| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (58)

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:18PM xenocidic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You mean "fount" ?

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nope. Font.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:52PM xenocidic said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I gotta respect that you're willing to stand by your typo, unabated by idle trolling =]
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Not that it matters, but it isn't a typo.

font
–noun
a productive source: The book is a font of useful tips for travelers.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:25PM xenocidic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Never seen it used in that fashion before: I stand corrected.

(I've only ever heard "a fount of ..." etc, i.e. fountain)

Learn something new every day - Thanks X3F!
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 5:04PM DJCUEBALL said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Ooohhh one full day... wow wee! What was I thinking posting in a site with a bunch of fanboys.

I have both systems so don't even bother flaming with that crap.

@ Sadistic
The point I'm making is, again, if you read you P.O.S is that MS is notorious for copying everyone or buying them out since the beginning when they bought DOS. There are a very few things they have actually done that's "innovative".

I'm done with this shit.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 5:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please don't feed the trolls.

Thank you.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 5:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He shoulda used "fount".. as a writer, why risk the confusion?

"font" is obviously ambiguous, in particular since the other meaning has become so prevalent in age of computing

I knew about the other use of 'font' , previously, *only* because I had to look it up once. It is becoming antiquated, while 'fount' is still highly suggestive of the underlying meaning

hahahah.. more waste of time for everybody.

BTW, Boku looks awesome, my kids will love it
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:22PM DJCUEBALL said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
How sad and pathetic that MS has to copy everyone else yet again. They are so notorious for that. Why can't they come up with more original stuff??

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:24PM Peacefuloutrage said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Um, this isn't Little Big Planet, it's an easy to use programming programming tool. Which is a lot different than a level editor.

And level editors and programming tools have been released for years. You may want to read or get out more..
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Thing is this was announced several days before LBP.

Now who's copying who?
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:32PM DJCUEBALL said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Oh really? How come it's just surfaced now? It says it's a project also. Does that mean it won't happen? Face it, MS business motto is to copy or buy out competition.

Can you give me source on when this was announced prior to LBP?
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OK:

Wired Techfest Demo: Boku (Dated 6th March 2007)
http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/03/techfest_demo_b.html

Wikipedia: LittleBigPlanet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Littlebigplanet
"Announced on 7th March 2007"
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Here you go jackass:

http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/03/techfest_demo_b.html

Little big planet was announced 7th of march, now check the date of that article.

if you did just a bit of research before shouting your mouth off you wouldn't look like such a dumbass.

While we're at it, why don't you look here as well:
http://research.microsoft.com/projects/boku/

Last i checked LBP was a side scrolling game, nothing like what microsoft is doing.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:49PM Softserve said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
There's actually video of it from when it was first shown off too. It takes no time to find.

The only difference now is that the release of LBP is giving people fodder to argue about it.

I think these are very different, either way. Even the way MS talks about the purposes of Boku is different. The original idea was just to get kids into programming and they seem to be sticking with that concept.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ooh burn.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 5:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please don't feed the trolls.

Thank you.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:22PM Peacefuloutrage said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Looks cool.

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:22PM Rax Dakkar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When somone on your staff is contemplating purchasing a 150$ collectors edition, I think its hard to say they are "woefully unable to afford the hardware necessary".

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well I am unable to, that's for sure.

Not to mention that $150 is a pretty far cry from the $460 (plus tax) it would take to pick up a PS3 and LBP.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:10PM Alex R said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$150?
Pah! £150, now THAT's real money. £150 spent on GH:WT, I am guilty.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:35PM Joeybeast said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Boku doesn't have the level of polish LBP has, not yet at least.

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 7:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you are a total retard.

little big planet is a jumping (platform) game where you can modify maps.

boku is a image based programming tool

THEY ARE NOTHING ALIKE AT ALL
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Other then allowing users to create, this has nothing to do with LBP.

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Heh heh heh, This is a copy of LBP, just think for a second.. Fanboys. Someone who's not a fanboy of any console give a comment.

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:50PM Softserve said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think the better thing would be for you to read the comments above yours. There's nothing less fanboyish than facts, dates and video lol.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:08PM docholoday said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I try and not be a fanboy for either camp, but after reading the MS project page for it...

http://research.microsoft.com/projects/boku/

The first few sentences pretty much give it away. It's a "visual programming language" aimed at getting kids interested in in programming.

That sounds like a totally different premise from LBP. One is essentially a "create your own platformer" game and the other is a level editor with educational focus.

Just because you can create things in both and both are open ended doesn't mean they're the same things. Geez. Everyone take a drink and calm down.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 3:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
looks like a Net Yaroze ripoff, sony needs to pick that back up for PS3 tho, it would be epicness

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why not just install Linux on your PS3 and hook a keyboard and mouse up to it? Instant-Net Yaroze epicness..

In reality tho, your comment is stupid and misguided.. Net Yaroze is still totally different then Boku.
Reply

Posted: Nov 4th 2008 1:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damnnn.. I am currently in my 2nd year Game Design and Development and we are learning XNA/C#. This boku thing makes it useless..

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:18PM max3091 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
HAHAHAHA!!!!................................no

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:20PM Jonman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Boku" sounds like the kind of thing I shouldn't be typing in Google while at work.

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think you're thinking of bukkake...
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 5:01PM Jonman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now I am. Thanks a bunch.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 5:36PM NukeAssault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I lold.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:22PM Drew327 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Woefully unable to afford?

Add a network adapter, hard drive, rechargeable batterty packs, and a live subscription and you will have spent just as much (probably more) on a 360, to get what a PS3 already does.


... or just have fun with your arcade.

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:29PM Cube said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you care about online then you'll have a version with a HDD. Most people don't seem to have a problem with a wired connection, cheap rechargeable are perfectly fine and Live is worth it.

In the end, though, it's just about which games you prefer.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I have both systems, sorry but the PS3's online capability is no where near where Xbox Live is at.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:53PM JCarpio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Um, so Richard can't afford it right now. So what?

It wasn't a fanboy slam, it's just simple economics.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 4:33PM adobe64 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i will definitely be paying attention to this one..

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 5:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have to laugh at those claiming a lbp ripoff.Ill have you know nothing lbp did was original.There were rpg makers and level editors long before lbp.Boku is a game design tool that gets kids interested and ready for future game development.

What this means is microsoft actually cares for the future of gaming and wants to make it easier and get more involved.

This is light years ahead of lbp in the sense your creating your own game not just a level within a game.

As far as not being able to afford a ps3 i think the majority of 360 owners could afford a ps3 including myself.As a matter of fact i got my 360 after ps3 launched and i payed 400 for my 360.

Regardless of what any idiotic fanboys say.The 360 is the better console the full 360 degrees and theres no way for sony and its fanboys to get around that.

Why cant you accept the fact that sony failed and let it go.Move on from this and learn your lesson get a 360 theres no point in you suffering any longer.

I have to laugh at how you guys keep lying to yourselfs claiming your exclusives have better graphix and psn is better than live its really sad and pathetic.

i was in one thread today were someone said that uncharted looked better than any 360 exclusive and that kz2 looks better than gears2 lmao just really sad.

Posted: Nov 4th 2008 1:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How can you say Sony has failed? LOL. You are clearly pathetic. Their system has been out for two years compared to 360 3 years... and their hardware sales are only about 4mil apart. For a year difference, and price difference, I would say that is pretty good.

Many people say that Uncharted looks better than any Xbox exclusive, and it does (for now). But Gears 2 is looking pretty good, they MIGHT be equal. As for KZ2, I am not sure how it looks.

When it comes down to purchasing a system, it all comes down to what the customer wants. So to tell someone to buy an Xbox is completely STUPID! I got PS3 for these reasons:
RFOM, R2, Uncharted, Warhawk, MGS4, GT5, LBP, KZ2, free online, blu-ray, and the Pixel Junk games... they are addictive!

Does 360 have ANY of these?

I would love to get a 360 for Gears.. maybe Fable. But what other good games are there? And which ones are not on the PC that I could pick up for much cheaper?

Even at $199, I cannot justify an Xbox 360 purchase. (especially because I would want to play online)
Reply

Posted: Nov 4th 2008 2:38AM Blaze463 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You done?
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 5:55PM robotoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know if it's meant to be just a programming tool disguised as a game/level editor, or an actual make-your-own-level LBP kinda game. but if it's the latter, it's certainly missing the polish, detail, and charm of littlebigplanet, probably cause it's more focused on the programming side? anyways, as a tool it looks powerful, but as a "game" it's missing a lot, so I don't think it's fair to compare it to LBP, it has probably a totally different objective.

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 7:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
editor richard mitchel: you are a fucking idiot for even mentioning little big planet and boku in the same sentence.

#1 boku is a PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE and little big planet is a platform game!!!!!!!!!!

#2 you started a flame war for the other retards like you who dont actually read the articles they blog about!!!!

boku is a genius little app for young aspiring game creators and has NOTHING TO DO WITH OR COMPETE WITH A GAME WHERE YOU CAN ONLY CREATE MAPS

EDIT THE ARTICLE HEADLINE

Posted: Nov 3rd 2008 11:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why can't we all just get along?
Reply

Posted: Nov 4th 2008 12:02AM stoneNboneCDXX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This guy has got a point, A bit harsh and too many CAPS but he has a point.

LBP = Great Side Scroller level maker, that's about it.
Boku = Make pretty much any game you want.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2008 10:21PM Blaze463 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I havn't been able to stop playing LBP since I bought it last week, I'm addicted like crazy. This is NOTHING like LBP. And I need some clarification. Is Boku a 360 game or PC program?

Posted: Nov 4th 2008 2:42AM Blaze463 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LBP is a hell of a lot more than just a level maker. It's really hard to explain, but if you own the game you will see.

Posted: Nov 4th 2008 10:57AM MDMonster said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well I can assure all of you that LBP isn't even worth it anyways I have both consoles and LBP is just too blah.
I can assure that if you go and buy LBP your a retard.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW