In a recent interview with gamesindustry.biz, Peter Molyneux, the outspoken creator of Black and White and Fable, gave his opinion of a territory he's relatively unfamiliar with -- the PlayStation 3. Molyneux, whose games have appeared exclusively on PCs and Microsoft's home consoles, explained his position that the PS3 is "still waiting for that definition title that represents the platform", much like Wii Sports has for the Wii, and how he hopes Fable 2 will for the Xbox 360. We'd probably award that honor to a certain ring-shaped shooter, but hey, to each his own.
Molyneux tried to smooth the assuredly ruffled feathers of the PS3 camp by stating his belief that LittleBigPlanet, whose development team was founded by former Lionhead Studios employees, could fill that void. He goes on to sing the praises of the texturized platformer, saying that he's "incredibly proud of what they've done," and that "it's just an amazing experience to see how their game has progressed." We wonder if he can maintain his LittleBigEnthusiasm when Fable 2 and LBP compete for top honors on their shared release date of Oct. 21.
Reader Comments (152)
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 6:36PM (Unverified) said
Burn.
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 6:39PM (Unverified) said
What I meant to say is: Is Joystiq asking for another flamewar?
Reply
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 10:02PM Extinction said
Coincidentally, PS3's defining game comes out the same day as Molyneux's (LittleBIGplanet)
Reply
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 10:50PM (Unverified) said
Doesn't seem like a burn to me. It's a perfectly reasonable statement. "Defining game" to me means the single game that comes to mind when you think of a system, and the one that everyone who owns the system (or even everyone who's played the system) has played.
The only thing on PS3 that's a contender for defining game status is MGS4, and it really doesn't come close to fitting that description.
Honestly, Sony consoles have never really had defining games. That's a strategy that Nintendo and Microsoft have followed: pouring vast resources into a single IP and using it to represent the system. It's easy to point to the defining games for all of Nintendo's systems: Super Mario Bros. -> Tetris -> Super Mario World -> Mario 64 -> Zelda: Wind Waker (somewhat less definitive than the others on this list) -> Brain Training -> Wii Sports. For Microsoft, it's been Halo -> Halo 3.
But for Sony...? No single game comes to mind for any generation. I guess FF7 almost counts, but that was really only for the first couple years of the PSX. The system quickly redefined itself as the platform where you could play *all* the good games. Its identity was its diversity.
And obviously that's a good strategy too, but it helps to have one centerpiece to point to. I don't think it's coincidence that the Playstation has never had either a defining game or a real mascot. But now, LittleBigPlanet seems poised to take up both titles...
Reply
The only thing on PS3 that's a contender for defining game status is MGS4, and it really doesn't come close to fitting that description.
Honestly, Sony consoles have never really had defining games. That's a strategy that Nintendo and Microsoft have followed: pouring vast resources into a single IP and using it to represent the system. It's easy to point to the defining games for all of Nintendo's systems: Super Mario Bros. -> Tetris -> Super Mario World -> Mario 64 -> Zelda: Wind Waker (somewhat less definitive than the others on this list) -> Brain Training -> Wii Sports. For Microsoft, it's been Halo -> Halo 3.
But for Sony...? No single game comes to mind for any generation. I guess FF7 almost counts, but that was really only for the first couple years of the PSX. The system quickly redefined itself as the platform where you could play *all* the good games. Its identity was its diversity.
And obviously that's a good strategy too, but it helps to have one centerpiece to point to. I don't think it's coincidence that the Playstation has never had either a defining game or a real mascot. But now, LittleBigPlanet seems poised to take up both titles...
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 11:14PM KeenCommander said
You're right - PS1 didn't have an absolutely defining game, but - at least to a lot of people, PS2 was GTA3. Granted it later went multiplatform later, but it's heavily associated with the system - and became a showing point for what the system could do, not to mention that I'm sure it sold a whole lot of them.
Reply
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 12:04AM (Unverified) said
@ Keen commander
I'm pretty sure either FFVII or MGS were associated with the PS1 but whatever.
Reply
I'm pretty sure either FFVII or MGS were associated with the PS1 but whatever.
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 2:29AM (Unverified) said
I'd have to say that the N64 was just as defined by Ocarina of Time as it was by SM64.
Reply
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 9:13AM erh said
@Bluebrake
I suggest Crash Bandicoot is the PSX's defining game. It may not have been the PSX's best selling game, but Sony very heavily advertised the game and, during the PSX years, Crash was an instantly recognizable mascot character that people associated with the Playstation brand.
Reply
I suggest Crash Bandicoot is the PSX's defining game. It may not have been the PSX's best selling game, but Sony very heavily advertised the game and, during the PSX years, Crash was an instantly recognizable mascot character that people associated with the Playstation brand.
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 10:24AM (Unverified) said
"And obviously that's a good strategy too, but it helps to have one centerpiece to point to. I don't think it's coincidence that the Playstation has never had either a defining game or a real mascot. But now, LittleBigPlanet seems poised to take up both titles..."
Oh hell no, for a start I think Molyneux was heaping praise on LBP because it praises his former releases by proxy. As for definitive games, I always thought that not having a go-to mascot was far more a strength than a weakness. How many times has Nintendo's mascots earned it a 'kiddy' label, alienationg the alledged "hardcore" audience? And how many times has the Xbox's association with Halo made people instantly think of the utterly mind-numbing community that plays it? Seriously, definitive games are over rated because there's no such thing as a perfect game. Diversity will always be better.
Reply
Oh hell no, for a start I think Molyneux was heaping praise on LBP because it praises his former releases by proxy. As for definitive games, I always thought that not having a go-to mascot was far more a strength than a weakness. How many times has Nintendo's mascots earned it a 'kiddy' label, alienationg the alledged "hardcore" audience? And how many times has the Xbox's association with Halo made people instantly think of the utterly mind-numbing community that plays it? Seriously, definitive games are over rated because there's no such thing as a perfect game. Diversity will always be better.
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 11:42AM SheppyReturns said
Evan has a point. But I also think the days of a console mascot were shrinking during PSX's rise. Platforms nowadays don't NEED a defining title. In my opinion, it limits the console and only fuels fanboys. As an example, how many people STILL use "360 is fer teh shooters?"
In essence, I think consoles are becoming much more like media formats. Like, is there a DEFINING CD? DVD? VHS? Laser Disc? See where I'm going with this?
Reply
In essence, I think consoles are becoming much more like media formats. Like, is there a DEFINING CD? DVD? VHS? Laser Disc? See where I'm going with this?
Posted: Sep 22nd 2008 4:26PM (Unverified) said
I think of RFOM as the PS3's defining title, personally. But that might be because my friend and I have entirely too much fun with it.
I think Resistance 2 will go farther to implant the RFOM series as the PS3's defining title, much like Halo is for the 360.
Reply
I think Resistance 2 will go farther to implant the RFOM series as the PS3's defining title, much like Halo is for the 360.
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 6:37PM RKN said
I thought the defining title was MGS4, the game people had been salivating over all the way since E3 2005, the sole reason to get a PS3?
Maybe the defining title will be the substance/subsistence version of MGS4?
I wouldn't know, I haven't got to play it yet, damn my PS3 breaking! : (
Maybe the defining title will be the substance/subsistence version of MGS4?
I wouldn't know, I haven't got to play it yet, damn my PS3 breaking! : (
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 7:09PM (Unverified) said
Here we go again with the broken PS3.
DAMMIT NINJA! fix that fucking PS3 already.
Reply
DAMMIT NINJA! fix that fucking PS3 already.
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 10:07PM (Unverified) said
My PS3 went kaputz on me too, so I don't see myself playing that "defining game" anytime soon. In fact, I'm keeping the $149 they want me to spend to repair my 14 month old system and possibly putting it towards an XBox 360. I almost feel like Anakin Skywalker admitting that! LOL!
Reply
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 2:27PM MarkezJM said
For awhile I thought your hijinks with PrematureAssassin were just good spirited antics between two passionate individuals. But I really hope you get banned for that stupid, bigoted comment you made that went something like "I hope your black ass gets banned, boy"
You tried to back pedal and say you didn't mean 'boy' in a racist way, but guess what, you're a dumb bigot.
I'm tired of hearing about your stupid broken PS3 and I hope I don't have to see posts from you ever again.
Reply
You tried to back pedal and say you didn't mean 'boy' in a racist way, but guess what, you're a dumb bigot.
I'm tired of hearing about your stupid broken PS3 and I hope I don't have to see posts from you ever again.
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 3:56PM JoshMilewski said
I don't think it's MGS4, because you really have to have played the previous MGSs for it to make any sense.
You can buy a PS3 + LBP and just enjoy it no matter your past experiences, though, and that's what makes a defining title (of course, the game already has to be really good).
Reply
You can buy a PS3 + LBP and just enjoy it no matter your past experiences, though, and that's what makes a defining title (of course, the game already has to be really good).
Posted: Sep 22nd 2008 7:48AM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said
The irony in all of this is LeonSKennedy using Chris Redfield as his avatar...and I'm nerd enough to know it.
Reply
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 6:41PM (Unverified) said
I know everyone will over react but I believe he's actually correct....ANd he said Defining not GOOD....So I don't wanna hear Uncharted or MGS 4....I know they were both Good if not Great games...LBP really shows what the PS3 is about and what you bought the thing for.
LBP may be the game for a few reasons....
1. Its gorgeous so it definitely shows what the PS3 is capable of.
2.Users can freely create content on it which is something Microsoft wont allow 360 owners to do.
3.It utilizes PSN and Trophies very well.
4.Though it looks childish its a gamers game so the Hardcore will love it
5.And finally its easily accessible so everyone can play it
Which is something neither MGS or Uncharted can say.
LBP may be the game for a few reasons....
1. Its gorgeous so it definitely shows what the PS3 is capable of.
2.Users can freely create content on it which is something Microsoft wont allow 360 owners to do.
3.It utilizes PSN and Trophies very well.
4.Though it looks childish its a gamers game so the Hardcore will love it
5.And finally its easily accessible so everyone can play it
Which is something neither MGS or Uncharted can say.
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 6:53PM (Unverified) said
"Users can freely create content on it which is something Microsoft wont allow 360 owners to do."
Halo 3 has custom-content...so does N+...and so will GHWT. There are some restrictions regarding DLC and patches but as far as user-created in-game content, they would easily greenlight LBP should it come out for 360.
Also I still stand by my opinion that LBP isn't a good Mascot/Killer App/Defining Title for PS3.I know that fanboys are desperate for it but right now the only viable option is either Kratos or Killzone 2/Resistance 2(provided they took the effort to make those generic assholes recognizable).
Reply
Halo 3 has custom-content...so does N+...and so will GHWT. There are some restrictions regarding DLC and patches but as far as user-created in-game content, they would easily greenlight LBP should it come out for 360.
Also I still stand by my opinion that LBP isn't a good Mascot/Killer App/Defining Title for PS3.I know that fanboys are desperate for it but right now the only viable option is either Kratos or Killzone 2/Resistance 2(provided they took the effort to make those generic assholes recognizable).
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 8:07PM Maverick Saturn 06 said
I was going to disagree when I started reading, but upon completly reading I realised that I was in the opposite state, I very much agree with you.
Halo defines the Xbox, the very name gets people excited and considerably, Mario titles and smash brothers is the defining title on Wii, while MGS4 and Uncharted may have both been excellent games, they aren't 'the PS3' like Sonic 'was Sega'.
Reply
Halo defines the Xbox, the very name gets people excited and considerably, Mario titles and smash brothers is the defining title on Wii, while MGS4 and Uncharted may have both been excellent games, they aren't 'the PS3' like Sonic 'was Sega'.
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 8:34PM (Unverified) said
I don't see how anyone can say that MGS 4, Resistance, Ratchet And Clank & Uncharted are not console defining experiences.
When I think of the Playstation brand I think of Final Fantasy, GTA, MGS, Guitar Hero, SOCOM & Gran Turismo. All but 3 of those are now multiplatform titles.
The original fable didn't represent the original X-Box - Halo did. In fact Fable was awful especially considering the huge amount of hype and lack of promised content. Fable 2 will not define the 360 either. I think it's safe to say that Gears Of War & Halo have that title locked up.
When I think of the 360 I mainly think of Gears Of War, Halo & Ninja Gaiden. Those are console defining experiences. I have nothing against Fable 2 - I hope it's good. But, the original Fable was a huge letdown and was never a console definer.
I can understand being excited for Fable 2 because I am hyped for a game with a similar situation. Killzone 2 was a letdown much like the original Fable was but the sequels have a tremendous amount of hype and potential.
Reply
When I think of the Playstation brand I think of Final Fantasy, GTA, MGS, Guitar Hero, SOCOM & Gran Turismo. All but 3 of those are now multiplatform titles.
The original fable didn't represent the original X-Box - Halo did. In fact Fable was awful especially considering the huge amount of hype and lack of promised content. Fable 2 will not define the 360 either. I think it's safe to say that Gears Of War & Halo have that title locked up.
When I think of the 360 I mainly think of Gears Of War, Halo & Ninja Gaiden. Those are console defining experiences. I have nothing against Fable 2 - I hope it's good. But, the original Fable was a huge letdown and was never a console definer.
I can understand being excited for Fable 2 because I am hyped for a game with a similar situation. Killzone 2 was a letdown much like the original Fable was but the sequels have a tremendous amount of hype and potential.
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 9:39PM Youthinized said
This guy's opinion.
LBP will probably be the gta3 for ps2.
Reply
LBP will probably be the gta3 for ps2.
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 10:06PM Extinction said
You can't compare Halo3's letting you move items in a level around to LBPs letting you create levels from scratch. Or even anything else you suggested. N+ doesn't let you upload levels to a central repository for sharing. You know damn well MS doesn't allow proper user-created content that is comparable, that's why Unreal supported mods on PS3 and not 360
Reply
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 10:36PM (Unverified) said
Immortal what does MGS, Ratchet, or Uncharted done for the PS3 to define it....Lets see...
1.Graphics...Ok all the games look gorgeous.
2.Use of PSN...MGO is terrible, Rachet and Uncharted have no online features and Socom isnt out yet...Resistance is he only game that has proven to be a great online game.
3.Trophies. Uncharted is the only one that uses trophies.
These are all so called parts of the "Playstation Experience" Yet none of them meet all of the criteria of that experience. Thats why LBP might be the first to be the defining experience. THOUGH ALL OF THESE ARE GREAT GAMES!
Reply
1.Graphics...Ok all the games look gorgeous.
2.Use of PSN...MGO is terrible, Rachet and Uncharted have no online features and Socom isnt out yet...Resistance is he only game that has proven to be a great online game.
3.Trophies. Uncharted is the only one that uses trophies.
These are all so called parts of the "Playstation Experience" Yet none of them meet all of the criteria of that experience. Thats why LBP might be the first to be the defining experience. THOUGH ALL OF THESE ARE GREAT GAMES!
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 1:32AM Heywatchitbuddy said
That reminds me of Microsoft talking about Viva Pinata...
Reply
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 1:20PM (Unverified) said
@ExMcloud
They don't meet YOUR criteria for a platform defining game. There is no set of standard criteria for a game to be platform defining. Just because you think MGO sucks doesn't mean other people don't like it. Many people think that Halo 3 & Gears suck as well.
Molyneaux is being to vague with his statement of platform defining game. What he means is a game that appeals to everyone (casual and hardcore) because that's what Wii Sports (I guess) and Halo 3 did. Little Big Planet may be the closest thing to a game that appeals to everyone on the PS3 to this point. It will also give the console a mascot it can hang its hat on for the consoles life cycle.
The PS3 has MANY defining titles that are exclusive to the console. In fact, any good exclusive is a console defining game. I think the bigger named ones are obviously MGS 4, Uncharted, Disgaea 3, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, Ratchet And Clank & Resistance. There are also honorable mentions like GT:P, Motorstorm & MLB 08 The Show.
Trophies are brand new so not all games are going to have them retroactive. That is not a criteria for a game being platform defining. That insinuates that if the PS3 never had trophies then no game would ever define the platform.
I would consider Bioshock a platform definer for the 360 before it went multiplatform. Bioshock had no online mode like uncharted. So, I don't think network play is a criteria either.
I think we will just have to agree to disagree.
Reply
They don't meet YOUR criteria for a platform defining game. There is no set of standard criteria for a game to be platform defining. Just because you think MGO sucks doesn't mean other people don't like it. Many people think that Halo 3 & Gears suck as well.
Molyneaux is being to vague with his statement of platform defining game. What he means is a game that appeals to everyone (casual and hardcore) because that's what Wii Sports (I guess) and Halo 3 did. Little Big Planet may be the closest thing to a game that appeals to everyone on the PS3 to this point. It will also give the console a mascot it can hang its hat on for the consoles life cycle.
The PS3 has MANY defining titles that are exclusive to the console. In fact, any good exclusive is a console defining game. I think the bigger named ones are obviously MGS 4, Uncharted, Disgaea 3, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, Ratchet And Clank & Resistance. There are also honorable mentions like GT:P, Motorstorm & MLB 08 The Show.
Trophies are brand new so not all games are going to have them retroactive. That is not a criteria for a game being platform defining. That insinuates that if the PS3 never had trophies then no game would ever define the platform.
I would consider Bioshock a platform definer for the 360 before it went multiplatform. Bioshock had no online mode like uncharted. So, I don't think network play is a criteria either.
I think we will just have to agree to disagree.
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 8:35PM (Unverified) said
@Immortal
Look when you hear Sony bring up the so called Playstation Experience or if any of the good people here work in Retail we here the same thing from our "Sony Reps"....PSN, Trophies,The Cell....I hear that crap about 50 times a day...This isn't my criteria...Its Sony's...To define something is to "set the limits" of what can be done MGS did nothing to take advantage of what the PS3 as a system can do but use the Cell...
It didnt use the freedom that users of PSN have to create content, they didn't make a great PSN game, or use the Playstation XMB, or even use trophies....(And they sure as hell knew about them ahead of time)...Uncharted falls under this too..
Sony's defining games for this generation should use all of what the PS3 can do from the Blu-Ray drive to the networking features, and free online play...Games like Resistance, LBP, and MAG...These will be the games that showcase why the PS3 is superior to all other systems (If you believe that)...What the system can do for the games is what defines them not what the games can do for the system.
Reply
Look when you hear Sony bring up the so called Playstation Experience or if any of the good people here work in Retail we here the same thing from our "Sony Reps"....PSN, Trophies,The Cell....I hear that crap about 50 times a day...This isn't my criteria...Its Sony's...To define something is to "set the limits" of what can be done MGS did nothing to take advantage of what the PS3 as a system can do but use the Cell...
It didnt use the freedom that users of PSN have to create content, they didn't make a great PSN game, or use the Playstation XMB, or even use trophies....(And they sure as hell knew about them ahead of time)...Uncharted falls under this too..
Sony's defining games for this generation should use all of what the PS3 can do from the Blu-Ray drive to the networking features, and free online play...Games like Resistance, LBP, and MAG...These will be the games that showcase why the PS3 is superior to all other systems (If you believe that)...What the system can do for the games is what defines them not what the games can do for the system.
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 6:44PM nzero said
I hope Fable 2 burns in the water (though that is relatively impossible lol) But really Fable 2 looks like a fun game and all its just that everytime Molyneux opens his mouth its to say that his game is God or something. I mean usre it looks like a fun game but I feel that it won't be a great game. He just reminds me of Denis Dyack. I feel that the ps3 does have games that defines it (metal gear, uncharted, rachet and clank) I mean it has good games, just everyone makes it seem that it doesn't. The 360 and the ps3 basically have the same games excluding their first party efforts. But whatever fanboys just ruin everything.
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 7:39AM (Unverified) said
Pyros burn in water.
PS: Ach, the good old 2Fort Exploit.
Reply
PS: Ach, the good old 2Fort Exploit.
Posted: Sep 21st 2008 3:23PM (Unverified) said
wow...anger everywhere!!and plenty of stuff burn in water as pointed out above!!Good job guys!!!*claps*
Reply
Posted: Sep 22nd 2008 8:20AM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said
I'm afraid I can't let you do that, Dave.
Reply
Posted: Sep 20th 2008 6:48PM Lone Starr said
I want a counter-comment from David Jaffe.
Featured Stories
Super Joystiq Podcast 004: 38 Studios meltdown, Gravity Rush, Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, Dragon's Dogma
Posted on May 25th 2012 3:30PM






