THQ sues Activision Blizzard over box art
We certainly notice the strong similarities between the two covers, but we're sure the legal rationale for the suit will go beyond saying: "These two cars are in practically the same position on the cover, with a red car in the foreground and a blue one airborne in the background." At least, we hope the legal arguments go beyond that.
PDF - THQ Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. [Patent Arcade]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Titanium_Orchid @ Oct 27th 2008 5:18PM
lol
5th hot meal @ Oct 27th 2008 5:28PM
lol for sure,
and rightly so I reckon. plagiarising motherfuckers.
Desert Eagle @ Oct 27th 2008 6:16PM
My thoughts exactly.
Shagittarius @ Oct 27th 2008 5:23PM
Its because they both used the IGN watermark.
Bao @ Oct 27th 2008 5:28PM
No, no it must be the ESRB logo.....
Foetoid @ Oct 28th 2008 12:34AM
I wish i could vote you higher than 3 hearts shaggy.
Albanian_Killa @ Oct 27th 2008 5:24PM
Haha that's insane! Did Activision even look at the other Baja game before actually publishing their similar game? Wow... For the first time, I think that a lawsuit for a patent is actually justified lol. Not to mention they don't want customers mixing the two games up. Imagine, Activision went on a big ad campaign, people bought the THQ one lol
SoCoolCurt (PSN: KillaKornbread - XBL: SoCoolCurt) @ Oct 27th 2008 6:17PM
yea your right and i think thats the main fear here. THQ is probably worried that uninformed consumers may be confused and accidentally buy the other game instead of theirs considering the name and box art similarities.
SoCoolCurt (PSN: KillaKornbread - XBL: SoCoolCurt) @ Oct 27th 2008 6:19PM
yea your right and i think thats the main fear here. THQ is probably worried that uninformed consumers may be confused and accidentally buy the other game instead of theirs considering the name and box art similarities. i say they certainly have a justified cause on this one, especially since i dont really perceive this being a 'huge' seller anyway, they dont want people cutting in on the little bit of money they get from it.
Blazur @ Oct 27th 2008 6:24PM
Clearly they looked at it...they're almost identical!
Macroy @ Oct 27th 2008 8:44PM
Trademark, not patent.
Misfit Toy @ Oct 27th 2008 5:28PM
I can imagine the artist downloading the cover to one game and carefully rendering his own rendition and then presenting it to the execs.
Activision artist: Viola! My creation!
Activision publisher: Great job! You must have spent hours creating this cover. I really like how the red buggy is in the front there with all those lights...and there's that blue truck in the background flying in the air. Looks like an exciting Baja game! Should really stand out from the competition.
Activision artist: Uh huh...
Yipcanjo @ Oct 27th 2008 5:47PM
Good ol' Viola!
Oh, wait...you meant "voilà", didn't you?
Temmink @ Oct 27th 2008 6:09PM
Carefully rendered? Looks more like he applied a blur filter and handed it back! Rediculous...
Misfit Toy @ Oct 27th 2008 7:26PM
Unless of course it was an intentional viola...
Gehodra @ Oct 27th 2008 7:52PM
The activision publisher's name was Viola.
Nicolas @ Nov 11th 2008 5:17AM
While Voilà means "That's it" in French, viola means "Raped" =)
Chin-Poh @ Oct 27th 2008 5:30PM
Speaking of "rip-offs", doesn't Hammer from Fable II look a lot like Nariko from Heavenly Sword, of course much more buffed up?
And look at the direct Solid Snake rip-off on this boxart!
http://scrawlfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/vampire-rain-boxart.jpg
ryan @ Oct 27th 2008 6:01PM
Those are pure money makers right there! lol
deaftly @ Oct 27th 2008 5:32PM
Its prob not even worth the court/lawyer fees to even bother about sue'ing over this pile of crap.
vidGuy @ Oct 27th 2008 5:35PM
Are you kidding me!? This is such a frivolous lawsuit, I hope the attorney who brought this gets disbarred. I mean, BAJA: Edge of Control has a helicopter and the other one doesn't, for crying out loud.
**beep**sarcasm detector running low on batteries**
Roddie @ Oct 27th 2008 5:41PM
Activision meant to put in the chopper, they just forgot. Like the Wii version of Okami, I'm sure a fixed cover will be offered free of charge with a helicopter in the space that's been designated for it at the top left.
Blah @ Oct 27th 2008 5:37PM
I probably would have been "Activision, What the shit?" before suing them.
Dirty @ Oct 27th 2008 5:39PM
I think this can easily be solved with a "jinx you owe me a coke"
Lars @ Oct 27th 2008 7:18PM
Hehe, could have been a coincidence. These games are so generic that I would be surprised if the box art DIDN'T look the same.
Ignatius @ Oct 27th 2008 8:21PM
By coke, you mean hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Vidikron @ Oct 27th 2008 5:43PM
Meh... probably just an accident. For example, if you have the vehicles from that angle and you want don't want the vehicle in the foreground to cover up the background vehicle then it needs to be higher. The easiest way in an offroad game is to simply have the one in the background jumping. And then the bike is simply thrown in the background as an afterthought to say, "This game has bikes too!".
Take a look at Mortorstorm: Pacific Rift's cover:
http://www.ebgames.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=70789
Buggy in the foreground, jumping truck in the background, and an ATV off to the side. They just did theirs from a different angle.
Quastor @ Oct 27th 2008 5:51PM
Is it also an accident that both co-pilots in the red truck are pointing ahead?
Vidikron @ Oct 27th 2008 6:00PM
I don't know, probably. That's sort of their job... they help navigate. But beyond that, what would be the point of copying a cover in the first place when it wouldn't cost that much to have a new one drawn up? It's not like we're talking about flagship titles here, so I doubt anyone is trying to ride coat tails.
Hala Madrid!! @ Oct 27th 2008 6:03PM
Confirmed: These two covers don't look the same.
Thanks Vidikron
Vidikron @ Oct 27th 2008 6:06PM
LOL... I didn't say that. I'm just saying I doubt there's any negative intent here.
Dirty @ Oct 27th 2008 6:07PM
I down vote you purely because you directed me to an EB games website. Filthy preorder bastards!
DEATH TO GAMESTOP!
Anam @ Oct 28th 2008 8:38AM
No, it was definitely intentional. Look, they even put the ESRB logo in the same corner!
DangerMouse @ Oct 27th 2008 5:43PM
Wait, the Activision one is the official game. They should be suing THQ instead.
Mr Khan @ Oct 27th 2008 5:45PM
We can only hope that they destroy each other
Though both make meaningful contributions
Phantom @ Oct 27th 2008 9:40PM
Activision published COD4 , as long as they still have infinity ward , they better survive.
ryan @ Oct 27th 2008 5:59PM
Ugh, people will siphon money for anything.
modok @ Oct 27th 2008 5:59PM
this happens all the time, sometimes we just don't notice it. it's called a knock-off. what happens is that one person comes out with something, here the original box art, and then the other guys, having seen the box art and thinking it's spot on, hire some one to give them, uh hum "the same but different". and that's what you get. i know, because i'm a graphic artist/designer and that's all people want. take in mind that to them, originality has the chance of failing, while imitating what worked before is a safer bet. bollocks i know...
Maverick Saturn @ Oct 27th 2008 5:59PM
Activision: Fuck, we can't think of an idea for cover art, huh? Whats this I see right here next to my son's console, Baja? Hmmm, maybe we could use this cover and tweak it just a little, nobody will notice, besides, gamers are stupid, mwahahaha
dvnt @ Oct 27th 2008 6:07PM
Wow, talk about a blatant rip-off. Who is the marketing genius that is going to lose their job over this?
ssasami @ Oct 27th 2008 6:08PM
I'm sure there are huge lines waiting to buy both of these masterpieces. :)
mr bean @ Oct 27th 2008 6:12PM
Aww, they're not the same at all! One's got a motorcycle and the other's......hey wait....oh shit!-there it is....down in the corner! lol lol
LaughingTarget @ Oct 27th 2008 6:17PM
They're completely different. Even a blind chimpanzee situated in the center of a cavern with the lights turned off and his friend Ray Charles can tell they're nowhere near the same. The blue truck on the THQ cover has lights on the roof, the Activision one doesn't. Plus, the Activision tires are bigger on the red car. And see the grill protector on the red car? Totally different from the THQ one.
Man, a trained seahorse can tell the difference.
/sarcasm off
Patrick @ Oct 27th 2008 6:31PM
Eh, I know a bunch of the guys that made this game, and even they joke about it. "Baja 1000: The game you bought cause you thought you were buying the other game!"
"Baja: Edge of Control" had a much bigger media buy (not huge, but you've actually heard of it) than "Score International" and I'm sure Activision was trying to trade on that marketing.
JoeTheBlow @ Oct 27th 2008 6:32PM
Motorstorm says hi......and sells about 50 times more than these complete waste of discs.
Wouldn't surprise me if they worked together on this lawsuit just to get publicity.
Lekko @ Oct 28th 2008 3:49AM
They should settle this lawsuit with a race.
JoeTheBlow @ Oct 28th 2008 6:27AM
Up around dead mans curve? Your on buddy!
First one to jump out the car is a chicken.
Birdshake @ Oct 28th 2008 5:24AM
What am I suppose to be looking at?
007craft @ Oct 28th 2008 9:02AM
You know, THQ will LOSE this lawsuit. The cover may be identical but its a DIFFERENT cover. Some1 over at activision looked at the boxart, and just drew a picture that was similar to it. Its actually a differnt picture, and you cant copyright a generic truck and positioning when drawing a picture. Theres nothing to sue for here.
Bones3D @ Oct 28th 2008 9:14AM
The resemblance between the two are disturbing to the point that they might even come off as stereoscopic renderings of the same file, only with slightly different textures and minor prop/environment changes. The odds of this occurring completely by accident are unbelievably low.
At this point, Activision could probably counter-sue using the same charges, suggesting some sort of wrong-doing on THQ's part as a means of further devalue their competing product by making it look like a clone of the higher priced title.
This kind of reminds me of various cases where Apple has had to go after MP3 player accessory manufacturers for employing ads/box art that looks remarkably similar to Apple's iTunes ads, on the grounds that they are infringing on Apple's trademark as a means of gaining sales from iPod users, rather than advertising their product as a generic accessory that will work on any device featuring a headphone jack.