In an interesting gesture of cooperation, it appears that Sega is working with the ESRB to make sure that MadWorld releases with an "M" rating in the US. MTV Multiplayer reports that the publisher has been submitting new builds to the ESRB and noting the rating organization's feedback. This is all, of course, an attempt to avoid an "AO" rating, which would not only ban the game from retail, but prevent it from being licensed for the Wii (or any other console, just to be clear).
The Sega reps also aren't expecting MadWorld to release in developer Platinum Games' native land of Japan until after its March 2009 release in the States. The company is focused on making it a Western hit -- and don't expect it to be shown at this week's Tokyo Games Show.
[Via GamePolitics]
Reader Comments (21)
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 11:07AM (Unverified) said
Stupid stupid stupid.
Im a fucking adult. Where are my games? I have moneys!
Reply
Im a fucking adult. Where are my games? I have moneys!
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 11:34AM (Unverified) said
Obviously the genious of my humor is lost on simpleton such as yourself.
Reply
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 1:07PM MrHashbrown said
Last I checked you were under 18 and got pregnant with Michael Cera.
Reply
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 1:58PM darkinchworm said
I believe "genius" is the word you were looking for.
By the way, the name's Dumas.
Reply
By the way, the name's Dumas.
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 2:01PM Grey Acumen said
Yeah, he's a fucking adult! Everyone knows that fucking adults are better than fucking children!
Unless you're pedobear.
Reply
Unless you're pedobear.
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 11:09AM John Z said
I'm not sure I like this so much. I can understand wanting to avoid an AO rating, and I know that we all love our gutzangore, but this just feels wrong. How much creative input will the ESRB/other agencies be able to exert over Sega and Platinum with this deal? Is this just a matter of Sega doing an eye-doctor-like "So, tell me which is an M, this... or this? How about this... or this? Good, good, can we eviscerate him like this... or like this?" Or are the ESRB/whoever actively saying "Your sever points can be here, here, here, and here, but no touchy here, here, or here; oh, and we want this to go like this"?
Reply
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 11:27AM (Unverified) said
I'm pretty sure the ESRB works just like the movie ratings board.
As such, they base a game's rating on what is within the game. From there, the company is responsible for changing things. So, in my opinion, Sega is just trying to find out just how far they can push the line between M and AO, then toe the line just enough to keep the M rating.
Reply
As such, they base a game's rating on what is within the game. From there, the company is responsible for changing things. So, in my opinion, Sega is just trying to find out just how far they can push the line between M and AO, then toe the line just enough to keep the M rating.
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 12:04PM Mmmmz said
The gaming industry literally needs to grow up and stop being afraid of the dreaded porn, I mean, AO rating. Have the ESRB create a separate X or Po rating for porn games. That way games that should be rated AO (GTA, Manhunt, some FPS, etc.) can be rated as such and if the retailers and Console makers don't like it, they'll lose out on millions. If most "Mature" games were movies, they'd be rated R. So, come on developers and publishers, rally together and lets stop doing a this ridiculous dance.
Reply
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 12:53PM Suichimo said
As it stands there is every reason to be afraid of an AO rating. If a game gets that all of the millions of dollars and thousands of man hours go to complete waste.
As for your solution, it still won't work. You say that retailers and console makers will lose out, well I say you're wrong. At this moment retailers actually don't have to follow the ESRB. They choose not to sell AO games on the basis that they are AO, what is stopping them from doing the same thing if they bring in a new rating? The only way a game with such a high age rating would get sold would be through the website of the developer and/or publisher.
Reply
As for your solution, it still won't work. You say that retailers and console makers will lose out, well I say you're wrong. At this moment retailers actually don't have to follow the ESRB. They choose not to sell AO games on the basis that they are AO, what is stopping them from doing the same thing if they bring in a new rating? The only way a game with such a high age rating would get sold would be through the website of the developer and/or publisher.
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 12:33PM (Unverified) said
Heres a way to avoid AO:
Take a note from Viva Pinata and make everything drop candy, there is no way that would get AO, plus the special edition could include candy called Soylent Green.
Reply
Take a note from Viva Pinata and make everything drop candy, there is no way that would get AO, plus the special edition could include candy called Soylent Green.
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 1:34PM (Unverified) said
Another game I won't even be interested in now. A game with gore that isn't AO? Boring.
Reply
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 1:55PM (Unverified) said
Shame this is gonna sell even less than No More Heroes.
Wii just isn't the machine for this, it should really come over to PSN/XBLA.
Reply
Wii just isn't the machine for this, it should really come over to PSN/XBLA.
Posted: Oct 7th 2008 2:37PM (Unverified) said
I'd be totally shocked if it wasn't a best all-time seller like all of Clover's other games.
:-/
Reply
:-/
Posted: Oct 8th 2008 3:00AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
Would it really be that gory to even demand an AO rating?
I mean, violence is violence... but protesting soccer moms (I know that's a generalization, but who cares!) seem to care more about realistic-looking violence (see: Manhunt) as opposed to cartoonish violence.
Granted, MadWorld's cast doesn't look like they belong in Looney Tunes, but the graphic style makes it seem far less realistic than other violent games.
Reply
I mean, violence is violence... but protesting soccer moms (I know that's a generalization, but who cares!) seem to care more about realistic-looking violence (see: Manhunt) as opposed to cartoonish violence.
Granted, MadWorld's cast doesn't look like they belong in Looney Tunes, but the graphic style makes it seem far less realistic than other violent games.
Posted: Dec 30th 2008 3:25PM (Unverified) said
no more heros sold well... joetheb and yuo know what you guys are getting a game from the same developer who making mad world.
it will sell
Reply
it will sell
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments









