| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (82)

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:27PM AsherR said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sounds great. I'm kinda pissed off and ecstatic at the same time because that even adds more stuff that I want to play. So we have Fallout 3, Fable 2, GoW2, Left 4 Dead next week, WotLK, Last Remnant, and Persona 4.

Dear Gaming Industry,

Screw you.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:28PM AsherR said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
*adds even more
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:30PM chrisgrant said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Except you, Capcom. You're alright.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:32PM AsherR said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah props to Capcom for holding their games until after the holidays. Well, I'm sure they'd probably release RE5 and SF if they were ready, but they aren't so meh.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:34PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I doubt it. Lost Planet was a Q1 release, as was Devil May Cry 4. Capcom is targeting Q1 and letting everyone else scrap it out in Q4. Really really smart move.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:35PM Zertoss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So we should be lumping Stardock in there with Capcom.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:38PM AsherR said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ah good call Zertoss! Stardock gets an A+ as well. I'm curious as why more games don't target the summer time though. I understand that Q4 is really key, but come on! Release it in Q2 or Q3 and then advertise during Q4.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:57PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree, summers feel like a barren wasteland almost every year when it comes to releases. Almost the entire summer I had to rely solely on Battlefield: Bad Company and whatever used game I scrounged up.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 4:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's because in the summer it's warm and sunny. You're are supposed to be outdoors getting drunk or playing baseball or something. In the winter we leave for work moments after the sun rises and it sets about an hour before we go home. It's frigid out and it sucks...all excellent reasons/excuses to sit on your couch for all your free time.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 4:28PM Larz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Where I live it's just the opposite. Late fall & winter are actually comfortable outside, making me want to go out and do stuff. Spring, summer, and early fall is so uncomfortably hot that I don't even want the sun's rays to touch me at all.

Anyways, single player games I like to save until spring/summer. It doesn't really matter when I play them since I can't play them with other people. And that relieves the summer drought.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 7:38PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
oh dammit to hell. i forgot all about The Last Remnant!

*looks at bulimic wallet. cries.*
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How come Joystiq never did a review for Far Cry 2????
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:41PM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
because joystiq has limited resources and aren't a primary source for game reviews.

Besides, far cry is just another shooter. Nothing really remarkable that would be newsworthy besides the fact that its a good shooter.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm about 11 hours into Far Cry 2 and I think its great!

~end review
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:55PM Haggard said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You only have to play FC2 for one hour to know what it's like. Because everything you do in that one hour is repeated, repeated, repeated enough times until you have a 30 hour game.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:56PM Anticrawl said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I disagree, the day and night cycle, dynamic weather, fire propagation and animations for every single action make it news worthy. There are no magical teleporting cameras or zooming out into 3rd person, and blends a health bar system with the regenerating health we've come to accept.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:56PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I feel Far Cry 2 is more like GTA than a shooter, but GTA with actual good shooting mechanics.

I'm not that far in yet though...but enjoying it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:32PM BoxcarWalrus said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
How long was it? Did it ever get redundant just following the red path? Are there varying enemy types that you need to avoid? How about large epic encounters/getaways? Or is the game basically just the demo but much much longer? Come on Justin!
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sorry, next time I'll have bullet points and a smiley face playing a guitar to help you out.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:49PM BoxcarWalrus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's about time you've realized the one thing Joystiq was lacking.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:24PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bullet point reviews are awesome. I'll look forward to reading them in the future.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 8:11PM germdove said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Of course you mean, reviews OF bullet points, yes? Thank you Justin, I've been waiting.
Reply

Posted: Nov 14th 2008 1:20PM Jaclo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can turn runner vision off. That's how I've been playing it. You don't see any red paths. You just figure it out for yourself.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:33PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks like a lot of fun, but I'm curious how deep the (single-player only?) experience is by the time you get through the game.

In short, is this a rental or a purchase?
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:19PM DeadPlasmaCell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Here's a good review you might enjoy. Overall it seems like a rental.

http://arstechnica.com/reviews/games/mirrors-edge-review.ars/1
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reviews are saying it can be beat in roughly 6 hours. There's no multiplayer, but sounds like there's a time-challenge mode where you race through checkpoints and compete against your own personal best times.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I suspect Mirror's Edge will bore. While I dig the art style and appreciate the parkour mechanic, the environments look sterile and undifferentiated. I also do not dig its focus on time trials. That emphasis really lessens my interest in the title. I appreciate the alternative, gun disabling combat, and would like to see that move added to shooters. However, when the dust settles I feel Mirror's Edge will wind up as disappointing as Assassin's Creed.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How about, you know, actually trying it first?
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:49PM Vcize said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, I thought Assassin's Creed was awesome so I hope it ends up like that.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played the demo quite a bit. If the demo isn't a good representation of what to expect from the full game, then it should not have been in the demo.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah. I played Assassin's Creed about 6 months after it came out because people complaining about it made me less excited, but you know what? I really, really liked it. So much so that I refuse to trade it in. It joins Dead Space as one of the best video game surprises that I have ever received. Other contestants on that list are Star Tropics, Final Fantasy 2 (4), and Jet Force Gemini.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:44PM butaneko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope it's not like Assassin's creed since that game was painfully repetitive after the first 2 hours.

Having only played the demo of Mirror's edge I kind of already wish it was an open world game. That and multiplayer -- co-op running would be wicked!
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 4:51PM s256 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The demo consisted of the first stage. There are environments that look much different - try watching the last trailer.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:45PM arsohn said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone else like the cinematics? I personally really enjoyed them, I thought they had a cool crisp look to them, especially on my hd widescreen, I thought it fit with the theme nicely.

I love IGN's review though, that Nate Aheren is an idiot college frat boy. He knocks it down for the cinematics reminding him of esurance commercials, I'm sorry but that's a pretty weak way to knock a game. I'm certainly not going to knock star wars for chewie reminding me of a dog that bit me once.

Anywas I'm curious to anyone's thoughts on the cinematics. I sorta wish they did the animated movie thing with Mirror's Edge first and not Dead Space.
Reply

Posted: Nov 15th 2008 1:41PM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The whole IGN crew is basically a fraternity house. But, they do good reviews now and then, so I guess whatever works for them. I personally don't think its necessary to act like they're passing a peace pipe around the office all day long.

Regardless, this game is on my to get list for sure. Though I'm with Chris on this one. This will be one of the very rare games I'll be getting on PS3 instead of 360. I'm only okay with that because its a single-player experience.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:46PM InsaneFool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't wait to get this when it comes out for the PC in January.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:46PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll be picking this up for sure, eventually.

With the cool-ass gameplay that this game brings along, they really could've had some very cool online multiplayer modes if they had the time. Even a race mode against actual other people (not just their ghosts) would be sweet.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:46PM Courtney said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good to know the experience seems to hold up across an entire game. The demo certainly had me intrigued. Thanks Justin!
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:47PM Mr Khan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I really respect y'all for not giving out scores

Means you respect our intellect to make our own judgments, and it keeps you out of the neat little farce that's become more and more apparent
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
meh C+
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:57PM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
5/5! Game has no flaws whatsoever! But.. 5/5 doesn't mean 100%... or does it?
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:34PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. Game reviews would be alot better(and would decrease the amount of nerd rage online) if they didn't have scores.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 4:36PM Vcize said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I give this comment a 92/100.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 6:22PM Blaquebeird said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
92, eh? That's a pretty high score, sure you're not being paid off? Shill!
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 2:47PM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"And [the stumbles] shouldn't distract you from the fact that this is, without question, one of the most inventive and original titles of the past five years."

I don't buy it. Just cause it's an action game in first person doesn't make it super inventive (heck, breakdown even had the in-game cinemas you hoped for). It relies on the tried and true mechanics of run, jump, and climb navigation except that it blows your mind because it's the only game anyone can think of where you shouldn't be fighting.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 8:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game feels more like a first person racer, as far as the demo goes. It's the same exhilerating feel of determination as you try to aim the perfectly placed step for a jump to shave off the .42 seconds you need for a higher rating that you get when you're preparing yourself for that wicked drift turn in Midnight Club. A perfect FPS/Racer mashup. Shoot, I didn't even flinch when I heard that acrobatics were impossible while holding a weapon. The run-play is that good.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nice, can't wait to pick this up. passing up all the other AAA games (gears, fallout, fable) till later this year.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Also, remember the splashes of red that were used to help you navigate the world? A couple of stages in the middle of the game are literally bathed in crimson, making finding your way through enemy-laden rooms just infuriating"


Can't you just jump or climb over anything and continue with the mission?

Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It doesn't exactly work like that. There's usually a pretty specific path for you to find, and early that's easy because they highlight stuff in red. Later, that effect gets more subtle, just using red to draw your eye to the right path.

Later, there are whole rooms that are entirely red, so not only is it hard to find the right path, but you become completely desensitized to looking for red.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2008 3:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, Ok.

Thanks for explaining Justin.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW