| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (27)

Posted: Sep 24th 2008 11:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't believe they screwed multiplayer- BIA2 was some of the best coop ever.

I waited years for THIS game, and now I'm gonna pass. I feel like Christmas just got canceled.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 12:02AM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Waah, waah, waaaaah.
Reply

Posted: Sep 24th 2008 11:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Decent reviews, but not good enough to get me to buy it. When it comes to war shooters, it comes down to the online first, then single player 2nd and I think CoD:WaW would be more fulfilling. Then again I don't plan on getting CoD either.
Reply

Posted: Sep 24th 2008 11:10PM QuePasa87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not sure I want to get this yet with WipEout HD releasing tomorrow. :(

Plus I have to save moneys for Left 4 Dead, LBP, Dead Space, Gears 2, Resistance 2, Fallout 3, maybe Fable 2, Far Cry 2, maybe World at War. eeeeeek
Reply

Posted: Sep 24th 2008 11:33PM QuePasa87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh and I forgot SOCOM. My poor wallet lol
Reply

Posted: Sep 24th 2008 11:11PM MC Double Def DP said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I enjoy this game, but I had to get use to not pressing the left trigger to aim. Lost too many good men by directing them to charge blindly in the direction I wanted to zoom in on.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 2:10AM Parnic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Switch to the "Tour of Duty" control scheme for a left-trigger zoom.
Reply

Posted: Sep 24th 2008 11:35PM Aperture said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
eh, i never liked the feel of the first two, the weapons felt too inacurate for me to really enjoy it, but who knows this time around?
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 2:10AM Parnic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The weapons are much more accurate in this game than the previous installments.
Reply

Posted: Sep 24th 2008 11:47PM Lone Starr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That pic is creepy. Uncanny valley....
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 2:38AM SeanR said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Looks like it belongs on myspace...
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 12:20AM TheyDidItFirst said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just bought it and I'm really liking it. Then again, I really liked the first 2 also so i guess this one isn't much different. I definitely made sure to turn off the thing where the screen turns red and the action cam though, they're both way to distracting.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 1:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what other options can you turn off?

I am on the fence about this game but after reading what you wrote, I'm a little more excited to enter into a more realistic experience.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 12:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want this game. I have an un-opened copy of SW:Force Unleashed I could return and get BIA:HH
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 1:35AM rullers said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
And the barrage of garbage continues...
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 6:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
80%+ has become garbage now?!?

I remember the good old days of video game reviewing when 70% was garbage... :-(
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 3:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess it was a bad time to get back into playing Halo 3 again.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 5:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game on authentic=the best ww2 game ive ever played.
Its incredibly realistic as if you run/gun. You WILL be cut to pieces.
Now what they really need is BiA Iraq/modern warfare.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 7:38AM cuteSAVAGE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It'll have a hard time going up against Treyarch's Call of Duty: World at War this Christmas, of course. "

Gearbox > Treyarch

Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 + Earned in Blood > Call of Duty + United Offensive + Finest Hour + 2 + Big Red One + 3

I'll take original, tactical, gameplay playing out to one of the best told stories in any video game over cookie-cutter cinematic action any day.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 10:29AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And I'll take co-op over a game that was in development forever and still couldn't put what should now be a basic feature into the game.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 1:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sorry, but BiA is _not_ a good game. From the first one where you had the shakiest gun in the West, concrete hedges, and one 'tactical' move you repeated over and over ... to having to listen to painfully sophomoric, cliche "thoughts about war" and supposedly humanizing stories about soldiers cutting hard-boiled eggs ... it's cheesy and hammy. That makes a good lunch, not a good game.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 2:10PM cuteSAVAGE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think we differ greatly on what merits a great game, as well as a great lunch.

I like immersion, I like to forget that I'm playing a game. I don't want my hand held around every corner, and I certainly don't want to push through an endless barrage of enemy NPCs for the sake of pushing my way through to the next linear objective simply because some silly developer couldn't figure out the proper AI algorithms to dictate an action other than run, shoot, run, shoot some more, and die because they were too busy copy and pasting 1999 game design standards.

BiA certainly isn't perfect (it only looks that way in comparison to other WWII drivel that isn't titled "Commandos 2" or "Company of Heroes"), it was just the perfect shot of espresso when everyone else was serving decaf. Who would have thought we would need another with EiB and now HH. Virtual Ham n' Cheese for the vegan win!
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 8:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
after gameinformer gave SW.FU a 8.75 can you trust them can you trust any fanboy magazine (looking at you xbox) lets see what some big names score it
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 9:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't IGN give this a 7 or something?
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 12:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know,there's a reason 1UP changed their scoring scale. It's because people just look at a number and if it's not an 8 - 10,they don't give it the time of day. You're supposed to READ THE REVIEW and see what's good and bad about the game and judge if you'll like it,not just look at a number and never give the game another thought again.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2008 12:40PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This rant receives a 6.5/10

Not worth the time it takes to read ;)
Reply

Posted: Nov 13th 2008 5:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can blod be turned off?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW