| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (66)

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Finally! Now bring back modern warfare! and maybe futuristic but not 100% keen on the futuristic one as other companies tend to do that better :D But who knows :D
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LOL "And yes, we know how ironic it is that we are, in fact, reading into the comment. So sue us."

I shall be filing a law suit soon agaisnt you guys for them :P

Just kidding :D Joystiq Owns
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 7:49PM Averna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There are a lot of other settings before modern warfare (vietnam, korea, etc). We might still be running around with antiques for a while.

That being said, we could be looking at the future setting similar to a Tom Clancy type future... or treyarch could take things (like they do) to a silly level and we could see a laser gun battle... lets not go down that road
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Great, even though I'm realy enjoying the COD: WaW beta. It's just really fun and it looks and sounds great to boot.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:32AM ExMcCloud said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Im all about Modern Warfare but PLEASE make some new weapons...If I use the damn M16 one more time I'm gonna shoot somebody with a Halo Rocket
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:32AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I enjoyed using the M16. It was the M4 or forced AK47 useage that really got on my tits.

Also the fact that there was no real reason for the G3 to exist in singleplayer.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:37AM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thank the heavens for that ¬_¬

Bloody WW2 games are doing my head in now, its just the same old repeated story or patriotism. BORING!
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:38AM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And the funny thing is, they rarely present British war heros ¬_¬
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:59AM Vcize said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Soap?
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:05AM silverwolf761 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Canadians never get anything more than a passing mention as well
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:33AM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Call of Duty has been way better to non-american soldiers than most games.

In medal of honor the most you saw of the British was that SAS guy in Allied Assault who got himself killed at the start of the second mission.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know I would play another WWII if I could play as the Russians.

That would be awesome.

Well at least México gets an honorable mention in Brothers in Arms.Yes people,we were there too
(Allies)
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:51AM Alex R said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I say BRING ON VIET NAM!

(Sorry in advance if that was inappropriate)
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 1:39PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lol, I find it hilarious how the British in some of these WW2 games are depicted as sitting back and having a cup of tea, fuck you American's you go fight, we will just sit here sipping our tea. We forght too! And yeah, what about canadians? And french? And Russians?

Oh wait, they were at the British houses sipping our Tetley tea as well. Silly me, how could I forget? :D
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Call of Duty - Civil War FTW!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:44AM FernandoRocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That sounds interesting...
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yes, please make an American Civil War shooter! I propose the following highlights:
- Stand still in stand rank and file and watch your friends drop beside you!
- 3 minute reloading mini game!
- 1 in 30 chance to hit your target! Sometimes your musket will not even fire!
- Random infectious diseases!
- Build campfires in the wilderness!
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Exactly!
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:25AM PedoJokerBear said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
YOU TOO CAN CATCH TYPHOID!
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:43AM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Featuring 10,000 vs 10,000 online play - no, that's not lag; the battles were really that slow.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 1:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Civil War has a ton of potential for great games. What most people don't realize is that the Civil War wasn't "stand in line, shoot, reload for 2 minutes, shoot". While forces were still marched across battlefields, rarely would they face off in the old "chivalrous" fashion. In fact, most of the combat was done in close quarters with bayonets, swords, and revolvers. It seems like you could combine guerilla warfare and that type of melee combat for a solid game, but to my knowledge, no one has done it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think a Civil War game would be great, if it could model what Yourself is talking about. I still think the movie "Glory" is one of the greatest movies of all time, and it features some of the coolest battles too. I believe the same director made The Last Samurai as well, which had similarly cool battles.

Plus, the game could (ethically or not) exploit not just the hundreds of thousands of real people who died in the war, but also exploit the current political situation of America, which has people bitterly divided into Republican and Democrat camps. And all those bigots who shout racist epithets in a Southern drawl while they play games? They'd now be considered RPers when they play on the Confederate side! Sweet.

Also, COD games have never been about realism like a Clancy game might be. They're more about Hollywood style action and heroics. So a Civil War game's weapons wouldn't have to be realistically inaccurate, or reload slowly. But the most key thing would be to feature deep bayonet combat. Oh, and cannons. I'd love to see cannonballs rolling into a huge battle :D
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:39AM FakeJamaican said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nobody has done WWII right sine the ORIGINAL Medal of Honor for PS1
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:39AM FakeJamaican said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*since
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've played a shit ton of WWII games and my all time fav is Medal of Honor: Frontline (Xbox)

IMO, its the best WWII game ever. The game looked phenominal back in the day as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGFKbn6HCkk
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:02AM AwesomeTown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought the original CoD on the PC was absolutely incredible. After that, all the other WWII shooters just didn't live up to that for me, and I just got so bored with them.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:43AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, CoD1 is excellent.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
European assault for the PC was really good,COD1 was also great.


Now my favorite MOH game is heroes for the PSP.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 5:01PM FakeJamaican said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I suppose those are all good too... I just can't find a game that let's me relive the awesomeness of the original MOH...the first time you whip out the fake ID...BAHAHAHAHAH

i do remember the glitch though, that always made them fall backwards...even when you shoot them in the back of the head...
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
How about ending the first-person shooter genre instead.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 1:43PM mattimus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
umm, how about not?
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:19AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, because you don't enjoy them. Nevermind the fact they drive the largest sales numbers.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think we just need to slow down on FPS, theres no shortage of them, thats for god dam sure. Lots of em have rank up systems so you have to dedicate like 1600 hours before you get everything. WWII or not, i wish other gamers would get as much attention.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:55AM Haggard said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
How about multiple genres of games can exist at the same time? This year I'm excited for Far Cry 2 and Left 4 Dead, but also for Little Big Planet, RB2 and GH:WT as well.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the popularity of the FPS genera is the only thing that keeps companies from switching to MMOs.

Although adventure games would be appreciated also is all about the games you play, I bought Intellivision lives yesterday and it kick ass,I found myself playing a intellivision game 2 hours. The lack of Burger time and Dungeons and dragons advanced nonetheless still disturbs me.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 2:47PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There is nothing wrong with FPSes, it's just that we don't often see anything brilliantly new in that area.
Reply

Posted: Oct 21st 2008 2:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I bought Intellivision lives yesterday and it kick ass,I found myself playing a intellivision game 2 hours."

B-17 Bomber is the best WWII game ever.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Took them long enough. Now they can do modern warfare and run that concept into the ground.

I'd be interesting if they tried out something like Vietnam or the Balkins region, though that last one is a little close to modern warfare I suppose.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:57AM OriginalWeJo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really think they need to investigate other wars for possible use. Imagine something like the Call of Duty: French and Indian War. Reloading muskets in the heat of battle whilst a Native American is poised to attack all in highly realistic HD graphics.

Sign me up, Billy.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 10:57AM Duke said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I wish the world cared more for the gamers and committed to WWIII so we could have some new game material. Damn selfish world!
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:32AM John Z said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's not for lack of trying, let me tell you...
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:03AM Swizzler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah I hope this is the last WWII game for a while, that way, when they make a nice one with next-gen technology it will be interesting and new.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Something seems a little strange by referring to WWII as a "classic war" - like it's some kind of morbid term of endearment.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:56AM Haggard said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Remember that time 70 million people died? Classic!
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 12:42PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Classic in the sense of conventional, Nation vs Nation wars that used to be the norm. Korea was pretty much the last of those. They are remembered as "better" wars because you knew who your enemy was and what they were fighting for, now its all about civil wars and insurgencies, bloody, messy affairs fought without honor, though not reaching that massive scale of human loss

Classic is appropriate
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 1:45PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I see what you mean Mr Khan.

WW2 was really the last war where there was 'good versus evil' beyond reasonable doubt.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 8:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Interestingly enough WWII is one of the only wars in history in which there is a clear, accepted good versus evil.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:08AM Dirty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea seriously we need more barbie games and more MMOs.
Reply

Posted: Oct 20th 2008 11:10AM Dirty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This was supposed to be a reply to gurls play games 2. Fing comment system.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW