyone says. Yes, there are some bugs, but every game has them.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 6:46PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not much of a deal considering I can build a computer that includes the same hardware as specified and case et all for 390.00
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:06PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd like to see that... I'm guessing you'll have to skimp on the case and PSU, but that's like true of the PC in question as well. Also, does this EA PC have an OS? I assume it does if the goal is simplicity.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:13PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your right I didnt include the cost of an OS in that...So I guess were talking close to 600 if you need a copy of vista.

I guess not too bad of a deal then...

I always forget people buy OS'
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2008 7:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow...finally something that the Lemonade, Strip Club, University, Zoo, Hospice, Solid Waste, and Mall Tycooners can get excited about.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW