| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (94)

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 1:36PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My type? Don't get confused. I think the legal system is a total mess and needs to have tort caps nation wide. I am against all the high tort cases made out of bs claims and people looking to make a quick buck. However, I sure am not going to sit back and say the people making those claims are not a major reason things have gotten so out of control. So blame me all you like, I sure as hell didn't create the mess. Instead I would like to see it repaired.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 1:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't hate the playa' hate the game
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 1:58PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn straight!
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
listen to this - i was driving a rental truck why my car was being fix. I am in a turn lane to go to a resteraunt. As i pull forward i accidently clip this ladies bumber and it ripped off. not a big accident at all. i was traveling very slow. now, she has sue me and my insurance for $50,000 and says she cant work and is permanently disabled.

as expected it is now going to mediation. she will probably settle for a few thousand dollar. it is crazy that people can be so dishonest.

i was rear ended recently. in fact, it was a very hard impact. my car was total and my neck was really hurting from whiplash. i have x-ray done and show no damage. what did i do? i let it go because it was the right thing to do.

more people should be fair and not looking to get rich quick off small accident.

lawyers dont care about the truth or the facts. they care about milking as much money as possible. its sad.

not all lawyer. but, many lawyer are very bad people.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:44PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The woman made the claim, she hired the lawyer to do it. Yeah, we lawyers are all the devil. It never gets old hearing it. Excuse me while I go drink some blood.

I can make the same arguments about plumbers, doctors, IT repair people, roofers, etc - they are all doing things to screw people out of money for their own interests all the time. Be realistic.
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 1:20PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know there are many lawyers who hate things just as much as the rest of us, and I'm always glad to hear from one who does. I do think that the bad lawyers were the ones who started the problem, instead of having the ethics to say that they wouldn't take such a frivolous case instead of enabling abuse of the legal system. Perhaps we should blame law schools (for a multitude of reasons).
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:09PM Tridrakious said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm with this big time. Microsoft should have to pay for bringing out a defective system and knowingly launching the console just to compete with the ps3 and wii.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Microsoft would have to "disgorge" all the cash it made on the 360"

jokes on you, microsoft hasn't made any cash on 360, they're still operating at a loss. And refund program? They warranty every xbox. They're quick and ask no questions when you turn it in.

This is a nonissue and hopefully will be thrown out of court immediately.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:16PM Shmil said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 1:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
shmill

that not 100% true. They write off all RROD in 1 financial quarter. The gains have yet to completely offset the loss.

Just because they make profit in 1Q doesn't mean they are out of the red in the console lifetime yet.

Obviously they want it to seem that they have made back all the loss. I would do the same.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:07PM verymetal said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Good, this should be a lesson for future console makers to actuallly test the product before it ships.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 1:21PM SoulBlade said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
They did test it, but chose to ignore the results.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:09PM enbadesign said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well I'm sorry that people think that Microsoft as a company is the second coming of Jesus, but the truth is that Microsoft is a terrible company that engages in some very questionable business tactics.

Just like a bank that sells off a whole bunch of securites and credit swaps then gets hit on margin calls. Microsoft knew what it was doing when it launched the 360. They knew the failure rates from the production line.

Microsoft knowingly put a defective product on the market with a failure rate of over 70%. With early units the failure rate will hit almost 100%. Every person I know with a first year 360 has had it fail at least once.

That is grounds for a lawsuit and Microsft deserves to be punished for what they did. Sure there have been a few great games for the system but that does not make up for the garbage piece of hardware.

It is the same thing as a lawyer saying, "Yes my client stole a few hundred thousand dollars and burnt a few houses down, but he donated $20k to charity and offered to rebuild the house he burnt down. I think we should cut him some slack and let him go."

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:12PM enbadesign said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
By the way the 70% failure rate refers to the 70% and higher rate from the factory production runs. When you add the 20% or higer defective rate of consoles that actually shipped you get over 90% of all production failing.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Microsoft knowingly put a defective product on the market with a failure rate of over 70%. With early units the failure rate will hit almost 100%."

[Citation needed]
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:30PM WackyCoffee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just wanted to point out that the percentages don't work that way... adding the 70% you speak of and then the 20% of ones that were released is incorrect. It's 20% of the 30% that were released... which is like 6% of those that were produced in total (factory failures and ones that made it out) that should be added to the 70% to make: 76%

Arrrghhh... now my head hurts.
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 12:51AM Saria the Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@badboy: Your avatar reminds me of hairy butt-lips. And this: http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=fbGkxcY7YFU
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:11PM I am a machineee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IF THE ECONOMY IS SO BAD THEN PEOPLE DESERVE THE REFUND TO HELP THEM OUT WITH BILLS, NOT HELP OUT BILL.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:14PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If the economy is so bad, M$ should be making new jobs in its country of origin. "Trickle down theory" is just putting money in mainland Asia and that island in the Atlantic Ocean where most CEO's keep their disposable income.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:12PM BigD145 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
If MS had just ponied up the dough to build their product in the US, they may have broken even AND had a better reputation.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:15PM enbadesign said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
There is no factory in the US that can build a 360. We have nearly zero consumer electronics production. Unless you count a few tazer companies and one TV plant for Vizio that assembles foreign made components.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:25PM Ordeith said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And the product would have been over $1K and the success rate woudl be at 30% instead of that being the failure rate.

US Labor is expensive and unreliable.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:21PM BoilerMaker11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:26PM Shmil said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, what he said.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:21PM BoilerMaker11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo, Sony, and M$ have all been targets of sue sharks over the past couple of years...but I think M$ could legitimately lose this one. For what they're being sued for, the can't possibly defend against it. They knew their product was faulty and they put millions through hell.

And I will laugh when their production line stops. It'll teach them to stop taking Sony-famed games :)

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:21PM BoilerMaker11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
double post to make joystiq remember me

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:24PM Morisato13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FAIL!

Double = 2
Triple = 3
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:35PM BoilerMaker11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
woops
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 12:35PM WackyCoffee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't really say anything about wanting a recall. From personal experience, I'm a satisfied customer.

I still have my launch 360 and it's been almost 3 years. I have an Elite 360 that's working great. I just picked up another 360 Pro a couple of months ago for my office. All 3 of them are functioning fine and see ample use from me and my friends... whether it's playing games, watching DVD's, streaming videos from my PC, etc.

I'm not saying that there aren't issues with other peoples 360s when they complain... I'm just saying don't think that it's all 360s that are failing. I don't know the exact percentage and I'm sure no one else does except certain MS employees.

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 12:30PM OmenSign said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My xbox died october 12th 2008 at approximately 12:00 pm central time.

Within 24 hours I had a ups label provided by microsoft and sent my xbox out the door, too anxiously await a 2-3 week return.

Can I blame microsoft for high rates of hardware failure ( Possibly due to shoddy controls and quality measurements )? Of course.

Can I blame microsoft for not responding to that problem in a responsible manner? No, they responded and took necessary actions.

I've had my xbox for nearly 2 years and 7 months before it tanked. A rate far longer then what I typically have for computer replacements or simple pc repair/upgrade. Not to mention that it is a device I used frequently, without having to do said upgrades throughout its life span.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 1:19PM zero2dash said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I've had 4 repairs; I hope this goes to a national level and I can sign up here in MO.

I've played more Ps3 in the last two days than I have 360 in the past two months; I have no faith in the system anymore. If it RRoD's again I'm going to repair the damn thing myself with some AS5 and the nuts/bolts method; screw the MS repair center. >=(

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:43PM burjeffton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm so happy I don't live in California.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 1:23PM guttertalk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Generous? Considering the failure rate, this product should have been recalled and replaced with standard quality unit or completely refunded the money. Frankly, the extended warranty is the least they could do.

I bought one (which has RROD twice), but I won't buy another MS game console (or likely any MS hardware). I won't reward failure and incompetence with my money.

FWIW, I'm all for the lawsuit. It's one of the things (in addition to rational consumers) that Milton Friedman said maintains the free market. It's a court so you have to prove your argument.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 2:45PM Edge of Blade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No.

A recall would have delayed everyone getting their 360 back by flooding the channel with Xboxes that haven't failed yet. A recall would be the knee jerk reaction, but when you actually look at the analysis, replacing 360's as the fail is much more efficent for the consumer.

Plus, a "recall" is for when a product poses an immadiate threat to the consumer, which this does not. Microsoft dealt with this correctly.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 3:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't believe people are reporting on this without tying to verify the lawsuit exists. Both Joystiq and Kotaku have picked this up, even though the DailyGamesNews.com report is so devoid of information, I'm not even convinced the lawsuit exists.

Who are the plaintiffs? Is the lawsuit already a class-action suit, or is it merely seeking class-action status? Why aren't there any quotes from lawyers in the article? Is there a way for people to join the settlement group? Where's the obligatory attempt to contact Microsoft? DailyGamesNews doesn't even site any sources at all. How about a link to some legal documents or even a single game? Hell, there's a major grammatical problem in the first sentence of the linked article, and people want to think this is credible?

Don't get me wrong. There very well may be a lawsuit. There are certainly enough reasons out there for someone to sue and want their money back. But it'd be nice to see the larger blogs (who I like to think are a little more responsible) take some effort to check things out before reporting them as fact.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@chin-poh

You can search anything on Google and get millions of results. You say this in every single post of yours' but it proves nothing. I have a 60GB launch PS3, no problems. My son even shoved 3-4 disks at once in there couple of times, didn't think it would work after that. But it's still going strong. I had to use needle pliers to get 'em out. I watch tons of Blu-ray and game on it hours straight. It sucks that your system broke, but it makes no sense to keep bitching when everyone knows there's no widespread PS3 hardware issues.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 6:24PM doom saber said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So true. Not all consoles made are perfect as in there will be at few a handful out of billions of units that will break down. That happens with any product. Also, there were reports of launch ps3 breaking down, which I think has been fixed with the newer models since we have yet to hear stuff about the newer ones; I have a launch one and have yet to experience any problems though my fat ps2 have problemz reading shattered soldier.

Just that it is normal for an early model to have issues; I recall the wii had problems when it came out, though it was fixed through firmware.

I agree with Desi D and unless ps3 has a failure rate like the RROD, I doubt there will be a lawsuit especially if only a handful of launch ones break down
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 7:13PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At this point, I don't care anymore. I also will not be buying the next xbox anywhere near launch. That thing's going to have to prove to me that it's mechanically sound first.

Posted: Oct 16th 2008 9:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Great! As a Cali resident, I hope MS loses the lawsuit and I get my money back. I would've never bought a 360 had I known the true extent of the RROD problem.

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 12:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The reason we are in this economy nonsense is because of scumbag corporations like microsoft, i hope they lose and pay people who trusted their product and failed. Fascism has taken over this country!!

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 3:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Boy are you a brainwashed idiot...........thanks for explaining it to me like a true sheeple!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 11:42AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
RemzVkru you are so full of crap. You obviously have no idea what is wrong with the economy. MS is in no way causing the problems we have, nor is their warranty issue hurting the market. I can't believe anyone who actually looks at the economy would agree with you. That was just desperate hate spewed at MS. And you call other people sheep. Laughable.
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2008 11:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Both of you are clueless to what is going on. You should be ashamed to be americans cause you are ignorant and gullible fools so keep spinning the wheel hamsters, you deserve what's coming to you very soon!!
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW