| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (25)

Posted: Nov 10th 2008 8:03PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I love how the DLC's title is a reference to Steve Job's and his stance on Blu-Ray.
Reply

Posted: Nov 10th 2008 8:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Lolwut?
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 12:03AM darkinchworm said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I wasn't aware his surname included an apostrophe.
Reply

Posted: Nov 10th 2008 8:36PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
man i can't believe this game has such powerful guns, i should really check this out and see if my computer can handle it. if not then their is online gaming like this site http://www.umbla.com, has to offer to its visitors and it has a selection.
Reply

Posted: Nov 10th 2008 8:41PM Shmil said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If you're going to whore yourself out then at least do it well. Try putting some god-damned effort into it, "i can't believe this game has such powerful guns" LOL
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 2:29AM MattF said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You are an utterly worthless human being
Reply

Posted: Nov 10th 2008 9:18PM goatboat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
bitch, you should see my guns.
Reply

Posted: Nov 10th 2008 9:47PM Jinn35 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Man, I'm sure that there is a place in the world for you, but Joystiq is just not that place.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 12:46AM rTwelve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i couldnt even see the text without tilting the monitor
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 6:04AM Esat Dedezade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
rTwelve: ctrl + A my friend :)
Reply

Posted: Nov 10th 2008 9:15PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it coming to the 360? Preemptive "Argh" if it isn't!
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 1:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"No DLC is exclusive forever"
And considering that it was to be on BR disc in first place but it isn't should tell you something ;)
Reply

Posted: Nov 10th 2008 9:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No joking, what a beautiful screen shot, lovely.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 12:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
yeah this is BS... I bought a 360 for bioshock because it was an exlusive.. then it was out on PC then the ps3? now the ps3 is getting exlusive DLC? I love bioshock and have played threw it 7 times.. But I dont wanna have to buy a 400$ system then a 70$ game.. then 10$DLC for like an hour of extra crap.. seriously this is BS! fuck you guys
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 1:05AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Bioshock on PS3 is very VERY weak port.
Nothing "lost" if You are one of person that cry after every "lost" exclusive.
And DLC? Just wait - I have a strange feeling that it wont be exclusive too long too...
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:56AM Vidikron said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@anonim1979

Knock it off with your nonsense. You're always just making shit up or making mountains out of mole hills when it comes to the PS3. A "VERY" weak port? There is a 1 point difference on Metacritic between the two versions and that can very likely be more than explained away due to the game being a late port on the PS3. The 360 likely got a little extra credit since the game was reviewed when the hype was big.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:04AM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Here, I'll give you an example: http://ps3.ign.com/articles/920/920389p2.html

Go read that page. The PS3 version is getting knocked because it had the SAME issues as the 360 version. Their contention is that those issues should have been ironed out during time taken to port it to the PS3. In other words, the PS3 is just as good if not better than the 360 version, but since they didn't fix the bugs found in the 360 version they took extra points off.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Bioshock on PS3 looks like Vaseline smeared s*** on screen:
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/yoda-dip-jp/20081004

Works like *** too:
http://www.gameplayer.com.au/gp_documents/081017PS3vs360BioShock.aspx?Page=1

"[quote]Put simply, the graphics in the PS3 version of BioShock are shit; in a less harsh tone, they’re disappointing to say the least. Visually, it looks as though the entire game was rendered at a lower resolution and then upscaled. The lighting effects have been toned down for the PS3 port, and yet somehow the frame rate manages to get juttery when too much is going on. "

Speaking about such silly things like 5GB mandatory installation, lack of 60fps mode (not that it was something speciall on X360 but...), some very low quality textures, etc.


And some retail comparison by grandmaster(FoundryHD - full RGB etc:)
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?p=1232954#post1232954

"Yikes, this conversion is as rough as a badger's arse. IQ and frame rate both take a hammering compared to the 360 version."
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2008 4:37PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Again, go read the IGN review. They clearly state the PS3 version looks better in some parts and the same in others.

And I'm not even going to bother with looking at your screenshots. You tried the same BS with Mercs 2 when you claimed that the 360 version had no tearing and the PS3 version did. Your proof was a single comparison shot where the PS3 version had some tearing and the 360 did not. Yet you posted that screenshot in a thread where Joystiq was talking about a comparison video and the screenshot (from the video) they used for their article had tearing on the 360 side and not the PS3 side.

All you ever do is cherry pick screenshots and post "info" from obscure sources to make the PS3 versions of games look bad when they really are not. I, OTOH, have linked to a credible source that completely contradicts what you are saying and can point to Metracritic as further proff of your BS.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2008 4:39PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*proof
Reply

Posted: Nov 16th 2008 9:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@anonim have u even played ps3 version... its awesome, better than 360... ive played both... its great on both, so why dont u start thinking for urself and play it before u start talking sh*t... and if u have played ps3 version than u know ur full of sh*t
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 4:44AM DarknessBear said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wooohoo
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:19PM ZippyDSMlee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can we finish the game now plz? (polish,dtail,balance,ect,ect)


God its already made all the money its going to make...why not finish the Gdamn thing instead of add more crap to it....
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2008 1:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is the unfortunate side effect of lame PC developers building games for consoles. In the PC world it's acceptable to half-ass a game and patch it for years after its release (BF2 etc.). Now these same clumsy, lazy devs are bringing their mentality to the X360 and PS3 and you're looking at the end result.

Maybe Fallout 3 with its myriad fails is a good example.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2008 2:07PM ZippyDSMlee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Popfrogs

Umm...they patched BS maybe twice that a "myriad of patches over the years" doseitnot make.

I'll admit FO3 has issues but its the different between a hot girl with DDDD's being retarded and a fat guy being restarted both are dumb fcks but one is "fun" to be around :P

I swear BS is not only rushed but simplified and paced to the point of stupidity.

FO3 has mostly polishing issues(damages,equipment,balancing,ect) but frankly...they let you mod the damn thing which basically means it will be perfected. BS is as it is broken out of the box (aka a b.o.o.b) and their to busy making money off it to fix it...like the big 3 car markers...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW