| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (131)

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Most amazing game I've played in years.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:40AM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And... can you believe it? It has higher metacritic scores than Dead Space!

http://www.joystiq.com/2008/07/31/the-joystiq-e3-2008-awards/#c13453722
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:52AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Who cares about scores? All that matters is that it's a damn fun game.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:05AM dapoktan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Its a real shame I have no friends
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:10AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
WEll thanks to xbox live, now you can have pretend friends who'll pretend that they know you and socialize you for at least 10 minutes.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:20AM ZaxCG2 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
If Dead Space had online co-op, it'd probably do better. ;)
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 12:31PM ILL Thief said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
to all the guys below me...don't get me wrong..i LOVE my 360! but to say that the pc won't be relevant next gen when it has an install base close to tripple that of any console or even all of them combined is just clearly not smart thinking! an to say more people will be playin it on 360? comeon..the pc has a track record of taking valve games an making them some of the biggest hits in history! even if only a quarter or less of the pc market jumps on this we'll still have bigger numbers than gears 2,halo 3,or any other console game! an believe that valve wouldn't release any feature,unsupported or not, if it didn't work right. sorry for all the talkin but it's annoying lately when console only people are putting the pc down..even going so far as to say in other forums that the 360 version of fallout 3 looks "lightyears" better than the pc version..i mean comeon..what do you do with that kinda statement?? lol i will be gettin this for my pc an 360 though! show this company love people!!
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 3:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
knightsray...

take into account that likely 95% of that installed base is using a PC with on-bard graphics, and your "user-base" shrinks quite considerably. So long as the price for merely a graphics card is the price of at least an 360 Arcade, your arguement holds no ground. When I can buy a PC in 2005, and then use the same PC to fully enjoy my games 4-5 years later without having to dump $400-500 into my PC for upgrades, then I will consider the PC installed base to be equal or greater than a console.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 3:41PM Larz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a very very fun game, that's what it boils down to.

I can't believe the 360 version is getting such good scores though. I played it on 360 after playing it on Steam and I was kinda disappointed. It's sooooo much better on Steam, plus you get to use highly superior K&M controls. If the 360 is getting these scores then the Steam version must be getting 10's.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 3:47PM ILL Thief said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
to the guy who responded...you are not able to fully enjoy games with a 360 even a year after it's released...graphically consoles degrade quicker than pc(s)..i'm still using the original graphics card in my comp that i built it with an i'm still able to max games out. my argument holds no ground?? this is about left 4 dead retard...valve is always known to cater to lower end systems anyways an even one of those systems will still be capable of display better graphics than the 360 at higher resolutions..xbox games are made at around 1024x768 an you can play all the same games on an nvidia 8600gt or ati 2600xt which both sell for 75 dollars..or the price of one 360 game genius! all i gotta do is wait a month an i can get 2 newish games for the price of your 1! it's obvious you don't know what you're talkin about cause you're using the same argument that every console kid uses...it DOES NOT cost alot..with the price you have to add when you buy 360 games it GREATLY outweighs the cost of a decent pc with a greater library of games and features for cheaper. there's even FREE games out that are on par with full fledged 360 titles. why don't you go learn somethin about a pc before you talk about it nooooooooooooobbbbbbb!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 5:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Thank you Joystiq for the full-page Ozzy flash ad commercial that not only popped up when trying to vote up a post but also did not close properly. Much appreciated.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 7:11PM grimone said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@dsub: You need to look at the video card stats here http://www.steampowered.com/status/survey.html and these are just the Steam users who responded to the survey.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 8:37PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
JangoGod, you must've not read the comments above.

The PC version has split-screen multiplayer and you can play online in that mode.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2008 1:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dsub:

read and learn....times have changed, and for the record, i bought both 360 and PC L4D..and not only is this a better game on PC, it's far more populated on PC, just like TF2..which is empty on Live whereas on PC, there are thousands of active servers.

Read and Learn before you talk nonsense

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/43049/PC-Market-is-Bigger-than-we-Thought-Says-Analyst

make sure you read the linked story too, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. The only issue the PC has is not enough of an attach rate with 4 to 5 times the install base as any one console. And yes, they are all gaming PC's. STEAM has close to 20 million users alone on that service, about to get even larger with L4D and many other titles in 2009 hitting the system. STEAM is just pure GREATNESS.
Reply

Posted: Dec 8th 2008 12:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am lonely...
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:08AM Muffin Lad said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Deserves it

I only hope it plays "Blue Wraith" during the fights

and a Cornetto to who can tell me why that relates
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
mmmm...Shaun of the Dead?
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:26AM Zanthox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Stayed up all night playing till my 7:40 class... On PC though, of course. Amazing, incredible, so good.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:18AM The Punisher said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
With review scores that high, it looks like Zombies DO run after all.

I'm still going to get this game even though wrapped up in Gears 2.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:20AM spin cycle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pegg is right. Zombies don't run. Ever.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2008 1:20AM The Punisher said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Things change.

Zombies at one time rose from the dead and would unearth themselves from their coffins. This is no longer the case.

Zombieism was once thought to be super natural, today, however, it seems to be more viral.

And in the past zombies simply stumbled around, but with any good story, things change to keep it fresh.

Sorry you want to hold on to the boring past, but $$$ doesn't lie. And fast moving zombies are here. Deal with it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 19th 2008 1:25AM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh good lawd, please, you two, not this stupid ass argument all over again. Months and months and months ago, I can't even recall, so many people got into this stupid stupid stupid argument. NOBODY CARES. THEY'RE ZOMBIES. IT'S FICTITIOUS. THEY CAN DO WHATEVER THE ELL THEY WANT. THEY COULD USE MAGIC WANDS AND BE LITTLE HARRY POTTER ZOMBIES FOR ALL ANYONE CARES.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:20AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Just to be clear:

This is a PC game first, and a 360 port second.

Hate if you will, but in a year there will be a million maps on PC, as well as crazy things like playing through the campaign with TF2 characters.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:25AM sicsided said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
NEED A DISPENSER H... OH GOD! HE PUNCHED OUT ALL OF MY BLOOD!
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
True. But considering that I'm 3 out of 3 for having serious problems getting Valve PC games to work, I'll stick with the put-the-disc-in-and-it-just-works approach of the 360, fewer maps or otherwise.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just to be clear:

Who cares! And even with all your "millions of maps", more people will play it on 360. Why? Becuase PC gaming isn't what it used to be. I'll be surprised if next-gen it will be relevant anymore. Just wanted you to be clear ON THAT!

BTW, not tyring to be an ass but thats the way you came across. Just wanted to give you some of your own meds. :P
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2010 10:48PM coil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, 360 is the lead sku according to a friend (at Valve) of a friend. The demo is quite polished, at least.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Everyone is forgetting the biggest advantage that pc gaming has over the 360/ PS3... less 12 year olds...
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do Not feed the Troll Please,

Move along
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 9:59AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"Hate if you will, but in a year there will be a million maps on PC, as well as crazy things like playing through the campaign with TF2 characters."

Sounds like the dying cry of an old man trying desperately to get attention. Sad thing is, nobody really cares.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:00AM darkinchworm said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Sad thing is, nobody really cares."

I love when people go out of their way to POST A COMMENT saying they DON'T CARE what someone is saying!
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:05AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I prefer to get my games for the consoles these days. I will take less maps and other mods for the ability to sit on the couch and relax while playing on a big screen, laughing with the wife.

I look back at all my years gaming on the pc and can't see how I spent so many hours sitting at a desk to do that. No thanks.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:08AM Courtney said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I look forward to playing this with my teenager while sitting on the couch together. I'll take that experience over your million maps, thanks though.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:32AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
1. Fewer 12 year olds
2. Longer lasting active community
3. You can still play this on your couch with a 360 controller on PC.
4. It costs less and any "DLC" will be free.

I have a 360 and a PC. Valve is a PC developer, so I'd bet you brains to bagels that the smart call is the cheaper, more expansive version.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:33AM PoisonedAl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I like how the console-tards say it doesn't matter, but are always the first to start whining like a broken gearbox when the PC owners get a load of free DLC long before they do (if at all).

I have a PC and consoles. I don't fucking care that you don't care, even if you weren't lying. STFU!
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:40AM einhanderkiller said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
More people will play it on 360? I seriously doubt that. The Orange Box sold over twice as much on PC as it did on 360.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, it really doesn't matter when the game doesn't work. It can be $10 cheaper, tons of free goodies, active community and still be a complete waste of money if the game crashes every time within the first 5 minutes of play, which just happens to be my experience with the PC version of Half-Life 2. If it weren't for the 360 version of the Orange Box, I would have never been able to experience that game.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:58AM Duke said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Al, your comment was full of "jackass".

I, and many others, haven't complained about shit when it comes to add-on levels. So stop acting like you know how we all think. Also, I didn't know we were all "tards" because we play on a console. I guess your PC usage is what keeps you so far above the rest of us on the food chain.

Also, wouldn't the console people, those not getting the add-on content, be the only ones who could complain in your scenario. Why would the PC only people have a reason to complain? They wouldn't. You just wanted to come off as a tool, and you did.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 10:58AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
PROTIP for Anam:

That's not a cupholder; it's a DVD drive.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I knew I was doing something wrong!
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:11AM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anam: Ever tried updating your display drivers? That could be your problem, especially if you're using a fairly old rig.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:12AM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Er, I meant, if you've never updated your drivers, THAT could be a problem.

Though I guess a driver update could theoretically goof things up also.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:13AM Courtney said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Wing

You might be able to play on your couch with a PC, but you can't play a local split screen game. I'm basing this off the information at Co-optimus about coop functionality. Therefore, I would need two computers and two copies of the game to enjoy playing with my lady or my kid, and because of the setup of our house, we wouldn't be in the same room together.

So, it's cheaper and more functional for us to get the console version. I don't deny the benefits of PC gaming, but also recognize that even when a PC and console version of a game are available, sometimes the console version is superior for some gamers desires.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Courtney
..."You might be able to play on your couch with a PC, but you can't play a local split screen game."

Actually, the PC version does have support for splitscreen. Apparently, it was removed from the demo but Valve plans on implementing it as an 'unsupported bonus feature'...


"Split-screen was always something we only wanted to officially support on the x360 due to the controller issues. However, we are planning on making some of the functionality work on the PC as an unsupported bonus feature,"
Yahn Bernier

http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8416904#post8416904
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:25AM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You know, the PC version is gonna have more people playing because it's a Valve game.

And if you wanted you could plug your PC into your HDTV and play it with a controller on the couch.

Just sayin'
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@dark_inchworm

As it was years ago, I don't honestly remember what I did and did not do, but I usually try updating drivers when things don't work. I remember one of our computers had problems because it had a Voodoo card and they went bye-bye or something.

But to be clear, it's not one, but three games (Half-Life, Team Fortress, Half-Life 2) that I've had problems with getting to run on multiple computers. Compare this to Blizzard games that work every time on every computer I've tried. Now maybe Valve is better today, but after so much crap from one company I'm tired of bothering. I love their games and I support them, but I'll do it on my ever reliable console.

Anyway, all I'm trying to say is that it's not features, but fuctionality that have drove me to console-only gaming habits.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:31AM Vcize said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
For every 12 year old rapper on XBL, there is a 35 year old elitist snob on whatever PC game you're playing at the time.

Two and a half years ago I was one of them (the snobbish PC gamer, not the 12 year old rapper), oh how I've seen the light...
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
you know, back in the day when i only got new games twice a year (birthday & x-mas) this free DLC argument might have mattered. now, i have a stack of unplayed games through the roof. by the time DLC comes out for a game, i'm long since tired of it and ready to move on.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 11:45AM Courtney said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Mark

Huh, that's news to me. That's cool that they are implementing it. I wonder how well it works. Sounds like they have some concerns, but are comfortable enough to release it.

I hope they include that with more PC releases. I'm not sure I would want to bank my L4D purchase on an "unsupported bonus feature", but if they have all the kinks worked out, I might be willing to try it on another game in the future.
Reply

Posted: Nov 18th 2008 3:50PM chispito said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How does it actually make a difference which version has more people playing? All you need is three of the right people playing (unless you're playing the competitive multi, I suppose).

I have to admit one thing though, this is the first Valve game where I probably wouldn't feel like I was playing with my feet if I was forced to use dual analog instead of KB+M. It's just not a twitchy, precision-oriented game (based on my time with the demo).
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW