There is no new release date, but given the flood of great titles at the end of the year (not to mention that other MMO Wrath of the Lich King), we're not too bummed about the delay.
There is no new release date, but given the flood of great titles at the end of the year (not to mention that other MMO Wrath of the Lich King), we're not too bummed about the delay.
Reader Comments (30)
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 5:34PM xThePunisherx said
This used to be such a hyped-up game. Now it just looks like crap.
Reply
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 5:40PM (Unverified) said
Speaking of which, that game sure gets a lot of attention. Even my mates who don't game pre-ordered it right after we played the demo together. I'm even surprised to find people who are barely connected to gaming talking about it.
Kinda sad in a way, considering how few people knows about CSS or TF2 in comparison. Guess it's the "Everything is more awesome with zombies" syndrome.
Reply
Kinda sad in a way, considering how few people knows about CSS or TF2 in comparison. Guess it's the "Everything is more awesome with zombies" syndrome.
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 5:46PM xThePunisherx said
I didn't find L4D very special....fairly average actually. Guess i'm spoiled by Holiday 2008 >.
Reply
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 6:19PM (Unverified) said
I also found Left 4 Dead mediocore.
It's a shame that all my friends are too busy playing Halo 3, Call of duty and gears to realise how good TF2 on the pc is. They still think pc gaming is "gay".
Reply
It's a shame that all my friends are too busy playing Halo 3, Call of duty and gears to realise how good TF2 on the pc is. They still think pc gaming is "gay".
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 6:35PM (Unverified) said
CSS sucks dude...seriously, there is a reason people don't talk about it.
1.6 is the true Counter-Strike, with better hitboxes and hit-reg. Counter-Strike: Source makes me feel like I'm running around with a giant head with a target on it.
Besides, the recoil on it is awful.
The only thing that game has over CS1.6 is graphics.
Reply
1.6 is the true Counter-Strike, with better hitboxes and hit-reg. Counter-Strike: Source makes me feel like I'm running around with a giant head with a target on it.
Besides, the recoil on it is awful.
The only thing that game has over CS1.6 is graphics.
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 7:05PM (Unverified) said
Lawlersauce, are you kidding? CS:S is the most played multiplayer FPS in the world- it even tops Halo 2 and 3. As a matter of fact, if I'm not mistaken, the only game that tops it at all is World of Warcraft.
Also, I'm not going to lie, CS:S is worlds better than 1.6, and I was an avid player. CS:S is just, all around, a better game, and if you feel the way you say you do, then you haven't played it in a long, long, LONG time.
Reply
Also, I'm not going to lie, CS:S is worlds better than 1.6, and I was an avid player. CS:S is just, all around, a better game, and if you feel the way you say you do, then you haven't played it in a long, long, LONG time.
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 10:45PM (Unverified) said
Me too. I remember reading a preview of it in an EGM in 2006, thinking of how awesome it would be. Two and a half years later, nothing.
Reply
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 6:05PM (Unverified) said
I don't think it's "in addition to" the XBL fee. I'm pretty sure the 360 version is "on hold" until the PC version is done. My guess is this title will end up as PC-only.
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:48PM Omega2k3 said
Well, guy, it's in addition to a FREE Silver Account, or just on the PC. You don't need two subs to run the game, just like FFXI.
Also, the game looks damn good, and dev time at 2-3 years is a good amount of time to really polish a game instead of rape it by putting unrealistic deadlines or pushing it out the door and losing quality. 2-3 is like a shining glorious period of time where a game could be absolutely goddamn outstanding.
Reply
Also, the game looks damn good, and dev time at 2-3 years is a good amount of time to really polish a game instead of rape it by putting unrealistic deadlines or pushing it out the door and losing quality. 2-3 is like a shining glorious period of time where a game could be absolutely goddamn outstanding.
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 6:00PM Levi said
I'm pretty disappointed about this. I'm part of the crowd that has been eagerly awaiting this game since it was announced in 2005. The whole time I played Wow (for the few months till I turned level 40 and sol my account ftw), all I could think of was how awesome a game would be if it was structured like WoW but a bonafide FPS. This is that game...
...just please finish it...
Reply
...just please finish it...
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 6:58PM Misfit Toy said
Better than it being MIA as some had called it. I'd rather wait then it drop off the radar. I got plenty of games to play till then anyways. Thank you holiday onslaught.
Reply
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 7:07PM (Unverified) said
I don't care if they delay it as long as the final product is done right.
Reply
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 7:21PM (Unverified) said
Good. Get back to a bricks-and-mortar game [incl.single player] like GoW2. You aint gonna take on the likes of WoW and win-you'll lose your trousers. No soup for you, kids!
Reply
Posted: Nov 17th 2008 8:18PM EaserSmoot said
If this is anything like Planetside was before SoE Star Wars Galaxy'd the game over, then they have my money.
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2008 1:24AM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
At this point who gives a shit? The development on this game has been far to long with what very little than has been shown being awful. Tabula Rasa was an epic fail and MMO's just don't work as FPS. This game has been off my radar and will remain there unless they completely blow me away. Not likely. Figured it was vaporware like Alan Wake has become.
Reply
Posted: Nov 18th 2008 5:37AM (Unverified) said
How is MMOFPS worse than MMORPG? 1..2..3..4..5..6!
On the one hand, it'd be nice if the MMO field was wider than simply CRPGs.
On the other hand, i don't really want to play an MMO in any form...
Reply
On the one hand, it'd be nice if the MMO field was wider than simply CRPGs.
On the other hand, i don't really want to play an MMO in any form...
Posted: Nov 18th 2008 8:47AM (Unverified) said
Well, we did kinda suspect this, when the boards went dark about it, but back in May/June they were still saying this was coming in the US, probably trying to keep interest.
Sign me up, in the meantime, it's a smart thing, with all the releases coming out. This will make a perfect 2009 game.
Reply
Sign me up, in the meantime, it's a smart thing, with all the releases coming out. This will make a perfect 2009 game.
Posted: Nov 18th 2008 4:47PM (Unverified) said
Cheap WoW PowerLeveling 1-55, $49.99,with lvl30 Mount 3-5days
special1-60 powerleveling,$56.99 lvl30mount. check www.gmlvl.com
Fast powerleveling 1-60,$64.99 with 300 gold, lvl30 mount. 6days; Simple 60-70 powerleveling,$64.99,with 2000 gold, 375 first aids; Fast powerleveling 1-70,$129.99 1 Lvl225 riding skill flying mount2.500 Gold;3.375points First Aid 4.Flight Paths uncovered 5.lvl30 Mount 6.two professions to 300 points.
Reply
special1-60 powerleveling,$56.99 lvl30mount. check www.gmlvl.com
Fast powerleveling 1-60,$64.99 with 300 gold, lvl30 mount. 6days; Simple 60-70 powerleveling,$64.99,with 2000 gold, 375 first aids; Fast powerleveling 1-70,$129.99 1 Lvl225 riding skill flying mount2.500 Gold;3.375points First Aid 4.Flight Paths uncovered 5.lvl30 Mount 6.two professions to 300 points.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 224 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 162 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 117 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
