Reader Comments (24)
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 6:20PM (Unverified) said
Thanks Alan for telling us... And thanks a lot Andrew for answering such a heap of questions!!! =D
You guys rock!
You guys rock!
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 6:30PM (Unverified) said
Yoon:
"Cautiously Optimistic?" pretty pathetic. Why do you even post on this blog........go back to your 360 and Gears.
"Cautiously Optimistic?" pretty pathetic. Why do you even post on this blog........go back to your 360 and Gears.
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 6:40PM ashstampede said
um...that statement of cautiously optimistic was solely geared towards the online aspects of the framerate. So why is that seen as a 360fanboy support statement?
Reply
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 7:09PM (Unverified) said
@ashstampede
He is being cautiously optimistic about MP in general (read it again)...where the heck do you get framerate from?. along the same lines, every major gaming site has raved about every aspect of KZ
And when you notice the weekly wrap up of games, Yoon is always playing a 360 game like Fable 2 and especially Gears.
Reply
He is being cautiously optimistic about MP in general (read it again)...where the heck do you get framerate from?. along the same lines, every major gaming site has raved about every aspect of KZ
And when you notice the weekly wrap up of games, Yoon is always playing a 360 game like Fable 2 and especially Gears.
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 9:36PM zerodip said
God forbid he doesn't jerk off all over the game just because it's a PS3 exclusive. I love my PS3 and want to see it and it's exclusives do well but that doesn't mean I'm going to blindly praise a game I've never played before. Your statement is so fucking ironic; any sensible person here would realise that you're the fanboy. "Oh noes, he said he was cautiously optimistic about an aspect of a game he's never played, what a fucking fanboy!" Are your thought patterns really that juvenille?
Reply
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 2:14AM Andrew Yoon said
When is being optimistic a bad thing? Hope you enjoy your ban, 'cuz we certainly don't need an obviously small-minded individual like you around these parts.
Reply
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 6:56PM (Unverified) said
Man I hope they put the cover system into multiplayer.
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 9:27PM kentuckyfried said
Me too. It sounds interesting, and there aren't enough MP games utilizing a cover system.
Reply
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 6:57PM (Unverified) said
WHY IS R3 TO AIM THIS ISNT 2002
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 8:20PM MrVee PSN Vampah said
dont forget you can always change the control presets so its no biggie any ways.
Reply
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 8:45PM (Unverified) said
you can change the controls if you want, you could do this in the beta switching it to L1
Reply
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 8:45PM McWilly said
The multiplayer beta doesn't even have a cover system in. The rocket launcher is way too overpowered and all games end in a rockets only match.
Plus there are pretty bad glitches such as the superman run (although they will probably be fixed). And the controls are like moving a 50st man on puppet strings on a hot sweaty july afternoon.
Plus the framerate is ridiculously bad during hectic situations. It crashed my PS3 about 20 times during specific situations. This game just isn't fun. It's just another technical benchmark for graphics on the PS3.
Sony need to start making "GAMES" and not these boring mindless interactive movies that only appeal to graphics whores. Real gamers will not like this.
Plus there are pretty bad glitches such as the superman run (although they will probably be fixed). And the controls are like moving a 50st man on puppet strings on a hot sweaty july afternoon.
Plus the framerate is ridiculously bad during hectic situations. It crashed my PS3 about 20 times during specific situations. This game just isn't fun. It's just another technical benchmark for graphics on the PS3.
Sony need to start making "GAMES" and not these boring mindless interactive movies that only appeal to graphics whores. Real gamers will not like this.
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 8:47PM (Unverified) said
i believe Guerilla said that there would be no cover system in online multiplayer
Reply
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 8:56PM (Unverified) said
nah sony just needs to work harder at getting the right people the beta.. people like this scottish prik who take it for granted don't even deserve to play it for free... btw, it's just a beta.. all in due time, all in due time
Reply
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 9:07PM (Unverified) said
go ahead and report the issues but you don't have to make it sound like Sony is incompetent because of what you saw on a prerelease.. the fallout 3 demo when it was first released on PC fried my video card but I didn't rally people against bethesda just because i was sour about it, in fact I bought the final version on PC which had no more problems than any other version 1.0 game... grow up guy
Reply
Posted: Dec 16th 2008 9:13PM (Unverified) said
well i had the beta and i completely loved it , it was the only thing i played last month , i really like everything (gameplay,phisics,graphics ) the only thing i agree with scottishprick is that the rocket launcher is too powerful but GG has taken action already other than that the gameplay is superb, i wasnt expecting too much from the beta but left very impressed by it, congrats Guerrilla Games you have a very special game and i think 95%-98% ps3 owners that get the game will like it
Reply
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 12:46AM (Unverified) said
Man, I wanted the single-player to last more than a mere 6-10 hours. I'm not a huge fan of competitive online, which is why I tend to lean on co-op modes a la Resistance 2
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 2:40AM (Unverified) said
THIS GAME WILL MAKE OR BREAK MY LIFE
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 2:44AM (Unverified) said
No co-op kinda sucks, but this game will be great regardless.
Featured Stories
Super Joystiq Podcast 004: 38 Studios meltdown, Gravity Rush, Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, Dragon's Dogma
Posted on May 25th 2012 3:30PM