| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (80)

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:03PM Tez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Right. And Sony was working on the six-axis long before the Wii remote was announced.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:22PM FredFredrickson said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
He's got no reason to lie, does he?

I think it's perfectly plausible that they were working on avatars before Mii's came around. Especially since he admits they weren't necessarily part of the 360's future UI plans in their inception.

Clearly, Mii's have influenced the avatars' design... but hey, they had the time to watch what Nintendo did and learn from it, so why not?
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Before any Sony Fanboy decides to point out the 1999 Patent, bear in mind that patent =/= actual work.

In these days Companies patent themselves just in case some son of a bitch decides to sue them twenty years later.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't think where it came from should be an issue.

More importantly, they spent THAT long on it, and THIS is what they came up with?
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 6:06PM JCA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly. Just because it was in development before the release of the Wii (and thus the Mii) doesn't mean Microsoft didn't know about their existence within Nintendo. Corporate espionage is a real entity.

Even if there was no espionage and the concept of avatars is coincidental...the end design seems very Mii inspired.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 6:45PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1. Everyone forgets PSP had a tilt detecting dongle long before Wii was anything more than "Revolution."

2. The way Rare describes it is such a dumb fuck vagueness. "Der, you create a custom character that you can identify with and even use in multiple games perhaps. So we thought of character creation." ...k, I was doing that shit on N64 wrestling games...
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 9:08PM DarkTetsuya said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Exactly what I was thinking ... do they *really* expect us to believe that something that's so similar to something already out there, coming out second, was actually in development first?

Guess they should've released it sooner, in both counts.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 10:20PM PhaseDMA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ya. Rare came up with it before they saw the Mii - And promptly told them they would never use it. Well at least until they realized what kind of response Nintendo was getting.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 11:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Marty - valiant defender of all things Microsoft. Give it a rest, would ya?
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 11:32PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, if you were following the 360 very closely before launch they mentioned having characters who you customize with tshirts.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:05PM fwacce said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Uh huh.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:49PM kamanashi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I believe him. I mean, it's not like there is reason to steal it. Nintendo may have done it first, but it was to attract old people and kids.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 7:43PM Delgadoh said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Sorry, I couldn't read the wonderful addition you made to this story. I'm not sure why such insightful commentary is so white, fuzzy and unreadable.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:05PM loflyinjett said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Yeah right...And Sony had motion controls before nintendo too right?

Companies always say this to make themselfs feel better.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:09PM loflyinjett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Woah... Ninja'd
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:05PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This really is not a big deal. I believe what they say in that the similarity is 'purely coincidental'.

Reason being, it's really not an amazing or revolutionary idea or anything, cmon, it's just not.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:24PM whatthegeek said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
but it is a relatively new idea to bring avatars like these to a console - in fact Ninty was the first to do it. I find it very hard to believe that MS was pounding away at this idea before Nintendo, and still managed to come out w/ it almost two years after Nintendo did.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I have to disagree, Mike. The notion of personalized characters, even on a console, is not entirely unique or original. Does Microsoft get the credit for letting people have unique online handles (aka GamerTags)? Of course not.

It's all in how well an idea is executed that makes it noteworthy. It looks like Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony all have their own interpretations of this avatar idea, though no one is a direct copy of another.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:06PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have trouble believing them on this one. Anyway, I think the spore-like creature idea would have been much more fun and a lot less creepy.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:14PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Unless you can put a giant cock and balls on these avatars as well!
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:25PM whatthegeek said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you can make a cock out of a Mii, you can make a cock out of anything!!

Viva la Penis!!
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:44PM Courtney said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Actually, there is an interesting idea there. What if there was an option to turn on, where your avatar was shaped by the kinds of games you played (or the achievements you got). Say, certain appendages or gear was only available to the players of specific games or those who had earned specific achievements.

If there were some cool options, it might give people another incentive to try games out of their normal sphere or go for achievements. It could also result in some really wacked out avatars. Which I'm all in favor of.

Of course, seems like a bear to implement, but that's not my problem.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:06PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Honestly, I don't care. Worrying about who thought about what first is pointless fanboy fodder.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:40PM juju187 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
without pointless fanboy fodder joystiq would cease to exist...
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
cease to exist given my goodbyes..
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:09PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Miis were an idea that Shiggy was toying with since back in the NES days, but thats not relevant here

I could see Rare coming up with this idea on their own, since they're always on with some strange ideas of their own. The mii-like way they're being integrated into the New Xbox Xperience, however, certainly seems like the sincerest form of flattery, however.
Reply

Posted: Sep 12th 2008 2:01PM easo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mii arent intergrated into the wii expirence. They only show up in Nintendo made games starring mii's (wii sports, wii play, wii music, etc.) Avatars are taking the place of gamer pictures, which are used to identify you in everything you do on xbox live and across every game.

Keep in mind,that I think avatars are stupid and dont fit in with MS user base or image. Now if avatars were munny like characters that could be customised with content from the games you own (gears armor, halo weapons, etc.) that would be cool.
http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Games/G/Grand%20Theft%20Auto%20IV/Everything%20Else/Niko%20munny/2443653069_c13ba8c1da_o--article_image.jpg
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally, I don't care who thought of it first; I just think it's a bad idea. I don't want a cute little character representing me. I want to look like a bad-ass when I'm online. I'm playing Gears--not Viva Pinata. I think they're alienating a lot of gamers with this move.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Someone's not comfortable with their spot in life.


What bully kicked sand in your face?


Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:26PM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think Microsoft's plan is not to put Avatars into your games, but rather, let your game put stuff on your avatars. And then avatars will be used for stuff like the 1 vs 100 game. So instead of having a generic dude for that, you can have a dude that looks like you and is wearing a sweet helmet you unlocked from Fallout 3.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You know that Its optional, right?
You don't have to create one if you don't want to.
So you can be more "Bad-ass" while playing Gears.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:29PM whatthegeek said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, the avatars aren't SOOOO cute and sugary that I feel emasculated by the thought of having one represent me online, but I would definitely like for them to be a little more bad ass. Maybe my avatar could be holding a bloody chainsaw, or a ninja sword or something along those lines - I guess what I'm saying is I'll reserve judgment until I see what sort of accessories and such MS offers.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:32PM Tez said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They're only alienating the insecure ones like yourself.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:32PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Lots of us play Gears and VP though. Just an FYI.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:01PM kamanashi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You are one of the people that think if there is no gore, then it sucks.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:40PM Dirty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Viva P kicks ass. I should chainsaw your ass for even suggesting that its not a great game.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What bully kicked sand in my face? I'm a gamer commenting on a gaming site--lots.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 6:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"They're only alienating the insecure ones like yourself."

Meow. I just have an online persona, kitty--I'm not insecure. Part of the reason I play games is to take control of a fictional reality. I play games with characters that appeal to me--and I'd like my avatar to appeal to me as well.

By the way, why did any of you smart-asses bother picking a Joystiq image at all? There's a perfectly good Mario default available.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I have a feeling that Lee Musgrave's poker face involves a lot of sweating and nervous laughter.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why are they even defending themselves? Miis are the goofiest looking things around. Avatars are at least a little more decent with the HOME ones being the best IMO.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:25PM Andrew F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Animals or Spore creatures would have been awesome.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:24PM KiraXD said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
ugh this Avatar thing is so ugly... as long as i can keep it just menus.. ill be happy

this looks like garbage compared to home. its not very streamlined and mature like my other console... i want maturity for both consoles not this fisher-price shit.

thats the reason i bought the 2 next gen consoles and not a wii.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:31PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You bought a PS4 and an Xbox 720?
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Durr durr durr

I need a video game to tell me how old I am!


Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:02PM kamanashi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok, avatars wont break the console. If you paud attention to earlier things on it, you would know it wont be in t and m rated games.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:11PM KiraXD said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
woah woah woah... chill out wii-fanboys... dont start crying over a comment.

i just dont want my menus cluttered with the avatar look... thats all. man.. fanboys really explode dont they? lol.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"fanboys really explode dont they? lol."

Funniest part is that, in this reply chain, you're the only one who exploded.

#1 - It's optional
#2 - Usually, the only people who are vocal about their desire for their games and anything representative of their games are kids age 12-16... you wouldn't happen to fall under that age group, would you?
#3 - Not everyone who disagrees with you is a Wii fanboy.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:33PM Lamppost said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lolwut
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:36PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering Rare's ultra slow development times, plausible. Still, a bit suspect in my book.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2008 4:44PM hey buddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And yet, the Miis still work better.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW