| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (30)

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 6:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds good, but I wonder if it works with older AMD hardware like the X2 series. Anyway, I'll give it a download when it's verified working on an x64 based PC.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:07PM Lorben said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Works on my AMD Athlon 64 3700
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:06PM FernandoRocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Will it work with my crappy ATI Radeon HD 3200 with HDMI?
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:18PM kevin949 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you read the article?

a single circular button on your desktop that, once clicked, turns off the various Windows processes and, should you have the proper AMD CPU, GPU and motherboard, boost the hardware output.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:44PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can probably overclock that card (if you case is properly vented, otherwise I wouldn't recommend it) using the Catalyst Control Center. The option to do it is under "overdrive". I'd let the program test how high your card can go for you, otherwise you might roast it.

It might void your warranty, but it's a pretty harmless process as long as you don't go nuts and try for double the performance (you might get 10%, if you have decent case cooling)

Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:11PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Other than anti-virus/firewall/etc, what do people have running that would get in the way of gaming? All I have open is Firefox, which I could easily close myself with "one click". I mean, I guess this could get rid of Itunes background services, and maybe some internet services like FTP, etc, but it seems like anyone that is a serious gamer wouldn't have those running anyway. I guess this is a better branding than AMD Live, but still, this type of branding seems outdated.

I'd be less critical, but I'm still waiting for AMD to come out with a solution for cooling my 4870 graphics card that is more efficient than running it at 40% speed continuously. It's been two months AMD, grrrr.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:19PM kevin949 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Do you know how much other crap your computer is running or do you only know about things that are right in front of you and/or in your systray?
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You'd be surprised. Windows itself hides about 20 different services at once, which can be disabled. I'm guessing it shuts down explorer.exe, which is pretty sizable. There's other stuff.

I repair normal people's computers for a living, and the amount of shit running on those. Basically, they slow down to a crawl.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:31PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do you know that there are like 10 things that show up as svchost.exe? Do you know which ones you can and can't disable without locking your machine? Atleast I listed examples of some of the BS background processes that companies (namely apple) leave on millions of machines needlessly. You didn't give one example.

The point is, the only people that would potentially use Fusion, are gamers that should know how to get rid of the garbage on their computers in the first place. Not that most gamers would be using Vista anyway, but that is beside the point. I don't see the wisdom in giving laymen a gigantic button that overclocks their hardware (Does that break the warranty? I hope people will check) and kills their processes (I wonder if their database of whitelisted programs includes firewalls like Comodo or ZoneAlarm).
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:35PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@#28

Yeah, normal people have a ton of garbage running on their machines. They also don't care about overclocking, or gaming (atleast not the type of gaming that requires overclocking and all background processes killed...). Solitaire will run just fine with all that garbage open :P
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:39PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Slight correction, I read on a forum that doesn't deserve mention, that this was a Vista only thing. Now I'm not so sure if that is true.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 8:14PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The point is, the only people that would potentially use Fusion, are gamers that should know how to get rid of the garbage on their computers in the first place."

Yes, but sometimes you want the stuff running all the time EXCEPT when running a game.

For instance, I want Windows Media Sharing on. So I don't disable it. But I don't need it on while I'm playing TF2. So this button might be cool for that.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 8:45PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does media sharing take up enough CPU or Ram to make a real difference in games? I wouldn't go so far as to say that this app is pointless, and it actually might be useful if it has functionality for re-launching the stuff it stops with one click, but...I don't know.

It just agitates me when AMD does crap like this instead of fixing the stuff that is already broken (like the cooling on the 4850 and the 4870). I know it's free, and I know I don't have to use it, but it does impact me when valuable human resources are spent getting things like this up and running instead of bug fixing like they had ought to be doing.

In hindsight, I guess this is a great app for that one guy that actually built an AMD based gaming rig in the past couple of years. I honestly fear for AMD and ATI once Nehalem comes out. They are already being destroyed in the processor arena, and now the gap is only going to widen. They need to hit the graphics market hard now that Nvidia's faulty chip scandal has taken off. The 4850 and the 4870 are a start, but if people start turning in 4850's and 70's because the core is melting at the 100+ degrees celcius temps they are reaching, they might not be able to take full advantage.

I wonder if this app closes Control Center and it's 7k mem usage. I know 7k isn't a lot, but it's not as if AMD/ATI isn't guilty of crapware that needs to be disabled during games :P
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 8:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, Bananaboat, I have a 4870, myself - there is a very easy fan fix you can do yourself.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/FORUMS/showpost.php?p=3100889&postcount=1


Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 9:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, and disregard that thing on the bottom saying you have to reload the profile very time you reboot - you don't, as long as you leave the CCC on the Overdrive screen when you close it.

Trust me, you'll see a 20-25 degree drops in temps, even under full load.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 11:13PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks, I already did the fan fix, and it does bring the temperatures to acceptable levels, but having it run constantly at 40% (as fast as I can stand it being. Any more and it's loud) isn't a good enough solution for something that cost 300 dollars. AMD needs to come out with a driver that significantly under clocks (or under volts) both the GPU and the memory on both cards when not in use. CCC currently does under clock, but not enough.

Either that, or they need to come out with some numbers showing that the GPU and ram are fine at 100 celcius. I'd also be fine if they were willing to come out and say that they'll replace any cards that fail due to the fan constantly being at high speeds for years (when that time comes).

I'm not that angry with them. I knew what I was getting into when I bought the 4870 instead of the GTX 260, and I bought a case (Antec 900) with great airflow to compensate. It's just unacceptable to me that they won't even acknowledge that the heat is an issue (Catalyst 8.9 just came out...no fix). I'm just glad I didn't get the 4850...that little monster is a fireball, and the fan sounds like a jet engine.
Reply

Posted: Sep 19th 2008 10:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Doesn't matter what you're running windows enables all kinds of crap by default.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:18PM QuePasa87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope this helps me with my crappy 3800+. I'll be getting an opteron 185 since I know I won't have the $ anytime soon at all for a whole new rig :(
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 7:36PM kojo87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
damn it doesnt work on Vista 64bit yet. when it does it going on my Athlon 64x2 6400+ and ATi HD3870 rig. mmm speedy.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 8:00PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Since I don't have AMD I'm not going to be able to use it, but however I'm really liking their initiative to streamline hardware optimization. Hopefully it could extend the lifecycle of certain components so that people would complain less about how many times you have to upgrade your PC.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 8:19PM omegajimes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anyone actually tried running something with/without this thing yet? I just got home and tried installing it, Vista 64-bit, you've failed me again!

Athlon 64X2 5000+BE OC'd to 6000
3870
with 4 GB RAM on an MSI K9A2 Plat 790FX

Anything to speed up my gaming before I spend much needed food monies on a phenom and a 4870X2 would be much appreciated.

Also, information on which processes it shuts off would be nice. Does it start them back up again when you're done?

Go AMD for marketing something as enthusiast, and not giving out any of the details an enthusiast would want.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 8:23PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So aside from all the whining, the correct response should be:

"It is really awesome when a company gives its consumers a cool utility for free."
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 8:27PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have an NVIDIA nForce 780i Mobo and a Geforce 8800GT.

This sucks.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 8:46PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It should still work shutting down background stuff.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 9:06PM michaspi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope the program doesn't crash the computer by trying to kill System Idle Process.
Reply

Posted: Sep 18th 2008 11:10PM drun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm tired of seeing thay "meant to be played" thing, it's time for something new.

I have a 3870 and it's so hot that I wanna make out with more fans.
Reply

Posted: Sep 19th 2008 12:24AM ROBOCOLOSSUS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I tried it out... didn't do much for me. Every setting killed my internets and made it impossible to play any Steam games. I don't wanna fuck around flipping random switches in custom profile; they should at least have a "don't touch my internet connection" option. /:

Problem with this thing is only people who probably already know how to take care of their unnecessary processes will be able to use it effectively. My vote goes to don't bother.
Reply

Posted: Sep 19th 2008 8:13AM jynxycat said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
AMD and gaming.



Ha.

Want to speed up your games ? Buy an Intel Q2C.
Reply

Posted: Sep 19th 2008 10:04AM Buckshot said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
More AMD bs. They killed ATI, now want to give you some crapware app. Considering most gamers are using 64-bit Vista and supposedly no more 32-bit OS's on the horizon, why would they not design the app native 64-bit. Just get an intel Q6600 and let AMD rest in peace.
Reply

Posted: Oct 21st 2008 6:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually CleanKill http://mercedhill/cleankill does similar things.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW