| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (44)

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:35PM R Planteer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hulu.com is offically awesome by my watch, and its growing with incrediable speed. I use that more than I use Veoh, and probably about as much as I use Youtube.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Thats odd, I didnt know that Time does jokes.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 7:41PM XGM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
instantrimshot.com
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Really? It was one of the biggest gaming disappointments in the entire history of video games.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:44PM Mr Khan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
hyperbole ftl

Daikatana sez hi2u

(authors note: i am perfectly conscious that this is an incoherent comment)
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:57PM KingJD said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Really? Not sure why people think that. I really enjoyed it, it was a pretty fun and unique game to play. I think it's the debate over the DRM used that has people thinking that way.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:00PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FC2 was a bigger disappointment to me, because I was *expecting* spore to be rubbish.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:22PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Science Spore was better. Since when is "cute" an invention?
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:26PM Esat Dedezade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Word
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 7:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
John Romero made me his bitch
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 7:13PM bmill3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well said.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 8:53PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm loving Farcry 2. But then again your average FPS fan loves things like COD and Halo rehashes with added gimmicks to cloud the fact that it is the same game as before.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 12:34AM Geist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was a poor game. But in terms of technology, it was quite impressive. Being able to algorithmically generate natural-looking movement is no easy feat.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 11:43AM LuiginDaisy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Define "Best Inventions of 2008..."
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fuck you, Hulu and your US-only availibility.Since Dr.Horrible went largely commercial by now, is there any other place where I can watch it?
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...okay, after doing some research, Hulu does seem to be an interesting feature with TV Episode stream etc.

Is there anyway to hack it with proxies?
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:06PM Inect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes... yes there is.

(a Canadian starts to watch the office on hulu)
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 12:36AM Geist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can watch Dr Horrible on Youtube.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:43PM Itzapro said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
[edit: banned for being a FIRST poster]
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 8:00PM Obienator said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You better start contributing like a normal person, instead of hunting for "first" posts. Joystiq is pretty good ad banning bozos like you, so you've been warned, kid.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 9:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Come to Engadget, no one gets banned! It's so much fun!

/sarcasm, well, about the second part...
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 5:48PM Lone Starr said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Time said it so it must be true.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:05PM mcarage said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They also had Hitler as man of the year, so they've been known to be mistaken before.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 8:02PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
They are morally neutral on that, they also did Putin one year, right?

It's not about right and wrong so much as it is about influence and change.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 9:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh Hitler /was/ the man of the year. They already gave FDR it in '33, who else was there that had that much influence and would be remembered in the future? It's been about 70 years and it's still rare to go a day without hearing the name Hitler.

Now that's not to say TIME is relevant at all anymore... Everyone is the person of the year, really? Was it that lame of a year?
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:06PM anoffday said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How is Spore an invention? Spore is a video game. Wouldn't that make Pong the invention?

Sounds to me like Time needs to stick to what they know, which obviously isn't video games.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wat?
Securom didn't make the list?



...well, someone had to do it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 7:50PM KeenCommander said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
SecuROM in some form has been around for years, only the particularly intrusive version of it (version 7, I believe) is new. Most people just hadn't heard the name until now because the old versions were no more obnoxious than other anti-consumer packages.

Sorry to rain on your +1 parade.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i dont think half of those things are inventions at all
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:24PM BigD145 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This from the magazine that names "You" as person of the year.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 6:25PM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But I'm so unique and talented!
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 7:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm not.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 7:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's why Haggard won and not you.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 8:08AM Rocketboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, you did win.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 7:49PM michaspi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did they base their decision on a special DRM-less version of Spore created just for them to review?

Or did they just pirate the game with the DRM already stripped out?
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 7:59PM spyder said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They must of played a different game than I did.
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 8:19PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Left the world of PC gaming ages ago, but from everything I saw on Joystiq and a few other places, I got the impression it was one of the lamest games in awhile?
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 9:36PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wouldn't say it was bad, the problem is that the basic concept, procedurally generated genetic evolution, was not delivered upon. The decisions you made in one section really did not reflect upon the rest, as opposed to the reality that they promised, where every little gene would inexorably alter your fate
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 8:33PM Spiritbeast said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This article must have been written before Spore actually came out or something..
Reply

Posted: Nov 2nd 2008 8:55PM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wow Large Hadron Collider took 5th place for failing on the first 5 runs? Awesome, 2008 the year with no innovation.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 9:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are you kidding me? This game is terrible. IMO Fallout3 and Fable2 weren't that great either. This year is full of disappointments. Let's pray GOW doesn't suck.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 11:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think Fallout 3 has been awesome, and true enough to its roots too.

Fable didn't hold me for too long, but that's more due to the fact that Dead Space is exquisite and Fallout 3 right behind. The real-time combat is the biggest stumbling point with Fallout 3.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 6:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
?! Fallout 3 is awesome.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 11:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It certainly wasn't bad - but they bit off just a little too much - the tribal and civilization phases were very shallow and lame after the first playthrough.

Space had a lot of promise but just turned out to be too much trouble.

I really enjoyed cell and creature though - but there wasn't enough depth in the whole of the game to keep a longtime gamer, imo.

Someone new to games, though? It's actually a great experience that exposes them to game types they may not have played before.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW