| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (21)

Posted: Nov 5th 2008 11:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It took them 6 months of development time to discover that the underlying game just wasn't that good. We could have told them that.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 12:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WRONG

Obviously you have never played one of the most popular fantasy boardgames in the history of the genre. The game itself is outstanding yet they couldn't nail the social aspects of playing such a game. Yeah, there is a lot of downtime in between your turns, but when playing with real friends that is not a bad thing. When playing against fake internet friends, I can totally see how it would hurt that aspect of the experience. Something like Uno works better because turns are next to nothing and the game is constantly moving. Talisman is not like that...it is long and involved and takes some brain usage.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 12:26AM hibikir said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Many of us have played Talisman, and found it to be a luck-ridden dicefest, with a lot of downtime and not enough decisions. Not only it's not a very good game, it's obviously not going to be engaging online. All the good memories when playing it live come with enjoying the company of friends. But with good friends, even a bad game is enjoyable.

Zombies will meet the same fate: There's no gameplay in there, and a lot of die rolls. It's not going to be any fun on Live. I don't understand how anyone could approve that project either.

Want a quality fantasy game? Look for a copy of Magic Realm on ebay. Or go play Titan, it's getting reprinted. If you can't handle the compexity of those two, try Descent or Duel of Ages, but don't come telling us Talisman is the end all be all of boardgames. It's mediocre.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 2:08AM monkeyhole said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Just because you have the patience of a baby chimp doesn't mean everyone out there does.

Talisman appeals to a huge audience that has been playing it for years. Calling the game mediocre is just plain ignorant. Believing that many people would spend money on a 'bad' game is just plain ignorant. Acknowledging that you have different tastes than the massive crowd that enjoys Talisman would be the adult way to say it.

Next time, baby chimp, try to be an adult.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:12AM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 12:33PM monkeyhole said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jeepers:

People buying a video game because they fell for marketing and hype, versus people purchasing and continuing to play a 25 year old board game are such completely different situations that I don't even know where to start.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 5:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@hibikir: But Zombies!!! has three exclamation points. It---has---to be good.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2008 11:50PM Xperiatchet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well its expensive because these people who are writing the code, fat men like you, they need money. and they also need free donuts and coffee so they can work diligently and they will rarely leave the workplace too, because i am prejudice and i say they are all fat and eat donuts and cant stop so they are forced into working, like slaves!
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 12:30AM drnerd said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!
PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!
PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!
PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!
PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!PRICE!!!!
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 12:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 12:43AM Courtney said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I remember playing hotseat strategy games on a PC years ago, where you might seriously have ten minutes between turns. We'd usually get a couple of movies or have a different game also going while playing the war game.

Can't imagine that many gamers would have the patience for something like that anymore. Hell, I don't think I would have the patience for it now.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 5:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought most of the fun of lengthy multiplayer games was having your mates 'round to your place and yelling at each other and eating greasy food and watching terrible movies while someone sits in the corner and contemplates their next move.

Kids these days will never know the pure joy of what I like to call a "nerd orgy".
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 12:50AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What this developer doesn't realize is that Talisman was all about waiting and complaining between turns. GO WOULD YOU GO and the like. As long as you had mics/cameras all would be fine. EAT IT EVERYONE.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 1:13AM sicsided said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Getting someone who knows how to implement that code. You think it may be easy. It is not.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 5:53AM jrr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd just like to point out that amount of time it takes for one player to complete a turn has absolutely no bearing on the percentage of time you'd be doing nothing.

Also, it's in a five player game you'd be spending 80% of the time doing nothing; for a six player game it'd be more like 83/84%.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 2:52PM zuburi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In a seven player game, it'd be like 86%! In a 12 player game, it'd be like 92%! In a 47 player game, 98%!
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 6:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Boardgames videogames with a system like Eye of Judgament to move, play + mics + cam and rock the world.

Roll dices in front of camera, camera recognize the roll, flsh locations to move.
Move the token like in eye, grabbing and dropping, etc.. virtual cards to draw, use with codes for cam to, again, recognize and sort them...

I think this will rock and seems not hard to do.

Mail CAPCOM with this and let them sort it out.

Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 10:05AM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Twilight Empirium FTW!

Google and then eBay it if you don't know...
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 1:07PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll stick with Settlers.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2008 1:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because programmers (and artist, designers, musicians, etc...) work for free, amirite?
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2008 1:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1-2 testing sorry for taking this comment zone for a test: cancellation are bad things!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW