| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (54)

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 8:40AM superafroboy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well done Majesco, very well handled.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 11:54AM Obienator said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I know right? I wish more companies would handle stuff like this with class and humor.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 4:41PM Temidien said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. It's nice to see companies not screaming lawsuit and handling these things with a bit of finese. I'm sure Majesco also appreciates the publicity this thing brings to Cooking Mama.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 11:57PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I highly doubt they want this type of publicity. I'm sure they are just hoping that PETA will mind their own damn business before this type of propaganda makes headlines and sucks Majesco into a fight that they shouldn't have to be involved with in the first place.

It would be nice if Majesco had a spine, or if people would stop reporting on groups like PETA, (Remember, game and TV reporters made Jack Thompson matter in the exact same way) but that isn't going to happen. The best thing Majesco could have done (since they seem to fear headlines that could be made by taking them to court) is what they did; Make a joke of it, and hope it goes away.

For our part? I think a meat feast is in order. It's Tyson chicken nugget time.

/runs to the freezer
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 8:41AM jhowlett said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
too nice, don't be a saint
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 8:47AM StarFoxA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hahaha, Majesco did a good job of handling this.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 8:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I just played the game again...why is there blood coming out of the eggs? PETA need to take some biology lessons.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 8:56AM jhowlett said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
there can be blood in eggs if they're fertilized. when i learned about baking i was taught to crack the eggs one by one in a separate bowl just in case you get a bloody one.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:24AM alex7575 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think you do that, to avoid mixing in a rotten egg, the little dot of blood on the egg doesn't make the egg less edible.
Some people may think of it as gross, but hey, you're eating an animal's egg to begin with, if you got beyond that, a dot of its blood should be a no brainer.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:36AM jhowlett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it could also be for rotten eggs but i was specifically told about the blood. the person showing me didn't want it in cakes.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I stand corrected.

Even so, have you seen the amount of blood coming from the eggs? That can't be accurate.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 10:02AM anoffday said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've eaten and prepared a lot of eggs, and not once have I seen blood come out of one. PETA exaggerates everything, and you know it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 11:11AM Sponge said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 8:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
They should include a recipe for haggis just to piss off Peta.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 8:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"And thanks to PETA for making the whole laugh possible."

No. No thanks to PETA. They are nutty. Quit talking about them on Joystiq, please.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This, this a million times this.

Please don't give them any press.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Why can't I hit the little plus sign next to your comment a millions times for this?
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 3:22PM Abdo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 4:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I also am becoming very sick of how often PETA is mentioned on this site, and worse, in a positive manner.

I'll "thank them" when they abandon their extremist idiotic views designed to polarize rather than educate.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 4:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. PETA< like Jack thompson, thrive on any and all publicity.
NoHitHair: That was sarcasm, check your detector. what else can you expect from a naruto fan, I guess.
Reply

Posted: Nov 22nd 2008 10:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for your input. I appreciate advice about my character from a person over the internet who summarizes me through an avatar.

As for completely missing my point, the sarcasm isn't the issue. It's that PETA's mentioned on this site more than should happen on a gaming blog.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:08AM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love how they "quoted" Mama in the press release. Kudos to Majesco for not letting their knickers get bunched up.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well done. Handled like true business people. Not like a bunch of doe-eyed, opinionated, screaming freaks.

And why is it when I watch Animal Cops I never see PETA hunting down those losers who abuse and neglect animals? Not enough celebrity for them?

Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 10:02AM Geist said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They're too busy making Cooking Mama parodies.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well played, Majesco. I cannot understand why PETA still pulls shit like this. Every time they try some new publicity stunt, they always end up making themselves look like asses and everyone talking about how crazy they are. I mean honestly, making fun of PETA is like winning a game of (select preferred multiplayer title) against your mom, it's too damn easy and not worth the effort.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:21AM alex7575 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Stay classy PETA, nothing you ever do will be taken seriously anyway. Good job digging yourself the biggest hole anyone could have.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:34AM butaneko said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Fuck PETA! They are terrorists!

I'm going to buy 100 copies of this game then I'm going to eat 5 steaks for lunch and flush 5 more down the toilet.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hey now that's a waste of perfectly good steaks. The least you could do is set a table up outside their office and eat it there.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Of course, PETA will now be pissed off because there's a pet dog in the series, as Majesco now endorses the slavery of animals.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 9:46AM Dirty said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I heard that in the Korean version you get to cook protégé.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 4:41PM Gaming 4 Jesus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I laughed. And it felt gooood.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 10:03AM anoffday said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think they should make a Cooking Mamma: Bizarre foods edition. Mmmm hamster and cat brains.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 10:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For every animal that PETA refuses to let die, I'll eat three!
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 11:31AM Levi Partridge said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Go right ahead Maddox.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 2:24PM aristokrat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
PETA doesn't refuse to let them die though. Over 2/3's of all the animals that go into PETA custody get euthanized. Yet they still send their brainless minions to picket animal shelters that do the same thing (to a lesser extent even, because they try to find the animals homes instead of releasing domesticated animals into the wild to die).
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 10:44AM Mighty Ponygirl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One thing that PETA does very well is set the terms of the extreme so that a moderate point can be reached.

For example, you have one extreme end (any industry that uses animals) saying "we can do whatever the hell we want with the animals, they're not human and they're our property" (for example, a medical researcher saying that doing a retro-orbital eyebleed from an animal without any anesthetic is just fine and dandy (imagine having blood drawn from your eye while you were awake to experience it), or a meat industry spokesperson stating that it's fine and dandy to shove a pipe down a goose's throat and forcefeed it until its liver becomes fatted, or lock cattle in cages so small they can't move... that's one extreme.

On the other extreme, you have PETA saying that animals have souls and eating eggs is murder, and that humans have no right to exploit the hard work of honeybees, and that killing a chicken is functionally no different than killing a child. That's the other extreme.

In between those two extremes most people find a moderate voice: the SPCA/Humane voice which states that animals should not suffer needlessly, that they should be allowed at least a minimal standard of living, but that they are not the equivalent of humans. This continuum will have room in it for diversity: for example, a vegetarian who would not eat an animal or even a vegan who would not "exploit" an animal, but recognizes the privilege of this position and would not force it on others, or the research veterinarian who understands that the animal subjects will be subjected to testing and even termination, but who attempts to care for these animals and make sure that they are not tortured and that their overall suffering is minimal.

In the last few years, with its endless array of shock campaigns, PETA has jeapordized its position, it risks no longer being able to set the extreme position but actually causing a backlash, which may allow the "moderate" position to push further away from their goals of overall animal protection.
Reply

Posted: Nov 22nd 2008 10:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't agree that we should embrace extremism because it can be used to counterbalance its opposite. That effectively condones both extremist sides while neither are necessary or helpful. Worse, since there is a radical voice rather than a reasoned one, those who believe in, advocate and work for them are deceived into accepting uncompromising views as reality rather than rationally assessing the situation.

We're too polarized. PETA does not help that situation.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 11:08AM e168 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm a vegetarian and thought the parody was hysterical and well done. I've also played and enjoyed the Cooking Mama games. People are getting so upset, but I don't see what the big deal is. I've played many videogames where characters eat meat, and have never thought twice about it. It doesn't influence my actions. The connection between Cooking Mama and real recipes or food is weak anyway. It's more like food-based minigames than actual recipe preparing.
Reply

Posted: Nov 21st 2008 1:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How many people believe murder is wrong but play video games that involve killing human beings?
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 11:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Save the animals!!! Eat Peta members!!!
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 11:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Huh? I have a People Eating Tasty Animals bbq every year. What PETA is this?
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 12:22PM Gnoll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I appreciate the classiness of the response, but does this mean PETA's not getting sued? Because that's what I wanted for my birthday this year :'(
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 12:32PM Saria the Cat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
:) Nice one, Majesco. I wish more companies would handle situations with this kind of tact. And it's also nice that they're including veggie recipes in the menu next time.

I just don't understand why PETA attacked them in the first place. Aren't there bigger animal rights issues like, I don't know, gorilla poaching?
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 12:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Get real, Saria! Nobody solves actual problems nowadays! I suppose you want the government to improve your quality of life, or doctors to cure diseases. Why do things that matter when we can funnel billions into ridiculous wars or combat the "threat" of global warming? Come on!
Reply

Posted: Nov 22nd 2008 10:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hairstylists are paid more than the most esteemed of teachers.

Our loyalties are crystal clear.
Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 1:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, well, fuck animals. Seriously, somebody needs to tell these hippies to grow up. These are the exact same kind of people who caused Prop 2 to pass in California, guaranteeing that eggs and chicken meat will cost more for everyone just so the chickens who are going to be slaughtered or farmed for eggs will have a few extra inches of space. Why? Because hippies put their own feel-goodism above any practical concept of reality. Their pro-Prop-2 commercials actually had a photo of a chicken in a cage and the word 'BAD', then a photo of a kid hugging a chicken in a gigantic yard and the word 'GOOD'. How do you reason with such idiots?

Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 2:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly.
Reply

Posted: Nov 21st 2008 1:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know, pretend that you believe that all life deserves some measure of respect and should be treated in an ethical manner. What do you do when people just say "fuck animals"?
Reply

Posted: Nov 21st 2008 4:12PM Seven Weasels Running on a Keybo said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Fuck animals..."
Um, seriously?

I hope you were going for absurdist humor there. People who talk like that, in a ridiculously reductionist and reactionary way, just end up lending more support to groups like PETA.

That is, the idiocy of your statements makes it easier for PETA to justify their own idiocy.

And as far as your larger point goes, I am not familiar with Prop 2, but I really see no reason why people shouldn't pay a little bit more out of a basic level of compassion for other living things. PETAs messages - which are disturbingly misanthropic and questionably support violence and forms of terrorism to reach their goals - are far different from just asking people to have a concern about where there food comes from.

There is a difference between giving a shit about animals and being completely batshit insane about animals. I really don't see there as being anything wrong with the former (in fact, a little more unselfish compassion would do much of us some good), and to bash that sort of moderate view is just as unreasonable and ignorant as categorically bashing meat-eaters (etc.) as PETA does.

Reply

Posted: Nov 20th 2008 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
As a vegan, I think everyone is being a tool about this. PETA, Majesco, the general public. Some further thoughts, even though probably nobody cares: http://matthew.balousek.net/?p=16
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW