| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (9)

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 6:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Still pissed about battle.net possibly charging. Otherwise this article would excite me. =(
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 6:15PM Falcon6 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Some advice: Don't worry about changes when you have no idea what they're changing about it.

For all we know, the money-requiring feature is something that's added to the otherwise-free Battle.net, and we can play on Battle.net for free without worrying about it.

I'm withholding judgment on it until later. For now, I'll just enjoy the look at Diablo III.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 6:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Something added as in commercial minigames like on XBLA? That I wouldn't mind so much
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 10:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it seems obvious to me. Blizzard now has so called "blizzard accounts". These will most likely be similar to xbox live, 1 account, multiple games, one monthly fee. I doubt it will include WoW access, but SC2 and D3 will likely use the same account, and give multiplayer access to the games. Not required to play, only for online matchmaking.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 7:08PM iHavePants said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hrm, those two "new" units were in the first announcement video of Diablo III.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 7:21PM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So some new features may remain a secret for 'years'?

Well that confirms a Christmas 2010 release date!

I am equally keen for this and Starcraft 2. So as long as one of them comes out by this time next year, i'm happy. And with the triple-campaign thing they're doing with Starcraft, they only have to work on 1 campaign now to get the game out there, so it should definately be within 8 months.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 8:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sorry, but if it's really multiple years and they aren't just joshing the crowd, they need to shut up and make their game and cut out the seasonal feature hype.

Otherwise, it's going to end up being a case where by the time the game comes out, it's played out and irrelevant. That nearly happened to Diablo 2 and the risk will be even higher this time with the gameplay being ten years older and imitated another three dozen times. Nothing they've shown so far would be particularly interesting if it wasn't a Diablo game.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2008 11:09PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To everyone complaining about the lack of detailed character customization:

"...but once you put them on your character you couldn't see them in the game, since your player is so small."

I told you so.

Besides, since when is equipping myriads of different armor components, weapons, and other accessories not considered "customization?"
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2008 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee don't charge a monthly/annual fee!!!

I actually want to buy this game!!!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW