Whereas Electronic Arts has been actively pursuing a more diverse portfolio of original IPs, rival publishing powerhouse Activision Blizzard is looking to take a less risky approach of focusing on a narrow field of franchises and, in CEO Bobby Kotick's words, exploit it. Hey, it's just business.
When asked about the Vivendi Games franchises that were tossed aside when Activision consumed the company (e.g. 50 Cent, Ghostbusters and Brutal Legend) during yesterday's conference call (transcript via Seeking Alpha), the Big Kahuna said, "With respect to the franchises that don't have the potential to be exploited every year across every platform with clear sequel potential that can meet our objectives of over time becoming $100 million plus franchises, that's a strategy that has worked very well for us."
Kotick said that there's only been a "small single-digit number" of new, successful franchises in the last five or 10 years, and that properties they work on are those that "we know if we release today, we'll be working on 10 years from now." He cited rising development costs as a factor in this conservative business strategy.
Of course, as gamers we typically don't mind sequels as long as they show noticeable improvement over their predecessors (and sometimes that's not even necessary), but come on, Bobby, we know you've given KennyL free reign. We really do appreciate it, now do us another favor and just release Brutal Legend. You can write it off as a charitable deduction, we promise!
Reader Comments (86)
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:18PM (Unverified) said
It's what's wrong with most gaming companies nowadays. If it's not "exploitable", as in, if it yields less potential revenue than another game, it's not worth releasing.
I remember when I had fuzzy feelings for Blizzard.
Reply
I remember when I had fuzzy feelings for Blizzard.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 2:46AM MrIronic said
Perhaps it's because they're worries. They do what they *think* people will want and will gain them money based on something being popular now for what they *think* is long term. But ironically might not match what people really want long term, which is new stuff, and so they don't take those edgy risks they should take.
Besides even if a game is good and doesn't have any squeals it gets the company good reputation, and what price do you put on that Mr.Business man?
Reply
Besides even if a game is good and doesn't have any squeals it gets the company good reputation, and what price do you put on that Mr.Business man?
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 7:24AM AwesomeTown said
Didn't you get the memo? Periods are out of style.
Reply
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:05PM DonaldMick said
I don't know whether I want to punch that guy for his scaring me when I opened Joystiq, or for the comments.
... eh, I'll go with the comments.
Reply
... eh, I'll go with the comments.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 8:08AM Ghen said
I don't see why Brutaller Legend and Brutal Legend 3: The Brutalacolypse wouldn't be big stars.. I think this guy is just scared.
I seriously hope Brutal Legend doesn't become vaporware, that would bring a single tear to my eye which would probably trickle slowly down my cheek before I wipe it away with a finger and host an all-girl-guest orgy to regain my manliness.
Reply
I seriously hope Brutal Legend doesn't become vaporware, that would bring a single tear to my eye which would probably trickle slowly down my cheek before I wipe it away with a finger and host an all-girl-guest orgy to regain my manliness.
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:27PM Negativecool said
Are you a child or are you seriously just that naive? Exploit = profit from.
Games are released for profit honey. The more profit, the more games you can release. The more games you release the more profit.
You see how this whole "business" thing works?
Reply
Games are released for profit honey. The more profit, the more games you can release. The more games you release the more profit.
You see how this whole "business" thing works?
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:36PM (Unverified) said
Hey, NegativeCool, pay attention. I think we all know how business works. The thing is, though, several games, some of which looked pretty damn nice, were canceled, not because they wouldn't have made a profit period, but because developer time and resources would be 'better spent' churning out the same old bullshit.
I'm not going to dis Activision, because if there's any company that can take an old, 'exploitable' franchise and make it feel fresh again (Call of Duty, for example), it's them. It still sucks, though, that kickass, ORIGINAL games like Ghostbusters or Brutal Legend were shitcanned to make room for Guitar Hero: Same Shit New Tracklist Edition or Shitty 'Profitable' Licensed Game #5,102.
Reply
I'm not going to dis Activision, because if there's any company that can take an old, 'exploitable' franchise and make it feel fresh again (Call of Duty, for example), it's them. It still sucks, though, that kickass, ORIGINAL games like Ghostbusters or Brutal Legend were shitcanned to make room for Guitar Hero: Same Shit New Tracklist Edition or Shitty 'Profitable' Licensed Game #5,102.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:14AM iHavePants said
"I'm not going to dis Activision, because if there's any company that can take an old, 'exploitable' franchise and make it feel fresh again (Call of Duty, for example)"
Wut? Activision publishes Call Of Duty, Infinity Ward are the creative force behind it.
Reply
Wut? Activision publishes Call Of Duty, Infinity Ward are the creative force behind it.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:18AM WiredKnight said
Exploit =/= Profit. Well, maybe to people like him, but for the people behind those "successful" titles he hold is such high regard, that not how it works.
Yes, profit is good and is ultimately necessary for a company to continue making games. But the reason games are successful are because the people making them love doing it.
Its not just about making a quick buck, it's about doing what you enjoy with other people who have a common goal, and sharing it with the community.
Reply
Yes, profit is good and is ultimately necessary for a company to continue making games. But the reason games are successful are because the people making them love doing it.
Its not just about making a quick buck, it's about doing what you enjoy with other people who have a common goal, and sharing it with the community.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 4:51AM (Unverified) said
'Wut? Activision publishes Call Of Duty, Infinity Ward are the creative force behind it.'
Shit, I knew something was wrong when I reread it but I couldn't put my finger on it.
That just makes things more lame.
Reply
Shit, I knew something was wrong when I reread it but I couldn't put my finger on it.
That just makes things more lame.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 9:49AM (Unverified) said
"Wut? Activision publishes Call Of Duty, Infinity Ward are the creative force behind it."
Uh, Infinity Ward is owned by Activision...they were bought back in 03...
Reply
Uh, Infinity Ward is owned by Activision...they were bought back in 03...
Posted: Nov 8th 2008 2:08AM The Blank Mage Returns said
I'm upping Negativecools's comment, but only because it's giving me eye strain.
Reply
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:16PM (Unverified) said
Basically, what he's saying is: We can't do what EA used to do with these titles.
Reply
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 8:55AM (Unverified) said
Exactly. While EA is branching away and coming up with new IPs and gaining more respect, Activision is just following in their footsteps and gaining a reputation for whoring out their games.
Hopefully this business strategy of his backfires in his face.
Reply
Hopefully this business strategy of his backfires in his face.
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:38PM (Unverified) said
Ugh, 4Kids, fuck that noise. Thank god for Funimation or I wouldn't be able to stand the sight of One Piece.
Reply
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:27PM (Unverified) said
Interesting that Activision is trying to ape the old EA strategy when even EA themselves have finally realized how stupid it was.
Reply
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 5:51AM (Unverified) said
This!
Just because Activision now own the mega-money generator that is WoW they think they can get away with shit like this.
This is how companies go down, overconfident moronic managers like him going against all normal logic and sterring the company down a one-way street to fucksville.
Reply
Just because Activision now own the mega-money generator that is WoW they think they can get away with shit like this.
This is how companies go down, overconfident moronic managers like him going against all normal logic and sterring the company down a one-way street to fucksville.
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:55PM Giantenemycrab said
and you know what's really sad? Once EA finally starts doing cool stuff is when they start losing money. But this asshole and his company that simply "exploits" titles are swimming in cash.
Reply
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:58PM samfish said
They'll get what's coming to them for it eventually. That kind of business plan is destined to crash and burn sooner or later.
They can only pump out so many Guitar Hero's or Call of Duty's before people get sick of them and move on to the next new thing. And when that happens, Activision will be screwed since they have no new output.
Reply
They can only pump out so many Guitar Hero's or Call of Duty's before people get sick of them and move on to the next new thing. And when that happens, Activision will be screwed since they have no new output.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 5:18PM (Unverified) said
Yup, similar strategies are already running THQ (Licensed-IPs, and more of them!) and Midway (The "M" stands for "Mediocre"!) into the ground, and already killed Vivendi Games (A cross between THQ and Midway).
Reply
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:04AM (Unverified) said
What does ActiBlizzard have to do with Kenny L? I thought he was straight Take2 which last I checked didn't fall under the ActiBlizzard umbrella. What did I miss?
Reply
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:58PM (Unverified) said
being in the games industry i'd have to disagree.. EA was (past tense) the proverbial devil. Lately they're making some bold steps in the right direction though.
I think we can all agree that THQ is probably the worst.. though they don't really make enough money to get any kind of mainstream coverage of their crappy movie-games.
Reply
I think we can all agree that THQ is probably the worst.. though they don't really make enough money to get any kind of mainstream coverage of their crappy movie-games.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:20AM (Unverified) said
I think this asshole's the first guy to just say fuck it and admit what they're doing. A lot of companies do it, but I can't think of one that just came out and said "yeah we didn't want to make it cause we couldn't find a way to run it into the ground"
Reply
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 2:40AM zuburi said
Going to have to agree with eldee. They were really, really awful. Highlights included them paying us to write a strategy guide for one of their games - then not supplying us with copies of the title and charging us full retail for them.
Then there was a certain higher-up who, while talking on a cell phone and thinking I was out of earshot, said something along the lines of "these assholes [gamers] will buy what we tell them to."
This was several years ago, and plenty of said higher-ups went on to other things in unrelated businesses. Believe it or not, they have cleaned up their act a lot.
Reply
Then there was a certain higher-up who, while talking on a cell phone and thinking I was out of earshot, said something along the lines of "these assholes [gamers] will buy what we tell them to."
This was several years ago, and plenty of said higher-ups went on to other things in unrelated businesses. Believe it or not, they have cleaned up their act a lot.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 2:46AM Haggard said
It's weird, I love the direction EA is taking (giving the hardcore excellent games, paid for by casual games bought by the masses). But I hate that they've started putting limited installs on their PC games. I can understand (a little) securom, but requiring internet activations is just plain retarded.
So it seems to me EA have taken one step forward, two steps back.
And yeah, fuck this guy.
Reply
So it seems to me EA have taken one step forward, two steps back.
And yeah, fuck this guy.
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:56PM (Unverified) said
all in favor of an activision boycott say aye.
fuck activision. blizzard has a tumor that needs to be excised.. blizzard may milk its OWN franchises, but at least there's a level of care and quality that can be respected.
Reply
fuck activision. blizzard has a tumor that needs to be excised.. blizzard may milk its OWN franchises, but at least there's a level of care and quality that can be respected.
Posted: Nov 6th 2008 11:59PM (Unverified) said
to clarify: boycott activision and support EA! show publishers what we want.. not guitar hero 92! we want new IP's and compelling new franchises!
Reply
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:04AM Joystick Hero said
Boycotting them is completely unnecessary. If they make a good game, you should buy it.
Now, the vast majority of their titles that look like they will be shit should be passed. That's the message you want to send. "Make GOOD games", not "Stop making games".
Reply
Now, the vast majority of their titles that look like they will be shit should be passed. That's the message you want to send. "Make GOOD games", not "Stop making games".
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:06AM (Unverified) said
I'm all for an Activision boycott, mainly since nothing good is coming, but just to clarify, which do we not want a 92nd Guitar Hero, or Guitar Hero 1992?
Reply
Posted: Nov 8th 2008 2:31AM The Blank Mage Returns said
Guitar Hero 1984 has potential. Your high scores will, of course, be monitored.
Reply
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:03AM The Gentleman Bat said
This really is everything that is wrong with the industry as a whole, and properly reflects the world's economic strategy when it comes to new technology and ideas. We've gone from products that could entertain us for years to products that entertain us until the next version comes out (and the next and the next and the next). They're literally telling their developers to HOLD BACK so they can put content into a sequel rather than one whole game.
It makes me sick.
Reply
It makes me sick.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:05AM (Unverified) said
50 Cent seems like a highly exploitable franchise.
On a side note, I ranted about this yesterday and it still annoys me to no end
And really? Your in an interview and the first word that comes to your mind is "exploit?" Not capitalize or iterate or develop or polish?
EXPLOIT?!? really? ass.
Reply
On a side note, I ranted about this yesterday and it still annoys me to no end
And really? Your in an interview and the first word that comes to your mind is "exploit?" Not capitalize or iterate or develop or polish?
EXPLOIT?!? really? ass.
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:23AM (Unverified) said
I think it's because he's finally reached Bush level of douchebaggery, meaning he doesn't even care what he says or does anymore.
Reply
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 12:23AM iHavePants said
Also(paraphrased and emphasis mine):
"Ghostbusters canned to MAKE ROOM FOR shitty 'Profitable' Licensed Game #5,102."
Wut?
Reply
"Ghostbusters canned to MAKE ROOM FOR shitty 'Profitable' Licensed Game #5,102."
Wut?
Posted: Nov 7th 2008 1:01AM (Unverified) said
Actilizzard/Blizzivision/Activision/Whatever this guy is in charge of now... is dead to me. Until they release something awesome and I totally forgive them, but for tonight, they're dead to me.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 218 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 152 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 92 comments










