| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (128)

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh Great. Activision strikes again...


Guitar Hero XXXII
StarCraft XV
Call Of Duty X
Diablo VIII
What next?
Oh Yeah. Probably Tony Hawk LXIX.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You think they'd have enough money from WoW eh?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:43PM TheE3Guy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, that is gay as fuck
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:54PM GreyFox said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Starcraft 3: Finishing the Game You Thought You Finished Before
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 8:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I mean... Just look at my nick... It's been with me for years... I hate those guys so much.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 10:35PM motamedn said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
i've always bought all Blizzard games bc they were quality products and worth supporting (except WoW bc I don't want to continue paying to play--i just skipped playing that one)

But now, I'm gonna pirate the **** out of sc2. vote me up if you plan to do the same.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 4:42AM Voltron said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Whine like you mean it blizz will prob just release one product if the fan base is mad enough
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 9:06AM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What if each of the three SC3 'chapters' has as much content and is as well-made as a regular triple-A game?

Does the fact that there's more than one of them somehow dampen the experience?
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 8:32PM Lord Foortwenti said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@ pers

I'm sorry, but there is never a good excuse to pirate a game. By pirating this (or any other) PC game you aren't telling Blizzard that they are making a bad move, you are telling the world you are a fucking childish, douche-bag THIEF.

If you don't support the move, let Blizzard know through the proper channels, and if it really pisses you off that much then don't buy the game. But for christ's sake, by pirating a game you aren't punishing anyone except all the other people that enjoy the PC as a gaming platform.

-------------------------------------------------

That being said....I think this move is incredibly lame and REEKS of Activision sticking there money-grubbing nose into Blizzards affairs. Lets face it, Blizzard has always been about supreme quality AND quantity w/ their games. I honestly don't think this would have happened had Vivendi (Blizzard's old owners) not merged w/ Activision. This just straight up bites and reeks of nothing more then a money-grab.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2008 6:44AM Ghen said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm a fucking childish, douche-bag THIEF, so this news doesn't bother me.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ehhhhhh, what :| ?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:04PM Dionkey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WTF!!! (MGS Alert sound)
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 9:22PM acme64 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
exactly...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:04PM SoulBlade said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Super lame... it better be worth it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 8:03PM ExMcCloud said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I cant lie to you and say it will be....This is Activision we are talking about...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:05PM SecretAgentHam said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
hmm. they must have known we'd buy it anyway. cheeky bastards
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 6:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Its like Spore all over again......its like they WANT it to become the most torrented game ever.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:06PM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Meh. I hope they don't do this with Diablo III
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:08PM Dionkey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I second that
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:25PM rivaldi22 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You mean Diablo III: Lord of Hatred, Diablo III: Lord of Destruction, and Diablo III: Lord of Terror?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:30PM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nooooo don't give them ideas.

Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:06PM NeoK 182 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so your splitting the campaign into 3 parts. okay blizzard give us a good excuse now that the first part isn't out yet.

If EA can crank out a new C&C each year you guys can get this shit down faster now that Activision is paying the bills.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:35PM Sora said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe Blizzard wants to make a quality product?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 8:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I second Sora. Blizzard doesn't need Activision to pay the bills.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:07PM GabrielGray said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It'd beter be fairly long campaigns for each race. There were three separate campaigns in the origianl installment - all in one package and three in Brood Wars - also all in one package. If each individual campaign isn't about as long as all three from the original or Brood Wars, I'll be a liitle wary of buying into Starcraft II. Does it look like one of the best RTS's ever? Yes, but that won't justify over-charging the consumer for something that was considered standard on their previous installations.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 8:55PM bm111 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
For me, anything much longer for a campaign for a single race than what was in the original SC and BW, would get pretty damn boring. In the original, IMO the race switches came at exactly the right time before playing through the previous part got stale.

They better just make each one a normal length and priced at like $15 or something.

Yeah, fat chance.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:07PM xHaldirx said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I love Starcraft, but that's bullshit.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:19PM Ignatius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It'd better not be $50 a game...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:51PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ameeeen brotha', you speak tha' truth of the Lord!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 5:55AM MrHashbrown said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The only way I'd buy it if the first was $40 and the others were $20-$30.

But even then it's a ripoff, and I second all the people who will choose "other methods" to get the game because that is frankly total bullshit.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:07PM JoshMilewski said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
PokéCraft!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:28PM rTwelve said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This is not how I wanted to envision that.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 8:06PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Gotta construct 'em all!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So I guess that means that you buy one and then pirate the other two? I wonder if online play will be restricted to the race that you purchase, cause that would suck.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 8:28PM Lone Starr said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
They didn't say each version would only have one race -- "each part *focusing* on a separate race." (Emphasis mine).

This doesn't sound good but I think it's way overblown and perhaps slightly misleading. I could be wrong, but I'm expecting something much more in the way of Tides of Darkness, Brood Wars, Frozen Throne -- a meaty expansion.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, and I thought it was taking them long enough already. It will be 2015 and people will still be finishing StarCraft 2.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:14PM Nushio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What they didn't mention is that you have to buy and install all three in order to select that race in multiplayer, thus ensuring that the Zerg expansion outsells all other expansions by an order of a magnitude...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh son of a bitch. They better price it as per episode content. Also, the number of Starcrafts you buy better not interfere with multiplayer.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:18PM iofthestorm said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It better be something like Orange Box, where you can get all three for the price of a normal game or just get one race at a time if you're a weirdo. Seriously, does this make any sense to anyone? WTF.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So is this Blizzard's latest innovation for PC gaming? Selling one game as three seperate games? Sounds like a ripoff to me.

Will players who are only interested in online gaming have to buy all three disks to be competitive?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:11PM Rask said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll say it because none else seems to have the balls to...

Fuck Blizzard.

Starcraft 2 split up into 3 seperate products?? Bullshit...

Diablo 3 turning out to be Diablo 2 with a facelift? Lame and uninsteresting.

The innovative company of yesteryear is dead.

The company that completely scrapped Starcraft and re-built after fans revolted is gone and buried.

They're all about the money now and the Activision merger is making it worse.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Are we thinking about the same Blizzard? The Blizzard I know hardly revolutionises at all, but rather takes ideas and polishes them stupidly well.

I can't really think of anything Blizzard did that was revolutionary in the past other than perhaps Battle.net.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
HEY THERE!! Some of us would have settled for a facelifted D2. Have you gone back to play D2 only to realize it looks like pixelated crap, because it runs at many less pixels than your LCD? I want to play it but I can't, it hurts my eyes!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:34PM Rask said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have.. I couldn't play through the whole game it looked so painful.

Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:11PM aMac said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Dear Blizzard,

Fuck you.

Signed, Starcraft 1 fans
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Make that at least two of us.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 7:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Me three, real sh*tty move on them...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I hope they make it so that I won't have to buy all three games to enjoy the full multiplayer.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:12PM whatthegeek said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I was going to pick this up day one, but instead I think I'll just play the original starcraft a second time - it's out now, and you get a complete game in one package instead of it being broken up into three separate parts so they can charge you three times for what should be all one game. Unless they're $20 a piece, count me out.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2008 7:15PM Rask said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have absolutely no problem believing that all 3 will be released at the same time.

I'm pretty sure there's going to be a deluxe package for 99$ and then all 3 seperate for 39$ a pop.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Time Ducks (iOS)

Posted on Feb 7th 2012 9:00PM

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW