EA's Riccitiello deems Br�tal Legend a 'significant creative risk'

by Ludwig Kietzmann on Oct 16th 2008 2:30PM

Ever since the corporate Activision blizzard left Double Fine's Brütal Legend without a sturdy home, we've been engaged in an agonizing guessing game -- which publisher is brave enough to tackle the God of GWAR epic? If not MTV, how about the new, debatably less evil EA?

"I have seen it," EA CEO John Riccitiello told Gamasutra. "I am well aware of what the game is. It's a very significant creative risk." Oh, what are you talking about, John? You know what's really popular right now? Guitar Hero. That, and outrageous ultra-violence, as seen in your company's very own Dead Space. Surely a combination of both would yield a powerful, nigh-undodgeable bullet point on the back of Brütal Legend's box?

Mind you, Riccitiello isn't completely averse to "significant creative risks." He added that games described as such could "end up being some of the world's best products." Examples? "Spore was also a significant creative risk. So was The Sims. Portal, BioShock." But before you start reading between the lines, consider his next example: "But so was Grim Fandango."

Ugh, we really dropped the ball on that one, world.

Source

Tags: Activision-Blizzard, Brutal-Legend, EA, Electronic-Arts, John-Riccitiello, PS3, Tim-Schafer, Xbox-360

Reader Comments (59)

Come on John... you know you want to add the brilliant fellows at Double Fine to your stable of EA Partners... just do it... publish... keep adding developers that make great product... Make buyers think "amazing experience" when they see the EA logo (sans sports games, obviously)...

yeah. Just through money at the problem.

I feel an obligation to purchase this game before I even see it.

Dirty walks in to a local electronics shop.

"Hey look there's that game with Jack Bla--"

Dirty is then seen sitting on his couch, holding the controller, and booting up the game.

"....what the hell?"

I would probably end up leaving with a copy of Kung Fu panda.

Don't blame me, I bought Grim Fandango. Great game.

Same here, I got it on launch day and got me a free copy of Full Throttle from the Tim Schafer fan club offer from it.

Full Throttle, there's another freakishly awesome game.

Grim Fandango was awesome.

I mean Jack Black is supposed to be the voice of the main char; if they flesh the game out right, it will be promising. Any new IP is hit or miss. Depending on market. Some games just get a good word of mouth from the media and fans alike. That gets the ball rolling...

Kane & Lynch had much potential, but to me the game was not worth "buying"...

I think the game is release worthy but I'll admit I am getting pretty sick of Jack Blacks shtick.

He was good in tropic thunder.

He was also good in King Kong as this was the only role in which Jack Black played a character as opposed to playing Jack Black in every other movie.

He was also good in School of Rock.

He wasn't good in Tropic Thunder.

He was AWESOME in Tropic Thunder.

"Any new IP is hit or miss."

Right, but we're talking about Tim Schafer here... what exactly are the misses that have happened in his career?

@ AoE i get your point, but im going to go out on a limb and say:

The "average" gamer doesnt know who he is much less to purchase it off his name alone. So EA is hesitant it seems, but i say complete it, and put it on the shelves either way.

Our CliffyB's & John Romero's*(used to anyway*) seem to get a nod, from the media with they're flashy ways. Lambo's screeching out of McDonalds blaring rock music and leaving a trail of Cog tags. Hence Joe Shmo recognizing them in some form, which adds to the "hype".

Grim Fandango the best adventure/puzzle game ever.

no, monkey island 2

GWAR is awesome.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr3PTMlUcIg

Dude. You're EA. YOU CAN TAKE THE HIT.

While that is true, they don't WANT to take the hit

Either way though, I don't see how Brutal Legend is a risk. It's a game where you basically play as Jack Black, kill demons with a big axe, drive around in a monster truck/BUS and kill demons by playing awesome guitar solos... Sounds like an OBVIOUS buy

This is the same guy who tried to convince the Mirrors Edge devs to make the game 3rd person.

What does this douche know about games beyond "License" and "Yearly Roster Updates"

"Significant creative risk"?

Isn't that what being creative is? Isn't that the whole point of being a business that is based upon creativity? Isn't the second word in your company name arts?

Oh, I forgot, EA would rather put out something like The Littlest Pet Shop as long as it makes them a few bucks. (Oh and then riddle it with DRM, oh yea, I went there.) Last time I checked games like that aren't very creative.

Your words strike true.

whats wrong with Grim Fandango? I thought it was pretty damn good game.

It is...just turned out to be a huge flop.Think B&E+Psychonauts x 100 and that's approximately how much.

If Grim Fandango is wrong then I don't wanna be right.

"Significant creative risks" inject much-needed vitality into this industry. But, hey, who'd want that?

I think he mistook the word creative for business.

Well in his line of work, I'm sure he gets those words confused all the time. Just like the words 'sub par' and 'money'.

Hashbrown, I don't think EA has never NOT thought that sub par = money.

Ugh, that's just pathetic. Then again, coming from EA...e_e

EA did just release Dead Space, which is a new IP and a really phenomenal quality game.

And it takes about 0 creative risks.

True, but I think it's EA's responsibility as a company (to shareholders) to evaluate games with "creative risks" and decide if they can make a success of it.

A lot of games take creative risks and tank in the market. If we (gamers) aren't *buying* the creatively-risky games, I don't think we're in a position to complain to publishers about not releasing more of them.

Consider Pyschonauts, Okami, Beyond Good and Evil. All critically well received, all very creatively risky, and all had relatively poor sales. If those games had sold strongly, publishers would maybe not be so reticent to take a chance on a "risky" creative idea.

Yes, they're backing Dead Space... after RE4 broke some records. And for the record, the only reason I didn't play Psychonauts was because I heard they kill a baby for every copy purchased. Yes, that's a totally viable, and NOT fictitious, excuse. (I did get Okami... on the Wii. A couple of years after its intial release.)

Just make it, instead of : The Sims-Backyard Edition.

Could've turned out better as a Wii game, i think. If you lower those "sales to make profit" numbers significantly, it would fit in neatly. Just as how Zack and Wiki and No More Heroes were deemed to be unexpected successes by their respective publishers

Certainly unfeasible, as it would require a total re-working of the project, but still...

I seem to recall a 'significant creative risk' game that EA is releasing. But it's name escapes me.

...something about mirrors.

...hmmmmmmmm.

Cinderella's Magical Mirror Adventure?

Boogie! John Travolta's Mirrored ball Disco Inferno edition?

Timothy Leary's Mind Mirror?

yes, this is an actual game and yes it was published by EA

Sometimes a company need to make some cultural capital instead of butt-loads of cash.

This is another opportunity to keep building EA's rep with the core.

Guess EA doesn't like metal.

Lost my copy of Grim Fandango a while ago. I hope someone found it and is enjoying it though.

Were you playing at the beach last?

I loved Bioshock and all that, but I fail to see what about that title made it a 'significant creative risk.'

I think it was the giant diving suit monsters. Or the art-deco style of the setting.

You don't see it?

Just the fact that it was a wholly original IP, though I think that's even a tough sell for true any more. Gears of War is huge, Dead Rising and Lost Planet did exceptionally well, Assassin's Creed, Mass Effect, Crackdown...

I guess original IPs are only significant creative risks if you aren't in the pocket of a major publisher or you aren't Rare Limited. Right now, Brutal Legend has neither going for it, so it's "risky." Maybe EA just learned their lesson from Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath, and decided they didn't want to single handedly trash a brilliant game and studio with a nonexistent marketing campaign?

Um running around killing corrupted humans, injecting urself with genetic altering substances, syphoning power from little girls all in an underwater ex-paradise. Tackling subjects like genetics, corruption, and elitism. The game lets you get drunk and smoke cigarettes. Uh, what was a "creative risk". Numb nuts.

| 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 50 Comments

Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Breaking News

The most popular posts
in the last 7 days

Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 152 comments
David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments

EA's Riccitiello deems Br�tal Legend a 'significant creative risk'

Reader Comments (59)

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:35PM ScottG13 said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:10PM edoglost said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:35PM Dirty said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:16PM MrHashbrown said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:23PM Dirty said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:36PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 7:46PM LaughingTarget said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:37PM loofmodnar said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:38PM Negatron said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:44PM Revving Injuns said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:48PM Dirty said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:00PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:13PM MowDownJoe said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:13PM MrHashbrown said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:35PM AoE said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:54PM Negatron said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:41PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:48PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:51PM KaneRobot said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:53PM Ranus Studios said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 5:42PM Megadanxzero said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:54PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:55PM AwesomeTown said

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 12:36AM The Blank Mage Returns said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:55PM easo said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:04PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 9:55AM thesage42 said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:57PM Jack Tretton said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:59PM Ethan said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:12PM MrHashbrown said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:44PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:00PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:00PM Orangecoke said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:10PM Humppakummitus said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:26PM Orangecoke said

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 12:44AM The Blank Mage Returns said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:06PM Doctor Doom said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:09PM Mr Khan said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:10PM MrHashbrown said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:49PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:03PM Dirty said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:22PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:11PM Dirty said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:20PM Ranko said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:32PM Android8675 said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:04PM Dirty said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:42PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:53PM Orangecoke said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:00PM cuteSAVAGE said

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:58PM (Unverified) said

Info

Description

MSRP

Release Date

Genre

Developer

Publisher

Rating

Breaking News

Double Fine Kickstarter passes $1 million in under 24 hours, breaking yet another record

Featured Stories

Ghost Recon: Future Soldier brings information warfare to the front

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

The most popular postsin the last 7 days

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW

The most popular posts
in the last 7 days