What does an Obama presidency mean for video games? 1UP asks the question in a lengthy analysis of Obama's relationship to gaming culture.
Obama first entered our scene in December 2007 with comments presented to Common Sense Media on the topic of game violence legislation on his way to being dubbed the most "gamer-friendly" Democratic candidate. But the President-elect is better known for targeting youth voters with a $44.5K in-game ad campaign during the election season. (And apparently, it worked.)
Obama did urge us to "stop playing Game Boy" and put down the Wiimote (see screencap above -- from his Election Day ad), but the sentiments were geared toward encouragement rather than scorn. 66 percent of voters ages 18-29 (you know, gamers) supported Obama yesterday, according to CNN. Forget a puppy, the next US President can show some love back by bringing Wii to the White House.
Reader Comments (73)
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:00PM (Unverified) said
That what we in a non-biased UK call a hypocrite...
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 4:19PM (Unverified) said
LOL @ unbiased UK.
Right. Bias does not exist there. The United Kingdom is actually a huge black hole for bias.
Reply
Right. Bias does not exist there. The United Kingdom is actually a huge black hole for bias.
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 4:33PM (Unverified) said
The hypocrisy is in the fact that he bashes gaming while at the same time spending 50K on in-game ad campaign.
And yes, telling me "To put my gameboy down" ,even if to go out and vote, is a bash as it implies that gamers are still a bunch of stereotypical fat nerds who spend all their lives in front of their monitors not caring about current affairs such as the election.You don't hear him specifically highlighting activities such as listeining to music or hanging out with friends do you? No, these are normal things to do.President doesn't need to tell "those" people to vote for him oh no!
@ Jaffar someone
Yes, as far as politics go, an average Brit doesn't really care about US Election.
Reply
And yes, telling me "To put my gameboy down" ,even if to go out and vote, is a bash as it implies that gamers are still a bunch of stereotypical fat nerds who spend all their lives in front of their monitors not caring about current affairs such as the election.You don't hear him specifically highlighting activities such as listeining to music or hanging out with friends do you? No, these are normal things to do.President doesn't need to tell "those" people to vote for him oh no!
@ Jaffar someone
Yes, as far as politics go, an average Brit doesn't really care about US Election.
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 4:52PM (Unverified) said
I'm gonna have to respectfully disagree.
I think by him putting his money where his mouth is and specifically put in game advertising only reinforces his message. He wanted to people who are too enveloped into themselves or their habits to wake up and vote. So again, no hypocrisy.
Now was it a bash? Sorta. Though I suspect some of the people truly offended are guilty as charged. And if you're offended but not a lazy oaf I think you're not being understanding enough. Would you say that their AREN'T gamers out there who game too much and serve too little? It may not be all of us, but it certainly isn't none of us.
And you have to remember too, that all politicians are still pretty clueless about video games and still follow their stereotypes. We need to SHOW them we're not what we think they are. And with President Obama being black I'm sure he knows all about stereotypes. Should we hold him MORE accountable? I don't know. He's still human after all. We all make the same mistakes. It takes patience and understanding.
With already one confirmed video game regulator rolling in his new crew we need to show him that we care about politics. Especially when they start fucking with our games.
Reply
I think by him putting his money where his mouth is and specifically put in game advertising only reinforces his message. He wanted to people who are too enveloped into themselves or their habits to wake up and vote. So again, no hypocrisy.
Now was it a bash? Sorta. Though I suspect some of the people truly offended are guilty as charged. And if you're offended but not a lazy oaf I think you're not being understanding enough. Would you say that their AREN'T gamers out there who game too much and serve too little? It may not be all of us, but it certainly isn't none of us.
And you have to remember too, that all politicians are still pretty clueless about video games and still follow their stereotypes. We need to SHOW them we're not what we think they are. And with President Obama being black I'm sure he knows all about stereotypes. Should we hold him MORE accountable? I don't know. He's still human after all. We all make the same mistakes. It takes patience and understanding.
With already one confirmed video game regulator rolling in his new crew we need to show him that we care about politics. Especially when they start fucking with our games.
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 5:09PM Haggard said
I found pretty much everyone here cared about the US election, and I live up in north england where there's no electricity and we still have outdoor toilets.
But apart from newspapers, media is nowhere near as biased as the US (our news channels do not blatantly lie, for instance) - nor are our politicians so corrupt. Of course they're corrupt, but it's small shit like buying a regular house for someone they're having an affair with or something - not handing out multi-billion dollar contracts to businesses our leaders happen to be friends with.
Reply
But apart from newspapers, media is nowhere near as biased as the US (our news channels do not blatantly lie, for instance) - nor are our politicians so corrupt. Of course they're corrupt, but it's small shit like buying a regular house for someone they're having an affair with or something - not handing out multi-billion dollar contracts to businesses our leaders happen to be friends with.
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 5:19PM PoisonedAl said
"Right. Bias does not exist there. The United Kingdom is actually a huge black hole for bias."
And proud of it! However, I hate discrimination! I believe we should all hate each other equally!
Reply
And proud of it! However, I hate discrimination! I believe we should all hate each other equally!
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 5:41PM CommentSystem said
put your gameboy down to go and vote is a bash......right. the only people who would think thats a bash are the ones who play so much that they actually take it personally.
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 6:47PM Foetoid said
Geez Jakka you must be highly sensitive to find that bashing. Typically, gamers spend a lot of time playing games as their primary form of entertainment. Videogames are also primarily played indoors with little movement. So asking gamers to put down thier gameboys to get out and vote isn't bashing at all. None of you would be having a teary if he said 'get off your Jetskis and come and vote' now would you. He was simply trying to say he's in touch with gamers, asking them to get out and vote. It's not compulsory to vote in the US, so you really have to campaign hard and do whatever you can to ask people to get out and vote. Gamers are probably the least likely people in the US to get out and vote thanks largly to the time taken up by the games they play. It's not hypocrytical to say what he said.
Reply
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:03AM (Unverified) said
I got invited to a US election party in London. By fellow Brits. Most of them had obama fever, so I don't think you could say all brits are unbiased - at least those who had more than a passing interest in the subject had a bias one way or the other.
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:03PM Burritoclock said
This is the stupidest thing ever posted on this site for a million reasons, not the least of which is that regardless of your political beliefs only a moroon would believe that any elected official is going to be "pro-gamer" or do anything related to video games OTHER than whine about violence or restrict adult games. PERIOD.
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 5:13PM Haggard said
"or do anything related to video games OTHER than whine about violence or restrict adult games."
http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/11/04/british-mp-keeps-amateur-suicide-bombing-game-perspective
Reply
http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/11/04/british-mp-keeps-amateur-suicide-bombing-game-perspective
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 7:52PM Special Agent Steve said
I like Wii and 360. OH GOD NO! I'M GREEN! SHIT!
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:05PM Shagittarius said
A 1% increase in the youth vote isn't enough to claim in game advertising had an effect. How could you even imagine that turnout came from game advertising?
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:14PM (Unverified) said
It's obvious really. It's merely pointing out that all gamers are lonely, socially-detached nerds that never leave the warm glow of their TVs/monitors; and that until recently with in-game Obama-tisements didn't even realize that Election Day was upon us...
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:05PM SpacePenguinBot said
It's September 12, 2001. You're sitting in front of a TV, watching footage of the World Trade Center collapse over and over and over again.
All of a sudden, someone from seven years in the future walks out of a tiny temporal vortex, and tells you: George W. Bush is going to fuck this up so badly that in 2008, the United States of America will likely elect as president a black man whose middle name is Hussein and whose father was Muslim. Oh, and he also admits he's used cocaine.
I think it would have been easier to convince me of the reality of time travel. "No, no, I believe you really are from the future. But the other stuff, that's CRAZY."
Reply
All of a sudden, someone from seven years in the future walks out of a tiny temporal vortex, and tells you: George W. Bush is going to fuck this up so badly that in 2008, the United States of America will likely elect as president a black man whose middle name is Hussein and whose father was Muslim. Oh, and he also admits he's used cocaine.
I think it would have been easier to convince me of the reality of time travel. "No, no, I believe you really are from the future. But the other stuff, that's CRAZY."
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:21PM MarkHam006 said
What does a name and religious following have to do with this?
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:29PM (Unverified) said
The fact that Bush's Government + Tabloids hyped up the terrorism and 9/11 to the point where all ,but 10% Smart Americans, believed that every bearded dark-skinned person wearing a "turban-like thing" on their head is a terrorist?
I got the punchline of the joke pretty quickly.
Reply
I got the punchline of the joke pretty quickly.
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:38PM (Unverified) said
waves,
I for one voted against McCain because his middle name is "Sydney" and I was quite worried he could potentially be involved with those dirty Australians.
Reply
I for one voted against McCain because his middle name is "Sydney" and I was quite worried he could potentially be involved with those dirty Australians.
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 4:02PM SpacePenguinBot said
Just to be clear, my comment was meant to point out what an amazing campaign Obama and his team ran, and the kind of transformation that America has undergone in just 7 years.
I didn't vote based on name or race, but let's be honest... those were obstacles that his campaign had to overcome, and they probably couldn't have won if it weren't for Bush's disastrous presidency.
Reply
I didn't vote based on name or race, but let's be honest... those were obstacles that his campaign had to overcome, and they probably couldn't have won if it weren't for Bush's disastrous presidency.
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:11PM (Unverified) said
Well, guess that puts me in the 34% who didn't vote for him.
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:36PM (Unverified) said
Who can afford a Wii? I need to prepare to subsidise failure!
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:30PM (Unverified) said
I only worry now about Biden's past on supporting RIAA/MPAA bills.
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:39PM AwesomeTown said
Yea, me too, but it hopefully won't be too bad, because at least someone is doing something about the RIAA:
http://techdirt.com/articles/20081030/0203582685.shtml
Reply
http://techdirt.com/articles/20081030/0203582685.shtml
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 4:53PM (Unverified) said
Yeah, I forgot that the vice president just basically sits around and does little to nothing and only really comes in to power if and when the president is no longer able to lead the country. Oh, wait...
The vice president can help draft and push or pull a bill through the house and senate before the president gets to sign it... not to mention that the vice president can persuade or otherwise help guide the president in to making a decision about whether or not to sign a bill in to law or to veto it.
Reply
The vice president can help draft and push or pull a bill through the house and senate before the president gets to sign it... not to mention that the vice president can persuade or otherwise help guide the president in to making a decision about whether or not to sign a bill in to law or to veto it.
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:41PM EvilSandmich said
More video games for the slothful, fewer for those paying taxes to support them.
Reply
Posted: Nov 5th 2008 3:45PM The Fuzz 53 said
I'm glad to say that I wasn't of that 66%. You'll see...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments











