We all reacted similarly to the news of a DHL freight train derailment in which 21,600 Xbox 360s were lost due to "impact damage, wetting, pilfering and shortage" -- no, not by inquiring about the well-being of those who were on board at the time of the crash. That would be silly. We reacted, as anyone would, with general concern for the Redmond-based software juggernaut whose precious cargo was destroyed in the accident.
That's why we were so glad to hear that Microsoft recently filed a complaint against DHL in which they call for $2 million in damages to replace the missing consoles, stating that the shipping company "negligently breached its duties as a common carrier, handler, bailee, warehouseman, agent, or in other capabilities." We agree -- it was incredibly negligent of DHL to allow their train to crash like that. Really, terribly unprofessional.
Reader Comments (52)
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 6:33PM (Unverified) said
Not to be rude or anything but Engadget had this story up like days ago....
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 6:39PM Colonel Falafel said
This is the case a lot of the time.
It's as if Joystiq doesn't have any communication with its sister sites.
Reply
It's as if Joystiq doesn't have any communication with its sister sites.
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 7:27PM Premature ejaculation man said
I wonder how you guys would react without the internet for a month. You're used to receiving information instantly and complain when its a day or two late.
My bet is that you'd go crazy.
Reply
My bet is that you'd go crazy.
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 9:17PM (Unverified) said
you guys do realize that this article is linked to the engadget article, clearly showing that it is in reference to the article from engadget..
Reply
Posted: Oct 13th 2008 12:10AM Morisato13 said
Something about this irked me as it felt really insensitive towards the metrolink train crash in Southern California. I guess that's just me though.
Reply
Posted: Oct 13th 2008 12:47AM (Unverified) said
Premature ejaculation man You Win in so many levels.
Reply
Posted: Oct 13th 2008 2:10AM (Unverified) said
not everyone reads the sister sites..... think about that....
Reply
Posted: Oct 13th 2008 8:03AM gothikgamz13 said
The fact that Microsoft has the balls to sue another company due to losses that occurd in transit- I work for DHL(and not the pick up and delivery guys)but the Frieght side of it, They sign a bound contract and are given certain excemptions to in which if this would happen or any other thing to the frieght(cargo) Insurance would cover the damages and a full investigation would be put in motion. So for you nay sayers that blame DHL, Shame on Thee- if anything it is the Train-Company's fault
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 9:15PM (Unverified) said
opps..... Someone said it already.......
Well, anyway, if a company like DHL "I'm assuming the lawyers would go to who ever it was that actually holds the money for the insurance" offers insurance and then refuse to pay you after the very reason you bought the insurance for "destruction of your shipment" that is kind of a-hole-ish thing to do in itself.
The way some people sound, is if Microsoft was suing the people who where on the train.
Reply
Well, anyway, if a company like DHL "I'm assuming the lawyers would go to who ever it was that actually holds the money for the insurance" offers insurance and then refuse to pay you after the very reason you bought the insurance for "destruction of your shipment" that is kind of a-hole-ish thing to do in itself.
The way some people sound, is if Microsoft was suing the people who where on the train.
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 6:40PM (Unverified) said
Wait, my lawyernese might be rusty, but I believe for ol' Billy to win this one, he has to prove that DHL caused their OWN TRAIN TO DERAIL ITSELF. If that is true, then something tells me MS will be the least of DHL's worries
Reply
Posted: Oct 13th 2008 8:44AM Rocketboy said
Um, no. At my past job I did freight claims for years. Granted, they were truck claims, so there may very well be different laws/situations, and if there is, I hope someone who has a bit more knowledge of rail shipments pipes in. Now that the disclamer is over, unless it was considered an "Act of God", or a wartime/terrorist incident, they would (normally) be responsible. Really, the situation that they would not be liable for the damage, is if was due to improper/insufficent packaging. What I would suspect is also part of the lawsuit (which would not normally be covered, thus a lawsuit) is Microsoft trying to recover the cost of shipping, as the product never reached it's destination (yet another (possible) breach of contract). The other situation is that Microsoft may be charging DHL full retail price. If DHL believes that the goods were not being transported as part of a sale, then Microsoft would be in the wrong. You can only claim the actual value of the goods at time of shipping.
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 6:42PM (Unverified) said
Umm... just to comment on the poster's tone - I believe the negligence referred to in the statement is the fact that DHL refused to reimburse Microsoft for damages that they had insured against.
If you buy insurance for shipping a product and it gets damaged in transit, you have a right to sue the carrier if they don't pay up. And I believe in this case you would be claiming that they were "negligently breaching their duties...".
Reply
If you buy insurance for shipping a product and it gets damaged in transit, you have a right to sue the carrier if they don't pay up. And I believe in this case you would be claiming that they were "negligently breaching their duties...".
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 6:54PM Special Agent Steve said
Xbox 360's destroyed? More like stolen... with all these amazing games lol.
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 7:08PM (Unverified) said
DHL Boss: If only there were some way to keep these Xbox 360s...
DHL Train Dude: You're asking me to crash another train, aren't you?
Reply
DHL Train Dude: You're asking me to crash another train, aren't you?
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 7:21PM (Unverified) said
Oh right, you can act as indignant as you like but MS is a company and they potentially lost a shit load of money there. They have every right and need to recoup those losses.
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 7:34PM (Unverified) said
Seriously. We can always go to a sleazy motel and make more people, but in the next few years they'll stop making new Xbox 360s and you guys will be feeling pretty dumb.
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 7:50PM (Unverified) said
what the hell are you talking about? Does microsoft owe some sort of obligation to those people? Are they comparing the value of an xbox to the people lost? No doubt they also think its very sad, but what on earth is so heartless about holding the company responsible for not keeping their finances covered?
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 7:59PM THEBLAH said
Reply to WRE
Why should a company ignore lost money because of something they didn't cause.
Also, it was a freight train, I doubt there were any passengers and if there were probably none of them were seriously harmed. The train probably went off the rails and skidded on the dirt for a bit, or collapsed a small bridge, shook the 360s and the people. Alot of the 360s probably still worked just they couldn't ship them out knowing that there was a small percentage that could have broken fans or disc drives. Your imagining a huge collision with explosions and helicopters, the train on its side, carnage everywhere.
Reply
Why should a company ignore lost money because of something they didn't cause.
Also, it was a freight train, I doubt there were any passengers and if there were probably none of them were seriously harmed. The train probably went off the rails and skidded on the dirt for a bit, or collapsed a small bridge, shook the 360s and the people. Alot of the 360s probably still worked just they couldn't ship them out knowing that there was a small percentage that could have broken fans or disc drives. Your imagining a huge collision with explosions and helicopters, the train on its side, carnage everywhere.
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 8:05PM (Unverified) said
Sorry guys, I didn't see the "NO JOKES ALLOWED" sign. Why don't you two just go suck each other off for a little while and I'll practice my feel-bad-for-the-giant-corporation face.
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 9:55PM (Unverified) said
Whoa. Apparently all of Microsoft's train lawyers are on this thread and pissed as hell that the validity of their case is being impugned, even in ways that are obviously satirical.
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 8:43PM (Unverified) said
TRANS-EUROPE EXPRESS!
sorry i just wanted to have something in caps...
get that album!
Reply
sorry i just wanted to have something in caps...
get that album!
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 7:57PM Breakfastmachine said
DHL: Hey Microsoft. One of our trains crashed and we lost a bunch of your 360's.
Microsoft: That's ok, we opted for the insurance.
DHL: Yeah, about that...
Reply
Microsoft: That's ok, we opted for the insurance.
DHL: Yeah, about that...
Posted: Oct 13th 2008 8:48AM Rocketboy said
Welllll.. they actually did not have to 'opt' for insurance unless it was considered a high-value shipment. Truck freight does not work the same way that small parcel does. They should have already been protected. Of course, it all depends on the contract, but even then.
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 8:27PM (Unverified) said
Microsoft: "If anyone is gonna get away with destroying our consoles, it's going to be our own cheap hardware!"
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 9:00PM mezzaninex said
2 million? Doesn't Bill Gates wipe his ass with million dollar bills? Just take two tp sheets from his house and forget about it.
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 9:06PM (Unverified) said
Don't they have insurance for things like this, or does it not ably for things over x amount of dollars?
Reply
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 9:15PM anoffday said
"it was incredibly negligent of DHL to allow their train to crash like that. Really, terribly unprofessional."
Well, seriously how hard is it to drive a freakin train? All you have to do is basically know when to brake, so don't fall asleep and you'll be ok.
And they should have to pay for them. Why would they get out of that?
Reply
Well, seriously how hard is it to drive a freakin train? All you have to do is basically know when to brake, so don't fall asleep and you'll be ok.
And they should have to pay for them. Why would they get out of that?
Posted: Oct 12th 2008 9:17PM NotCognizant said
not really negligence on the part of dhl. one would assume that microsoft has insurance on such large shipments? maybe they didnt.
Reply
Posted: Oct 13th 2008 2:50PM (Unverified) said
DHL is the worst delivery company my company has ever dealt with. This company has left brand new Apple computers on the street in front of our building (we are on the third floor), and a previous delivery guy was angry at the size of a delivery we had, so he was throwing and kicking packages.
DHL has lost our orders, damaged our orders, and delivered almost everything we've ordered or sent later than it should have arrived.
No wonder they had to change their name from Airborn Exrpress. It would buy them another couple of years where they could take people's money for sub par service.
Reply
DHL has lost our orders, damaged our orders, and delivered almost everything we've ordered or sent later than it should have arrived.
No wonder they had to change their name from Airborn Exrpress. It would buy them another couple of years where they could take people's money for sub par service.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










