| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (73)

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 9:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
saw that coming
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well there goes another 60 bucks....
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 12:57PM ExMcCloud said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You mean 80 bux....When u see the Lunch pale special edition your gonna buy it...Period.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:04AM fischju said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Review wha? My Survival Edition just got dropped off, I'm a little hysterical, don't expect to hear from me for a couple of days.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:53AM ZaxCG2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Make sure to leave the feeding tube in your throat. Also, wear eye-protection when stepping into the sun after completion of the game.

(Mocking you because I don't have the game)
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:16AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
so better than Halo than?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
No, different.










And its *then, not than.


/Grammar Police out
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My grammar is atrocious because I did not attend college and played too many video games. I also kill babies and vote republican.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:21AM superklye said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are you joking, Fenix? "Than" is used for comparing one item to another.

"X is more than Y." "Y is better thAn Z."

Then is used when discussing time. "What happened then was..." "Then we went to the store."

Looks like the grammar police need to come and Rodney King some sense into you.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:22AM superklye said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh...Oh God damn it...I just saw the second than.

My bad. :(
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:23AM Slaziman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
He meant the second "than" retard.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:24AM Slaziman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh god I just saw you already posted an apology.

My bad :(
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:26AM primetime4 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@superklye... wouldn't it be nice to have an edit feature?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:47AM Shmil said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@ primetime
It would be nice to see an edit button, but also it's very entertaining to see people make small asses of themselves. NO offense to anyone in particular, I'm guilty of it as well from time to time. Probably even in this post.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:48AM anoffday said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Cynics,

Now we know you're lying. Democrats are the ones who kill babies, not republicans.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"Faults be damned ..."
"Despite so many worries ..."
"... so many little- and medium-sized issues ..."

And absolutely no hint of what any of the issues are? Next time, Joystiq, could you please quote part of the reviews that are just slightly more informative?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:20AM Ludwig Kietzmann said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think there's a way to access the ENTIRE review via futuristic hyperlink technology. :) Also, I'm not sure how quoting the parts which reviews suggest players overlook is particularly helpful. What you want is the nega-review.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 11:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Thank god for Science. This "hyperlink" you speak of sounds like it could really benefit humanity.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 12:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Excuse me, but if Joystiq wants to summarize reviews is it really horrible of me to suggest that they use more informative quotes from the reviews?

I'm not asking them to change the format. I'm suggesting that this edition of the megareview feels less useful for me than other editions have been.

Sheesh.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 1:53PM Ludwig Kietzmann said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I understand the complaint, but the whole point is to use excerpts which capture the intent of the review. It's hardly informative to highlight nitpicking in a review which aims to praise the game.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 1:59PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They are posting the summary quotes that were prepared by the authors. Thats pretty much how every website handles this, otherwise they end up having to dice apart the review themselves and making it a bit time consuming.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 3:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks Duke. I didn't realize it was just the summary that the original reviewer prepared. I still think it's annoying that the summaries mention complaints with no indication of what the complaints are, but I suppose it was incorrect for me to direct my criticism towards Joystiq.

Sorry about that, Ludwig.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:18AM NaeemTHM said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hey did you dudes confuse Eurogamers score for Giant Bomb?

When I see slew of A's and 100's then one 80 or 75, it makes me feel that that review just wanted hits on his website. Sure everyone is entitled to their opinion, but COME ON! Clearly you're hating to get web-traffic.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:28AM GenGrievous said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Eurogamer used to be a pretty thrustworthy site but this year they've really started to bullshit their readers with high scores for certain hyped up games. Certain games get point deducted for minor niggles and others get 10s eventhough they have major flaws.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:29AM baby sea tuna said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Remember, those guys at Giant Bomb are the same ones that hated on EVERYTHING while at Gamespot.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:42AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why would they have gotten mixed up? Giant Bomb hates giving out 5/5's, so usually gives out 4/5's, which translates to 80/100 on metacritic.

Eurogamer on the other hand gets knocked both for giving all hyped up games outlying low scores, and for giving all hyped up games automatic perfect scores. The two are kind of mutually exclusive, so complaining about each is not only invalidates one of those arguments, but both.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:51AM NaeemTHM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You know what? I just read Giant Bombs review and take back what I said. It was well written and his qualms seem justified.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 11:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the reviews all basically say the same thing... its just a case of how much you "penalise" the faults.

Thats a personal thing really. (as is most reviewing, but anyway..). Some people are able to overlook huge problems if they find something worthwhile, others let the small problems ruin the experience for them.

(Eg: I'd overlook the terrible interface in KotOR because the immersion was so good. But i couldn't overlook it KotOR2 because the rest of the game wasn't good enough to overshadow it)
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I don't give a shit what the reviews say, good or bad. I played the game a couple hours last night before going to bed and it's unbelievably good.

As soon as you take your first steps out of the vault and get that ridiculously great view (seriously, go see it and then come back to me and say graphics don't matter), you know you're going to get sucked in for hours.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 11:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. Love it love it love it. Pretty much the best game I've played in a long long time.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 12:38PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree with you 100%. I played the game for nearly 5 hours last night and it exceeded my expectations in every way possibe. I like it allot better than Dead Space and Far Cry 2 which are both great games in their own right. I put it in atraround 9:00pm and the next thing I knew it was 2:00am. It has some insane immersion and fantastic gameplay. Honestly, I didn't like Oblivion that much but the formula was good. The subject matter in Fallout 3 is more up my alley than Oblivion.

The vault section of the game was a little boring but it provided some good backstory into the characters. This is especially true when you get to look at the overseer's dossier and files.

It's amazing to have a true open world FPS RPG like Fallout 3. It really mixes all of its elements perfect and makes another candidate for GOTY.

I have the PS3 version and there were a few AI bugs and graphical issues I noticed - but, those were mostly while in the vault.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Glad you like this Fallout; I've put in 11 hours straight already and I have to force myself NOT to play so I don't completely neglect my life.

Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:19AM foxhoundadam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm really worried that the crap comabt system will kill this game for me. Although the setting and presentation look amazing.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:23AM foxhoundadam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be fair Giant Bomb rates on a sacle of 1-5 stars. They gave it a good 4 Star review, but joystiq has expanded that to the "80".
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Metacritic does that, not joystiq. They also screw up 1up's grading system, since an A means an automatic 100 and a C- comes out to something like a 60. The point is their conversion system for letter scores is fucked up.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 8:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did Oblivion's crap combat ruin the game?

No.

I see where your coming from though.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:26AM Huey2k2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Out of all those reviews I trust the Giant Bomb one the most. I seem to have a lot of the same taste in games as Jeff Gersmann.

So from what I can tell it's a very well presented and put together game, but it suffers from a lot of the poor combat and AI issues that Oblivion had, which are the main reasons why I could never get into Oblivion.

I kinda want this, but at the same time I'm low on cash and Gears 2 comes out soon... Decisions decisions.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:28AM Dirty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ill wait for the Nega-review.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 11:18AM Dirty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Im just kidding. Gamefly just sent it, likely a keeper.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, every time somebody gives game a lower score, "they're just doing it for traffic".

Same happened with LBP.

Variety - "Good fun game,excellent level editor, but takes years to get anything done" 8/10

You don't even wanna know about the fanboy backlash.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Maybe it took them years to get anything done, but there was no shortage of great user made levels when I was in the beta. In fact, I was shocked at how great some of them were since it was only going on for less than a week.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 3:20PM TwEE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can see a lot of people I know thinking LBP like wii music is garbage for tots.. So not everybody out there is going to give it a 10..
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Also yes, we should have more reviewers like those on Giant Bomb as that's what, 6th 100/100 I've seen this month?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I highly doubt these "issues" will be as crippling or as frustrating as all the problems Fable 2 has.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:53AM totorototoro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not a diss on Fallout 3 (which I'm sure is great fun), but what is with the grade inflation for games this year?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:56AM ZaxCG2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
THEY'RE ALL JUST SO GREAT. WHY WOULD YOU QUESTION THAT?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:59AM totorototoro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
:D
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 10:59AM ZaxCG2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well I'm officially interested in this game. Never really heard of the series before (I was never a PC gamer until a year ago, screw you), but after watching the GT Retrospective and watching the trailers I'm ready to ... well... try to see if my PC can run it. BAHAHAHAHA. Oh I'm good. 2.04GHz ≠ 3GHz.

Anyways, if this is Oblivion with guns, I'd have a lot of fun with it. Oblivion was great... it just lacked gunnage.
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 11:05AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can someone clear this up for me, for certain? If I play the PC version, can I still get achievements tied to my XBL account and be logged into XBL while I play?

Basically, would it be the same as if I was logged into XBL on my 360?
Reply

Posted: Oct 28th 2008 11:18AM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If its a Games for Windows LIVE game then yes, not just Games for Windows. Like I know Gears of War for the PC can do that, be logged into XBL just like on the 360.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW