| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (37)

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:08PM Avarice said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"There are no 'kill 10 rats' type quests"

So space-rats will be left to breed unchecked? YOU FOOLS!!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:20PM Burritoclock said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Best first comment EVER!
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:30PM germdove said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Y
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:30PM germdove said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
You
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:35PM Buckshot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
agreed
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 1:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
amen to that
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 1:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
amen to that
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 1:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
damn....
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 9:29AM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No Womprats, no deal!
Reply

Posted: Oct 26th 2008 8:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a bit off topic, but Avarice, is that Zap Rowsdower in your avatar? lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:35PM germdove said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Great googly moogly, sorry about the comment spam, all I was trying to say was that Avarice wins the internet.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This actually sounds really good.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:37PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still won't allow myself to become excited about this game until it's announced for the PS3 or 360. Before any PC gaming purist tells me that MMO's don't work on a controller let me just say the PS3 supports Keyboard and Mouse and there is no reason the 360 can't also support such a peripheral. I do think it's possible that an MMO can easily work on a console controller.

I know Mass Effect worked better on a computer but it was more than adequate on a console. I know it wasn't an MMO but it can be done. As I said before even in the event that it couldn't the PS3 supports KB & M and I am sure the 360 would also do something similar if it had to.

Te bigger issue for a console MMO (especially on Live) is the thought of a monthly fee to play the game. That would be some pricing structure on the 360. Pay for a keyboard and mouse (if no BC support for an existing MS one exist), pay for Live, pay for extra DLC, expansions & pay to play the MMO on top of that. Not like the PS3 would be much better because I would still have to buy the KB & M if controller support weren't supported.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem with MMOs on a console can be seen, to an extent with FFXI, is that an MMO will be limited technologically on a console.
While a PC can be upgraded, and over time is expected to be upgraded -- and an MMO can reflect that with advances in complexity, effects, etcetera... a console as it stands cannot. At best, you can upgrade capacity via a hard drive.
With FFXI's case, being a PS2 MMO as well as PC, the PS2 has ultimately been the limiting factor for any number of advances or features that have been widely asked for by the community. While a developer COULD potentially allow one platform different advances in UI/graphics/effects, they probably would not, as that would increase development time and costs.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:28PM sk8monroe81 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
kaelitz- ur PC comment makes no sense.. look at the # 1 MMO and PC game, WOW. they have topped the charts with sub-par graphics because their game can be played on almost every PC out.
many PC owners cannot play most PC games that have high requirements.
the great thing about consoles is that everyone has the same console and same specs.
the thing about console gamers is that they(we) tend to pick up new games all the time and get bored with older titles. you say FF11, you know that is an old game right?? how long should they support that title?
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sk8monroe81 - My comment makes plenty sense. Look at the requirements for WoW back in '04 when it was released, and look at the requirements for Wrath now in '08. They HAVE changed. Granted they haven't shot through the roof, but they have risen nonetheless.
WoW is also the oddball when it comes to MMOs nowadays. It was not designed for the high-end rigs like Crysis has been, or other PC-oriented games. Similarly, other MMOs also have steeper requirements compared to WoW -- at least to get the full graphical experience.

And yes, I say FFXI because S-E seems to have no real desire to stop supporting the title any time soon. They just released their 4th expansion pack within the past year for it. As well, it still seems to have a dedicated fan and subscriber base.

I'm not saying the issue is insurmountable. FFXI has shown us that an MMO can thrive while still being playable on a console. However, I'm merely stating that a console is a large limiting factor in the long-term, and since MMOs generally have a lifespan of let's say... 10 years or more, the aging of the hardware of a platform it must continue to support can put a serious toll on development and other aspects.

Of course, developers can turn around and no longer provide support or updates for deprecated hardware, but I'd wager that'd piss off a lot of people, and would definitely be bad press.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 10:19PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
kaelitz --

How about this ... They can release it on both but only continue to upgrade the PC specs with expansions. It's not like these console can't handle an MMO.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 9:35AM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just to note: Xbox 360 supports a keyboard and is really nice to have one around for account recovery and naming Halo 3 videos.

Also, do you guys not own a computer?
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 7:30PM RogueJedi86 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
" Before any PC gaming purist tells me that MMO's don't work on a controller let me just say the PS3 supports Keyboard and Mouse and there is no reason the 360 can't also support such a peripheral. "

Wouldn't a console that uses a Keyboard and Mouse to play a game just be a PC? Why not just use a PC instead? Most console gamers have a PC, and have the cash to afford a new video card and some RAM to run the next big game.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 6:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a nice kick in the ass, Thank you Lucas arts/Bioware/EA for pissing on people that do not have access to broadband. KOTOR 1 & 2 are two of my favorite games so its nice to know that I won't be able to play the so called "KOTOR 3,4,5".
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:11PM HTCEVO said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be fair to Lucas, haven't they pissed on you enough to teach you *not* to get excited about games they release anymore?

With the exception of 2 of the 3 Rogue Squadrons, I can't think of any recent Star Wars games that are worth their full asking price. Isn't this kind of behavior a bit expected by now?

I'm sure this will be done on the consoles, or else they wouldn't have even said they would consider it. My bet is that it will be a last minute announcement in order to garner some sort of excitement for the title. It's meant for fanboys and girls of star wars everywhere to make publicity by bitching about it only being on PC. You know what they say, negative press is good press.

Sorry if I sound a little jaded, but Unleashed still has a sour taste in my mouth, and only Soul Calibur 4 did anything right with the franchise of late.

Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:33PM sk8monroe81 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hojo- u know lucas has been milking the force since the 70's right? 30 years now... get used to it...
most of the star wars stuff is not good its just filler for the fans.

in 2008 and beyond broadband is really the only way to play a game online. dial up are you serious? to play a MMO... lol.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:37PM Blaquebeird said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Rogue Squadron?! Those are the only Lucasarts games you can think of that are worth their money? I don't even know what to say. I can understand not liking RPGs, but saying KOTOR 1&2 aren't worth their money probably blasphemy in some religion or other.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 9:23PM HTCEVO said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ragincajun, I never liked KOTOR, so that's why I didn't bring them up. The turn based combat drove me batty.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:13PM Avolii said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They seem to be making a LOT of promising ideas.

Sure hope they pull through or else it'll be quite the disappointment.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Theres nothing really secret. It's pretty obvious the reason they aren't giving specific information is because its not there. It's a game in development and there are probably a lot of things in the game being worked out still meaning nothing is concrete.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 7:56PM ExMcCloud said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bioware=Awesome By Default
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 8:01PM DerickDBrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When are we gonna get to see this gameplay footage that was at the announcement?
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 8:11PM mietha said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm excited, but skeptical as well, being as there's only been about 5 playable real MMO's ever released and Bioware has zero experience in the field.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 10:10PM phobic99 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Blizzard didn't have any MMO experience when they were developing WoW. I'd say they did ok for a bunch of first timers.

No idea what you mean about "only 5 real playable MMOs" though.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 11:52PM chispito said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's Bioware. I'm sure they'll do a fine job. And honestly I'm rather more interested in a fresh take on an MMO than one by a proven dev.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 8:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i didnt read past the part where the guys love mandalorians, because right then I knew this was an instant purchase
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 9:14PM CJLopez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Go crossplatform playing, with a Wii version using Motion plus for 1:1 lightsaber experience!!!!!!!!

You know you want it!!!!!!

Still, might play the PC-version
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2008 10:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Do all characters automatically start with amnesia?
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 1:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I believe memory in consoles is the most limiting factor lets face it 512 megs of memory is not enough for almost any modern mmo to play smoothly. Add that in with development costs for 2 or 3 platforms. Releasing patches across all 3.

patches on consoles have to be approved by the console company before they can be released. So if you have a major bug pop up in a patch you may have to wait days or weeks to fix it till its is approved by the console company.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 3:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it me, or is it sounding like a highly instanced single player game, with connected MP/PvP hubs?

If everyone is following different stories, has different goals, is in different areas/factions and is instanced to prevent them all interfering with each other... then its not really very MMO..

Still, interesting to see how it turns out. Wish there was an offline SP version...
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2008 1:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
how about just keep it to pc platforms?...
online console gameplay is good..but wouldnt be for an mmo. like some people above my post stated, console gamers move on to new titles... in a very short amount of time... well at least IMO, i got bored fast of console games...so i just decided to stick to pc gaming :P
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW