Was it mere coincidence that Activision's latest Wii FPS was situated right next to The Conduit at Nintendo's SF media event? You know, as if to say, "You want first-person shooters? Wii has you covered." Surely not. One thing's for certain: The situation certainly made it easier for us to transition from one game to the other in order to gauge how different developers are putting motion-control to use in the genre.
In the case of Treyarch, its Wii team has obviously played plenty of Metroid Prime 3; Call of Duty: World at War is pratically a play-alike (without the Morph Ball, grapple beam, and ... er, all that other sci-fi stuff). We were pleasantly surprised to find that the game is also similar to another FPS ... Call of Duty: World at War – the "HD" version.
Activision attributes this to the fact that, at least when it comes to size and overall design, the game's levels are identical to those found in versions of the game being developed for more technologically beefy consoles. Sure, it's not anywhere near as pretty as the PS3 and Xbox 360 games also due this fall, but it's keeping up in terms of gameplay.
The level we spent time with was in the Pacific theater and saw us squaring off against Imperial Japanese Army forces. We'd already fought them on Xbox 360, so we were familiar with their merciless tactics and propensity to charge at us full-tilt, bayonets at the ready. Sure enough, the Wii game's A.I. acted just like we'd remembered.
Most of our play time was spent battling inch-by-inch to cover in some truly brutal scenarios, while debris and shrapnel flew around us. Low-res or not, it was intense. We started off using the flame thrower to cook our enemies extra-crispy and fill their bunkers with billowing, scorching gas.
Perhaps it was the TVs we were playing on, or maybe we've just become accustomed to HD FPSs, but when we switched over to our machine gun, we found that it was much easier to nail enemies without using the iron sights – they just sort of muddied the screen when brought up. Using automatic weapons gave us a chance to try the reload mechanic, which consists of moving the Nunchuk towards the Wiimote then away. It actually worked quite well; there wasn't even a bit of shaking required.
All in all, we came away from our demo with a sense that Wii owners won't be getting the short end on the M1 Garand with this Call of Duty installment. So far, it looks, sounds, plays, and feels like a suitably epic FPS for Nintendo's console, without any glaringly cut corners.
Reader Comments (40)
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 10:18AM (Unverified) said
Teh Jaggiez! Theys hurtin mah eyez!
I wonder if GT will do a comparison with all 3 versions? :P
Reply
I wonder if GT will do a comparison with all 3 versions? :P
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 10:49AM (Unverified) said
to borrow a Fernandos staple
but but but...the Wii is PART of this generation, and it LEADS in sales.
That screenie right there SHOWS how FAR BEHIND the Wii is to the PS3 and 360 in terms of being part of THIS generation.
Pathetic, PS2 games look better than that.
Reply
but but but...the Wii is PART of this generation, and it LEADS in sales.
That screenie right there SHOWS how FAR BEHIND the Wii is to the PS3 and 360 in terms of being part of THIS generation.
Pathetic, PS2 games look better than that.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 5:52PM Foetoid said
Geez Killjeebus, it doesn't take long to forget how bad last-gen games look. This looks far better than anything on the Ps2 and will look even better again in 480p on a decent TV. I'm sick of everyone crying about the Wiis graphics. As long as it's better than last gen (which has already been easily proven that it's very doable, only the laziest of devs don't want to bother) then isn't that good enough?
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 10:21AM Grey Acumen said
Tah-daaahhh!
This game will be worth following, and I have a quick prediction to make about the future:
Week 3 - Game sells significantly lower than its HD counterparts. Game sites declare Wii to be inhospitable for Mature games.
Week 10 - Game continues to sell well, HD sales have started to drop to the point that weekly sales are about the same for Wii vs HD. HD still ahead in total sales though.
Week 50 - Game continues to sell well and is now either close to overtaking or overtakes sales of the HD version. Game sites declare that this is because of the limited number of good FPS for the Wii compared to what are available on HD consoles, or ignores this completely.
Reply
This game will be worth following, and I have a quick prediction to make about the future:
Week 3 - Game sells significantly lower than its HD counterparts. Game sites declare Wii to be inhospitable for Mature games.
Week 10 - Game continues to sell well, HD sales have started to drop to the point that weekly sales are about the same for Wii vs HD. HD still ahead in total sales though.
Week 50 - Game continues to sell well and is now either close to overtaking or overtakes sales of the HD version. Game sites declare that this is because of the limited number of good FPS for the Wii compared to what are available on HD consoles, or ignores this completely.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 10:33AM JACKOFNOTRADES85 said
I just had to downgrade about three months ago to a 36" SD tv from a 60" Sony Bravia that broke and will cost an arm and a leg to fix.
Let me tell you that it took a long time to get use to it. I even slowed down on playing on my PS3 because I couldn't see anything. I played through Doom 3 finally then went back to the console to play Force Unleashed. I really miss my HD tv and if I ever get it fixed I will appreciate it even more.
Just saying. HD graphics might not define gameplay, but they sure do help out my eyes.
Reply
Let me tell you that it took a long time to get use to it. I even slowed down on playing on my PS3 because I couldn't see anything. I played through Doom 3 finally then went back to the console to play Force Unleashed. I really miss my HD tv and if I ever get it fixed I will appreciate it even more.
Just saying. HD graphics might not define gameplay, but they sure do help out my eyes.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 11:03AM (Unverified) said
So true Jack. I can barely even watch Chumpvision TV. I have 2 27" TV's on either side of my 50" Panny during Football season for fantasy purposes and when you dart your eyes back and forth between the Chumpvision TV's and the HD one...it feels like you are looking with blured vision.
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 11:17AM (Unverified) said
"and the only thing HD really has going for it, IMO, is the much better color quality"
You either do not have your HDTV hooked up properly, have a poor HDTV...or you need to have your eyes checked.
My opinion, best LCD HDTV's Sony Bravia
best Plasma HDTV's Panasonic, or Pioneer
Seriously, every single person that comes over to watch football at my house is FLOORED by the difference, INCLUDING a few friends of mine that have older RP screen or older LCD, Plasma HDTV's that THOUGHT they were watching in HD until they saw mine.
Some of them do not even have the equipment nec. to properly receive an HD signal.
Reply
You either do not have your HDTV hooked up properly, have a poor HDTV...or you need to have your eyes checked.
My opinion, best LCD HDTV's Sony Bravia
best Plasma HDTV's Panasonic, or Pioneer
Seriously, every single person that comes over to watch football at my house is FLOORED by the difference, INCLUDING a few friends of mine that have older RP screen or older LCD, Plasma HDTV's that THOUGHT they were watching in HD until they saw mine.
Some of them do not even have the equipment nec. to properly receive an HD signal.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 11:32AM Vidikron said
"I don't see too much difference from when i watch on my HDTV back at home (ATSC Tuner gets all the local channels in HD for free, but still low-res analogue cable), and the only thing HD really has going for it, IMO, is the much better color quality"
You're kidding, right? If you lived near me I'd invite you over to watch some football one Saturday. The differences when switching from an HD broadcast to an SD broadcast is glaring and often painful. Now, some channels do get over compressed these days and you'll see macro-blocking during fast movement, but even then the overall quality is far and away better.
Seriously, watch some live sports. They tend to show off the differences the best due to the all the detail on the screen (all the players, people on the sidelines, the crowd, etc...).
Reply
You're kidding, right? If you lived near me I'd invite you over to watch some football one Saturday. The differences when switching from an HD broadcast to an SD broadcast is glaring and often painful. Now, some channels do get over compressed these days and you'll see macro-blocking during fast movement, but even then the overall quality is far and away better.
Seriously, watch some live sports. They tend to show off the differences the best due to the all the detail on the screen (all the players, people on the sidelines, the crowd, etc...).
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 11:56AM Vcize said
Jebus, I have a similar setup and upgraded the satellite TVs to LCDs this year (for football also) and it was so worth it, I highly recommend it.
This weekend I had to head out to the in-laws and watch a game in SD again. Man, the difference between football in SD and HD is just ridiculous. Same goes for videogames.
Reply
This weekend I had to head out to the in-laws and watch a game in SD again. Man, the difference between football in SD and HD is just ridiculous. Same goes for videogames.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 10:29AM buttscratch said
no shit? Really? Its good? hmm... I'm very surprised
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 10:34AM (Unverified) said
Im fairly sure Goldeneye on the N64 had better graphics than that screenshot.
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 10:43AM Morisato13 said
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 10:57AM (Unverified) said
Graphics are not everything, but they sure help. I am sure this "version" suffers from equally bad AI, animation, physics...etc.
and then you have textures that look like this on the PS3...
http://ps3.psu.com/New-Killzone-2-shots-show-off-amazing-ground-textures-News--a0004983-p0.php
Now, who wants to tell me that graphics DON'T matter?
Reply
and then you have textures that look like this on the PS3...
http://ps3.psu.com/New-Killzone-2-shots-show-off-amazing-ground-textures-News--a0004983-p0.php
Now, who wants to tell me that graphics DON'T matter?
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 6:43PM (Unverified) said
Textures like what, Killjebus?
Oh, you mean those textures that can be done on the 360, PS3, as well as the PC? Yeah... Just to be honest, those textures aren't anything special.
The lighting is good, which makes everything look better, but the textures aren't anything note-worthy.
Reply
Oh, you mean those textures that can be done on the 360, PS3, as well as the PC? Yeah... Just to be honest, those textures aren't anything special.
The lighting is good, which makes everything look better, but the textures aren't anything note-worthy.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 11:06AM Mr Khan said
Sacrificed a good bit on the details in order to get more on-screen action, and generally large-scale fields of play.
They sure as hell broke their claim that it would be the best-looking Wii game, but certainly in the running for best multiplatform port so far, though Treyarch's own Quantum of Solace Wii, as well as Sonic Unleashed Wii, have it in the running
Things are getting sweeter.
Reply
They sure as hell broke their claim that it would be the best-looking Wii game, but certainly in the running for best multiplatform port so far, though Treyarch's own Quantum of Solace Wii, as well as Sonic Unleashed Wii, have it in the running
Things are getting sweeter.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 11:57AM (Unverified) said
these screenshots are 500x299...safe to say it looks better than that...
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 3:19PM (Unverified) said
u put that screen shot on a 50inch HDTV and you now have an even worse image.
the screen shots dont get any better.
the ones they show us are usually the best they can show.
graphics arent everything, but when you have a ps3 and 360, they do mean something.
Reply
the screen shots dont get any better.
the ones they show us are usually the best they can show.
graphics arent everything, but when you have a ps3 and 360, they do mean something.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 12:39PM Vegeta has a ps3 said
Sounds like the Wii version might actually be good(which is actually shocking). I may have to try both the 360 version and the Wii version.
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 12:56PM MrHashbrown said
It's actually pretty disappointing that everyone is shocked that there is actually a good third-party game coming. I really pity Wii's hardcore audience, but hey the future is looking bright after this week!
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 4:39PM Vegeta has a ps3 said
I may enjoy my Wii, but that doesn't mean I ignore all the crap the console has been getting.
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 3:11PM (Unverified) said
the screen shot ( which is usually a better graphic then actual gameplay ) looks like cod2 graphics.
sorry there is nothing nex gen about cod5 on the wii.
Reply
sorry there is nothing nex gen about cod5 on the wii.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 3:32PM Mr Khan said
On the Wii that processed is usually reversed, and play looks a lot better than stills. Early Metroid Prime 3 screens raised a lot of rage about how Wii was weaker than GC, but the game proved Wii's strengths
Skate It looks a lot better in motion when lighting and shadows come into play
Red Steel is the only instance where screens wound up looking better, and my guess is that is because Ubisoft carefully picked which areas to take captures of, and which ones to leave out
Reply
Skate It looks a lot better in motion when lighting and shadows come into play
Red Steel is the only instance where screens wound up looking better, and my guess is that is because Ubisoft carefully picked which areas to take captures of, and which ones to leave out
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 4:34PM Vegeta has a ps3 said
nex gen about cod5 on the wii.
You could say the same about games on the 360 and ps3.
Next gen does not equal prettier graphics.
Reply
You could say the same about games on the 360 and ps3.
Next gen does not equal prettier graphics.
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 4:37PM Vegeta has a ps3 said
Yep. Leave it to the regulars to completely ignore anything positive about the preview and focus on an easy target. LOL WII HAS INFERIOR GRAPHICS TO THE PS3 AND 360 LOL LOL. I IS SMART!!!
Reply
Posted: Oct 6th 2008 9:20PM (Unverified) said
Umm, did you guys even read the article? That screen shot doesnt do the game any justice
"We were pleasantly surprised to find that the game is also similar to another FPS ... Call of Duty: World at War – the "HD" version."
I'm just gonna have to take the guy's word for it who actually played the game, and wrote an article about how surprised he was at the visuals... maybe.
Take a look for yourselves, wankers.
http://wii.ign.com/dor/objects/14222041/call-of-duty-5/videos/codwii_flamethrow_100308.html
Reply
"We were pleasantly surprised to find that the game is also similar to another FPS ... Call of Duty: World at War – the "HD" version."
I'm just gonna have to take the guy's word for it who actually played the game, and wrote an article about how surprised he was at the visuals... maybe.
Take a look for yourselves, wankers.
http://wii.ign.com/dor/objects/14222041/call-of-duty-5/videos/codwii_flamethrow_100308.html
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










