| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (52)

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
lol for sure,

and rightly so I reckon. plagiarising motherfuckers.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:16PM llllFlREBlRDllll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My thoughts exactly.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:23PM Shagittarius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Its because they both used the IGN watermark.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, no it must be the ESRB logo.....
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 12:34AM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wish i could vote you higher than 3 hearts shaggy.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:24PM ALBGunner04 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Haha that's insane! Did Activision even look at the other Baja game before actually publishing their similar game? Wow... For the first time, I think that a lawsuit for a patent is actually justified lol. Not to mention they don't want customers mixing the two games up. Imagine, Activision went on a big ad campaign, people bought the THQ one lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:17PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yea your right and i think thats the main fear here. THQ is probably worried that uninformed consumers may be confused and accidentally buy the other game instead of theirs considering the name and box art similarities.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:19PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yea your right and i think thats the main fear here. THQ is probably worried that uninformed consumers may be confused and accidentally buy the other game instead of theirs considering the name and box art similarities. i say they certainly have a justified cause on this one, especially since i dont really perceive this being a 'huge' seller anyway, they dont want people cutting in on the little bit of money they get from it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Clearly they looked at it...they're almost identical!
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 8:44PM Macroy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Trademark, not patent.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:28PM Misfit Toy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I can imagine the artist downloading the cover to one game and carefully rendering his own rendition and then presenting it to the execs.

Activision artist: Viola! My creation!
Activision publisher: Great job! You must have spent hours creating this cover. I really like how the red buggy is in the front there with all those lights...and there's that blue truck in the background flying in the air. Looks like an exciting Baja game! Should really stand out from the competition.
Activision artist: Uh huh...
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:47PM yipcanjo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Good ol' Viola!

Oh, wait...you meant "voilĂ ", didn't you?
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:09PM temmink said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Carefully rendered? Looks more like he applied a blur filter and handed it back! Rediculous...
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 7:26PM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Unless of course it was an intentional viola...
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 7:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The activision publisher's name was Viola.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 5:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While VoilĂ  means "That's it" in French, viola means "Raped" =)
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:30PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Speaking of "rip-offs", doesn't Hammer from Fable II look a lot like Nariko from Heavenly Sword, of course much more buffed up?

And look at the direct Solid Snake rip-off on this boxart!

http://scrawlfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/vampire-rain-boxart.jpg
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those are pure money makers right there! lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its prob not even worth the court/lawyer fees to even bother about sue'ing over this pile of crap.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:35PM vidguy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Are you kidding me!? This is such a frivolous lawsuit, I hope the attorney who brought this gets disbarred. I mean, BAJA: Edge of Control has a helicopter and the other one doesn't, for crying out loud.

**beep**sarcasm detector running low on batteries**
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Activision meant to put in the chopper, they just forgot. Like the Wii version of Okami, I'm sure a fixed cover will be offered free of charge with a helicopter in the space that's been designated for it at the top left.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:37PM THEBLAH said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I probably would have been "Activision, What the shit?" before suing them.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:39PM Dirty said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think this can easily be solved with a "jinx you owe me a coke"
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 7:18PM Larz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hehe, could have been a coincidence. These games are so generic that I would be surprised if the box art DIDN'T look the same.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 8:21PM Ignatius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
By coke, you mean hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:43PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh... probably just an accident. For example, if you have the vehicles from that angle and you want don't want the vehicle in the foreground to cover up the background vehicle then it needs to be higher. The easiest way in an offroad game is to simply have the one in the background jumping. And then the bike is simply thrown in the background as an afterthought to say, "This game has bikes too!".

Take a look at Mortorstorm: Pacific Rift's cover:
http://www.ebgames.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=70789

Buggy in the foreground, jumping truck in the background, and an ATV off to the side. They just did theirs from a different angle.



Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:51PM Quastor said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Is it also an accident that both co-pilots in the red truck are pointing ahead?
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:00PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know, probably. That's sort of their job... they help navigate. But beyond that, what would be the point of copying a cover in the first place when it wouldn't cost that much to have a new one drawn up? It's not like we're talking about flagship titles here, so I doubt anyone is trying to ride coat tails.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Confirmed: These two covers don't look the same.






Thanks Vidikron
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:06PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LOL... I didn't say that. I'm just saying I doubt there's any negative intent here.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:07PM Dirty said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I down vote you purely because you directed me to an EB games website. Filthy preorder bastards!

DEATH TO GAMESTOP!
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 8:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, it was definitely intentional. Look, they even put the ESRB logo in the same corner!
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait, the Activision one is the official game. They should be suing THQ instead.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:45PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We can only hope that they destroy each other

Though both make meaningful contributions
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 9:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Activision published COD4 , as long as they still have infinity ward , they better survive.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ugh, people will siphon money for anything.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:59PM Modok said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
this happens all the time, sometimes we just don't notice it. it's called a knock-off. what happens is that one person comes out with something, here the original box art, and then the other guys, having seen the box art and thinking it's spot on, hire some one to give them, uh hum "the same but different". and that's what you get. i know, because i'm a graphic artist/designer and that's all people want. take in mind that to them, originality has the chance of failing, while imitating what worked before is a safer bet. bollocks i know...
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 5:59PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Activision: Fuck, we can't think of an idea for cover art, huh? Whats this I see right here next to my son's console, Baja? Hmmm, maybe we could use this cover and tweak it just a little, nobody will notice, besides, gamers are stupid, mwahahaha
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure there are huge lines waiting to buy both of these masterpieces. :)
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:07PM dv8withn8 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, talk about a blatant rip-off. Who is the marketing genius that is going to lose their job over this?
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Aww, they're not the same at all! One's got a motorcycle and the other's......hey wait....oh shit!-there it is....down in the corner! lol lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:17PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They're completely different. Even a blind chimpanzee situated in the center of a cavern with the lights turned off and his friend Ray Charles can tell they're nowhere near the same. The blue truck on the THQ cover has lights on the roof, the Activision one doesn't. Plus, the Activision tires are bigger on the red car. And see the grill protector on the red car? Totally different from the THQ one.

Man, a trained seahorse can tell the difference.

/sarcasm off
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Eh, I know a bunch of the guys that made this game, and even they joke about it. "Baja 1000: The game you bought cause you thought you were buying the other game!"

"Baja: Edge of Control" had a much bigger media buy (not huge, but you've actually heard of it) than "Score International" and I'm sure Activision was trying to trade on that marketing.
Reply

Posted: Oct 27th 2008 6:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Motorstorm says hi......and sells about 50 times more than these complete waste of discs.

Wouldn't surprise me if they worked together on this lawsuit just to get publicity.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 3:49AM Lekko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They should settle this lawsuit with a race.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 6:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Up around dead mans curve? Your on buddy!
First one to jump out the car is a chicken.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 5:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What am I suppose to be looking at?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 9:02AM 007craft said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, THQ will LOSE this lawsuit. The cover may be identical but its a DIFFERENT cover. Some1 over at activision looked at the boxart, and just drew a picture that was similar to it. Its actually a differnt picture, and you cant copyright a generic truck and positioning when drawing a picture. Theres nothing to sue for here.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 9:14AM Bones3D said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The resemblance between the two are disturbing to the point that they might even come off as stereoscopic renderings of the same file, only with slightly different textures and minor prop/environment changes. The odds of this occurring completely by accident are unbelievably low.

At this point, Activision could probably counter-sue using the same charges, suggesting some sort of wrong-doing on THQ's part as a means of further devalue their competing product by making it look like a clone of the higher priced title.

This kind of reminds me of various cases where Apple has had to go after MP3 player accessory manufacturers for employing ads/box art that looks remarkably similar to Apple's iTunes ads, on the grounds that they are infringing on Apple's trademark as a means of gaining sales from iPod users, rather than advertising their product as a generic accessory that will work on any device featuring a headphone jack.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Time Ducks (iOS)

Posted on Feb 7th 2012 9:00PM

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW