| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 11:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I am starting to warm up to the idea blizzard. Keep going. Because now for the first time you will have to convince me to buy one of your games.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 11:22PM rTwelve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want to see the cinematics :(
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 11:24PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't have a problem with the splitting of the campaign as I'm mostly going to be playing the multiplayer anyway. I'll just play the Terran campaign, play mp, play Zerg campaign, play mp, play Protoss campaign, then play multiplayer until StarCraft 3 releases. ( I like StarCraft :D ).
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 11:37PM monkeyssuck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I REALLY hope that each campaign will be as big as they say. If so, it might be worth it. But really, couldn't they fit all this on a dual-layer DVD? Or will one campaign be bigger than that?
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 12:41AM Tatticus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think they just don't want the game to come out in 2017 so they're going to release it quasi-episodic.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 11:38PM aughscreennames said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Who cares, this game is going to suck now. Being able to play on each side for the single player mode is one of the saving graces that make up the RTS genre. Bring on Red Alert.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 11:39PM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, this all sounds fine and stuff but here is my problem and maybe I'm not the only one with this issue.

The campaign in Starcraft was actually the tutorial. Each branch taught you the intricacies of the racial structures and how things worked. First five missions of each race WAS this aspecy.

So... this grand campaign sounds crispy and I'm all for it, but do I have to wait until chapters 2&3 to learn the intricacies of playing as Zerg and my fav Protoss? Will tutorial missions be provided for these races? Or will they prefer to go the Ultra Deluxe Strategy Guide route?

That's where my concern lies. That two of the three races will be dramatically changed and you're somehow supposed to learn these changes with any semblance of a base you were attempting to create goes down in flames.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 8:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or, you can load up a custom single player game (a skirmish), and read the manual..

In all honesty, doing it this way would teach you just as much, in a much shorter time period.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 11:40PM Gwr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thats an interesting idea they got there for storytelling on their RTS.
It sounds good and if someone can pull it of right, thats blizzard.

It seems like the story will be good and well told, I hope that it introduces you well into it tho because while I have played the older SC games, I didnt play the story modes .
I know a lot of people in a similar positions.

And about the game being divided into 3, they better give the option to just pay and download to make it less annoying.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 11:41PM south said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally I don't like paying more than once, but if all campaigns are at least as long as the original game I will reconsider.

To be honest I really only enjoyed playing Terran, so I might only buy that. I hope the campaign has a little more challenge now.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 12:04AM Paviel said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've heard that each campaign is going to be 25-30 scenarios long...

...as they had fucking better be...
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 12:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
With so little news coming out of Blizzcon I'm expecting a November 2012 release of the first installment.

Does anyone else think they are spending an awful amount of time developing the single player campaign. Most people will spend 100 times the time investment on the multiplayer portions. Look at the original Starcraft, yea I'm sure people have played the campaign a few times. The game is still alive today because of the multiplayer.

If they are going to go overboard developing all this campaign nonsense that's fine. However stop holding up the release date adding all this junk that people are going to play once and forget.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 1:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Honestly, if they just released a multiplayer portion, I wouldn't even bother with the singleplayer.

And I'm sure most people feel the same way.

What will piss me off is if I'm forced to buy all three singleplayer campaigns in order to keep my multiplayer updated. Multiplayer should be treated as a separate client that is updated separately. That way, to a certain extent, we can all choose how much of an investment we want to make for SC II. It's great if tons of people want all 3 campaigns and Blizzard can make that money-- but fuck that. I just want multiplayer, and I don't want to pay for it 3 times.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 1:55AM rizzuh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think that's partially why they're splitting up the campaign into 3 "separate games". waiting to finish all 3 first would take much too long, so with only 1 campaign at first, i'm guessing the game will be out sooner than we thought. especially since blizzard has already confirmed that the blizzcon cards they gave out was for the upcoming SC2 beta.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 2:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just get the feeling we won't even see this game in calendar year 09 when for the most part it's DONE. I've been playing the multilayer portion of this game at every convention Blizz has attended for the last 2 years.

Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 4:05AM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Am I the only one who thought the Starcraft story was fucking amazing and can't wait for it to continue in Starcraft 2.1,2.2 adn 2.3?

I am?

Naw.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 1:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really only ever play the campaign mode. I'm into the story and I've never much enjoyed multiplayer. I wouldn't call the campaign mode nonsense.

As for having to buy 3 different games, I think that sucks! I really enjoyed playing each race, but I'm not going to pay $180 to buy 3 $59 games just to be able to play each race in solo mode.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 1:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Zeratul is not a Zealot, in fact he is a Dark Templar.


I'm kinda disappointed with the revelation that it's going to be 3 separate campaigns, but I guess it only means MORE starcraft for the consumer, and that's not a bad thing at all.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 5:25AM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeh I didn't catch that in the article until you mentioned it.... ZEY MUST FIX IT NAO.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 1:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
If anyone read the anniversary special on Blizzard.com several years ago, or any commentary

You would realize the campaign was always set up integrative to help you learn the game + tell a story. "Stand alone product" Really...did any of you actually find the game play of SC that intriguing? Aside from maybe the combined time of 30-40 minutes of Cinematics+Speech , the other 8 hours was just boring RTS gameplay.

Keeping that mind, think about this too.
Q: When will Starcraft 2 be done?
A: When it's done

Right...so thats basically a stand on quality..pretty much a Blizzard marquee. I guess that's changed. This is just selling out, I don't care if each expansion is 10$ . Think about it
59$ USD for the initial Box. 10-20$ for the other 2 expansions. That's 100$ for a f-ing PC game that will take you 1 year to finish buying. Then..the expansion pack...49$..oh wait they're going to split that up too... that's almost 150$-200$.

Think about this, the typical WoW player plays for at least a year or so, or 2. 59$ Box + 14.99 monthly fee X 12 = 180 + 59 = 239$

That's almost the same. Fuck you Blizzard. Like Guitar hero World triple XXX extended tour and WoW doesn't make enough $ for you.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 3:19PM KapsLocked said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, dude. Way to jump to conclusions. Have they even priced the game, much less even put out a release date?!

I figure they would price them similarly to how Half Life 2 episodes would be priced - not sixty bucks.

... and where did you get $59 for the game in the US? PC games are usually $49.99 on release! These aren't PS3 and 360 games...
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2008 12:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
magicalpoop is a complete idiot; as evidenced by his name.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2008 12:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
wait i just read his entire comment now and i will go as far as saying magicalpoop is one of the dumbest people to ever grace the comments of joystiq
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW