| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (49)

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 4:38PM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I believe that all three actually feature this, even though the auto-off feature is normally turned off by default. The good thing is that it can be patched in by software too.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 4:46PM Derp the Daring said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Go, go government bureaucracy!
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 4:48PM jake11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i beat that game tape
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 4:58PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's up here, Engadget? Why are you singling out the Wii? The Wii is way ahead of the game, here. It's an energy sipper when on and in standby mode. An idle Wii uses less than 10% of what the other consoles use.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:06PM Ridgecity said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
actually it's 5% even when running at 100%...
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 7:45PM BigD145 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hmm. Engadget. Joystiq. Ah well. Partners, anyway.

Anyone know what's changed in the power consumption of the PS3 and 360 since 2007? 2007 numbers: 360 = 194 watts, PS3 = 171 watts, Wii = 17 watts
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 9:34PM Bandit5317 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The newer 360s (with the Falcon motherboard) only use 120 watts while playing a game.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 12:59AM Vidikron said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hah... my alarm clock uses even less energy than the Wii. But like the Wii, it's not very advanced either.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:05PM Ridgecity said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-356-2.htm

If you want to know the average power consumption for the Ps3, xbox360, Gaming PC and the Wii.

"As you play your beloved Super Mario game tapes, your Nintendo Box drains energy from earth's dwindling supply."

Gladly, it's 10x less than the other two consoles.
Reply

Posted: Oct 31st 2008 10:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree the Wii is miles ahead with Connect 24 off, but it is the worst offender with Connect 24 on considering all of that time it will spend in standby.

The "off" power usage is disappointingly high on all of the consoles. With the Wii with Connect 24 switched off, 13 hours spent out of the house is the equivalent of 1 hour playing Wii games! This is ridiculous.

Give us hard power off switches on the front of consoles! It's not that hard to flick a switch at the start and end of a gaming session.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:11PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its too bad the PS3 and 360 don't have a sleep function like the PSP or standby/hibernate in Windows. Just press the switch again and your right back in the game as you left it.

Or have I missed it?
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no thay don't , but thanks to FW 2.5 , the PS3 has everything else "required" on the list , I'm sure FW 2.6 will have a sleep function , Sony could do it with the PSP , they can do it with the PS3 . And I'm sure MS will get to work on this after they finish the dashboard .(I would die of laughter if the 360 is banned because MS had to wait until it was annual update time )
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:38PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't understand why a sleep/hibernate function haven't been put into the 360 and PS3. It is of course a large waste of energy when I leave my 360 on and I have to go somewhere else for a short while. I'd love to just have it go to sleep and then right back into where I left it when I come back.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
30 years? hell I can beat that. I got an old NES at home and a few computers and new consoles to boot, I'll have it down to twelve by the afternoon, tomorrow.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If it can be done without inconveniencing me or adding to the hardware failure rate, fine.

If it increases the hardware failure rate, I don't care if I have to burn baby seals to get the proper voltage.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 6:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Actually baby seal skin makes for great controller cozys. The key is to beat them yourself.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 12:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I use baby seal fat to insulate the walls and attic.

A reservoir of their tears feeds is my primary water source.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 3:46AM Lone Starr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But it will affect you:

"We certainly hope the plan is adopted, lest we be left to our seemingly inevitable, Mad Max-esque fate."

Guys, companies will use this as an excuse to increase the prices of consoles. Do not want!
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Requiring" a sleep mode for consoles made after 2010? Lul, none of current consoles even have energy star certification, they wouldn't be bound by any such requirements.

Not that consoles would be the right end to start in, try 500W plasma displays and halogen lighting fixtures, air conditioning units, heated outdoors swimmingpools and jacuzzis etc. Those are true energy hogs, poor ol' Mario is just a scapegoat...
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:44PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You have to start somewhere. Cheap energy was obviously the wrong place to start.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:39PM ALBGunner04 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn hippies...
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 7:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
damn electric bill.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 11:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn future generations.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This might mean a console redesign for consoles, a good sign in my book.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 6:36PM Sora said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
As opposed to a console redesign for handhelds?
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 12:33AM zuburi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
bee-yootiful.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 5:50PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Consoles??
Have they SEEN computer GPU's? Christ those things are ridiculous. I remember, back in the day, when you could actually fit them in a case that wasn't the size of an actual TOWER, and they didn't require an enormous power upgrade to 1,000 watts.
When they hell are GPU makers going to be forced to make more efficient cards instead of just making the cards bigger so more shit to be put on it?

If things are left unchecked, we will have to steal plutonium from libians to come up with 1.21 gigawatts just to run our damn GPU's. And personally, I don't want to have to travel back in time to save my life and warn myself to wear body armor...I really don't.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 6:22PM Keithustus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As long as there are no limitations on the actual functioning or technical design of the consoles, I'm fine with it.

As HitNRun stated above: "If it increases the hardware failure rate, I don't care if I have to burn baby seals to get the proper voltage."
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 6:34PM exaltedbladder said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
i wonder how much the energy the EPA's computers are burning...
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 7:55PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wish the 360 had a sleep timer (other than the one that shuts it down after 6 hours) so I could watch movies off my harddrive and go to sleep without worrying about it burning up over night.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 8:42PM horngreen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Wii uses less power because nobody who owns one plays it after about a day or two. My 360 uses too much power but thankfully it doubles as a space heater. And finally of course we'll have to JUST WAIT UNTIL KILLZONE 2 COMES OUT to see how much energy a PS3 uses. It will be cool to be an old man when you young uns are left to kill each other for food/water and oil in 40 years.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 9:01PM Triforceowner said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"We certainly hope the plan is adopted, lest we be left to our seemingly inevitable, Mad Max-esque fate."

Wouldn't you want their plan to fail, then?
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 9:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's the sun, stupid.

By the way, you could possibly save the same amount of energy if you just got Al Gore to get a smaller house and stop flying around in his private jet. Just sayin'.

Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2008 9:32PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ahh, Wii. Champion of the proletariat

No wonder its called Wii.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 12:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I would care, but I'm too busy playing Gears on my plasma television in my air-conditioned house while leaving the water running on all the taps.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 11:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have my third world child slaves play my games for me so I have more time to spray chemicals into the air while smoking and letting my car idle.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 1:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if we still had games in our Mad Max world i think id prefer it
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 2:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One more step toward pure liberal fascism. These enviro-Marxists are not going to stop until we are all living in the woods again.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 3:58AM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Down with energy efficiency!
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 6:05AM Bowser Rogozhin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Liberal Fascism? Easy labels are easy.

Are you dumb, deaf, and blind, or have you just missed the last few months? Governments bailing out omnipotent, multinational banks; the current world administrations, capitalist governments, they're ones in league with business. There is no overarching ideology with these guys, they're driven by pure money.

Stop talking, Chris.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 7:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha @ Chris for living in the past!
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 11:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In Germany, under the Nazi government, they were forced to use low-wattage light bulbs.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 6:24AM Bowser Rogozhin said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I don't see how anybody can criticise this measure. The environment is being fucked up and humans are to blame. Every little step helps so if the industry cannot get their act together and regulate themselves, then the federal government needs to step in and force a change. Only good can come from this.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 3:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is definitely NOT a scientific fact that we will be living that way under current consumption. That would ignore all history and economic realities.

And if the goal is truly to conserve energy, there is a far more efficient, far less costly way of doing so than having the EPA dictate terms. It's pretty complicated - let the price of electricity rise!

The only justifications to the political involvement such as EPA video game regulations are political, NOT economic.

And yes, I am an economist. :)
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 4:35PM Bones3D said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What gets me, is the lack of criticism toward this generation of game consoles regarding the requirements for batteries in their controllers. (The Wii being the worst offender of them all.)

While some rechargeable solutions have been available and work fairly well (such as the Xbox 360's rechargeable controller kit), others are just plain bad to the point of driving most users to buy disposable batteries in favor of more reliability. (Here's looking at you, Nyko...) With any luck, companies like Nintendo will take it upon themselves to provide users with more elegant and reliable rechargeable solutions to use with their console's controllers.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 7:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Twisted cords! A thousand "i"'s! Duke Nukem Forever! EPA! EPA! EEEPAA!
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2008 11:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually do find it horrifying that consoles (and most electronics) don't really have proper "off" buttons, and continue to use power while "off".

That's why I keep my electronics unplugged when not in use. Since I started doing that, my power bill has actually gone down by about 10$. I couldn't believe it.

So....just keep your consoles unplugged, or at least turn the power strip off. It really does help.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:40AM jumpshot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, the halo edition xbox was green...
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 8:20PM ethd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Easy way to put an energy star certification on any gadget:
Force all humans and scientists to remove all our gadgets that require the most minute amount of energy and force us to live in the stone age again.
The environment's all our fault. Game consoles are to blame entirely. Global warming started in the 1970's when Pong came around and natural causes such as, oh, I dunno, VOLCANOES aren't to blame one bit.
Got it?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW