| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (107)

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:34PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
inb4 "Butt" jokes
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:37PM jonostarsmore said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
what an unfortunate name
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:44PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I tried to make one when this was on 0 comments, but the 'stiq wouldn't let me :(
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
At least change it to "Buttons" or "Butler" or..."Butts"

"Can I speak to a Seymour, last name Butts?"
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:05PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bet this guy was the "butt" of all the jokes in elementary school.



Ta dum Tsshhhhhhh
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:38PM Ozzy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"what what, in the butt
i say what what, in the butt
you wanna do it in butt? in my butt?
what what, in the butt
oooohhhh yeaaaahhh"


i know that was very creepy to read, but i had to do it :P
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:39PM Joeybeast said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I have a client named Buttrick.
I can only imagine what his childhood was like.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2008 8:19AM Rocketboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Better Butt than Richard Dickman.

(An actual name, and the one I read, he was actually Richard Dickman III)
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ouch
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:37PM Yuccadude said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What an unfortunate last name. I'd like to think it's pronounced like "butte", but all I can think of is butt jokes.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:53PM Dirty said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Its pronounced doom-auss"
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 6:13PM Roto13 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That last name is really common in my area, and it's definitely pronounced the way it's spelled.

I had a teacher named Mr. Butt, and I know a girl named Crystal Butt.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 10:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crystal Butt

WAHAHAHWAHAHHWHHHAHAHHFKJHFJFHJHGJDGHFGHFGHGHHG *cough* *cough*

good times
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Bat Nipple jokes were always better than Bat Butt jokes anyway.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This was obviously meant as a reply to The Dark Wayne.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 6:46PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I will not forget this treachery
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It seems like a Nintendo centric magazine would be something that the unwashed casual masses would actually benefit from.







Butt
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, his last name is Butt, and he used the word hardcore. Coincidence? I think not.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2008 6:32AM Kaminaaa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You good sir, are hilarious!
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:40PM JoshMilewski said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
WTF at the last paragraph. Just gives me more of a reason to stick to blogs and the like.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:41PM Shagittarius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Imagine: Pulisherz
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:05PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's a pulisherz?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:14PM Shagittarius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's a publisher without an editor.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:28PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Shagittarius winz.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:50PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I concede to my opponent.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:54PM Mr Khan said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Well it makes a bit of sense. Magazines on the whole are going down the tubes, N-Revolution was not known for its quality, it has to compete with ONM, this perhaps was just the straw that broke the camel's back

To cite it as the main factor is, of course, needlessly inflammatory, but a dip in focus for a crappy, 2nd-rate magazine's target market isn't without merit
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:57PM Dirty said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You forgot to say butt.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:01PM Mr Khan said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
oh, and Randy fails for citing that blatant example of yellow journalism (the link "focus is shifting away")

joystiq as a whole should forget it was ever written, it's a hard shot against your credibility, and a sad day in general
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wait wait, first, that statement was true, and yes, it does show that they are shifting focus, if not, they would have put more resources into more "hardcore" games (old or new franchises) instead of putting most of it on casual games, Sony is doing it and so is Microsoft.

Second, why should we forget that was said? most people still don't let go Kutaragi's or Moore's stupid remarks, yet we should forget that one?

It doesn't hurt Joystiq's credibility, it should just be a lesson to Nintendo's PR department, unfortunately, none of them learn, and the 3 companies still making stupid comments.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:42PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because that's not what was said. the Nintendo guy said "core games take 2-3 years to make"

the joystiq article said "no core games for 2-3 years"
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I call bullocks on this one.
While Nintendo does focus on "casual" games, it's hard to say the GameCube was anymore "hardcore" than the Wii is. Same goes for N64.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:28PM chdude3 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You call castrated bulls on this one? Bollocks to you!
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:32PM Blaquebeird said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The N64 was definitely hardcore. Maybe not compared to now, but back then it definitely was. Although I'd argue that SNES is probably the best system ever, primarily because of all the sweet games.

What gamer in the world doesn't have a fond SNES or N64 memory?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, I remember back in the day they were predicting Nintendo's demise because the N64 wasn't as hardcore as PS. Most of the "mature" games, RPGs, shooters, etc etc were on PS and Nintendo survived off 1st party games...as they do now..SNES was the last console that "hardcore".
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 4:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Butt
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:03PM anoffday said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It has become increasingly obvious that Nintendo's strategy...has moved increasingly away from the hardcore gaming community that is our specialty," Butt explained.

Yet, when a regular gamer says this the new nintendo fanboys are always right there to tell him how wrong and he stupid he is.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 6:22PM Grey Acumen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what are you talking about? he is wrong.

Whether nintendo is or isn't moving away from core games, that's not what's affecting the magazine's readership.
It's a little thing called the internet. It will always have the most up to date information, and core gamers are the ones most interested in getting the most up to date information. On top of that, while you generally have to pay for internet access, the information on games like this can almost always be accessed for free.
So compare:
Free + Updated on hourly basis + Search for what YOU want to know about vs. purchase or subscription + updated on monthly basis + read about whatever they choose to tell you.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 6:36PM anoffday said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Whether nintendo is or isn't moving away from core games, that's not what's affecting the magazine's readership."

All I'm saying is Nintendo is clearly targeting a different crowd than the one that made them who they are today. He's right about that. As far as the magazine goes, I don't give a crap.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 7:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is this a reaction to my reply to you the other day? (By the way, you may want to check my response, it clears things up a bit, and any insults I made towards you were either jocular or to place emphasis on the point I was trying to make)

It is clear that Nintendo is targeting a different audience than before, but there is something just as stupid as saying they aren't - acting as though that fact has had a negative effect on gaming over these last few years.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
As I said in another post:

Yesterday I went to the doctor and while I was bored to death in an exam room I flipped through a parenting magazine (believe me, the only thing to do in that room other than make log cabins out of tongue depressers which I had already done) .. and in this magazine was an advertisement for the Wii.

Case. Closed.

Wii is a toy, not a serious game console.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Because videogames are serious business.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:38PM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo is legally a toy company, not a gaming company anyways. Or at least according to them that's how it is.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:43PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Video games are toys.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, how do you feel about Microsoft advertising the amount of "family friendly" games they have and only marketing the bundle that comes with Lego Indy and Kung Fu Panda?

Case.Closed.

Every video game console is a toy, a definition of a toy is "an artifact designed to be played with". Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that describe a 360 or a PS3 or a DS or a PSP as well as a Wii?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:46PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really debated how to respond to this one, but the fact of the matter is that this whole drama was played out 20 years ago. Except back then the Xbox360 and PS3 were called IBM and Apple and people like you were calling the NES a toy
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 5:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I don't think you understand.

This was -parenting- magazine. They are known for being hugely anti-videogame. Yet you can advertise a wii in it, because the wii is something else.

Listen, you fanboys don't have to defend your steed, it's ok, we'll let you read the big boy blogs and eat at the big boy table even if you're playing with toys. I'm just saying any serious gamers I know own either a 360 or a PS3. They may own a wii, but its a secondary item.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 6:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No sir, YOU are the one who doesn't understand. A few things here I need you to clear up:

1. Name of said "parenting" magazine
2. Proof of them being "anti video game" and no, writing an article about violent games does NOT qualify. They must say that video games in general are ruining peoples lives, not just violent ones.
3. How a Wii showing up in said parenting magazine is different from Microsoft running an ad saying "we have X number of family friendly games" and only mentioning the bundle that comes with Lego Indy and Kung Fu Panda which, now I may be wrong here, aren't exactly "hardcore games".
4. How the definition of a toy (an object designed to be played with) doesnt fit every console/handheld ever made dating back to the Magnavox Odyssey
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 6:09PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And you don't seem to understand either. If you actually looked at Nintendo's strategy for the NES, you're going to see so many similarities it will make your head spin

established "serious gamers" had the same feelings towards the NES that established "serious gamers" had towards the Wii. It's a toy, it has less functionality than my computer. It's marketed towards families and little kids. Look at that dumb robot, those kiddie games, and that plastic gun. You look like such an idiot shooting that plastic gun at the screen

History is repeating itself, just in a slightly different way
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2008 6:25PM Roto13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just because parents are uncomfortable letting their children be around you, that doesn't mean there's some crazy-ass parent/video game war going on. The majority of parents aren't anti-gaming, or the majority of kids wouldn't have games.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW