| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (39)

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:37PM knighty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spiffy news, though I''d be playing alone for a while anyway, while I go on through my story mode.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:52PM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll be playing online, but not on day 1.. there's just too many games coming out this holiday so some will get pushed back to the spring.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:39PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is that guy wearing a dress?
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 4:46PM Boffo the Sock said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Negative. He's wearing the Frilly Armor of Gender Confusion.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So where are all those arcade models going to store this patch at? Seriously has to be the dumbest thing ever to patch a game that is not out yet a screw people over who you sell too.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:47PM PedoJokerBear said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
buying an xbox arcade (with no HDD) is probably the second dumbest thing to do huh?
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:52PM Ghen said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
arcade, LOL

get a hard drive on ebay
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You could win one - http://www.xonegallery.com/pixelsandpages - and then buy a hard drive.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:00PM WackyCoffee said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Probably on the 256MB memory card that comes with each Arcade package.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:06PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LOL
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
If people play online AT ALL, they almost need the HD. How else do you get map packs, or ANY DLC. If on line co op mattered to the person, they wouldn't buy an Arcade or Core system. End of story.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:18PM Negatron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks BadBoy, people are so accustom to what they have now a days, they forget the capacity of a memory card...
The patch isnt going to be 3 gig...

*Raises a curious brow*
Or is it? lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 3:44PM Snowblind said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It was either release the content as a patch, or delay the game and force it to go through the testing process all over again, which would have meant we wouldn't see the game for another few months.

Patching it in was by far the best move, even if we did have to wait a week. But since we don't, there's no way you can spin this to try and make it sound negative.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 4:26PM arrrgh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
kudos to Mr. Pete and team for pulling this off!!! most companies promise a patch and then somehow...forget that they were going to release one
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:43PM cantbeatmegaman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
that screenshot is just plain wrong.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:43PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Very good news - I was afraid that if it were left out for reviews, the game wouldn't come off as great.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:48PM cc123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reviews come out before the game launches. Matter of fact they should be either reviewing it right now or very soon. So unless they get a special early version of the patch, coop will not be factored into the reviews.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 3:05PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Obviously - but with the patch finished, at the very least they won't be saying the co-op will be coming sometime in the future... and at the very most, they may get to try it out somehow.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 6:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agree with Marty. The day that the patch is available, all the reviews are going to be revised. At least any good reviewer will have updated their article.

It'll help anyone who is still on the fence with fable 2, because those people usually decide 2-6 days from release to read comments and more reviews.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 7:40PM cc123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So reviews should be revised when a developer adds content that isn't on the disc?

I can understand if the reviews have notes added to them regarding the patch once it's been released but if the original score/review is changed for a patch they will be setting a horrible precedent.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Good. "We're going to patch it" and when they "hope" to have the patch out was worthless, especially from them. Calling it done, on the other hand, is black and white.

Nice work on earning back some of that credibility. Now that one of its major selling-points is back in, I may end up with a copy of this game after all.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:45PM Erluti said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
LOL @ "Black and White"
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ha. I didn't even think about that.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:21PM Negatron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Black & White,

That game was unique.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 1:45PM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder what happens if you play co-op from day 1?
Can you even co-op during the kid stage?
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:14PM D3m0sthenes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is great It'll be out on launch day.

Not defending the decision or anything... but you have to be online to use this feature anyway, and if it's free, I don't really see much of a problem.

Can't wait to play it!
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:22PM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Nice, and they said standing up against lazy developers wouldn't solve anything. They just didn't think we'd react so negatively and take it, so they got off their asses and got it finished.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Oh yes, this is because of all the people bitching and moaning. It couldn't possibly be that the developers are actually passionate about their games and want to provide the best experience possible is it? It isn't that it's something they were already working on fixing well before they even announced the need for a patch, considering it went Gold before they made that public?

Nope, you certainly accomplished something. I know in every respectable game studio the developers don't give a shit about what they do unless people start raising a stink in an internet forum. Then it becomes *serious*.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:55PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do you not think Blogs and Gaming News sites control the industries image? Developers have gone on record stating they have to watch what they say because of how the press is set up today. Public outrage on where the industry is headed where they sell the game before it is finished and just "fix it later" is neccessry. If you'd rather sit quietly and let things keep going as they are by all means do so, but don't try to drag the rest of us down with you. If consumers never objected to anything we would have no quality assurance, return policies, etc. You are an idiot.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 3:00PM ExMcCloud said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Come on man I highly doubt that they didn't wanna have it done day one, I doubt that laziness had anything to do with it.....Give them a break man....lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 3:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am sure they were more motivated by dollars. It stands to reason that this game will open with bigger sales and better legs through the holiday season. I actually think they could give a shit less what you or anyone else says on a blog or site. Hell, I only responded to you because I am bored at work.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 5:05PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly, they are motivated by sales and money. They want as much as they can get. This was made a big deal by the major gaming web sites, they saw that and were worried about losing a few extra bucks. Thus they made sure to publicly announce there would be co-op at launch. Otherwise if they didn't care they would have said nothing.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:23PM Courtney said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm most interested in the offline coop aspect of Fable 2. I'm definitely awaiting some reviews of how fun coop is before buying it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:32PM ScottG13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Huzzah! Can't wait for F2!
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:35PM Professor Lario said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope the reviewers have access to the co-op patch so that they can evaluate.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:50PM Dirty said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wonder how many people will be choosing this over LBP and Vice-versa.

For me this appeals more to me, I will be buying on day one. LBP I feel like I can wait, play it when I have more time to make levels.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 2:54PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have this reserved, yet LBP is a title I will get down the road.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 4:10PM IannCannon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Umm, how about both? Although it's gonna be hard deciding which to play first.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2008 3:22PM Tez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nice! Excellent news for Fable fans! Props to Lionhead for what was likely many late-night programming sessions.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW